The BLS makes positive revisions for a change this month but it widens the huge discrepancy between jobs and employment. 
Please consider the Bureau of Labor Statistics Monthly Payroll Report for September.
Initial Thoughts
- A gain of 336,000 is surprisingly strong given economists expectations of 160,000 and an ADP report of a 89,000.
- However, employment only rose by 86,000 and the participation rate (those looking for work or working) did not increase at all.
- For August, employment rose by 222,000 but unemployment rose by 514,000. Over half a million people wanted jobs but couldn’t find them last month.
- The civilian noninstitutional population is 267,428,000. Employment is 161,570,000. That means there are nearly 106 million people age 16 and older who are not working at all.
- Adding 73,000 government jobs is not a plus.
- Because of annual benchmark revisions, the way the BLS reports revisions, and the relatively small sample sizes of monthly jobs reports, we cannot, with strong confidence, suggest these reports portray an accurate picture of either jobs or employment.
Nonfarm Payrolls and Employment Levels

Full time employment is down by 696,000 since June of 2023.
Payrolls vs Employment Gains Since May 2022
- Nonfarm Payrolls: 4,832,000
- Employment Level: +3,271,000
- Full Time Employment: +1,424,000
- Only 43.5 percent of the employment gains since May of 2022 was full time employment.
Of the 894,000 rise in employment in January, 810,000 was due to annual benchmark revisions. And the BLS does not say what months were revised, just poof, here you go. Again, we cannot, with strong confidence, suggest these reports portray an accurate picture of either jobs or employment.
Job Report Details
- Nonfarm Payroll: +336,000 to 156,874,000 – Establishment Survey
- Civilian Non-institutional Population: +215,000 to 267,428,000
- Civilian Labor Force: +90,000 to 167,929,000 – Household Survey
- Participation Rate: +0.0 to 62.8% – Household Survey
- Employment: +86,000 to 161,570,000– Household Survey
- Unemployment: +5,000 to 6,360,000- Household Survey
- Baseline Unemployment Rate: +0.0 to 3.8% – Household Survey
- Not in Labor Force: 124,000 to 99,498,000 – Household Survey
- U-6 unemployment: -0.1 to 7.0% – Household Survey
Change in Nonfarm Payrolls

Monthly Revisions
- The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for July was revised up by 79,000, from+157,000 to +236,000.
- The change for August was revised up by 40,000, from +187,000 to +227,000.
- With these revisions, employment in July and August combined is 119,000 higher than previously reported.
Revisions were positive for a change.
Part-Time Jobs
- Involuntary Part-Time Work: -156,000 to 4,065,000
- Voluntary Part-Time Work: +177,000 to 22,152,000
- Total Full-Time Work: -22,000 to 134,167,000
- Total Part-Time Work: +151,000 to 27,336,000
The above numbers never total correctly due to the way the BLS makes seasonal adjustments. I list them as reported.
In July, full-time employment declined by 585,000. In August, full-time employment declined by 85,000. In September, there’s another decline of 22,000.
Hours and Wages
This data is frequently revised.
- Average weekly hours of all private employees was flat at 34.4 hours.
- Average weekly hours of all private service-providing employees was flat at 33.3 hours.
- Average weekly hours of manufacturers rose 0.1 hours from a negative revision to 40.1 hours.
An overall decline or rise of a tenth of an hour does not sound line much, but with employment at 160 million, it’s more significant than it appears at first glance.
A year ago average total private weekly hours were 34.6 hours.
Hourly Earnings
This data is also frequently revised. Here are the numbers as reported this month.
Average Hourly Earnings of All Nonfarm Workers rose $0.07 to $33.88. A year ago the average wage was $32.53. That’s a gain of 4.2%.
Average hourly earnings of Production and Nonsupervisory Workers rose $0.06 to $29.06. A year ago the average wage was $27.85. That’s a gain of 4.3%.
Year-over-year wages are finally keeping up with inflation after underperforming for many months. However, the growth in wages is now shrinking. The monthly increased for production workers in September was only 0.2 percent.
Unemployment Rate

The unemployment rate hit a 50-year low in January and April of 3.4 percent. For the second month, it’s 3.8 percent. That’s the highest since February of 2022.
Alternative Measures of Unemployment

Table A-15 is where one can find a better approximation of what the unemployment rate really is.
The official unemployment rate is 3.8%.
U-6 is much higher at 7.0%. Both numbers would be way higher still, were it not for millions dropping out of the labor force over the past few years.
Some of those dropping out of the labor force retired because they wanted to retire. Some dropped out over Covid fears and never returned. Still others took advantage of a strong stock market and retired early.
The rest is disability fraud, forced retirement (need for Social Security income), and discouraged workers.
Birth Death Model
Starting January 2014, I dropped the Birth/Death Model charts from this report.
The birth-death model pertains to the birth and death of corporations not individuals except by implication.
For those who follow the numbers, I retain this caution: Do not subtract the reported Birth-Death number from the reported headline number. That approach is statistically invalid.
The model is wrong at economic turning points and is also heavily revised and thus essentially useless.
Household Survey vs. Payroll Survey
- The payroll survey (sometimes called the establishment survey) is the headline jobs number. It is based on employer reporting.
- The household survey is a phone survey conducted by the BLS. It measures employment, unemployment and other factors.
If you work one hour, you are employed. If you don’t have a job and fail to look for one, you are not considered unemployed, rather, you drop out of the labor force.
Looking for job openings on Jooble or Monster or in the want ads does not count as “looking for a job”. You need an actual interview or send out a resume.
These distortions artificially lower the unemployment rate, artificially boost full-time employment, and artificially increase the payroll jobs report every month.
Expect a Long But Shallow Recession With Minimal Rise in Unemployment
Given hiring pressures and boomer retirements, I commented on July of 2022 Expect a Long But Shallow Recession With Minimal Unemployment Rise
That has been and accurate assessment of the strength of jobs.
Unlike many others, I still do not expect the unemployment rate will not rise much in the next recession compared to the average recession impact.
Bond Bulls are Getting Crushed in a Relentless Selloff
Meanwhile, due to unexpected economic strength, albeit of a dubious nature, Bond Bulls are Getting Crushed in a Relentless Selloff.
If you are seeing reports of China dumping treasuries as the cause, those reports are flat out wrong. See the above link for discussion.


The Third Oil Crisis is here https://youtu.be/bIq0o40Jo80
Ed Dowd Blackrock has been compiling reports on soaring disability data.
https://t.me/EdwardDowdReal/377
https://t.me/EdwardDowdReal/375
That is likely a reason for so many job openings… huge numbers of working age Americans are damaged and cannot work.
Also excess deaths are surging :
‘Huge, huge numbers:’ insurance group sees death rates up 40 percent over pre-pandemic levels https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/longevity/588738-huge-huge-numbers-death-rates-up-40-percent-over-pre/
So much for Safe and Effective….
Very true. An example:
Overall PMI data has been in contraction since November, 2022 – but the employment component of that index has remained in expansion.
Of course there are more jobs and more inflation. The economy needs more workers and has more inflation because it is far less efficient than it was in past decades. Why? DEI. We stopped promoting the best and brightest. Now, we promote on DEI. Unqualified people are running things.
Mish great analysis of another totally phony BLS report.
You and I seem to be the only ones that have noticed the big contradictions in the BLS jobs reports. Ex: for your valued readers: in January of this year, BLS reported big job “gains” of over 500,000, surprising economists.
But the BLS website showed that there were actually “2.5 million job losses.”
Those who believe those official numbers should beware of someone trying to sell them the Brooklyn Bridge.
Unfortunately, most money managers believe them because it is too tedious for them to do the type of number analysis you and I do. And that is how they “mismanage” customers’ money.
Bert Dohmen
Founder of Dohmen Capital Research
reading and believing anything out of BLS is stupid and a waste of energy. that energy costs calories, which are expensive in our inflation. shadow stats and mises.org do a 100x better job than anyone trying to correct or interpret BLS. just take the L out and you have correctly identified the BS. next item is understanding what the FED is and who owns her. only one mandate. keep her owners in high cotton. the rest is BS. see above BS
This is good analysis. It’s actually damn good. The USA economy is possibly not as “overheated” hot as the 336,000 Sept. jobs number seems to suggest. The Fed would probably be wise to leave the administered interest-rate where it is for a while, and let the system adjust to this new “5%-on-the-long-US-Treasury” rate regime. Really. If the bond-market can stabilize, then a good-job-creation scenario is positive for the stock-market. An unemployment rate of 7%, is very different from an unemployment rate of less than 4%. And an inflation rate of above 2% is probably needed for a while, for many various reasons. We think the Fed is done raising rates. Or at least, we think they SHOULD be done.
Atlanta GDPnow’s latest estimate: 4.9 percent — October 05, 2023. It smacks as a blowoff, a temporary surge in the transaction’s velocity of funds.
GDP NOW is consistently overstated. There is a high likelihood that their quarter end reading will print less than 4.9%. I’d be very cautious about taking stock in GDP NOW or this jobs report. They have no value regarding the employment situation or the economy as a whole.
Employment Data can be used to predict a recession
LEADING INDICATOR:
Initial Jobless Claims for 9/30/2023
= very low at 207,000
Very low probability of a recession starting in the next month or two
COINCIDENT INDICATORS:
September 2023 Unemployment Rate
= low at 3.8%
Very low probability we are in a recession now
Raw Payroll Employment Data Trend
……………………2023………….2022
July (-883,000) (-342,000) jobs
August +394,000 +410,000
September +585,000 +524,000
July 2023 weakness was temporary and disappeared by September 2023
It is absurd to think employment is a leading indicator of anything.
Jobs often increase in the first couple of months of recession.
It lags, and distortions are enormous.
Second, just look at the picture. People are taking second jobs and/or aging boomers are working fewer hours.
This has been going on since May of 2022, has it not? Hardly temporary.
Your reasons are total nonsense, but your conclusion that we are not in recession may easily be correct.
When it comes to jobs and the labor market, I personally prefer to pull data from cities around the USA on a week to week basis with articles like the one below:
https://www.kltv.com/2023/10/04/business-leaders-tackle-labor-shortage-during-panel-discussion-hosted-by-ut-tylers-hibbs-institute/
Each state has major labor shortages and they tend to be more pronounced in smaller cities and low population states but the labor shortage is there whether people believe the JOLTS, ADP, BLS reports or not.
I have yet to see any significant decrease in data flowing in that shows there is “enough” labor anywhere. According to the latest social security snapshot 832,000 people left the workforce from January thru August. This isn’t everyone who retired though because many people will retire and not start taking social security right away.
I suspect by the end of the year we will have lost 1.6 million people to retirement. Add people that have medical problems (diabetes, cancer, stroke, etc) that leave the labor force and subtract those that were never born because of low birth rates over the last 20 years and it’s easy to see this “surprise” labor trend will continue.
No one should be “surprised” by labor shortages moving forward if they are looking at the demographic and social security reports. Of course, if the Fed and interest rates explode to 13% then there will be massive job losses but that mess is another story.
All of this can change on the dime if all the people crossing the border are given work papers. I think Biden authorized 20,000 Venezuelans in New York recently. We’ll see if there are any more.
reading and believing anything out of BLS is stupid and a waste of energy. that energy costs calories, which are expensive in our inflation. shadow stats and mises.org do a 100x better job than anyone trying to correct or interpret BLS. just take the L out and you have correctly identified the BS. next item is understanding what the FED is and who owns her. only one mandate. keep her owners in high cotton. the rest is BS. see above BS. i still don’t know a single soul out of work, that wants one. in many cities and counties, i have lived and talk to folks of all ages……..
Well looks like Bidenomics keeps working. The 10 year spiked on news and TLT dropped almost 2% and has juicy call premiums with all the volatility. Only question left to ask is Got T-Bills?
As I’m getting ready to retire, I welcome the highest bond prices possible.