Median Home Prices Fall for First Time in a Decade, But What Does It Mean?

Please consider Redfin’s housing market update: Home Prices Fall Annually For First Time In A Decade As Mortgage Rates Pass 7%

Key Points

  • The median home sale price was $350,246, down 0.6% from a year earlier, the first decline on record. Redfin’s monthly dataset, which goes back through 2012, shows that the last time home prices declined annually was February 2012, when they dropped 1.5%.
  • Median sale prices fell in roughly half (24) of the 50 most populous U.S. metros, with the biggest drops in pandemic homebuying hotspots and northern California. Austin (-11% YoY) saw the biggest dip, followed by San Jose, CA (-10.9%), Oakland, CA (-10.4%), Sacramento (-7.7%) and Phoenix (-7.3%). That’s the biggest sale-price drop on record for each of those metros except San Jose.
  • Sale prices increased most in West Palm Beach (+15% YoY), Milwaukee (13.2%), Columbus, OH (9.5%), Miami (9.1%) and Fort Lauderdale, FL (7.8%).
  • The median asking price of newly listed homes was $382,225, up 0.6% year over year, the smallest increase since April 2020.
  • The monthly mortgage payment on the median-asking-price home was $2,520 at a 6.65% mortgage rate, the current weekly average. That’s an all-time high. Monthly mortgage payments are up 28% ($556) from a year ago.
  • Pending home sales were down 15% year over year, the smallest decline since July.
  • Pending home sales fell in all 50 of the most populous U.S. metros. They fell most in Las Vegas (-55.2% YoY), Austin (-49.5%), Portland, OR (-46.9%), Riverside, CA (-45.4%) and Nashville (-45.3%).
  • New listings of homes for sale fell 20.3% year over year. New listings declined in all 50 of the most populous U.S. metros, with the biggest declines in Oakland, CA (-45.1% YoY), Sacramento (-42.6%), Seattle (-42%), San Jose, CA (-41.6%) and Portland, OR (-41.6%).

Is Median Home Price a Good Metric?

Median price is a timely metric. Timeliness is good. 

But when transaction volumes are falling off a cliff (see last two bullet points above), cash buyers and those who are interest rate insensitive, are not pressured by affordability.

Cash buyers can easily (not necessarily do so in every case), artificially increase the median price as mortgage rates wallop anyone who needs a mortgage. 

In contrast, Case-Shiller provides very accurate, yet very lagging information.

 Ten Top Cities – How Much Have Home Prices Declined From the Peak?

Case-Shiller home price data via St. Louis Fed, chart by Mish

The Overall Message

  1. The top is in.
  2. Pending home sales is an outright disaster everywhere. 
  3. Affordability due to rising mortgage rates is the key.
  4. Home prices are falling, likely much faster than either median price or Case-Shiller report, due to weaknesses in each way of viewing things.

Point four reflects points two and three. 

The combined overall message of median price and Case-Shiller is telling. 

Existing Home Sales Decline 12th Month

No Rebound in Home Sales 

A brief drop in mortgage rates towards 6.0 percent was not enough to entice buyers in January. Buyers and sellers are on strike.

For discussion, please see No Rebound in Existing Home Sales Despite a Drop in Mortgage Rates

Due to closing lags, perhaps there is a steadying or slight uptick next month. But that will not change the overall dynamic.

Buyers want lower prices, but sellers want the prices they could have gotten 18 months ago. Results are as one should expect: Pending home sales fell in all 50 of the most populous U.S. metros. They fell most in Las Vegas (-55.2% YoY), Austin (-49.5%), Portland, OR (-46.9%), Riverside, CA (-45.4%) and Nashville (-45.3%).

And existing home owners do not want to trade a 3.0 percent mortgage rate for a 6.8 percent mortgage.

No 2008 Replay

People are trapped in their homes, but in a much different way than 2008.

In 2008, a big percentage of home buyers had negative equity and walked away from their mortgages. 

Now, all but buyers in the last 18 months or so have positive or at least near-neutral equity. 

Yet, everyone with a mortgage is trapped, equity or not. Who wants to trade in a 2.5 to 3.0 percent mortgage for a 7.0 percent mortgage? 

What About New Home Sales?

New home sales, is also unlike 2008. Due to falling lumber and land prices, the homebuilders can offer interest rate buydowns.

In 2006 and 2007, the builders offered upgrades like “free” granite, larger rooms, bigger backyards, even vacations. 

Now those freebees are more likely to be mortgage rate buydowns to make the price allegedly “affordable”. 

Related Posts 

For many additional charts on Case-Shiller home prices and a discussion of housing, please see Case-Shiller Home Prices Slide Another 0.5 Percent, Actual Drop is Much Worse

For discussion of declines from the peak, please see Ten Top Cities – How Much Have Home Prices Declined From the Peak?

Yesterday, I noted Services Economy Strength Spells More Inflation Troubles for the Fed

Does this at all reflect potential home buyers throwing in the towel, making a decision that saving for a house is pointless? 

In response to my question above …

Whatever the reasons, the Fed is not done hiking and that spells further grief for potential home buyers.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

22 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
since most folks, the middlebrows, purchase houses with NOT straight up currency, but heavily on margin, the price has increased drastically in past year for residential housing. the price of the places i sold a year ago out west are down 20% on price, but up drastically for a purchase for a middlebrow today.
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Long ago my parents provided food and lodging while I rented a commercial space and bought tools to start a business.
I didn’t have much time for social events or money for eating out.
Very, very limited business travel only.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Oh, great. So they postponed facing reality for later.
I bet, they are globe-trotting and identify is green, too.
Jack
Jack
3 years ago
What is the issue? A lot of the world believes in multi generational housing.
With all the MacMansions makes total sense.
Does not make sense to be chained to a mortgage – it is a ticket to slavery.
Save and buy cash.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Jack
Good plan.
Which cash?
Jack
Jack
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Sorry, I meant to say “save and buy your house with cash”. Left out a couple key words I guess.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  Jack
If multi-generational housing was so good, then why did the society go the other way? It’s OK in primiitive societies where everyone strives for basic necessities, or when the financial system has broken down.
If you promote cash, then you haven’t looked at the prices lately. Otherwise, I would agree.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
my whole neighborhood is one of multi generational living. brooklyn NY. i believe the working population here is over 65% immigrants. i lived in a similar hood in mexican side of phoenix. the savings rates in multi generational living is huge. so much savings and so many great benefits. and of course down sides too.
JS4
JS4
3 years ago
I’m sorry but, so many of these smaller, not great (i.e. dated interiors, terrible paint, meh neighborhoods, awful lighting, and doors made of cardboard) houses in terrible areas in places such as Houston, Phoenix, Charlotte, and Minn/St. Paul, are not worth what people are asking. Just using three bed and two bath as a standard, people are routinely asking 400k+ for houses around 1.5k sqft. Looking at those price histories going back 5 years, most of those houses were 275k at best in those markets. Maybe with MSP being the exception. Sellers deserve to be stuck in those houses until those prices come down to what they should be.
Not saying they should be 275k but, they are absoluitely not 400k+ houses in markets like Houston and Phoenix. Seems like the pricing and stagnation of those listings is begining to reflect what buyers think of these properties. Im seeing houses listed along those lines of criteria mentioned above sit for 60+ days and prices continuously falling. Sellers of these terrible properties (maybe buyers more broadly) tried to cash in on the demand in those cities and got incredibly greedy as evidenced by “…sellers want the prices they could have gotten 18 months ago…” AKA peak market when upper middle/upper class people were moving to southern markets, not buying derelect houses like the ones mentioned.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
Reply to  JS4
Here, I’ll say it. YES, they should be $275K! That’s $183 per SF which is generous plenty. It wasn’t long ago that $200 SF was west coast pricing.
Hell, yes, they should be $275K. To assume otherwise is to buy into that inflation mindset that crazy housing prices is okay.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
It means jack squat! It took us a year to remove the final FOMO craziness from last spring, while for three years prior to that housing was going great gangbusters. My house doubled in value in 4 short years. So at this rate, it’ll take us 5-6 years to remove that doubling. Houses in my neighborhood have not gone down one red cent. All that has happened to date is the froth has been removed. What happens over the next 2 years is what REALLY matters.
Again, do we find ourselves in a recession in the next 12 months? And if unemployment breaches 5% in that 2-year timeframe, does rent & mortgage relief come back? That’s all that matters. Nothing else matters. America has to decide if we’re going to turn away from these MMT-based policies for running our economy or are we going to let the goons at the Fed & Congress ruin our once great nation?
When JPowell lowered the FFR down to .25% and kept it there, he WILLINGLY chose to enter into a DEI experiment. He wanted all sorts of people to have a chance to buy a house that otherwise might not have been able to afford it. Unfortunately, he didn’t realize it would create an explosion in prices that now has pushed housing to the brink of unaffordability unless sub 4.5% mortgages return.
The Fed should be statutorily barred from buying treasuries longer than 5 years in duration. Their ability to push long-term yields lower is just absolutely asinine.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
Of course the the new folks knew what 0.25% could do to the housing market, same as Greenspan knew what 1% could do.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
Was talking with a friend the other day. She, and the bank, own a home together. Our local real estate people all believe this plummet is temporary, so they are making an offer on her home. She has no plans to buy another house, but was not seeking to sell either. She’s planning, if she sells, to rent until her daughter leaves the nest. Then a tiny home, or at least much smaller. This market, for big homes is not coming back any time soon. Also, trees are grown very fast now, which makes the wood garbage. Which means most houses are garbage. Which definitely affects their value. Just throwing these points as an example. We have a rapidly changing culture that this model can’t serve as well. Real estate is not going to look anything like it does now, in 10 years, never mind 20 years down the road when most will have their mortgage paid off. I have no clue as to the form it will take, but neither does anyone else.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  HippyDippy
I live in a house that is apparently in the total control of my Township.
However I do have a large note with a bank that is “secured” by some paperwork related to the house.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
It’s almost like the emporer wears no clothes. Funny how little substance is present in any of our norms.
MikeC711
MikeC711
3 years ago
I understand sellers not being able to move … it is interesting that buyers are not buying. I totally get the increased cost et al … but having a roof over one’s head is not considered a luxury in the US. If they are continuing to rent … then it is odd that that added demand is not pushing up rents (all we hear about is downward pressure on rents).
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
3 years ago
Reply to  MikeC711
Noone in America anymore; who is paid enough to afford even rent; has a job which revolves around anything, at all, other than getting paid a cut of the loot racket named “asset price appreciation.” Hence: Once that racket experiences even the slightest, temporary in nominal terms, slowdown; everyone’s “income” drops in lockstep with it.
Noone in America makes anything. Noone creates anything (Kanye excepted, perhaps…). Noone builds anything. Noone invents anything. Noone adds any real value. This has now been the case, full stop, for at least a decade. And to a large, and increasing, extent for 150 years. Kicked into high gear in 1971.
Instead, by now, absolutely everyone just lives off commission from selling “real estate”, “stocks”, “ads” and “investments”. As well as shoes, handbags, “apps” and bjs to those who “make” those initial commissions. In Russia, the saying used to be that everyone else simply lived of the long tail of the few who were “sitting on a pipe.” (perhaps not anymore. their pipe got blown up…). But in America, everyone else instead lives off the long tail dragged behind the few who are sitting idly at the welfare office ran by The Fed. And that one has, singularly unfortunately for everyone and everything, not been blown up yet….
So: Once the asset pumping clown racket slows, it’s no longer just a “wealth effect.” But in addition directly hits cashflow. For everyone. With very little delay at all. Hence declines in spending across the board.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
While obviously overgeneralized, to emphasize your point, that’s a pretty spot on analysis of most conventional businesses. Interdependence is desirable, but how and why is important. I would add that many are not done this way out of the herd mentality. These people change things up. And, thanks to the DoD’s creation of the internet to track everyone, their ideas are being spread far and wide. 3D printing is just one example. But this is a minor point.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
Is “Noone” anything like a “nooner?”
Asking for a friend.
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  MikeC711

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.