Most People Have No Idea How Much Stocks are Likely to Crash

S&P 500 chart courtesy of StockCharts.Com, annotations by Mish with thanks to Jeremy Grantham.

Fourth Super Bubble    

For almost a half-century, value-investing icon Jeremy Grantham has been calling market bubbles. Now, he says U.S. stocks are in a “super bubble,” only the fourth in history, and poised to collapse. 

Please do yourself a big favor and play the above interview in entirety.

It’s not a fluff interview. Bloomberg’s Erik Schatzker grills Jeremy Grantham right from the get go about Grantham’s view a year ago. 

Q&A Snips

Schatzker: At the risk of putting words in your mouth, you are as certain [now] as you were then, if not more?

Grantham: I would say clearly more. I did freely admit, not in our conversation, but elsewhere, that I wasn’t quite as certain about this bubble a year ago as I had  been about the tech bubble of 2000 or as I had been in Japan or as I had been in the housing bubble of 2007. I used to think in terms of near certainties. This time I felt highly likely bit perhaps not nearly certain. Today I feel it is just about nearly certain.

Grantham discusses “crazy behavior” , noting that even in 1929 you had some magnificent rallies.

Schatzker: If you are right and stocks are in a multi-sigma deviation from the statistical trend, tell me what happens. The S&P 500 peaked at almost 4800 points. What is the bottom?

Grantham: The trend line, being slightly generous, is 2500. And most of the great bubbles, the super bubbles go below trend and stay there for quite a while. In 2000, the Nasdaq came down 82 percent but the Federal Reserve raced to the rescue so loudly and strongly they stopped the decline in the S&P at the trend line, It only declined 50 percent. This time trend is at most 2500. And I would expect, even if the Federal Reserve tries to do the same it will be hard to prevent the market from declining to that level.

Mish: There’s much more in the interview. The above only covers 9 of 37 minutes.

Watch the video in entirety.

Let the Wild Rumpus Begin

The second favor you can do for yourself is read Jeremy Grantham’s GMO Viewpoint: Let the Wild Rumpus Begin

You will haver to register to see it, but it will be worth it. 

Epic Crash Coming   

The third favor you can do for yourself is start paying attention to John Hussman.

Yes, I know, many consider him to be a washed up permabear. Well, evaluations matter eventually. That time is now. 

Top Dollar for Top Dollar

Chart by John Hussman, blue annotations by Mish

MAPE stands for “Margin-Adjusted P/E” 

Unlike Grantham, Hussman’s view is not locked.

Trap Door

Please consider Top Dollar for Top Dollar by John Hussman.

Why is it so hard to accept that speculative bubbles can burst? Interest rates were driven to zero for a decade. Yield-starved investors chased stocks to valuations beyond the 1929 and 2000 extremes. That speculation front-loaded more than a decade of future market gains into the present. Those gains are now behind us, embedded in breathtaking multiples. If history is any guide, a collapse in valuations is likely to return those gains to the future.

For now, the market continues to be in a “trap door” situation. Our gauges of market internals remain unfavorable, and valuations remain obscene. The market capitalization of non-financial and financial corporate equities hit $67 trillion at the recent peak. That’s a lot of stock market capitalization. The ratio of U.S. market cap/GDP began 2022 at a record extreme of 2.82, compared with a multiple of 1.88 at the 2000 bubble peak, and a historical norm of just 0.78. When you look at market capitalization, recognize that as much as 72% of it may be air. That is the hazard.

Hussman provides over 20 charts. It’s not important to understand them all. The key chart is “You are Here”.

Hussman also goes into a discussion of the “Fed Put” that is the Fed will cushion the decline. 

OK, at what level? 50% at best as Grantham believes or something lower?

Higher? Why? 

As much as 72% of market capitalization may be air.

I have morphed into Grantham, but perhaps not quite Hussman. But like Hussman, I expect to be mocked for this post.

Previously I called stocks grossly overvalued. But then I thought it was possible for the excess to resolve by stocks going nowhere for long periods of time or by smaller declines that add up to a huge decline over times. 

Now I am thinking in terms of a multi-year crash. 

Grantham’s target of 2500 as a minimum decline on the S&P 500 seems about right.

No Escape

Is the any escape? 

In aggregate no. For every seller there is a buyer. In this case a buy the dipper. 

Someone must hold every stock every step of the way down, and pension funds will do just that.

Individually, investors have a choice. You can cash out, lighten up, or try to buy value. Grantham discusses this in the interview video as well.

But most won’t. It is extremely difficult to believe what Grantham is saying, what Hussman is saying, and what I am saying.

Japanese Nikkei

Japanese Nikkei stock market index courtesy of StockCharts.Com, Annotations by Mish

Grantham called all the bubbles including the Japanese peak. 

The Nikkei is still below the level it was at in 1989! And that is despite numerous 50%, even 100% rallies along the way.

If you want a bullish comment, then buy Japan, after decades of deflation the Nikkei has many reasonably priced issues. 

In general, think outside the US.

The Decline Will Shock Bears 

The upcoming decline will shock most bears. Many will by the dip, then that dip and then the next dip.

Some hedge funds will do this with leverage and blow up. 

If you just retired and think you have a a big nest egg and can ride it out in equities, expect your portfolio to fall by 50%, minimum.

If you are age 24 with few assets, you should be rooting for an epic decline. 

What About Gold?

S&P 500 – What is the Pain Threshold for the Fed and Traders?

For sure, the Fed will “try” to halt the decline. And so will Congress by sloshing money everywhere. 

The beneficiary of fiscal and Fed stimulus is highly likely to be gold.

Faith in the Fed is a key driver for gold. And the it blew the third major bubble in just over 20 years.

The Fed has no credibility and that should already be obvious. Soon it will be unavoidably obvious.

For further discussion of the idea the Fed is in control, please see S&P 500 – What is the Pain Threshold for the Fed and Traders?

This post originated on MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

67 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Spyguy
Spyguy
3 years ago
Most people can see problems, few the solutions. What to do, you smart. (Mad Max)
FrankieCarbone
FrankieCarbone
3 years ago
Looks like my black swan short LEAPS on the SPX and QQQ were a worthwhile insurance policy. Fact is, when I bought them I got them ridiculously dirt cheap and way out of the money so I considered that money to have been “spent on unemployment insurance” and “gone forever”. I was going to do it AGAIN next January after those LEAPs expired, until market reality finally met market investor’s brain head-on.  
Mish, for the likes of me I simply cannot understand why so few did not see this coming. Do you have an operating thesis on why this is so? If so then pray tell, please share. Inquiring minds want to know. I know fear and greed play a major factor but this insouciance towards such blatantly obvious black swan market risk – that has been in place for YEARS – is puzzling to the core.  
Agave
Agave
3 years ago
As long as we’re engaging in some individual prognostications, here’s mine:
SPX will bottom sometime within the next few weeks between 3900 and 4100.
Then it will rise to between 5500-6000 in the next 2-3 years.
Then sentiment will change, and a longer, bloody bear market will ensue.
Two major factors that I see are in play now, and will intensify in the coming years. These will be negative for our stock markets as well as for the world in general:
1. – Russia’s incursion to destroy the free and democratic country of Ukraine is just the beginning of the end of the current world order that arose out of the end of the first Cold War. It will throw Europe into much consternation and doubt over what comes next for them, and they will want to strengthen NATO. Countries like Germany, France, Italy, Sweden, etc. will all begin building up their own militaries and defense industries as well. It is astounding to me that the republicans seem to be falling in line behind the former president (the lunatic leader of their cult) and fanatic idiots like Tuckems Carlson of Fox in praising an iron fisted dictator who drops polonium in his opponents’ tea, has free speaking journalists thrown out of tall buildings, and thinks nothing of killing thousands of innocent citizens in someone else’s free country to burnish his imagined empire and place in history as a modern day Tsar.
China will also be emboldened, focusing on Taiwan at first, and maybe other countries eventually as takeover targets.
Both of these countries have set up an autocratic, dictatorial type government as more desirable than democracy. That about 40% of the US population is ignorant or decadent enough to support this is an ongoing internal strife here that will also lead to the severe degredation of America and our democratic system. That will be worsened if the culprits of the January 6th insurrection, including the top level planners, are not jailed and punished appropriately. There is again a taste for fascism and autocracy in the right wing segment of our society, backed by those who want to bring violence if they’re opposed.
2. Climate change. Many of the uninformed scoff at and mock this. It happens more slowly than our normal attention span, but is happening surely, and faster than expected. Those who study it in depth and with thorough scientific understanding know what’s coming, what’s already beginning, and that it’s not going to be good. Lots of complicated scenarios are impacting Antarctica, the Arctic, and large glaciers worldwide, and that’s just the part addressing sea level rise. The entire regime of other negative climate impacts is also beginning to show up, with a whole other set of consequences.
Maybe don’t think about moving to coastal Florida:
The larger impact on the economy will be a lot of negative economic impacts, many new costs and externalities, and vast political and migration strife with a lot of other societal impacts. All of which will weigh on the market outlook eventually, beyond the daily struggles of interest rates, inflation, or recessions.
I think we’ve lived through a relatively golden period the past 50-60 years, but things are about to get a lot more complicated.
Jackula
Jackula
3 years ago
Nice post and interesting comments below. My take is we have hit a combo 1960’s/1970’s political tumult/stagflation situation combined with late 1920’s excess speculative debt situation and it’s doubtful the market prices will hold anywhere close to current levels. It’s been clear since the FED essentally allowed very little debt unwind since the 2008-2009 debacle, actually the opposite has occured that at some point we were gonna have to pay the piper.  It won’t take much of a drop in asset prices before a whole lotta folks are insolvent and a waterfall decline will start to happen. And for all of you highly leveraged property investors out there, I wouldn’t be feeling so safe, Wall Street ain’t holding your paper this time around. They offloaded that on the taxpayers and we’ll see how bailing all of you out again plays out politically this time. I for one would like to see us crush the high margin speculators and return to a time would good old fashioned work and building stuff was respected and paid well.
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
3 years ago
Well, this is first war theme used to drive down prices in quite a while…..taking heat off the Fed, just letting the old dementia patient take the heat…What a fool that canard of a potus is….the inflation number friday will be the low for now….we already hit my NQ number that I posted here and I expect it to crawl back above after Fridays bad print…..
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
GREAT POST MISH.   thanks for your guts to lay out how you see it.   you really helped me figure it all out  back in the last bubble…………………keep on keeping it real.    
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
3 years ago
I’m not leaving any potential strategy off the table, but so far I don’t see the need  to raise cash. Today the Nasdaq closed down 344 and the Dow closed down 464….and I was up 2%. I have had a  few red days, but I’m still up on the year.
Right now uranium equities are trying to turn back up after a fairly rough 3 month correction. If they stay strong, I expect to have a decent year. Oil and gas is still working well. My miners were up bigly today. Gold and silver and platinum are all moving.
I’d be happy for Cathie Wood and ARKK to return to their fair value, which would be a hell of a lot lower than today.  That woman irritates the hell out of me. 
I’m trying to build a value-oriented, high dividend income portfolio filled with diversified miners, oil& gas, uranium, and a few other income funds…..and I’m giving myself the 5-7 years I anticipate I have left before retirement to get there. So I hope to stay fully invested with low leverage and just buy cheap shares if the market tanks. But if I think I need to step out for a while I will. This is not my first bear market. Or my second.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
“I’m trying to build a value-oriented, high dividend income portfolio
filled with diversified miners, oil& gas, uranium, and a few other
income funds”
Damn, are we missing twins?   Dividend income is where it’s at in this “transitory” inflationary period.   Along with real estate in the right markets…keep up the good comments Eddie_T.   I’m not a fan of radioactive materials though, I still hold uranium and rare earths from 2008 and that $$$ would have been better spent in real estate.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
Realist is my mentor. Everything I know about Canadian O&G started with him.  He doesn’t like uranium too much either.
I actually was once firmly anti-nuke on the environmental concerns, which we all know are real. I am now encouraged by the new generation of nukes though…..and the real reason I’m buying u names now is because there is no path (none, nada, zero) leading to full decarbonization that does not embrace nuclear power. But let’s retire the Goldwater era fast-breeder reactors that melt down if the grid fails, and build a lot of SMRS that are designed to prevent nuclear accidents. We’re going to need them, and in places where people are more practical, a whole lot of them are about to be built. America needs to wake up and smell the coffee.
Nmcoyote1
Nmcoyote1
3 years ago
I have moved out of high growth early  last year and invested heavy into value/ energy stocks. Now Im thinking about buying inverse exchange traded funds that would rise on any serious drop in the broad market. 
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
3 years ago
Can’t see the FED not doing some PPT. A drop to 2400 would wipe out retirees for a decade and make some reenter the workforce. The Fed will take higher inflation if it means an elevated stock market to prevent another 2009 situation. So far you can’t really argue that liquidity hasn’t worked. All money looks for a return and evidently keeps rotating. This also has caused rampant inflation. So where did the deflationists go ?
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
So nice of you to throw the bottom 90% under the bus to preserve the wealth of top 10%.
Where are you StukiMoi??
Christoball
Christoball
3 years ago
800 point swing on the DOW, 500 point swing on NASDAQ, and yet oil is flat with Ukraine hubbub.
Ethangregory
Ethangregory
3 years ago
I think socks have already hit their floor
Jack
Jack
3 years ago
Reply to  Ethangregory
Mine have holes in them
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
3 years ago
The only thing that can and probably will “save” the stock market (in strictly nominal terms) will be hyper-inflation combined with hugely negative real interest rates.
That is not to say that in “real” terms there will not be a massive loss of purchasing power on your “nominal” gains.
Carl_R
Carl_R
3 years ago
Reply to  Bam_Man
The problem with that is that as inflation rises, the PE falls, since they are inverse. The stock market did not do well in the late 70’s and early 80’s as inflation shot up.
davidyjack
davidyjack
3 years ago
Not selling my stocks because of high risk of cumulative inflation of over 120% over the next 10 years.    Plus I have dry powder to buy at lows.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
What about the bond market? How much it can crash when rates rise, hypothetically speaking.
shamrock
shamrock
3 years ago
denker
denker
3 years ago
What type of socks are best to invest in?  Argyle,  knee or ankle high, wool, cotton, polyester etc.   Just asking for a friend.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Good video and i am a bear already. If it will be the Mother-of-All Bear Markets remains to be seen. There is still too much blind belief that the Fed will save the market no matter what even if it didn’t save us from a bear market in 2000 nor in 2008. It did creat a snapback in 2020 but at the cost creating an inflationary spiral. Soon the Fed is going to have to decide to either control inflation or save the stock market. It cannot do both. In the end the Fed will choose to control inflation because stock markets recover but once in the inflationary spiral really sets in you end up like Argentina and Venezuala. The choice is clear and the Fed will make it either now or soon enough. 
The most interesting part of the video is the end when he said that Green was just a subset of a wider problem of generalized pollution and poisoning. Lots of investment opportunities in the de-poisoning sector in my opinion but we are very much in VCs on that.
Stocks will suck, bonds will suck and commodities will do well.
FooFooFed
FooFooFed
3 years ago
For all of you who believe the FED has power to stop a crash PLZ PLZ explain to me the mechanism specifically. There is NO Fed PUT if there is show me evidence. There is NO Plunge protection team. There is no printing press, if you think there is plz explain the mechanism to me. OK here’s the kicker HOW DOES the Fed control the Trillions of dollars that are issued in the EuroDollar futures market??? They can’t even track that shite. Grantham seems to believe the Fed has tools when asked about the PUT. There is zero examples of FED tools working. IF QE worked why do we cont. to do it?? GO back and read Fed guru DUDLEY comments from 2008, the guy was clueless. If the tools worked there wouldn’t be the big draw down in 2000 and 2008. IF the FED knew what they were doing we wouldn’t be where we are today. Thanks Alan,Ben, Janet, Jay!!  I knew you guys didn’t give a shite, but this is getting ridiculous. 
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  FooFooFed
The Fed can manipulate markets up to an ‘extent’, beyond which I believe they do not have the resources without theoretical bankruptcy. Sucking up funds or making funds more available (at the margin) is the usual process–with corresponding impacts on the real interest rate. With negative real rates, it is obvious that it works (both counter-intuitive and totally irrational) , but requires near constant application–hence Fed dependency. 
Another part of thee Fed program is psychology and messaging. We see that every day and the markets respond. It works while markets have faith in the Fed. What affects faith–an inability to fix the problem. No faith, no control. Collapse!
PreCambrian
PreCambrian
3 years ago
I follow Hussman very closely. He has well researched and scholarly articles. Eventually reality will set in and the real physical world will collide with the unreal digital dollar. What we have right now is the stock market wagging the economy instead of the other way around. Once we find that the real world is unable to supply our physical needs no matter how much digital money we have, then the market will crumble.
Christoball
Christoball
3 years ago
Market capitalization is nothing more than the value of all the shares selling at current price. I laugh at the values of some of these companies and wonder what the true value of their capital is. Needless to say it is very small. Some of these companies are just office space, intellectual property, and a sales marketing force. No means of production or anything really hard.
plashadpobedy
plashadpobedy
3 years ago
I just bought (18) “socks” off Amazon for $1.15/ea. I don’t think they will get any cheaper? For those who use laundromats, the polyester socks are better, because they dry very fast & thoroughly, not like the cotton socks (or “soxes”, if you prefer).
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
“Fourth Super Bubble”
Super tulip. Groundhog Day revisited. Human nature being what it is, the cycle keeps repeating itself. 
“It is extremely difficult to believe what Grantham is saying, what Hussman is saying, and what I am saying.”
Timing is always an issue. That which is motion tends to stay in motion. In January 2000, it seemed as if the Nasdaq would never stop going up. Few, if any, could see it would drop some 75% from the top.
“Everyone” now expects the FED will prevent that from happening again, because… printing press.
But what if it isn’t that simple? Inflection points occur at various times. Something goes too far and reverses.
A long time ago, Martin Armstrong projected a possible top for the DOW of 40,000. How many took him seriously when he said that? Now the DOW peak is about 37,000, just 3,000 shy. It is difficult to believe those who are going against the grain, at the time. The inverse direction is the same.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
I first heard about Wuhan flu in early January 2000 (5, 6, or 7). By mid-month I was of the mind it would be the pin that popped the bubble.  A decline in the order of 50-70% would be reasonable to expect. Again, Fed dependency stepped in.
Carl_R
Carl_R
3 years ago
I really don’t think you mean a “multi-year crash”. I think you mean a bear market. During the bull market, there were periodic bear moves, which were usually sharp, and strong, but didn’t last more than a few days, and then were followed by a slow, relentless grind to the upside. In a bear market, the situation is reversed. You have a slow, relentless grind lower, with periodic sharp upside rallies that burn out within 2-4 days. The market is starting to look like that, but right now it perched at strong support. Sometimes bear markets start with a crash, but sometimes they just start like this, with a slow grind down.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
No, a multi-year crash is possible. How big is the ‘bubble’ and how fast does it crash? The issue becomes one of contagion and mass psychology–as in the 1930s.
How many other markets fail in the process? How does society cope?  Covid x 10?  x100?
Carl_R
Carl_R
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
In 1929 there was a crash, followed by a multi-year bear market.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
Crash in the US stock market, and contagion. All markets were affected around the world. Massive social displacement. Slaughter of animals. Public works projects to provide employment. Political upheaval. The seeds for WW 2… That is not a ‘bear’ market.
dbannist
dbannist
3 years ago
Please leave the title “socks crash”.
Best title ever.
ed_retired_actuary
ed_retired_actuary
3 years ago
Grantham acknowledges that international stocks (especially Japan small cap value and Emerging market value) are less expensive relative to fundamentals than US stocks, and that value is generally less expensive than growth.  In the long term, investors emphasizing these stocks may avoid a moderate fraction of the US decline, should it come.   Many active managers claim that they are buying attractive stocks, rather than the market, and hence can side-step a bear market.  The historical record suggests that few will succeed, and of those few more by luck than skill.  Many pension plans and endowments recognize that stocks and bonds are expensive, and have diversified into hedge funds, private equity, commercial real estate, and other alternatives generally not easily available on reasonable terms to the smaller investor,  Due to lack of transparency, it is not clear to me that such strategies are much more than wishful thinking. 
Scooot
Scooot
3 years ago
Enjoyed the Grantham interview thanks Mish
Dr_Novaxx
Dr_Novaxx
3 years ago
Dang!  I was just beginning to like these socks.  Whatever shall we do?  
Hedge me once & hedge me twice & hedge me once again, it’s been a long, long time (since the last crash).  Seriously though, has anyone tried to quantify the effect of the “Plunge Protection Team?”  I mean, how steep would the last decline, say in March 2020, have been without their intervention?
Dominic69
Dominic69
3 years ago
Sorry but I do not agree…I nave been listening and reading analysts predictions for well over a decade, a crash like that it’s not going to happen, too many people and organizations are invested in this. We can talk about historical valuations and bla bla bla in reality we never experienced a time when Central Banks shower money everywhere with reckless abandon. We live in an era of permanent 0 interest rates, actually, negative interest rates…this is uncharted territory where you old map does not work. The Fed is not out of ammunition…at all. If a decline gets severe enough, they will buy futures directly, you can bet on it. The end will arrive only with a currency crisis and with the unwillingness of the rest of the world to soak up US monetary inflation….short of that, a severe crash ain’t coming.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Reply to  Dominic69
OK, got it. 
Put you in the “It’s Different THIS time” camp.
Dominic69
Dominic69
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
It is…but not the the usual mindless optimistic reasons of the permabulls….
I remember a well respected analyst like Jim Rickards when he said the Fed was “trapped” back on the mid 2010s….he kept quipping “The Fed balance sheet is already 4 trillion now…what happen if the next crisis hit?? Go to 7?? 8??” Well, guess what….where is the Fed balance sheet now?? A currency crisis is the only thing that will stop this madness.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Reply to  Dominic69
A few things.
1) Federal Reserve not allowed to invest in equities.  That could change but would require Congressional approval.
2) Wilshire 5000 near $50 trillion.  No way Federal Reserve can buy near enough to turn tide if sentiment negative.  Even with Congressional approval they will only dip toe via ETFs.
3) Fall of 2008 Federal Reserve slashed rates.  Stocks still went down.  Instituted QE.  Stocks still went down.  Only in March of 2009 when Congress forced FASB to replace Mark to Market with Mark to Model did stocks go up.
4) With inflation surging Federal Reserve has to sit on its hands for now (if markets were to crash before inflation abates).
Dominic69
Dominic69
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
1) Rules can change…on a dime and they indeed change 
2) Central Bank can operate with negative equity…it has been clarified over and over, there is not such thing as a “bankrupted Fed”.
3) It is not just QE but also the fiscal deficits as far as they eye can see that do the trick. Stocks did indeed crash when the pandemic hit initially (In one day in March 2020 the S&P lost 3000 points with the Fed already hard at work) but eventually they never looked back.
4) If the market crashes, that takes the economy with it forcing the Fed to reverse course so it’s a dog chasing its own tail….we rely too much on asset inflation for consumption in our economy.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Reply to  Dominic69
Federal Reserve Act specifies what can be purchased to avoid taking a loss.  If loss(es) exceeds its thin capital (around $50 billion) Congress would have to step in and bail.  No Way No How would Federal Reserve take large equity position.  It will have its hands full buying what it is allowed (treasuries, GSE debt + mbs, municipals, etc) when TSHTF.
Dominic69
Dominic69
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
The Fed changed its accounting rules in 2011 making a technical bankruptcy basically an impossibility. Any losses can be marked as a liability to the Treasury rather than a hit to its capital. Any future profits can be directed toward that liability.
We should still reiterate that Central Banks can work perfectly with negative capital, here an IMF Working Paper paper on it.
According to this article on American Banker in 2019, the Fed was technically insolvent at the time of this writing ($27B on a mark-to-market basis)
Finally, you can always fix “insolvency” for a Central Bank, the treasury can issue non marketable zero coupon perpetual bonds and exchange it for equity at the Fed, that’s it…an accounting game.
Currency Crisis are the real end of the road, nothing else.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Reply to  Dominic69
Well, that change occurred when Federal Reserve only buying assets that had full faith of US government … treasuries (explicit) and GSE assets (implicit).  Fannie and Freddie were taken into receivership by US government so no fail there.
If Federal Reserve allowed to purchase equities sure to be revisited.  
Federal Reserve not omnipotent.
Dominic69
Dominic69
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
The Fed is not omnipotent….as I said, if a currency crisis occur with the catastrophic inflation it imply, that is the real end of the road for the Central Bank….but until the game is pretty much accounting rules and fiction, I see no danger for the Fed.
TCW
TCW
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Interest rates have never been so low, and the balance sheet so high, so it does seem different this time. 
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  TCW
Now, interest rate (yield) high, balance sheet low (very low)…. oops zero. Technical bankruptcy.
Carl_R
Carl_R
3 years ago
Reply to  Dominic69
It is no doubt true that if they can keep interest rates at 0, stocks will not fall. The appropriate PE is 1/interest rate, or in this case, 1/0=infinity. However, if inflation forces interest rates higher, bad things will happen. Say the interest rate moves to 4%. That pushes the PE down to 25. If interest rates go to 20%, as they did in about 1981, that pushes the PE to 5. Note, too, that rising interest rates might adversely affect the “E” side, so a 4% interest rate might be a more than 50% drop in the market, and a 20% rate might be a more than 90% drop.
Dominic69
Dominic69
3 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
First they will try to mangle and bend of out shape the already ridiculous inflation metrics (already doing this).
Second, the Fed could still buy futures in a positive interest rate environment if a severe crash happen. Third, today a lot of consumption (meaning GDP growth) is based on asset price inflation anyway, so the Fed would reverse course quickly if a major disruption in the market occurs.
Finally, we will never see a 5% interest rate again in our lifetime…..I’m ready to bet on it.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  Dominic69
Everything you say is actually support for a major hard-landing ‘crash’. Your comment speaks to mass beliefs that are the primary cause of a vast miss-pricing of risk. Risk has a tendency of biting you in the a$$.
Dominic69
Dominic69
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
If we get into a currency crisis then, yes, we are in trouble.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  Dominic69
What, exactly, do you think Bitcoin is, except a sign of a global currency crisis?
Dominic69
Dominic69
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
It may be a sign but way too faint so far….
SAKMAN1
SAKMAN1
3 years ago
Reply to  Dominic69
In my view you are 100% correct. The Fed is drunk on the cool aid. They will party on until the cops show up, they will try to bribe the cops, hire hit men to kill the cops, whatever it takes to remain drunk and in power.
If that fails, we have a currency crisis. In the meantime, being trapped between a rock and a hard place only means the Fed trying to figure out how much they can buy without everyone coming to the conclusion that the Feds balance sheet is full of tulip seeds.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
I was on the beach this morning with my dog. No socks, needless to say.
As I have said previously, the Fed is in control until it isn’t. The sheer scope/magnitude of what is at stake, and having no ‘ammo’, will make the decline as bad as your worst prediction, and likely worse IMHO. Regression to the mean (trend) will be the word of the day, and then some. I expect to see panic, not necessarily of the kind that causes people to take flying leaps off tall buildings, but from the Baby Boomer generation that is about to lose 401ks, pension plans, savings, overpriced real estate, a way of life… Mass fear will induce a switch to gold that will cause demand to skyrocket.
Why does it make sense to hold gold? Because going off the gold standard is what caused the problem in the first place. The question is not ‘Got gold?’ but have you got enough of it? If I am right, having 5% in gold will not cut it. In fact, having gold in the USA will not be enough.
Cocoa
Cocoa
3 years ago
1929 had a severe regulator called gold…FDR had to confiscate it by dictat and double it’s value to increase money supply. In 2022 we have a total, unbacked system and we are pouring money into a deflating tire. The beneficiaries are the global elite class and political class(who get some nice bribe money from the former.) The system has been crashing since 2008 and cannot exist without QE running at 2 trillion a quarter or something. The dollar is chronically strong in the currency arena as well. All this inflation is using Covid as coverfire to blame it. Companies are just raising prices because there is no competition and supply chain diversity. To.make up for falling growth they raise per unit prices. It’s called collusion
klausmkl
klausmkl
3 years ago
USA is broken. Economics, have been decimated. Our New System is a command Inflation economy based upon a crony capitalist elite.  
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Fundamentally I agree with you mish. But, since central banks have opened the spigot, seems a flood of money dwarfs fundamentals.
whirlaway
whirlaway
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Well, at least this time I see Grantham saying that S&P 500 will go to 2500 – EVEN IF the Fed pulls all kinds of rabbits out of its hat.   So that makes it very clear-cut.  Let’s see how it turns out.
urtau
urtau
3 years ago
I sold all my socks, wearing sandals and hoping I can get in at a better price.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Reply to  urtau
Unfortunately, I have to ride it out … my feet stink if I don’t wear socks …
davebarnes2
davebarnes2
3 years ago
Reply to  urtau
I have not. My socks are mostly Merino wool, but they have just enough Spandex in them to stay up.
Darn Tough, Point 6, and Smart Wool are good brands.
urtau
urtau
3 years ago
Reply to  davebarnes2
Ah yes, the disrupters of the sock world.  Own a few pair of these, and retire on the moon in a few years.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
“I have morphed into Grantham, but perhaps not quite Hussman. But like Hussman, I expect to be mocked for this post.”
Well, I’m glad you got that out of the way.
I know a few here will pound you on Hussman.  I’ve been reading his weekly (now monthly) missive for years and know his mistakes (which to his credit he acknowledges) but that won’t stop the bulltards from mischaracterizing his position.
Scooot
Scooot
3 years ago
“Faith in the Fed is a key driver for gold.”
Did you mean lack of faith? 
Edit, all clear now, the chart has appeared.
whirlaway
whirlaway
3 years ago
My *socks* have never crashed.  At the most, they have dropped gently to the floor!  

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.