Huge Jobs Divergence Returns, Jobs +339,000 but Employment -310,000

Nonfarm payrolls and employment levels from the BLS, chart by Mish.

Today, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released its Monthly Payroll Report.

Initial Thoughts

  • The divergence between jobs and employment continues for a full year but has generally decreased in 2023.
  • The divergence jumped again in April and full time employment has stagnated.
  • Because of annual benchmark revisions, the way the BLS reports revisions, and the relatively small sample sizes of monthly jobs reports, we cannot, with strong confidence, suggest these reports portray an accurate picture of either jobs or employment.

Payrolls vs Employment Since May 2022

  • Nonfarm Payrolls: +4,063,000
  • Employment Level: +2,422,000
  • Full Time Employment: +1,734,000

Of the 894,000 rise in employment in January, 810,000 was due to annual benchmark revisions. And the BLS does not say what months were revised, just poof, here you go.

Job Report Details

  • Nonfarm Payroll: +339,000 to 156,105,000 – Establishment Survey
  • Civilian Non-institutional Population: +175,000 to 266,618,000
  • Civilian Labor Force: +130,000 to 166,818,000 – Household Survey
  • Participation Rate: +0.0 to 62.6% – Household Survey
  • Employment: -310,000 to 160,721,000 Household Survey
  • Unemployment: +440,000 to 6,097,000- Household Survey
  • Baseline Unemployment Rate: +0.3 to 3.7% – Household Survey
  • Not in Labor Force: +45,000 to 99,800,000 – Household Survey
  • U-6 unemployment: +0.1 to 6.7% – Household Survey

Change in Nonfarm Payrolls

BLS data and chart 

Change in Nonfarm Payrolls Details

  • Leisure and Hospitality: +48,000
  • Education and Health Service: +97,000
  • Government: +56,000
  • Manufacturing has peaked this cycle and has mostly been flat all year. In May, manufacturing was down 2,000.
  • Construction: +25,000
  • Retail Trade: +12,000
  • Professional and Business Services: +64,000

BLS data and chart 

Monthly Revisions

The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for March was revised up by 52,000, from +165,000 to +217,000, and the change for April was revised up by 41,000, from +253,000 to +294,000. With these revisions, employment in March and April combined is 93,000 higher than previously reported.

Part-Time Jobs

The above numbers never total correctly due to the way the BLS makes seasonal adjustments. I list them as reported.

Hours and Wages

This data is frequently revised.

  • Average weekly hours of all private employees fell 0.1 hour to 34.3 hours.
  • Average weekly hours of all private service-providing employees was flat at 33.3 hours.
  • Average weekly hours of manufacturers was flat at 40.1 hours.

Last month all of the above weekly hours was 0.1 higher but are reported as flat due to negative revisions.

An overall decline or rise of a tenth of an hour does not sound line much, but with employment at 160 million, it’s more significant than it appears at first glance.

A year ago average total private weekly hours were 34.6 hours. 

Hourly Earnings

This data is also frequently revised. Here are the numbers as reported this month.

Average Hourly Earnings of All Nonfarm Workers rose $0.11 to $33.44. A year ago the average wage was $32.06. That’s a gain of 4.3%.

Average hourly earnings of Production and Nonsupervisory Workers rose $0.13 to $28.75. A year ago the average wage was $27.39. That’s a gain of 5.0%.

Despite the gains, wages have not kept up with inflation.

Unemployment Rate

BLS unemployment data chart by Mish

The unemployment rate hit a 50-year low in January of 3.4 percent. This month it’s back to 3.4 percent.

The civilian noninstitutional population is 266,443,000. Employment is 161,031,000. That means there are over 105 million people age 16 and older who are not working at all.

Alternative Measures of Unemployment

Table A-15 is where one can find a better approximation of what the unemployment rate really is.

The official unemployment rate is 3.7%.

U-6 is much higher at 6.7%. Both numbers would be way higher still, were it not for millions dropping out of the labor force over the past few years.

Some of those dropping out of the labor force retired because they wanted to retire. Some dropped out over Covid fears and never returned. Still others took advantage of a strong stock market and retired early.

The rest is disability fraud, forced retirement (need for Social Security income), and discouraged workers.

Birth Death Model

Starting January 2014, I dropped the Birth/Death Model charts from this report.

The birth-death model pertains to the birth and death of corporations not individuals except by implication.

For those who follow the numbers, I retain this caution: Do not subtract the reported Birth-Death number from the reported headline number. That approach is statistically invalid.

The model is wrong at economic turning points and is also heavily revised and thus essentially useless.

Household Survey vs. Payroll Survey

  • The payroll survey (sometimes called the establishment survey) is the headline jobs number. It is based on employer reporting.
  • The household survey is a phone survey conducted by the BLS. It measures employment, unemployment and other factors.

If you work one hour, you are employed. If you don’t have a job and fail to look for one, you are not considered unemployed, rather, you drop out of the labor force.

Looking for job openings on Jooble or Monster or in the want ads does not count as “looking for a job”. You need an actual interview or send out a resume.

These distortions artificially lower the unemployment rate, artificially boost full-time employment, and artificially increase the payroll jobs report every month.

Expect a Long But Shallow Recession With Minimal Rise in Unemployment

Given hiring pressures and boomer retirements, Expect a Long But Shallow Recession With Minimal Unemployment Rise

Unlike many others, I expect the unemployment rate will not rise much in this recession compared to the average recession impact. Employment due to baby boomer retirement is another matter.

Demographically Sobering Thoughts on US Employment in the Next Five Years

In case you missed it, please see Demographically Sobering Thoughts on US Employment in the Next Five Years

This post originated at MishTalk.Com

Please Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

33 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback

[…] On June 2, I noted Huge Jobs Divergence Returns, Jobs +339,000 but Employment -310,000 […]

Frilton Miedman
Frilton Miedman
10 months ago
“That means there are over 105 million people age 16 and older who are not working at all.”
56 million are over 65, 18 million are in college.
1 in 5 Americans has a disability, which might suggest only 1 in 3 of them don’t work.
.
.
Siliconguy
Siliconguy
10 months ago
So basically the economy is muddling through even as the peak of the boomers reach 66 and retire. (The peak was 1957 give or take year depending on which chart you look at. Full Retirement Age is at 66 and six to ten months depending on exactly which year you were born.)
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
10 months ago
Mish,
Get your head out of the sand and stop trying to pivot the data into a recession view. Go outside and look around. We’re not in a recession so stop it already! Forgetting EVERYTHING else, how can we be in a recession, given the stock market?
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
10 months ago
I don’t care what they say about everyone here but I still like you guys. I think the economy is just reverting back to where it was in 2012-2017 which means it is basically puddling along at slow growth. I think there could be a recession at some point in the future but it appears more and more unlikely. The higher likelihood is we get a debt bomb explode at some point in the future. We live in strange and interesting times. I’ve posted before we may be like Japan but with slightly more growth and similar debt/GDP. America actually needs to start building new cities in all that open land. I’m kind of surprised no billionaire has tried that experiment to build a city of the future. Most cities are now held back by problems of legacy.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
10 months ago
This former, high-level employee at Google says we need to forget about climate change. Rather, we need to worry about something bad happening with AI in the next two years.
I agree completely. The likelihood of AI creating some sort of black swan event will grow exponentially over the next 5 years.
Frilton Miedman
Frilton Miedman
10 months ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
If AI were to become a crisis, it would be a bit more serious than a Black Swan market event.
If AI goes hostile – “Skynet”, first thing to go is the internet, then electricity & fuel, it wouldn’t need to directly attack us….the stock market would be the least of our worries.
Personally, I doubt it’s a problem, computers aren’t self aware, even if they become so, they have no motivator to attack us.
.
.
msspec
msspec
10 months ago
”…computers aren’t self aware, even if they become so, they have no motivator to attack us.”
‘HAL9000’ has been running in place, waiting for the signal….
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
10 months ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
The AI extinction scare has much better legs than the US financial default catastrophe scare and is more immediate than the Global Warming CO2 scare.
It is necessary to keep the plebeian masses’ attention focused.
Mac Timred
Mac Timred
10 months ago
I have a theory — other articles (hat tip Zero Hedge) note the difference between US born workers, where employment has stagnated since about June of 2021 – thank you Biden Admin – and foreign born workers, where employment has steadily grown.
My theory is that foreign born workers are harder to contact – more itinerant, less time at resident – and therefore this introduces a systematic bias to US born workers into the Household survey.
Thus the increased need for adjustments — not to suggest that BLS doesn’t also lean towards the home team.
Frilton Miedman
Frilton Miedman
10 months ago
Reply to  Mac Timred
Please tell me you’re regurgitating a Wagner funded Russian propagandist site about U.S. “news” as a joke, right?
Gave me a good laugh, thank you.
.
.
KidHorn
KidHorn
10 months ago
Doesn’t look like we’ve made any progress since pre covid. So where on any of those charts is the supposed job boom Biden created. Seems all that happened is things returned kind of back to normal after covid. When taking into account population growth, it’s even worse. We could have had a vacancy at president at at least done that.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
10 months ago
The BLS numbers lost their credibility when they started diddling with them in 2008-9 in the GFC.
Unemployment pay for 99 weeks.
The serious start of the contract/gig economy where when you lost your work you still weren’t unemployed.
I could go on but why bother.
Nothing has been actually fixed since the Dot Com bust.
MPO45v2
MPO45v2
10 months ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
The thing is you can drive by any fast food restaurant and see help wanted signs. My wife and I went out to dinner last night at a strip mall and all the shops had “now hiring” signs. Why people here don’t want to believe in the job narrative is beyond me. And don’t get me started in construction workers, there is a huge shortage there too with median age of electricians at 57 as well as others.
Of course not all industries are booming, I am sure some job areas are depressed but that’s just the way things go.
KidHorn
KidHorn
10 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
When many are better off unemployed than working for minimum wage, what would you expect? The only people filling those jobs are new immigrants. Many likely here illegally,
Frilton Miedman
Frilton Miedman
10 months ago
Reply to  KidHorn
I’m actually going to agree with you, and then ask…what’s the problem?
My Irish ancestors came here late 1800’s, were hated, saw “INNA” signs over every store front, worked menial jobs for dirt pay that no one else wanted.
.
msspec
msspec
10 months ago
Reply to  KidHorn
”When many are better off unemployed than working for minimum wage, what
would you expect? The only people filling those jobs are new immigrants.
Many likely here illegally,”
…as planned.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
10 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
There is definitely a mismatch of skills and jobs that’s partly to blame for this problem.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
10 months ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
And, we could go all the way back to ’83 when they stopped using Case-Schiller type data to assess housing inflation.
Owner’s Equivalent Rent Surveys. Yeah! that’s the ticket.
MPO45v2
MPO45v2
10 months ago
So inflation has been hot, jobs are hot, debt ceiling resolved with more spend so more Fed hikes inevitable?
And let’s not forget thousands of boomers retiring each day to join the socialism club and get free money and healthcare.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
10 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
To say nothing of the unproductive Gen X, Millenials and Gen Z that keep stumbling around blindly.
MPO45v2
MPO45v2
10 months ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Productivity decrease 2.1% in Q1 of 2023. Let’s just call it quiet quitting…lol.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
10 months ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Easy now, Lisa H, I’m Gen X, and I’m productive. Let’s leave those broad-brush labels to our M & Z gens.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
10 months ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
Correction accepted.
I read a number of trade magazines in the fields of vision, industrial lasers, electronics, additive manufacturing, etc.
There are a few really sharp younger folks around but the numbers are small and they are everywhere: US, Europe, China.
Not too many in Africa or South/Central America, opportunities there are apparently lacking.
Siliconguy
Siliconguy
10 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
The healthcare isn’t free, Medicare B is $165 a month. D is an another charge unless you get C which might be free, or not, depending.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
10 months ago
Reply to  Siliconguy
And additional Part B Supplemental insurance isn’t cheap if you want to avoid the 20% bankrupting you if you need serious work done.
And the insurance premiums keep going up every year.
MPO45v2
MPO45v2
10 months ago
Reply to  Siliconguy
A whole $165? I assume that’s a whole lot of doc visits like most of the boomers that I know use. My health insurance is $2000/month and I rarely see a doctor. this is what I mean by the huge disparity. social security that has a huge cost of living adjustment while minimum wage has been $7.25 since 2009 (14 years) and not tied to inflation – why?
The torches and pitch forks will come out if this continues much longer.
MrTea
MrTea
9 months ago
Reply to  Siliconguy

For the millions pouring across the border it’s all free. The whole world knows it too. Just get here. The imbeciles on the Supreme Court just ruled the states cannot defend themselves against the federal government refusing to enforce the law (after they got finished ruling that the Democrat one-party states could have THEIR OWN IMMIGRATION POLICY by refusing to cooperate with the feds when Trump tried to enforce the law.)

Citizens in Yuma found that if they had a baby needing an incubator all 40 at the local hospital were full of anchor babies. RIP USA.

Frilton Miedman
Frilton Miedman
10 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
“And let’s not forget thousands of boomers retiring each day to join the socialism club and get free money and healthcare.”
Damned lazy slackers, living off the dole at our expense! …They need to get back to work!
.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
10 months ago
“Expect a Long But Shallow Recession With Minimal Rise in Unemployment”
We shall see … but I’m fading this. Bigly.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
10 months ago
Per BLS response rate on employment / jobs
Establishment survey … 43.9% (December 2022)
Household survey … 71.0% (January 2023)
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
10 months ago
Per Establishment survey seasonally adjusted:
total non farm jobs May 2022 … 152,042,000
total non farm jobs May 2023 … 156,105,000
average weekly earnings increased:
$1,109.28 —> $1,146.99
yet withheld employment tax collection (a “hard” number) collected by Treasury Department
FY2022 thru May 31st … $2.151 trillion
FY2023 thru May 31st … $2.134 trillion
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
10 months ago
“Huge Jobs Divergence Returns, Jobs +339,000 but Employment -310,000”
Yes … in contrast to May 2022 employment report (initial estimate):
Establishment (jobs) survey … +390K
Household (employment) survey … +321K

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.