Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Junk-Rated Debt Sales Break Record, Fuel Dividends

Issuance of speculative-grade loans to finance dividends hit a record $72 billion in 2021 and there’s three months still to go.

Please consider Record Junk-Loan Sales Fuel Dividend Payouts.

Nonfinancial companies including insurance provider Asurion LLC and fast-food chain Whataburger Inc. have issued more than $72 billion worth of speculative-grade loans to pay dividends in 2021, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence’s LCD. That is already a full-year record in data going back to 2000, topping 2013’s previous high of $54.4 billion. 

U.S. companies have also issued a record amount of junk bonds this year, while leveraged loan sales are on pace to surpass 2017’s record of $503 billion. After the Federal Reserve cut interest rates to near zero and started buying billions of dollars worth of bonds, many companies were able to lower their interest costs and raise record amounts of cash by selling junk debt, thanks to strong demand from investors in search of higher yields. 

One major beneficiary of the boom: private equity. Companies owned by private-equity firms have sold over $60 billion worth of leveraged loans to pay dividends—another 21-year record. 

The largest buyers of junk-rated loans are collateralized loan obligations, which package the debt into securities. Sales of CLOs have set a record this year at more than $124 billion, with analysts expecting them to remain elevated into the year’s end, providing steady demand for new loans. 

Around three out of every four loans sold in 2021 have had single-B credit ratings. Despite the high volume, the average yield on newly issued, single-B rated corporate debt this year is around 4.8%. That is below the average yield of 5.9% over the past 10 years, suggesting investors aren’t getting paid enough for the extra risks they are taking, according to a recent report by S&P Global Ratings.

Capital Gains Tax and Private Equity

The buyout boom is fueled by easy money and a looming hike in the capital-gains tax. The tax plan also cracks down on alternative investments in IRAs. 

A rush is on this year to get things done before the tax changes take effect.

Taking on debt to pay dividends is of course mad, especially with single B-rated companies. 

I expect many of them will go bankrupt. It happens every cycle. But as long as the junk bond bubble is intact, stock prices have support. Bond bubbles usually break first.

It’s ironic that Democrat-sponsored tax hikes fueled this final push in junk that is bound to collapse.

Thanks for Tuning In

Like these reports? If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

24 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
hmm silly me , I thought dividends should be paid with earnings . Companies  are self liquidating.  Stock price super cedes  profitability/retained earnings growth .    Intrinsic  valuations of stocks  methodologies have been abandoned (i.e present value of future  earnings/free cash flow) .       
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  thimk
“…I thought dividends should be paid with earnings.”
Making sure they are instead paid with loot stolen from others, was the specific reason for central banks being invented in the first place.
Problem faced, was that the “wealthy,” who were the ones closest to politicians, risked losing money. Some because of just random events. Others, because they just weren’t particularly good at what they were supposed to be doing. In pretty much no instance at all, were they the best at what they were doing for very long, ensuring that left to free markets, they would soon enough be outcompeted by someone better.
So, the race was on to prevent them from going “bankrupt.” And central banking was it. Just keep lowering funding cost for those already wealthy and connected, and even the most talentless could prosper “forever.” Simply by getting free, TO THEM, money in ever larger doses. Of course, the money is never really free. Someone has to carry the cost. But central banking ensures that those someones, are never the wealthy ones which hobnob with politicians, but rather those further away.
So, you end up with wealthier and wealthier already wealthy dilettantes living solely off of Fed distributed loot. And poorer and poorer everyone else, who have to pay for it all. ALL because of central banking. And specidfically NOT because of anything else whatsoever. Not Mexicans. Not Chinese. Not lack of “skillz.” Not clean air. Not himan rights. Just, 100.0000%, pure crass theft, propagated and facilitated by central banking. Nothing else.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
And so US companies are rendered even less competitive, by having to service “debt” taken out solely as Fen engineered handouts to utterly and absolutely useless dimwits who couldn’t even feed themselves were it not for crass theft by The Fed and Government. As if being “owned” by the rank idiots The Fed handed the company to, hence having to kowtow to their child-brained drivel, wasn’t bad and destructive enough.
All while the idiots being robbed, are so dumb and indoctrinated that they still, even now, despite even this, keep falling for the trivially obvious nonsense that the cliff-diving competitiveness is, like, uh, because, like, that guy you know, he’s like China, is, uh, like, mean and, like, and, like, evil, and, human rights, and, like, stuff!!! “We” should, like, tweet something!!
Webej
Webej
4 years ago
America has the greatest economy ever.
What could be more productive than taking on debt to pay dividends and retire equity shares?
Everybody is taking the turn of phrase ‘making money’ a little too literally, reductio ad absurdem.
Does anyone know of other languages where this turn of phrase exists, without referring to the actual manufacture of coins & bills?
Wondering what the stakeholders in these organizations will be making when the money-making machinery goes for maintenance.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
These companies are fit for pump and dump. Investment firms buy shares and collect huge dividends for a while. All the time convincing their naive clients it’s a great investment. They sell their shares to investors at inflated prices and let their clients take the losses.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
the economy nowadays is like a Titanic, sailing around on a ocean of enormous debt, …an ocean with icebergs….it is only a matter of time; history shows that reshuffling deckchairs and the orchestra(CBs)  still desperately playing won t be of any help at one point,  when the day comes….  F*,now I even forgot to use f words 🙂
Carl_R
Carl_R
4 years ago
Fascinating. What happens to the price of the stock after they issue junk bonds and pay it out in dividends? IF the market is efficient, the stock price should take a huge haircut the moment it goes ex-dividend, since the market cap of the stock should drop by the amount of the dividend. The fact that any company is willing to do this, though, tells me that their stock is not taking a huge hit post deal, even though it should. Thus, as ludicrous as it sound, these deals must be increasing shareholder value, even though they should be doing the opposite.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
What I believe is being done here is tax avoidance on profits.
For example, the corp tax rate is 21%. So to pay dividends you normally first pay 21% on profits then can use the rest to pay dividends.
Now, you can take on debt equal to your profit. You pay dividends on 100% of the debt and use the profits to pay the debt so from an accounting point of view you are showing 0 profit and thus 0 tax. This saves companies 21% (the corp tax rate).
That should cause the stock to rise because the dividends are now 21% higher under this method.
TechLover1
TechLover1
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
That assumes these companies are profitable.
Many of these companies issuing junk debt are not GAAP profitable.
I believe this is just the behavior near market tops. If I were running a failing company and debt was available at attractive terms, why would I ever not take on as much debt at possible?
Enormous amounts of debt available and being issued at tight spread to risk free rate is classic signal for market top. I am making a note of this. Much of this debt is covenant lite as well. Hell, I understand there is debt being issued to pay interest on prior debt too. This will result in a lot of default. Timing is unknown but at this point I can’t imagine there won’t be a major correction/recession within 18 months. I suspect government will try to keep things under control until Nov 22 elections, but you never know if they can.
Keep your powder dry. There will be opportunities to acquire many assets in the next 24 months.
Scooot
Scooot
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
It seems mad to me.
When the Company pays the 100% of the debt in dividends, the owners of the company will receive that dividend, which is taxable income. So they would pay more tax than they otherwise would, and their company would have a massive debt liability for the privilege? 
Additionally, future earnings will be less due to the interest incurred on the unnecessary debt, and future payouts would be less due to the requirement to repay the debt? 
Unless of course the plan is to rinse and repeat for ever which might work for the Government for a while but not for public companies surely.  
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  Scooot
Here’s a numerical example to show what I mean.
Lets say a company’s profits are 1 million a year on which they pay 21% tax or 210K leaving 790K for dividends.
Now the company takes out a 9.5 million dollar 10 year loan at 5% interest so the yearly payment is ~1 million dollars. The companies profit is now 0 because they have a 1 million dollar a year loan payment offsetting their profit so they pay no tax. The company also now gives out 950K in dividends a year (1/10 of the 10 year loan).
So 950K > 790K. Yes, those receiving dividends will pay tax on them but that’s tax on free money (ie money they would never have had before). Meanwhile the company stock looks more attractive because it’s paying a higher dividend so the stock price can rise so that’s a 2nd way for the owners to win and stock gains are taxed at a much lower rate to boot.
With Biden’s proposal of 25% or more corporate tax rate this scheme looks even better.
Scooot
Scooot
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
As I say mad IMO.
The dividend isn’t free money to the shareholders, they now have a 5 year debt liability. The company has to service a 5 year debt which absorbs all their earnings. To me the Company Stock now looks awful, with no prospect of any earnings and the only way it can pay any future dividends is to issue more debt. 
Anybody could do the same thing. Buy a Ltd company off the shelf, take out a massive loan and pay themselves a dividend. What’s the difference? 
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Good points. My consciousness has been raised again. 
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Right Mish , we already knew that….But tell me what are we supposed to do then ?  Buy another house or rather sell one ?  Buy gold  ?   Sell junk bonds, shares etc ?  I don ‘t know…. and although your analyses are rational and well founded, you don t know either…. 
TechLover1
TechLover1
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
Timing a downturn is very difficult. Geremy Grantham has been ringing the bells and warning of an imminent recession for about a year now. I take it as a strong signal that a big recession is one to two years away. He has a history of being correct for large market events but two to three years early.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Mish you should be happy that the bubble is about to pop right ? 
anoop
anoop
4 years ago
is it ok to take a loan to buy back stock instead of paying dividends?
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  anoop
Yes. This is called a leveraged buyback.
ed_retired_actuary
ed_retired_actuary
4 years ago
Reply to  anoop
Both res8lt in the same leveraging of the issuer.  For private equity, the buyback would need to be conducted privately, which could be problematic.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  anoop
Everything is OK for corporations in the world of Reaganomics, with the rampant deregulation that has taken place in the last 40 years.
PostCambrian
PostCambrian
4 years ago
Reply to  anoop
Corporations are the only net buyers of US stocks. All others (individuals, pension funds, mutual funds, and foreign investors) are typically net sellers of stocks. See third chart in https://heisenbergreport.com/2020/06/21/goldman-corporate-demand-for-us-stocks-will-plummet-80-this-year-sp-aint-going-anywhere/
I really haven’t been able to find this type of data anywhere else.
Carl_R
Carl_R
4 years ago
Reply to  anoop
A stock buyback and a dividend are mathematically identical. There is no difference at all, except if the tax code is set up to tax capital gains at a different rate than dividends.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
Not exactly. A stock buyback reduces the float. Which has a lot of downstream repercussions.
TechLover1
TechLover1
4 years ago
Reply to  anoop
Of course it is OK. LOL
Stock buyback is preferred because it enriches the executives more who are often paid based on stock performance and they also generally carry options. In both cases they make more by stock buyback vs dividend payback.
There are tax benefits as well. That serves as a good reason for executives to do stock buyback.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.