Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Jobs Market Remains Tight as Unemployment Rate Dips to 3.5 Percent in September

Payroll and Employment data from BLS, chart by Mish

I have been commenting on the jobs-employment discrepancy for five months but it’s now in the seventh month.

The two surveys measure different things. A person is either employed or not, but someone can have multiple jobs.

Generally the numbers move in the same direction over time. The Employment (Household Survey) is noisy, but 7 months is a reasonable time frame for discrepancies to resolve.

If you assume both surveys are correct, then the interpretation is that the strength in jobs since March is due to about 1.7 million people taking extra part-time jobs.

The only other explanation is that one of the surveys is flat out wrong.

BLS Jobs Statistics at a Glance

Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 263,000 in September, and the unemployment rate edged down to 3.5 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Notablejob gains occurred in leisure and hospitality and in health care.

Here are the details from the monthly BLS Employment Report.

  • Nonfarm Payroll: +315,000 to 153,018,000 – Establishment Survey
  • Civilian Non-institutional Population: +172,000 to 264,689,000
  • Civilian Labor Force: -57,000 to 164,689,000 – Household Survey
  • Participation Rate: -0.1 to 62.3% – Household Survey
  • Employment: +204,000 to 158,936,000 Household Survey
  • Unemployment: -261,000 to 5,753,000- Household Survey
  • Baseline Unemployment Rate: -0.2 to 3.5% – Household Survey
  • Not in Labor Force: +229,000 to 99,667,000 – Household Survey
  • U-6 unemployment: -0.3 to  6.7% – Household Survey

Revision Details

  • The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for July was revised up by 11,000, from +526,000 to +537,000.
  • The change for August remained at +315,000. 
  • After revision, employment gains in July and August combined were 11,000 higher than previously reported.

Economists’ Estimates

  • Nonfarm Payrolls: 250,000 expected vs 263,000 actual
  • Unemployment Rate: 3.7% expected vs 3.5% actual
  • Manufacturing Payrolls: 20,000 expected vs 22,000 actual
  • Hourly Earnings: +0.3% expected vs 0.3% actual

The above estimates from Bloomberg Econoday.

Change in Nonfarm Payrolls

Change in Nonfarm Payrolls Since February 2020

Despite recent gains, Leisure and hospitality employment is 1.1 million lower than in February 2020.

The biggest gains are in professional and business services, up over a million, and transportation and warehousing up 734,000.  

Part-Time Jobs

The above numbers never total correctly. I list them as reported.

In March, the BLS said full-time employment was 132,718,000. Today it says 132,661,00. Since March there has been a decline in full time jobs of 57,000.

Everything points to part time jobs to fueling the job gains.

Unemployment Rate – Seasonally Adjusted

Unemployment data from BLS, chart by Mish

Nonfarm Payrolls and Employment Levels

Recovery Synopsis

  • In September, employment recovered all losses in the Covid recession for the first time.
  • The numbers do not reflect increasing population or the type of job recovered.
  • The red and blue dotted lines show the still significant impact Covid has on the economy.
  • The yellow highlight shows where employment would be had the previous trends continued.

The impact of demographics and Covid are both in play. Neither jobs nor employment will return to the pre-Covid trendline any time soon.

Hours and Wages

Average weekly hours of all private employees was flat at 34.5 hours. Average weekly hours of all private service-providing employees rose 0.1 hours to 33.5 hours. Average weekly hours of manufacturers was flat at 40.3 hours.

Average Hourly Earnings of All Nonfarm Workers rose $0.12 to $32.46. Year-over-year, wages rose from $30.92 to $32.46. That’s a gain of 5.0%.

Average hourly earnings of Production and Supervisory Workers rose $0.10 to $27.77. Year-over-year, wages rose from $26.26 to $27.77. That’s a gain of 5.8%.

Despite the gains, wages have not kept up with inflation.

Birth Death Model

Starting January 2014, I dropped the Birth/Death Model charts from this report.

For those who follow the numbers, I retain this caution: Do not subtract the reported Birth-Death number from the reported headline number. That approach is statistically invalid.

The model is wildly wrong at turning points but otherwise means little. It is also heavily revised and thus useless.

Alternative Measures of Unemployment

Table A-15 from BLS

Table A-15 is where one can find a better approximation of what the unemployment rate really is.

The official unemployment rate is 3.5%. 

U-6 is much higher at 6.7%. Both numbers would be way higher still, were it not for millions dropping out of the labor force over the past few years.

Some of those dropping out of the labor force retired because they wanted to retire. Some dropped out over Covid fears and never returned. Still others took advantage of a strong stock market and retired early.

The rest is disability fraud, forced retirement (need for SS income), and discouraged workers.

Changing Employment Dynamics

Covid-19 had an enormous impact on the labor force. Some job losses are permanent, millions of other other people now work from home.

Stimulus provided incentives to not work and some of those workers are returning to the labor markets now.

As of January 2022, there were 22 million workers age 60 and over. Millions will retire soon which will put upward pressure on hiring.

Strength is Relative

It’s important to put the jobs numbers into proper perspective.

In the household survey, if you work as little as 1 hour a week, even selling trinkets on eBay, you are considered employed.

In the household survey, if you work three part-time jobs, 12 hours each, the BLS considers you a full-time employee.

In the payroll survey, three part-time jobs count as three jobs. The BLS attempts to factor this in, but they do not weed out duplicate Social Security numbers. The potential for double-counting jobs in the payroll survey is large.

Household Survey vs. Payroll Survey

The payroll survey (sometimes called the establishment survey) is the headline jobs number, generally released the first Friday of every month. It is based on employer reporting.

The household survey is a phone survey conducted by the BLS. It measures unemployment and many other factors.

If you work one hour, you are employed. If you don’t have a job and fail to look for one, you are not considered unemployed, rather, you drop out of the labor force.

Looking for job openings on Jooble or Monster or in the want ads does not count as “looking for a job”. You need an actual interview or send out a resume.

These distortions artificially lower the unemployment rate, artificially boost full-time employment, and artificially increase the payroll jobs report every month.

Divergences

Once again we see a divergence between jobs and employment. Past divergences have resolved in the direction of jobs. One of these sets likely won’t.

Synopsis Since March

  • Employment +478,000
  • Jobs +2,162,000
  • Difference  1,684,000

The household numbers are admittedly noisy, but a seven-month divergence now stands out.

In expanding economies, discrepancies tend to resolve higher. At turns, discrepancies tend to resolver lower.

I suspect labor turnover and retirements have seriously distorted payrolls and at least some of this strength will be taken away.

Expect a Long But Shallow Recession With Minimal Job Losses

Given hiring pressures and boomer retirements, Expect a Long But Shallow Recession With Minimal Job Losses

The stock market is another issue. For discussion, please see Artificial Wealth vs GDP: Why Earnings and the Stock Market Will Get Crushed

While I expect the unemployment rate will not rise much in this recession, it’s another thing for the unemployment rate to decline and jobs to rise by millions.

Job Openings Decline by Over a Million, But What Does It Mean?

Job openings decline but from record levels. Let’s discuss the implications.

In case you missed it, please see Job Openings Decline by Over a Million, But What Does It Mean?

Correction

I inadvertently left a rise in the Labor Force line from last month. Here is the correct line.

  • Civilian Labor Force: -57,000 to 164,689,000 – Household Survey

This post originated at MishTalk.Com

Please Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish 

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

40 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JRM
JRM
3 years ago
6.7 is closer to the real unemployment rate of 15-20%!!
Avery
Avery
3 years ago
Someone can cat sit and surf this board for $20 / hour, easy. No welfare involved.
8dots
8dots
3 years ago
What I didn’t like yesterday, i like today. For fun and entertainment the Job blow sent the Dow down to Sept 30 high. It might be a test of Sept
low. If what I like today will be bs next week, sl. For fun & entertainment only : today low might be an opportunity to buy.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
I’ve complained since the credit based ’08 collapse, about the way Fed policy has been the Band-Aid for ill conceived fiscal & trade policy to offset stagnant wages since 1980.
Who knows, maybe the Fed’s timing is perfect as wages start to soar, maybe we become less debt dependant.
One thing is certain, with rates increasing there is going to be a fiscal reckoning for debt servicing ..will we be cutting retirement/SSA, or maybe take a second look at “job creating” billionaire tax rates.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
Wages. We won’t know official year over year till BLS comes out with September cpi.
But from this report:
Hourly wage … Sept21 $30.92 … Sept22 $32.46 … +5%
But hours worked per week went from 34.8 Sept21 to 34.5 Sept22
hence, weekly wages … Sept21 $1,076.02 … Sept22 $1119.87 … +4%
August cpi year over year +8.3%
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
If wages soar without a corresponding increase in productivity then inflation will also soar because you’ll have more people chasing limited amount of goods.
This is why wages started to stagnate once the US productivity gains from computers/internet reached their limits (noted in another comment in this article).
Roadrunner12
Roadrunner12
3 years ago
“As of January 2022, there were 22 million workers age 60 and over. Millions will retire soon which will put upward pressure on hiring.”
According to the chart on this link below “People nearing retirement outnumber people old enough to enter the labour market”
(Google:) Immigration ‘very difficult’ for applicants once they turn 40 | CTV News
Canada and the US have similar demographics and I have no doubt the situation is similar in the US.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Reply to  Roadrunner12
Correct, we have a problem, meanwhile some angrily propose spending billions on a wall as the Fed hikes to counter wage inflation due to labor shortages.
Matt3
Matt3
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
What we need to do is increase labor participation. If you’re able bodied and don’t work, then you shouldn’t have enough money for cell phones, cigarettes, booze, video games, lottery tickets etc.
Get the deadbeats off their asses.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
I expect huge revisions in a few months.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
I sort of doubt. (for a change) the Household Survey concurs with Establishment Survey for September.
We’re still early in the game. I’m not expecting job losses till 2023, when the credit losses appear.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
Since we’re on the topic of labor, I think economic junkies that need a hit will appreciate this report from the New York Fed regarding productivity. In summary, the days of high/excess productivity are over because everyone has a computer now and there is no more free magic left until someone invents something new.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
Yup, this is a well known reason of why the 90’s were such good times for the US (and Canada and a portion of Europe). Clinton gets the praise since he happened to be president during that time but the reality is that computers + internet increased productivity enormously.
nic9075
nic9075
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Not to mention the HUGE drop in crime which rose then plateaued at a high level for a decade. Of course attitudes were totally different then. Now people just accept drug dealers (dealing hard drugs) because they contribute to the economy (the consumer spending portion), people just commit identity theft (easier to take ones money using routing and checking account number) than physically robbing them etc
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  nic9075
Yes, people have accepted liquor stores for decades.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
I wouldn’t assume PC’s are the only variable, consider self driving cars, robotics, or look at the number of stores you still see human cashiers, for starters.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
If I recall from the article, it said about 15% of productivity was directly from the miniaturization effect of computerization from the 1960 thru to 2000s but those days are over so efficiency improvements moving forward are gone unless something new happens.
nic9075
nic9075
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
Where are these self driving cars? what happens to people who have bad credit and no down payment for an electric car 15 years from now? or who won’t be able to use public transportation since payment is now thru smartphone only. No smartphone and/or credit card u are out of luck. The NYC MTA is eliminating metrocards next year same with the MBTA in Boston…
nic9075
nic9075
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
you still see human cashiers everywhere as well as many many many undocumented workers in NYC ==== How do such people afford to live indoors???? The average rent OUTSIDE manhattan is close to $3000 a month now.
How is shoplifting going to be prevented unless a store manager really wants to get into a fight over something like ice cre
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
As of January 2022, there were 22 million workers age 60 and over. Millions will retire soon which will put upward pressure on hiring.
Mish,
Good reporting but I think moving forward you really should consider reporting the Social Security growth along with the jobs reports. We all know millions of boomers will retire and the struggle is finding out what that number is on a month to month basis. It is always estimated as 10,000 boomers a day retire but realistically, there are likely more retirements toward the end of the year because that’s when bonuses and credits towards years of service count for retirees.
Today is Friday so if 10,000 boomers retire a day then that means 50,000 people across america walked off their jobs and most don’t plan on returning. By the end of October that number will be about 200,000. Rinse and repeat, month after month, year after year until 2030.
I look at the social security reporting monthly (link below).
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
200K a month may be added but what’s not shown is how many are subtracted (deaths). For example for the whole year of 2020 (2020 vs 2021) only 400K more people were added to social security.
This link shows how fast the numbers are growing yearly since 1970.
Take a look at the far column (disabled people added). Note the number between 2010-2018. A scam went on there where people clearly claiming to be disabled but were not because now there are 1.7 million less disabled people collecting…
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
In the context of “workers” and “labor force” dead people or retired people are the same thing. I guess dead people don’t consume any more but in terms of labor force and workers, everyday is getting worse. There are not enough young people coming into the labor force to replace those dying or retiring. The problem is accelerating as we move forward toward 2030 when all boomers will be 65+ and in theory means 40 to 60 million (depending on how many die).
Furthermore, if these retired boomers want healthcare they will need to go to cities because rural areas are not setup for hospitalization of millions but that’s another comment for another day as it’s a trading opportunity and I like to “quiet profit” now.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Still looks like slow growth, or possibly a mild recession. Pretty much agree with your assessment here Mish. With very little job loss going forward.
Which means energy demand will continue to grow, because it only ever drops during a deep recession. (During the 2009 GFC, oil demand only dropped 2%).
Stock markets will probably remain weak for a while. Except for energy stocks. They continue to gush cash flow. A rough calculation shows 20% free cash flow at $80 WTI. Add 5% for each $10 increase in price. Get ready for a dividend bonanza in 2023 as oil will probably average $100 or more. And watch for price spikes if we experience a supply crunch.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Energy almost entirely hinges on Putin, already he has internal dissention inside the Kremlin for the Ukraine war failures, factoring the public’s anger over his conscripts, he could be forced to alter course.
I don’t know either way, but I suspect oil’s biggest gains are past, especially where the U.S. now produces more than it uses.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
You are correct; Putin’s invasion of Ukraine and subsequent western sanctions HAVE had an effect on oil and gas markets. Prices are higher than they would have been without the war.
Going forward, whether Putin is replaced, or simply throws in the towel and exits Ukraine, the long term ramifications of his actions will endure for some time. The sanctions will remain. The willingness of western oil and gas companies to work in Russia is already gone. Russian production is going to suffer a decline for several years. The west is unwilling to help him get the funds he needs to rebuild his shattered military.
But even when Russia was producing full out, their production topped out at 12 Mbpd in a 100 Mbpd market. There are plenty of countries and companies producing the other 88 Mbpd. And they simply have not been spending the capex needed to grow production for almost a decade now. Which is leading us to a supply crunch sometime soon. Because demand is still growing, but supply is now restricted.
Incidentally, the US produces 12 Mbpd of oil and consumes over 19 Mbpd. So we are a long way from producing more than we use. I am not sure where you got that idea from.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Correct, I mistook my numbers on US oil production.
The problem with Russian oil is that it comprises just enough of global supply for Putin to manipulate price, we saw that in 2020 when he flooded the market, which I suspect was part of a long term plan involving the Ukraine invasion.
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Amusing Billboard
In Las Vegas yesterday. There was a huge billboard that read:
“Now Hiring People Who Show Up To Work”
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Did they disclose the wage? Not sure what kind of work it was but if they were willing to pay $40/hour to flip burgers I am 100% sure their labor shortage would vanish as people rushed to do that job.
I think what the sign meant to say was “Now Hiring Slaves That Won’t Question Authority” and those days are gone forever. The jobs report proves it.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
This is the unintended effect of the lockdowns and free money given out.
So many low wage earners realized they got every bit as much from Uncle Sam as they did from working. So they’ve just decided Welfare is a career choice instead of showing up and doing something in an actual job.
Those slaves will get back to work and stop questioning authority the minute Welfare and other handouts go down so that $10 or $15 an hour is a lot more than Welfare.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
I disagree. The problem is many states still have $7.25/hr minimum wage. Do the math, that adds up to $1160/month and there is nowhere in the United States you can rent a decent apartment as the median rent is $1104. Why bother to “work” when it is futile and it is really a form of slavery? And if you cut benefits then you can expect an explosion of crime and there won’t be enough cops to deal with it.
Got expat plans?
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
I think it’s just easier for many to resort to the default, complaining.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
You seem to think minimum wage is what drives desire to work and work ethnic. It does not. Minimum wage could be remove entirely. It’s a late 20th century invention and yet somehow society functioned for thousands of years without it.
What drives desire to work and work ethic is the alternative. Currently the alternative is Welfare and other handouts. Those amount to (depending on whether your an individual vs single mom etc) between 10-25 dollars an hour if not more. So Welfare is effectively competing with jobs by essentially paying people to do nothing. Of course people are going to chose to do nothing over putting in effort whenever they can. That’s practically a default human (and animal too) condition to do as little as possible for as much gain as possible.
Lower Welfare and other benefits and the number of vacant jobs will drop accordingly. There will only be an explosion of crime if basic needs (food, shelter) are not met. But if you lower it so they can’t afford cell phones, internet, TV, designer clothes, booze, cigarettes and so on, then they will work. Plus bring back food stamps instead of EBT cards so you have to call attention to yourself when you pay using them so you have to look everyone in the eye and announce your a deadbeat (social pressure does matter).
Matt3
Matt3
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Couldn’t agree more!!
Matt3
Matt3
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
No one is working and earning $7.25/hr. Also, people need to be adding more value than they are paid. When you begin a career, you are likely a loss for your employer.
It’s a sad view to see people that provide an honest day’s work for pay at less than $40/hr. as slaves.
I’m sure you’re doing your part and paying up for everything and for people you hire or maybe you’re the cheap person tipping 15%.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
For how much?
oee
oee
3 years ago
Where is the recession? I can confirm the Biden/Harris admin has created 10 Million net new jobs in 20 months of mandate. Trump lost a net loss of 2.50 Million in 48 months.
i do not see any comments claiming they were fake jobs.
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  oee
If you think Biden-Harris created 10 million jobs you are a political hack troll.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Mish. You follow the numbers more closely than anyone I know. So what are they? I am curious.
How many jobs did were created (or lost) during Trump’s presidency?
How many jobs have been created so far during Biden’s presidency?
I looked up various sources and couldn’t find an exact answer. The closest I could find was:
Biden’s first 11 months: household survey 6,092,900; establishment survey 6,448,000
Trump 48 months: minus 2,876,000.
But I have no idea if these are accurate.
JRM
JRM
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
The Trump numbers include the shut down effect!!!!
Then BIDEN is being credited for the jobs “RESTARTING” and are being counted as “NEW JOBS” by the MSM/White House/Democats!!!!
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  JRM
Lol! Spin it however you want. Do you need a tissue for your tears?
I don’t really care.
I would simply like Mish to be able to tell me what the actual job creation numbers are. Trumps 4 years. And Biden to date. I am curious after seeing oee’s comment.
Mish seemed to think that 10 million so far for Biden was way off. But after seeing numbers over 6 million for the first 11 months, I imagine that after 19 months it would be close to 10 million.
I am also interested to see if Trump actually presided over a loss of almost 3 million jobs.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.