How Fast is the Fed Winding Down Its Bloated Balance Sheet vs Planned Maximum?

Fed’s balance sheet data from the Fed, chart by Mish

The Fed’s Announced Plan

  • For agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities, the cap will initially be set at $17.5 billion per month and after three months will increase to $35 billion per month.
  • For Treasury securities, the cap will initially be set at $30 billion per month and after three months will increase to $60 billion per month. 
  • To ensure a smooth transition, the Committee intends to slow and then stop the decline in the size of the balance sheet when reserve balances are somewhat above the level it judges to be consistent with ample reserves.

The above from Plans for Reducing the Size of the Federal Reserve’s Balance Sheet

Balance sheet reduction labeled Quantitative Tightening (QT) started in June. 

When QE ended, the Fed reinvested any maturing securities to maintain the size of its balance sheet. With QT, the Fed stopped reinvesting up to $30 billion in maturing Treasuries and $17.5 billion in maturing MBS every month, passively shrinking its assets as those securities “roll off” without being replaced. Those caps rose to $60 billion and $35 billion, respectively, in September.

From that viewpoint, we have had 3 months of QT at the lower schedule and 5 months at the higher schedule.

To give the Fed some additional leeway on mortgages, let’s calculate everything from the peaks rather than June. 

Max Balance Sheet Drawdowns vs Actual Drawdowns

  • Maximum Treasuries = (3 * 30) + (5 * 60) = $390 Billion
  • Actual Treasury Drawdown = $5.771 Trillion – $5.397 Trillion = $374 Billion 
  • Maximum MBS = (3 * 17.5) + (5 * 35) = $227.5 Billion
  • Actual MBS Drawdown = $2.740 Trillion – $2.625 Trillion = $115 Billion 

There is a lag of up to 30 days in reporting due to settlement issues, so the Fed is on its maximum schedule for Treasuries.

The Fed is only about 50% of where it should be regarding Mortgage Backed Securities. 

It’s going to stay behind planned maximum MBS runoff because mortgage refinancing is essentially nonexistent and mortgage payoffs due to existing home sales are in the gutter. 

Existing Home Sales Decline for the Eleventh Straight Month

Existing home sales from the National Association of Realtors via St. Louis Fed

On January 20, I noted Existing Home Sales Decline for the Eleventh Straight Month

Due to falling mortgage rates, there will be a small uptick in mortgage applications in the next few months.

However, housing transactions are not going back to the volumes that would allow a $35 billion per month reduction of MBS on the Fed’s balance sheet. 

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

22 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
david halte
david halte
2 years ago
The Fed has not wound-down its bloated balance sheet in long-Treasuries since Nov 7, 2022. Rates peaked between Oct 20-24, 2022 and have since fallen to a low trading rage. Yields now are just .25 percent above peak rates in Nov 2018, before Powell announced the end of that stint’s balance sheet reduction. At that time in 2018, the low-rate dependent housing market stalled. Powell chose to shift to a “flexible policy of setting rates” (pivot). Which produced the ridiculous inflation in real estate prices and other asset values (pre-pandemic). In April 2019, Jamie Dimon and leaders of 6 major banks were called to the House Financial Services Committee to explain income inequality. Dimon increased his bank’s minimum wage to $20 per hour, a 38 percent increase.
Oct 21, 2022, Janet Yellen reported on the lack of liquidity in the Treasury market. Since then, nothing fundamentally has changed to push rates down. Equities have rallied. China told Yellen to pound sand. Europe is repurchasing each others debts. BOJ has set records buying corporate bonds. Long-rates should be rising, if the Fed is tightening. In the Fed’s favor, early 2013, Bernanke wound down QE and long-rates doubled. There are less maturing Treasuries that Powell needs to repurchase, to keep rates stagnant. Yellen can buy Treasuries, to offset the debt ceiling, at lower rates of service.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
2 years ago
How does the ‘balance sheet’ balance with ‘mark to market’? Negative equity? More paid-in capital? Ignore it and it goes away?
Robbyrob
Robbyrob
2 years ago
Modern Capitalism Is Weirder Than You Think It also no longer works as advertised.
ColoradoAccountant
ColoradoAccountant
2 years ago
This all seems like rearranging the chairs on the Titanic as Pozar has caught fire (Hunger Games) with his papers on Bretton III, a commodity based currency system.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
2 years ago
this is the same affect as raising rates, and imho there is only one goal to running off the fed balance sheet, and raising rates. so the investment banks and money center banks in NYC mainly, will have ammunition room, to be able to bail themselves out again, WHEN not if the next panic occurs. whether that is days or years or decades away. btw i think those big boys who own the FED, are most fearful of the commercial r/e market. after the wuhan flu plague, many property owners might be mailing back the keys to the bankers and REITS financed by those bankers. my guess.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
Worst case scenario is commercial real estate will be repurposed as residential. It’s already happening.
Christoball
Christoball
2 years ago
Does this influence ODL Other Deposit Liabilities ?????
8dots
8dots
2 years ago
Fed Total Assets – RRP = Net. If the Fed dump $1T RRP Net will rise. The Fed will provide liquidity and good collateral in the o/n market during the panic.
hmk
hmk
2 years ago
Also how can they sell treasuries or are they letting them just mature. Again the price of the bond drops to reflect the higher interest rate.
EquitableTrade
EquitableTrade
2 years ago
Reply to  hmk
The Fed cannot afford to take the losses that would be realized by selling. The assets and liabilities on the balance sheet are huge. Equity is small. I am sure even marking the bonds to market would result in hundreds of billions in negative equity.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
2 years ago
Reply to  EquitableTrade
From Wolf Richter:
The Fed creates its own money, and so it cannot become insolvent. And its capital, which is capped by Congress, is not impacted by the losses because the Fed carries the losses as a “deferred asset” on its balance sheet, rather than taking the losses against capital.
Basically, the Fed wouldn’t be able to remit income to the Treasury until the losses were “paid back” by their monetizing future debt.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  EquitableTrade
A lot of what the FED does intentionally loses money. They don’t care about profits or losses. Money to them is like sand to Saudi Arabia.
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  hmk
Matures
But yes, the Fed could sell – Losses it would spread out
RyanL
RyanL
2 years ago
Excuse my ignorance on this, but is the only way they can run MBS off the balance sheet is if the underlying mortgages are paid? Is the market to sell actual MBS securities just completely illiquid to non-existent?
hmk
hmk
2 years ago
Reply to  RyanL
I don’t think they can sell them outright or they would lose principle as the mortage interest rates now are a lot higher.
RyanL
RyanL
2 years ago
Reply to  hmk
Gotcha thanks. I suppose that makes sense if the fed actually cares about P&L.
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  RyanL
They could sell but won’t
Losses are primarily a political thing
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  Mish
The FED couldn’t care less about profits or losses. A lot of what they do is designed to intentionally lose money. Better them than the banks they support.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
2 years ago
Reply to  RyanL
If the Fed actually sold MBS, it most likely would muck with the current MBS rates. The MBS that the Fed holds are very low yields with inversely high prices. If the Fed starts to sell it holdings of MBS, there’s a significant gap between the prices. If it forces rates up, then that’s bad for the housing industry with already high mortgage rates. If it pushed them down, that would be very inflationary.
The reality is that the Fed knew they’d undershoot their MBS targets when then announced them. I’ve been saying for many months that the Fed’s biggest problem is the residential real estate. They know they’ve created a monster, so they don’t won’t to intervene in any significant way that pushes home prices higher or lower. They’re trying to let this play out over 2-3 years and try to find the Goldilocks ratio.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
2 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
they don’t care about house prices. now commercial properties is a different story. they are just loading up the bazooka for the next bailout. of banks. 2 or 20 years.
Jack
Jack
2 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
No more bank bail outs. Gone out of fashion with tax payers.
Next crisis will result in a bail-in. Creditors (including depositors) will pay instead.
bobcalderone
bobcalderone
2 years ago
Reply to  Jack
I wonder if a (heavily armed) populace is going to tolerate the outright theft of its money…

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.