Minneapolis Fed “Wage Growth Is Too High” for Our Two Percent Inflation Target

The Minneapolis Fed president seeks to lower inflation by targeting wage growth.

Here’s a conversation with Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari, moderated by SiouxFalls Business founder, Jodi Schwan.

 Kashkari joined the video right around the 10 minute mark. 

Some comments by Kashkari starting at the 13:00 minute mark caught my attention. 

Wage Growth Too High

“A couple of years ago, I said, and  my colleagues said some of these factors look like they are temporary or transitory. Supply chains are going to get sorted out. So maybe we do not need to overreact. Well, it took a lot longer than we expected. And now you are seeing wages climbing. And wages are climbing trying to catch up to that inflation rather than leading the inflation. But now wage growth is at a level that it is actually too high to be consistent with our 2 percent inflation target.”

Traditional Tools Not Working

“This is a very complicated economic environment that we are in, in terms of our ability to analyze it using the traditional analytical tools that we have”

Service Economy Not Slowing Is Concerning

“The services economy continues to be very strong. We are not yet seeing much of a sign of our interest rate increases slowing down the services side of the economy. And that is concerning to me.”

Getting Inflation Down More Important Than Avoiding Recession

“We would like to avoid a recession but we know we have to get inflation down. Getting inflation down is job one.”

Monetary Policy Cannot Address Structural Issues

“Monetary policy can try to bring the economy into balance in the short run. But the long run structural issues, monetary policy cannot do anything about.”

Demographic Labor Challenges

“All advanced economies around the world are facing labor challenges because advanced economies are having fewer kids than prior generations. And those are fewer workers to produce things and there are fewer workers to buy things in the future.”

Immigration Is the Only Answer

“Japan is trying to pay their workers to have more babies. It doesn’t work. The only answer is immigration. This is a structural issue that we as a country have to get our head around, sensible immigration policy that meets the needs of our economy. I am not making a political statement . I have met with Republican and Democrat leaders who all understand this. It’s simply math.”

March Rate Hike and Dot Plot

“There is a lot of attention on March. Is it going to be 25 [basis points] or is it going to be 50? I am open minded at this point, about whether its 25 or 5o basis points. To me, what’s much more important than whether it’s 25 or 50 is what we signal in what we call the dot plot. In December, when I jotted down my dots, I jotted down that I thought we would get rates up to 5.4 percent and then hold them there for an extended period of time. And I was on the more hawkish distribution among my colleagues. Given the data we have gotten in the last month, which has been a very strong jobs report, higher inflation that we expected, and these are concerning data points, suggesting that we are not making progress as quickly as we like. At this point, I have not decided what my dot is going to look like, but I lean towards continuing to raise further. I would continue to push up my policy path.” 

That took things to the 25:30 mark followed by questions from the audience. 

Targeting Wage Growth

In response to a question, Kashkari said “We would need to get wage growth closer to 3 percent to be consistent to our 2 percent inflation target. I don’t know how embedded [wage growth is]  but it is our job to make sure that it does not become embedded.” 

Demographically Sobering Thoughts on US Employment in the Next Five Years 

Civilian Noninstitutional Population from BLS, projections by the CBO, chart by Mish

I investigated the poor demographic picture that Kashkari mentioned in my post Demographically Sobering Thoughts on US Employment in the Next Five Years 

If the Fed was not so hell bent on producing two percent inflation while not understanding what it really is or the exponential nature of what they seek, perhaps more people would want to have kids. 

The same applies to government control over our lives. 

This post originated on MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

57 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Counter
Counter
3 years ago
He’s perfect for the next Fed chair
david halte
david halte
3 years ago
Kashkari does not want a rise in middle class incomes, that will widen the gap from recent gains in minimum wage.
Kashkari promoted inflationary zero rates long after unfilled jobs outnumbered the unemployed. In 2017, Kashkari established the Fed’s “Opportunity & Inclusive Growth Institute: to promote research that increase economic opportunity and inclusive growth for all Americans, and help the Fed achieve its maximum employment mandate.” The Inclusive Growth Institute factors the percent of workers within minority communities, as part of the Fed’s maximum employment mandate. The Fed would keep inflationary zero rates until minority communities experience equitable full employment.
Zero rates were possible because of fabricated 2 percent inflation. Unfortunately for Kashkari, historically high inflation occurred before minority communities participated in equitable employment levels. Even though there were 12M unfilled job openings.
December 2022 FOMC: “Policy tightening would place the largest burden on the most vulnerable population. The unemployment rate in minority communities would increase by more than the national average. Inflation has stretched budgets for low to moderated incomes, while savings of higher income households are unspent.” – A complete failure for Kashkari’s Inclusive Growth Institute, and the Fed’s maximum employment mandate.
What remains of Kashkari’s experiment is to replace retiring workers with immigrant minorities to achieve equitable employment levels. Although it does nothing to improve existing minority communities.
The Fed’s equity aspirations (including equal pay for women), is explained by Lael Brainard’s speech on May 22, 2017 at Kashkari’s Institute: “Why Opportunity and Inclusion Matter to America’s Economic Strength”.
“In fulfilling its dual mandate, FOMC has set a target of 2 percent for inflation but does not have a similarly fixed numerical goal for maximum employment. That is because the level of maximum employment depends on ‘nonmonetary factors that affect the structure and dynamics of the labor market’.
Inclusion is an enduring goal of public policy that is embodied in our maximum-employment mandate. Maximum employment is inherently an inclusive goal.
We can also see persistent disparities by gender, such as the well-known wage premium earned by men relative to women with similar experience and expertise. With its focus on inclusive growth, this Institute could give us important insights on how far the overall economy is from full employment, as well as the barriers that could be limiting the economy’s potential, by studying labor market outcomes of men and women of different racial and ethnic backgrounds in more depth.”
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
3 years ago
What Krazy Eyes really meant to say was “Your average standard of living is not crashing fast enough.”
GruesomeHarvest
GruesomeHarvest
3 years ago
Immigration is the only answer! Are you kidding me? In an article about self driving cars and robots workers are displaced, what will they do? Now because of some phoney government statistic we must throw open the boarders and increase the cultural fractionalization of our society. Thank God, Mish isn’t a central planner!
God forbid the working man should get paid enough to fed his family! No let’s drive down his wage.
xbizo
xbizo
3 years ago
Looks like the penny may have dropped… for one fed member anyway… They can’t kill enough demand with interest rate increases to solve the supply problem. Need to try to increase supply of labor, chips, commodities, etc…
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  xbizo
As long as the Government doesn’t feed inflation with More Money Today, inflation is a cure for inflation. Increasing the supply of labor and things to control inflation is an academic’s pipe dream.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
Reply to  xbizo
Oh yes they can. You’re crazy if you think an 7-8% FFR wouldn’t kill demand. But will they at least get the FFR up to 6% is the question.
xbizo
xbizo
3 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
I must be crazy. I think the interest rate linkage is much weaker after the Great Lockdown than in a situation where an overheated economy needs to be tamped down. We aren’t going to have business failures and unemployment anywhere near the same scale. That was just done in 2021.
I see business loans still being made at rates of 9% to 10.25% as of last month. No signs (yet) that businesses will not borrow when needed.
How do you get wage increases to be made at smaller increments? Maybe the solution is the opposite of helicopter money – a tax to suck liquidity out of people’s bank accounts.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  xbizo
Give it time. Old debt is still at low rates. New debt will slowly replace it over time.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
The reason people don’t have many kids anymore in Japan and here is because it costs too much to raise them. In the 1960’s and earlier a large percentage of the population still lived on farms where they fed and clothed themselves. The cost of raising kids then was next to nothing so you could have large familes. Today 90% of the population lives in urban areas and probably <2% live on farms that could feed and clothe themselves. Unsurprisingly the cost of raising a kid today to adulthood is now hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Inane government polices that mandate car seats (seatbelts work just as well), day care (you don’t dare leave kids alone any more) etc just drive up the costs even higher for those that would otherwise like to not spend money on such items.
That’s why people don’t have large families anymore and paying them a pittance isn’t enough of an incentive to have kids.
Importing workers via immigration is essentially the equivalent of offshoring manufacturing jobs. Wage costs here meant we could not manufacture here so we offshored the production and imported the finished products. Now kids cost too much to raise to adult hood so the plan is to offshore making kids to 3rd world countries where they can be raised to adult hood for a fraction of the cost of doing it here and then we will import the finished product (young adults) to do service work.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Marvelous bit of new and novel insight.
Offshore the creation of “workers.”
And we get more consumers for free.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
I think that’s part of it. I think another big part is people can afford kids with sacrifices that many aren’t willing to make. They want the big house and new cars that require 2 incomes. Birth rates are still high among blacks, particularly ones on welfare, so they aren’t sacrificing much. They get paid more for each dependent.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65

You were sounding sensible, and suddenly:

Inane government polices that mandate car seats (seatbelts work just as well),”
No, they don’t. Full stop. Put a 2 year old in a shoulder belt and it’s obvious what would happen in a crash. Does a hundred dollar car seat make a measurable difference in a families’ economic picture? No, it does not.
What makes you people randomly start spouting obvious bullsh$$t? You’re not stupid…. Is this dementia? Parasites? CIA mind control beams? Seriously, what is going on with your mind?
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
It’s Alzheimer’s.
Or early senility.
I forget which.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Coming from a guy who thinks covid coming from a lab is a conspiracy theory and ivervectin has no effect on covid, and Trump won in 2016 because of Putin.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
The difference is negligible once kids are older than 2 (ie in front facing seats vs rear facing) in terms of saving lives (which is what it’s all about).
Regardless, shouldn’t it be up the the parents to decide whether or not they want to buy the car seat rather than mandating it? They know whether they drive fast/slow, what kind of traffic they drive in, how often/far they drive etc. And it’s not just a $100 one time expense. You need 1 per kid and they need different seat sizes at different ages so you end up buying 3-5 per kid over their time in the seat. All these things add up.
That’s my problem, it’s one size fits all and no way to opt out. It’s the same with kids being mandated bike helmets to ride bikes. They didn’t exist when I was a kid and I don’t know anyone who ever did serious harm falling off their bikes and believe me we jumped stuff and rode recklessly. Now suddenly kids (and adults too) need bike helmets. Again, I have no problem with them being sold, I have a problem with them being mandated.
jiminy
jiminy
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Children were cheap labor, we no longer live on farms so they are not needed.
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
3 years ago
When Fed people talk, the gobbligook just screams with Mish, “Eliminate the Fed.” Which is a weird scream for me to hear because I’d need a lot of convincing to agree with Mish on this one.
Hmmm. Someone want to try this? Tell ChatGPT: “Explain like a Fed member why FEATURE_OF_THE_ECONOMY will go UP|DOWN in the next 6 months.” Fill in the UPPER_CASE with appropriate words.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Felix_Mish
ChatGPT won’t even come close to what Alan Greenspan could do on a bad day.
JeffD
JeffD
3 years ago
Slowing the pace of the service economy is a legislative problem. It is simply not a problem the Fed can address given that Congress, the GSEs, and the FHFA are actively fighting against the Fed. The best the Fed could do in that regard is to liquidate *all* of its MBS holdings over a set timeframe that is less than five years, with no ability to purchase more.
Christoball
Christoball
3 years ago
“Japan is trying to pay their workers to have more babies. It doesn’t
work. The only answer is immigration. This is a structural issue that we
as a country have to get our head around, sensible immigration policy
that meets the needs of our economy. I am not making a political
statement . I have met with Republican and Democrat leaders who all
understand this. It’s simply math.”
I think all of the developed countries have age demographic issues just like the USA. Lower birth rates are better than electric cars for the environment, and the Northern Hemisphere should be applauded for voluntary population control.
If we use immigration from developed countries to solve our skilled worker problem, then those countries will have even deeper demographic problems. If we use immigration from less educated Mexican countries, African Countries, and Asian countries we end up poaching their young workers; and they too will develop age demographic problems.
If we rob other countries of their youth, they will not have sufficient workers to take care of their elderly and retired. Immigrants grow old and retire one day also, and then what???? Do we allow even more immigration????? Do we constantly overpopulate our continent????
ColoradoAccountant
ColoradoAccountant
3 years ago
The problem is socialism doesn’t work and darwinism does, but I even have trouble watching the lion pride stalk and kill the baby gazelle on PBS, no less human babies dying in the streets. We don’t have the stomach for darwinism, so socialism it is. Just how much socialism can we afford? That is what we vote on everytime we go to the polls.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Socialism has been fighting Darwinism ever since someone figured out that they could get someone else to do the work.
Being a “community organizer” beats the heck out of working on a production line or writing software (same difference).
ThatsNotAll
ThatsNotAll
3 years ago
Seems just the other day the “experts” were worried automation would cause too much unemployment.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  ThatsNotAll
nit wittery. the same types thought invention of wheel and shovel and tractors would replace man’s work. jobs are plentiful for many reasons, major being demographic. boomers croaking and retiring. good riddance. idiot self absorbed generation of whiners all born on 3rd base. i should know, i’m one of them. i’m just self aware.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
But now wage growth is at a level that it is actually too high to be consistent with our 2 percent inflation target.”
Oh, really? You don’t say? Let’s see, how could we fix that? Let’s “transitorily” reset our core PCE inflation dot plot to 3.5-4%.
Baring a significant recession, inflation isn’t going anywhere near 2%, JPowell. And, you know this, so let’s get the FFR up to 6% ASAP and go ahead and push the economy towards a recession. A good start would be to see the S&P 500 drop to Mish’s 2400 target.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
it’s called a democracy. the idiots are allowed to vote. so they vote themselves into office. from ronnie raygun to sleepy joe. war mongering nitwits hell bent on offering a con job free lunch. the free lunch was communist regimes doing all the capitalist work like making all our IJUNK and more. democracy works. look in the mirror and you will see the reason. PS. inflation is cumulative. the case for deflation borders on idiocy. last time i spent a benjamin was lunch for a couple of people. not much change. i still cannot find one damn soul out of work. i ask the question a dozen times per week, coast to coast, up and down the socio econ ladder. not one. this is one hell of a perverted recession. in fact if words still matter, it ain’t. and i repeat, the FED has one job now. to reload their bazooka. end of story.
Art Fully
Art Fully
3 years ago
OMG these people are idiots to whom we have entrusted the management of the nations financial system. Wage growth is inflation, but it doesn’t cause inflation, nor will directly addressing wage growth (by importing immigrants!!??) cause inflation to abate. Inflation is first and foremost caused by excessive growth of money and credit and that has been caused in this instance by a vast expansion of government spending beyond the tax revenues available to support government spending. Inflation, in effect, provides an extra tax on consumption that is paid primarily by workers and becomes the thing that pays for the excessive spending. Wages have lagged prices, and now are catching up – but that wage-price “spiral” is not the cause of inflation.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Art Fully
But wage growth can support continuing inflation.
As vanderlyn has repeatedly pointed out, inflation is typically cumulative.
Mac Timred
Mac Timred
3 years ago
“If the Fed was not so hell bent on producing two percent inflation while not understanding what it really is or the exponential nature of what they seek, perhaps more people would want to have kids.” Love it!
Why is it that Labor should only get 2% to 3% salary increases each year, but Capital is allowed to get 10% to 20% or more, annual returns????? On top of which, Labor for many years was getting even smaller increases – so catch up not allowed!!!
This is not rhetorical – it should be good for the country and the economy, for workers to do well.
Perhaps the Fed wants workers to get more equity to supplement meager wages?
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago

Powell:
#1 “there was a time when monetary policy aggregates were important
determinants of inflation and that has not been the case for a long time.”
#2 “Inflation is not a problem for this time as near as I can figure. Right
now, M2 [money supply] does not really have important implications. It is
something we have to unlearn.”
#3 “the correlation between different aggregates [like] M2 and inflation is
just very, very low”.

The rate-of-change in currency in circulation is back to 2010
levels. The 6-month roc in our means-of-payment money has turned negative. When
the 10-month roc turns negative there will be a recession. But now the FED
won’t know about it until after its already begun.

Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
3 years ago
Wage growth is a mirage. As younger workers drop out of the work force, higher paid workers remain, and entry level jobs have to pay more to attract workers. Let’s not forget minimum wage increases states recently passed.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
When the economy slumps, the Fed government decreases taxes for corporations and the wealthy.
When the economy’s too heated, they focus on stumping wage growth and increasing debt servicing costs for everyone else.
Gee, I wonder why wealth & wage disparity continues to grow to such an extreme?
.
Art Izagud
Art Izagud
3 years ago
These problems can’t be solved at the level of boomer. Of course we won’t have the workforce to support a retiree lifestyle of 2 occupants of a 4000 sq ft house and a 3 car garage, with the heat at 77 deg, falling down drunk so needing lots of medical services into their 90s. We indeed need structural changes and a culture of minimalism, inclusion, and efficiency. Oh yeah, and if you are going to print money for the wealthy, you are just begging for communism if you cut services for the poor, but you’ve been buying from communists your whole life anyway, you drunk. Probably time to start considering a UBI, and making it Liberty based and truly Universal. I really don’t care if inflation hits karen hard. I am happy consuming less.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
Reply to  Art Izagud
UBI also falls into the same people’s plans. This system has reached a level of entropy and is far too unstable to last. Unfortunately, the mind, body, spirit foundations of most people in the developed world are not even remotely prepared to handle this inevitability. Don’t believe this scenario? Our military does; and for once I agree with them. They see their missions as mostly domestic due to civil unrest. A lot of deploying troops to keep people in their cities. We have few warriors in the developed world. Without that mindset, a civilization cannot stand.
Art Izagud
Art Izagud
3 years ago
Reply to  HippyDippy
Just because elites want to use UBI as a control mechanism doesn’t make it a bad idea. It can, and must be done in a Spirit of Liberty, given as a citizens dividend requiring no injection or social credit, truly Universal. I see plenty of warriors emerging, yet they are not the midwits on both sides parroting demagoguery, and they are not the entrenched ideologues. They are the the culture warriors and evolutionaries. They are our only hope.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
Reply to  Art Izagud
They are our only hope, but if you were to compare our societies in the developed world to those planned to replace the existing people, it’s a very sad picture. Comparisons to the depression era populations are even more pathetic. And if you are seeing plenty emerging, you have no idea of what constitutes a warrior mentality. You are also wrong on the UBI. I’m guessing you bought the zeighgeist (sp?). You’re basically cheering on the very communists you harped about the boomers doing. It’s an economic prison to enrich the monopolists. Pure Wall Street communism.
Art Izagud
Art Izagud
3 years ago
Reply to  HippyDippy
UBI is technically capitalist. Ownership of the means of production is still private, and a free market exists on top. UBI is more a mechanism than anything. I guess you’d prefer be an ideologue and stick with the socialist welfare state by default, or just let the homeless pile up while you chant things like “end the fed” which will never happen. Probably best to keep developing yourself multidimensionally rather than being stuck feigning yourself as a warrior. We’ve got a 5th gen battle to fight.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
Reply to  Art Izagud
No it’s not. It’s the very definition of a welfare state. This is called socialism, but that’s just a euphemism for communism. That’s straight from Lenin on what socialism means. And we’ve never had a free market. UBI requires a strong centralized government. The rest of your childish statement is just an ad hominem attack. The go to choice of the weak minded. I was right; you have no clue as to what it means to be a warrior. What a child. Ignore.
Art Izagud
Art Izagud
3 years ago
Reply to  HippyDippy
You are projecting. and you are right, we have never had a free market because it is as impossible as pure communism. elites always collude. and I disagree with you that it would strengthen centralized gov. it is a simple mechanism that makes much of the welfare beurocracy obsolete, non crony, and non victim based.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  Art Izagud
HA HA HA. so damn true. and funny. nit wits born on 3rd base mid century last, are croaking off, so we have tight jobs tending to their fat and dumb lives. of course they voted for all the free stuff army from wars to corporate welfare. debt didn’t matter. raygun was a true amerikan.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  Art Izagud
UBI can’t possibly work or solve the problem.
If there isn’t the workforce to produce the goods/services needed by the population then no amount of money printed or otherwise can fix it. In other words you can give everyone 1 million a month and they still can’t buy what’s not available.
The only solutions are:
1) Everyone is going to make do with less.
2) Find a way to increase goods/services available (whether it’s robots or immigration or some combination of that)
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Texas, yes you can’t buy what’s not available.
But if you have heaps of money you can surely bid the price of everything else up to the sky’s the limit.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Indeed you can. That’s what Mish means when he talks all the time about ‘those with first access to money’. Right now the very rich get first access to all the new fiat created by banks so they are pushing up the asset prices for everyone else.
Giving out UBI would move around who gets money first but ultimately that would mean Americans get first access before the rest of the world. Now if you live in US you might not care but the rest of the world most certainly would and they’d do something about it.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Art Izagud
Art, I’m willing to make up for your lack of consumption if the Government will provide the money.
The way to Hell is paved with Government fiat…
Nuddernoitall
Nuddernoitall
3 years ago
You found a very meaty quote MISH: “Wage Growth Is Too High” for Our Two Percent Inflation Target.
Of course what he says is true, but facts be damned. It’s just that the quote doesn’t “sound” well. I’m confidant Liz Warren, and others, will twist this around to suit their next 15 minutes of fame/infamy.
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  Nuddernoitall
Two Complete Quotes
“But now wage growth is at a level that it is actually too high to be consistent with our 2 percent inflation target.”
We would need to get wage growth closer to 3 percent to be consistent to our 2 percent inflation target. I don’t know how embedded [wage growth is] but it is our job to make sure that it does not become embedded.”
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Right! Because everyone knows 2% is fantasy land, especially with Biden in office.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
I’m having trouble getting my head around why perpetual 2% inflation is necessary while wage growth must not be embedded.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Because it *adds* to inflation.
They are OK with 2% raises to match 2% inflation. That’s just treading water.
Growth in wages means wages rise faster than inflation. But if wages increase 3% while inflation goes up by 2 then that extra 1% is adding to inflation making it more than 2%.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Apparently I was unclear.
Why does the Government feel it is necessary for the price of everything to double every 35 years or so?
Looking at it another way, why should your savings depreciate to only 25% after 70 years (around the time you need them)?
I don’t have any problem with wage increase based on merit.
I do have a problem with wage increase solely because inflation is 2%.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
I don’t have the answer to that because it’s not stated anywhere.
My *guess* is that the 2% is meant to mirror the population growth so that ‘money per person’ is constant. In other words if there are 100 million people and 1 trillion dollars then they want it so that for 200 million people there are 2 trillion dollars.
Your savings only depreciate if you keep them under a mattress. If you earn 2% a year on them (bonds, stocks, real estate, commodities or whatever you invest in) then it’s a wash.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
Population numbers are also decreasing for many other reasons. Declining testosterone levels alone are having a major impact on our birth rates. Which is not helped by the MGTOW movement that is a response to both the man hating skank feminazis and to the state’s decision to have family court side with those feminazis. Not to mention fluoride. Many ways the state has ensured their solution of immigration is the perceived best. In fact, this move to immigration was already predicted by those crazy conspiracy theorists years ago. Just one more reason to consider this is not incompetence. This is an agenda. And we have no John Galts’. I’m not saying this is the case. I AM saying that it’s starting to quack a lot more like a duck every day. Depression looks more likely each day. Some 10 million people died during the last. Conservative estimate. How do you think this population would fare?
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  HippyDippy
This will be taken care of by all those high altitude jets spraying agents into the atmosphere to deplete our precious bodily fluids.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Funny how the slaves still call you a conspiracy nut if you mention them. It’s why it’s impossible to “wake” up the slaves; they never want to know. Sort of like how they all went nuts over a cold and took untested shots. Yeah, people have always just dropped dead for no reason always!
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  HippyDippy
We need a new word to describe the true conspiracies, like Social Security or the Federal Reserve or Wall Street.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
I have plenty of excellent words to describe them, but I don’t think I’d be allowed to post them here.😎

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.