Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

New York Fed Concludes Underlying Inflation Is Only 4.6%

Underling Inflation Gauge (UIG) data from FRBNY, chart by Mish

For January 2022, the FRBNY Underlying Inflation Gauge (UIG) is 4.6%. 

Key Ideas 

  • The UIG “full data set” measure for January is currently estimated at 4.6%, a 0.1 percentage point increase from the previous month.
  • The “prices-only” measure for January is currently estimated at 5.2%, a 0.3 percentage point increase from the previous month.
  • The twelve-month change in the January CPI was +7.5%, a 0.5 percentage point increase from the previous month. 
  • For January 2022, trend CPI inflation is estimated to be in the 4.6% to 5.2% range, a wider range than in December, with its lower bound 0.1 percentage point higher.
  • The “prices-only” underlying inflation gauge (UIG) is derived from a large number of disaggregated price series in the consumer price index (CPI), while the “full data set” measure incorporates additional macroeconomic and financial variables. 

UIG Explanation     

The FRBNY offers thus Explanation of Underlying Inflation.

UIG Definition from the FRBNY 

 If you seek an explanation you can understand, you are mostly out of luck.

Here is a paragraph in English that one can understand,

We use two data sets from the following broad categories: (i) goods and services prices (CPI, PPI); (ii) labor market, money, producer surveys, and financial variables (short and long term government interest rates, corporate and high yield bonds, consumer credit volumes and real estate loans, stocks, commodity prices).  

Amusingly, the FRBNY takes into consideration government interest rates, real estate loans, and the volume of consumer credit, but no direct measure of housing prices nor any measure of stock market bubbles. 

The article repeats nonsense about “well anchored inflation expectations”.

One of the inputs to UIG is the even more preposterous Trimmed Mean Inflation measure from the Dallas Fed. 

What is Trimmed Mean PCE?

Fred, the St. Louis Fed website offers this Explanation of Trimmed Mean PCE.

The Trimmed Mean PCE inflation rate produced by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas is an alternative measure of core inflation in the price index for personal consumption expenditures (PCE). The data series is calculated by the Dallas Fed, using data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). Calculating the trimmed mean PCE inflation rate for a given month involves looking at the price changes for each of the individual components of personal consumption expenditures. The individual price changes are sorted in ascending order from “fell the most” to “rose the most,” and a certain fraction of the most extreme observations at both ends of the spectrum are thrown out or trimmed. The inflation rate is then calculated as a weighted average of the remaining components. The trimmed mean inflation rate is a proxy for true core PCE inflation rate. The resulting inflation measure has been shown to outperform the more conventional “excluding food and energy” measure as a gauge of core inflation.

On January 4, 2022, I noted Trimmed Mean Inflation Is the Ultimate Absurdity in Inflation Measures

Measure Comparison

  • Essentially the Dallas Fed says lets throw out the top and bottom items of the PCE and average the rest.
  • The PCE stands for Personal Consumption indicators and is the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation.
  • PCE differs from the CPI in that it counts expenses paid on behalf of consumers such as medical insurance.
  • The Consumer Price Index weights rent much higher than the PCE which in turn weights medical higher. 

Items Chopped Off the Bottom

Trimmed Mean Inflation excluded items, table from Dallas Fed, annotations by Mish.

Chopping Methodology 

  • The Dallas Fed chopped off items with a combined weight of 24.07% from the low end.
  • This was “balanced” by chopping off items with a weight of 32.50% (100-67.5) at the top end.
  • Everything that went up by more than 9% annualized was chopped off the top culminating with gasoline up 103.5% and air transportation up 112.7%.

Ultimately, the Dallas Fed discarded 56.57% of the entire PCE, heavily weighted by discarding high inflation items to arrive at a preposterous 2.8% year-over-year measure of inflation. 

Home prices rose another percent in November according to the latest Case-Shiller measures. The Fed does not even count that as inflation.

Home Prices Jump Another Percent, Fed Extremely Behind the Inflation Curve

Current Measures of Inflation

  • CPI: 7.5% (January)
  • PCE: 6.5% (December)
  • Trimmed Mean PCE: 3.1% (December)
  • UIG: 4.6% (January)

None of the above measures factors in home prices. 

How Bad are Inflation Models, Expectations, and Forecasts vs Reality?

On November 24, I asked and answered How Bad are Inflation Models, Expectations, and Forecasts vs Reality?

Short Synopsis

Astrologers Would Likely Beat the Fed at Inflation Forecasting

Also consider Astrologers Would Likely Beat the Fed at Inflation Forecasting

The Fed claims to have tools to fight inflation. The last time we heard them so empathically was right before the housing bubble burst.

Behind the Curve

On January 25, I noted Home Prices Jump Another Percent, Fed Extremely Behind the Inflation Curve

Factoring in home prices, I have an alternate CPI at 9.70% as of November.

See the above link for details.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

35 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Jackula
Jackula
4 years ago
The BS from the FED is getting so thick and deep I need to buy another pair of sh*tkickers.
Webej
Webej
4 years ago
I get it. Totally UIG (‘Uncle Inflation Pugnacious’)  is going to help me get through the month, paying for any shortfalls.
For instance, inflation is less if you take into account
  • Your wages are going up by less than prices
  • You are borrowing money to make up the shortfall
  • Don’t count shocking outliers
  • Etc
In the long run, inflation is much lower because on an infinite horizon, the current blip will be insignificant compared to the straight line we generate over the next 100 years, so it is only statistical noise this month.
I totally get it. Inflation is a macro economical variable, and has nothing to do with paying current month over month expenses by uninteresting people like most myopic macro economically unschooled voters, who pay by using money they have to get from other people instead of creating their own!
MIFE
MIFE
4 years ago
Okay, so a positive fed funds rate should be about 5.25% then – or am I missing something?
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
“Thanks for sharing” says FED.
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
just returned from Lowe’s . Paid 12$ for 2 x 4 by eight ft stick of pressure treated lumber . I almost put it back on the shelve . must BE 100 % inflation.
dtj
dtj
4 years ago
Inflation is 0% when you take out all the volatile categories: food, clothing, shelter, transportation, health care, education and entertainment.
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  dtj
You forgot taxes. One might even call tax inflation “huge”. 🙂
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
“Former Blackrock fund manager Edward Dowd, grew his fund to $14B by ‘anticipating’ the next big news, believes Big Insurance will be the catalyst that causes the wheels to come off. Major life insurance firms are reporting multi-sigma increases in non-Covid-related death claims”
CRS65
CRS65
4 years ago
Be careful what you wish for when talking about inflation.  At the end of the day the Fed and its various ways to evaluate inflation is not trying to come up with a “real world” measure of inflation.  They are instead trying to understand the components and underlying causes of component inflation to gauge if and by how much monetary policy changes will be impactful on those components.  We certainly would not be well served for the central bank to use higher interest rate targets to combat components of inflation if those components’ price inflation will not necessarily be brought down by the higher cost of money.  Higher interest rates will certainly not cure pandemic related disruptions to manufacturing and logistics driven supply shortages and price increases unless the cure one seeks is slowing the economy down so much that demand collapses sufficient to match the throughput of the capacity constrained supply chain.  For this type of inflation supply/demand driven higher prices will themselves curtail demand until the supply/demand relationship comes back into balance.  In other words temporary high prices are themselves the cure for disruption related inflation. Over doing interest rate increases will only amplify the price inflation dampening effect and risk a recession and deflation.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
Reply to  CRS65
The policy error was made years ago … and doubled down at every opportunity.
Clean up won’t be pretty … but necessary.
CRS65
CRS65
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
If the long-term trend of core inflation will be in the 2% to 2.5% range then the 10-year Treasury Note rate is not far from “neutral.”  Thus, the question is how steep should the 2-10 year curve be for a healthy economy?  Would a discount rate and two year rate in the range of 1.00% to 1.50% be appropriate?  If so, the Fed needs to raise interest rates roughly 100 to 125 basis points, which would not be disastrous to either borrowers or the markets.  There is no real need to invert the yield curve.  Bernanke learned in the 2000’s, after raising rates continuously from 2002 to 2007 that the 10-year rate will stay relatively low due to the substantial demand for U.S. dollars abroad and the secular deflationary forces that come from rapid innovation.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
Reply to  CRS65
 “There is no real need to invert the yield curve.”
The bond market calls the shot.  Not the federal reserve.
  Running the loosest imaginable financial conditions over the past 10+ years has it consequences.  And the consequences are Bubbles.   Everywhere.  
CRS65
CRS65
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
As long as the U.S. dollar is the predominate global reserve currency and we not let the debt/GDP ratio get totally out of control the long end of the yield curve for Treasury securities should remained anchored at historically low levels.  Thus, if the Fed gets too aggressive in raising short rates it will invert the yield curve.  Look at a graph of the 10 year minus 2 year Treasury yield from 2003 – 2007, a time when Bernanke raised rates every year.  That yield differential went from over 2% to zero. 
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
Reply to  CRS65
Yes.  I concur. 
The reason for FUTURE (baked in now) inversions is due to PAST policy errors.  
Collapsing asset values will keep rates low on the long end.  The worm will turn with investors focusing on Return OF Capital.  Rather than Return ON Capital.  Treasuries backed by the full faith of US Government (taxpayer).  Treasuries will also benefit from stronger $US as foreign capital seeks safe harbor.
CRS65
CRS65
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
I believe that we are currently at the peak of the transitory components of inflation peaking.  Thus, I believe that we will see the Fed raise rates three times between March and July and then I believe that they will pause to reassess and will not likely raise rates again before the elections.  From my view point I believe that it will be unlikely that they are able to raise rates more than 100 bps over the next 12 months.  If we are lucky they will not have to reverse course by this time next year.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
Reply to  CRS65
Concur
Sunriver
Sunriver
4 years ago
Mish,
Could you ‘advertise’ your CSAI CPI chart in a link on your blog in ‘real-time’ (maybe updated monthly = real-time)?
Understanding a ‘somewhat true’ measure of Inflation is very important right now and I believe getting out the ‘truth’ on inflation (as opposed to the FED PCE lies), would help your readers understand the ‘pin popping the everything balloon’ as it deflates.
I just can’t look at the CPI or PCE anymore as truth and it would be helpful to see a more truthful index of inflation.
Thank You
General Ripper
General Ripper
4 years ago
Come to Naples FL where condos have doubled in the last 2 years and renters are getting $1,000 month increases!
Go to dinner and get a drink $50.00 minimum
Visits to food store require anti anxiety medication.
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Reply to  General Ripper
When something can’t keep going, it will stop.  The coming worldwide crash is going to epic, long and deep.
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
4 years ago
Sooner or later this is going to show up in silver and platinum.  Buy now and avoid the rush.
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  TheCaptain
Is it too late for platinum? Catalytic converter theft is already on the rise.
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
“New York Fed Concludes Underlying Inflation IS Only 4.6%”
Safe and effective.
Chopping Methodology” 
Inflationary informed consent uneeded. Trust the marketing slogan, Underlying Inflation Gauge. Anything else is misinformation. Trust only Dr. Powell and Federal Reserve Bank statements. Federal Reserve policy keeps us safe.
JeffD
JeffD
4 years ago
Banana Republic inflation is always hidden by throwing away the top third of items with prices increases, and those items often have the highest increase in absolute cost, not just percentage increase, e.g. housing. There is nothing laughable about what they are doing.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
4 years ago
Doug Casey was correct.   As we continue our descent as an nasty
empire,  each new leader will be worse and worse and worse.    The roman thinkers couldn’t imagine worse than Claudius or Caligula.    They got Nero.    My puppy brain pals couldn’t imagine worse than W the dumber.    We got obama and trump and now biden.    I can only laugh.   For my mental health.      the us lira is worth less and less each day i use her.     everyone i know is a millionaire.   it’s the new thousandaire.    
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago

They said
that this new measure measures “persistent inflation” and strips out
the volatile part. Using their explanation then I would consider 4.6%
persistent inflation as very bad because since it is persistent it will not
fall back down easily and will require the Fed to hike rates persistently as
well.

StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Since The Fed, and/or those close to them, are the ones deciding exactly how to, completely arbitrarily, “determine” what they claim is “inflation,” they can claim it is whatever they want to. 
The illiterates who are stupid enough to believe anything The Fed says has any meaning, other than simply being some contrived excuse to rob their betters, are the ones constituting the problem.
If a burglar is told he can steal more is he mindlessly spouts off that “inflation is 4.5%” than is he just as mindlessly claims “inflation is 8.9%”, why would he not pick the former?
It’s not like it refers to anything relevant. It’s just stupid people using what they reckon even stupider people believe is “economic jargon making me sound smart,” in order to justify to the latter that they are going to steal some stuff.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
“New York Fed Concludes Underlying Inflation IS Only 4.6%”
Yeah, well just another example of how far behind the curve the Federal Reserve is if they continue to play games (to downplay).
Midterms on deck (POTUS has called out FR to get inflation under control).  If inflation not under control by then, Democrats annihilated. 
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Democrats will lose regardless of inflation. The increasing possibility of Kamala in the White House, will turn any independent support they still enjoy. Annihilation is highly likely (even more than war with Russia 🙂 –the Fed is scrambling to come up with excuses. The idiocy from the Fed Res of New York demonstrates the chaos already underway.
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Nobody wanted Biden either, but he wasn’t trump. If trump runs he’ll lose to anyone, and his dimwit worshippers will continue their trumpletantrums.
The gop will become the tantrum party, some addled morons will perform some meaningless terrorist act, and that will be the end of the gop.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Not a fan of Trump, but if the election were held today on the up and up, Trump would easily beat Biden.
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
That’s what you thought last election.
CRS65
CRS65
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Not even close.  Trump can’t just run, he has to win the Republican nomination, which is certainly not a given.  Regardless, if Trump lost the nomination he would likely for his own party and run against the Republican nominee and the Democratic nominee, handing the election to the Democrat.  If he won the nomination it is likely that a “real” Republican would run as an independent and again that would hand the election to the Democrat.
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  CRS65
Excellent point, but the final result relies on one of the “likely” things happening. The “real” Republican run? They’d have done that in 16. Or 20. And, Trump’s behavior as president won over a *lot* of Republicans. And Trump running as an independent seems more likely for the media-Trump than for the real Trump. Thems two very different Trumps, fo shur, fo shur. Never forget that the media-Trump model has been notably unpredictive.
CRS65
CRS65
4 years ago
Reply to  Felix_Mish
I think that his hold on the Republican Party was too strong in 2016 and 2020 for an independent “real” Republican to take him on.  However, I see that hold weakening some and that along with the fact that the likes of Liz Cheney, Jeff Flake, Adam Kinzinger, and John Kasich are completely on the onside of the current Republican Party and have nothing to lose.  In fact, I think these types of Republicans would run just to ensure that Trump does not win should he somehow get the nomination in 2024.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
“When a person of reasonable intelligence cannot understand what is being said, surely something is very, very wrong.”

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.