Housing Starts Drop Another 4.5 Percent to a New Post-Covid Low

Housing Starts, Permits, Completions from Census Department, chart by Mish

As expected, the Census Department’s New Residential Construction report for January was another disappointment.

Building Permits

  • Privately‐owned housing units authorized by building permits in January were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,339,000. 
  • This is 0.1 percent above the revised December rate of 1,337,000, but is 27.3 percent below the January 2022 rate of 1,841,000. 
  • Single‐family authorizations in January were at a rate of 718,000; this is 1.8 percent below the revised December figure of 731,000.
  •  Authorizations of units in buildings with five units or more were at a rate of 563,000 in January.

Housing Starts

  • Privately‐owned housing starts in January were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,309,000. 
  • This is 4.5 percent (±15.9 percent) below the revised December estimate of 1,371,000 and is 21.4 percent (±10.6 percent) below the January 2022 rate of 1,666,000
  • Single‐family housing starts in January were at a rate of 841,000; this is 4.3 percent (±16.4 percent) below the revised December figure of 879,000. 
  • The January rate for units in buildings with five units or more was 457,000. 

Housing Completions

  • Privately‐owned housing completions in January were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,406,000. 
  • This is 1.0 percent (±9.8 percent) above the revised December estimate of 1,392,000 and is 12.8 percent (±13.0 percent) above the January 2022 rate of 1,247,000. 
  • Single‐family housing completions in January were at a rate of 1,040,000; this is 4.4 percent (±10.4 percent) above the revised December rate of 996,000. 
  • The January rate for units in buildings with five units or more was 349,000. 

Housing Starts Single Family vs Multi-Family 

Single vs multi-family starts, yellow highlights current, red a year ago, green pre-covid pandemic

Chart Notes

  • A year ago, seasonally-adjusted annualized single-family starts were 1.157 million.
  • Pre-pandemic they were 1.038 million. 
  • In January of 2023 they were 841,000.

Unadjusted Numbers

Unadjusted Starts, Permits, Completions, Chart by Mish

Unadjusted Notes

  • On an unadjusted basis vs a year ago, permits fell from 132,000 to 101,000.
  • On an unadjusted basis vs a year ago, starts fell from 121,000 to 96,000.
  • On an unadjusted basis vs a year ago, completions rose from 87,000 to 96,000.

There will be huge price pressures and discounts on any builder-owned units.

Expect More Negative Revisions

Last month I commented “Housing starts and permits declined again in December with negative revisions to November.”

This month, the Census department revised December starts from 1.382 million at a  seasonally-adjusted annualized rate (SAAR), to 1.371 million.

Discounting the revision, starts fell 5.3 percent. 

The Bloomberg Econoday consensus was 1.365 million starts, missing the mark badly.

Heading into and at the start of recessions, revisions are negative. Coming out of recession revisions are positive.

Expect more negative revisions in housing, GDP, retail sales, and jobs. 

Industrial Production Much Weaker Than Expected, With Negative Revisions Too

Yesterday, I noted Industrial production was flat in January vs an expected 0.5 percent gain. 

Negative numbers make the miss worse than it looks although manufacturing did rebound.

For discussion, please see Industrial Production Much Weaker Than Expected, With Negative Revisions Too

Also note that Consumers Go on Huge Retail Sales Shopping Spree in January After Months of Weakness

Don’t expect much if any follow-up to that. Negative revisions are likely.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

16 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
2 years ago

Should anyone be surprised by these numbers? NO!!! What do they
mean? They mean SQUAT!!! With some houses doubling in price after 3 years, it’s
time for there to be some serious pricing downside.

At this point, interest rates could be 10%. Who cares? The ONLY thing
that matters is, when we get to a real recession, does Uncle Sam trot out
mortgage & rent relief? Nothing else matters, so it’s pointless for Mish et
al to keep writing these articles about the housing market.
Anyone who would bet against the Fed’s and Congress’
affinity for MMT-based market controls such as rent & mortgage relief needs
to have their head checked. This is post COVID, people. The government’s
official policy now is “We’ll do everything we can to keep the economy, especially housing, from
failing.” EVERYTHING is now too big to fail.
BernankeAirdrop
BernankeAirdrop
2 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
I agree with you, it’s really frustrating and pretty clear to me that real, useful assets are never going to materially decrease in price in nominal terms. Everyone I know wants to buy a house, but even with continued declines they are still a good 50 percent over their 2020 pricing. I fully expect bidding wars to return (supposedly they have for good homes in West coast tech hubs), and people to spend everything they can to own a single-family home. Builders will never build enough single-family homes, and at the first sign of rate increases they stopped building. Looking back at historical housing start counts, builders were building far more homes in the 1970s when the population was roughly half the current count!
I can imagine Democrats proposing forty year mortgages as their plan to ‘fix’ housing affordability issues. The Fed can’t fight inflation when it’s free money handouts and injections causing inflation.
TechLover
TechLover
2 years ago
40 year mortgages are already in consideration.
What might happen is that most of the low end single family stock now available as rentals might either be destroyed or converted to owner occupied housing. This is because eviction will be nigh impossible and getting paid rent (or increasing it) will become very difficult if not impossible.
For example, in Chicago, anything less than $1500 in monthly rent is not viable as a rental unit. Takes six months to evict and usually you have to pay for the non paying tenant to move. Taxes are going up big time in the area too. With 7% rates (8+% for investors) and cost increases in maintenance and upkeep, these units are not viable as rentals anymore.
8dots
8dots
2 years ago
SPX options, for fun. #1 : a 100Y plunge. #2) If SPX close > May 4(H) it might rise above Oct 2021 for a monthly DM#13 SPX, NDX and the Dow deferred Bar Mitzva. Thereafter with so many unruly crazy teenagers, the plunge.
#3) Thereafter SPX fly above to 5K/6K and 38K/39K Dow.
Too much BS
Too much BS
2 years ago
January Housing Starts: Near Record Number of Housing Units Under Construction WHO IS RIGHT? Cant trust any one , can’t even verify all numbers are BS to suit the nerrative.
MJS357
MJS357
2 years ago
Reply to  Too much BS
Is there any way to determine WHO is building in the sense of Fed gov, banks buying land and building houses, that sort of data? Is it “Build iy and they will come” methodology?
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  Too much BS
It is very likely there is indeed a record number of units under construction. There was a huge rush to build units but labor shortages, material shortages, and delays postponed completions.
Mish
TechLover
TechLover
2 years ago
Reply to  Too much BS
Very large number of multifamily under construction. With the low rates and availability of capital and loans, that sector saw a mountain of gold and planned and started building like crazy.
There will be distress in multifamily sector in the next two years. Rents will come down and rates will stabilize at these levels. Capital for these projects will become scarce.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
2 years ago
“As expected, the Census Department’s New Residential Construction report for January was another disappointment.”
And yet we saw average 30 year mortgage (per MND) drop from 6.54% on December 30th —-> 5.99% on February 2nd.
Today? 6.75%
How will February fare …
MJS357
MJS357
2 years ago
Nope, it’s not a recession because of that three-letter word…JOBS
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
2 years ago
Reply to  MJS357
Employment a lagging indicator.
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  MJS357
Anyone touting “jobs” as THE reason for no recession, is economically illiterate.
There needs to be other reasons , not just jobs.
And full time employment has been dropping since last July.
The NBER looks at both employment and jobs.
Finally, I expect huge revisions in those jobs numbers.
Perhaps there is no recession yet, but it will not be because of “jobs”
shamrock
shamrock
2 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Gross domestic private investment is up 3% from last year and 20% from pre-pandemic. I expect 2023 to be another good year. Just in the past few days Air India ordered $36b in planes from Boeing, Ford is building a $3b battery factory, AWS is building $35b in data centers just in Virginia. Yes, housing is in the sheeter, but good economic news is out there. On net we’re looking at modest GDP growth, the GDPNow estimate is at 2.5% for the quarter.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
2 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
“Gross domestic private investment is up 3% from last year”
??????
Sure, in nominal $$s
“real” gross domestic private investment (chain 2012 dollars)
Q4 2021 … $3.740 trillion
Q4 2022 … $3.667 trillion
Down 1.9%
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
2 years ago
Reply to  Mish
When you have 500K+ jobs (no matter how slice & dice it) and you’ve got 5 weeks of sub 200K 1st time unemployment claims, then you have a relatively strong labor market.
“Finally, I expect huge revisions in those jobs numbers.” That’s nothing more than a guess.
Perhaps there is no recession yet, but it will not be because of “jobs”. YES, IT IS, MISH!!! Employment is single-handedly propping up the economy which in turn is bolstering consumer spending. Now, later this year as inflation continues to rage & Joe Consumer keeps spending on their credit cards, then we may well see consumers really start to lose control & cut back spending. The same can be said for corporate profits as borrowing costs continue to soar.
All that is well and good and may or may not come true. But today, IT’S ABOUT JOBS! PERIOD!
Mjs357
Mjs357
2 years ago
Reply to  Mish
In case we all missed it, market watch, had an article Bad news for pessimistic bulls and 10 reasons why there would not be a recession. It was laughable.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.