Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

No Buyer for First Republic Bank at Any Price, Here’s Why

FRC chart courtesy of StockCharts.com annotations by Mish.

In one of the biggest bank collapses ever, First Republic Bank is down 96 percent in two months. 

But look on the bright side. Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) fared even worse. 

At least FRC is still kicking. It rose 8.79 percent on Thursday. 

No Buyer at Any Price

You likely can’t give FRC away. There would be no takers. Its assets are worth less than zero.

That’s because merger accounting rules would require a buyer to immediately mark down FRC’s assets to fair value.

FRC lost $100 billion in deposits. And unlike SVB, it is stuck with severely underwater mortgage loans. 

The FRC business model was to give ridiculously cheap mortgage loans to high-wealth clients in return for their business. When that model started blowing up, clients pulled their deposits.

Given all around silliness by banks chasing yield, any buyer would likely have to raise capital which would hammer their own share price. 

According to the WSJ, Autonomous Research analyst David Smith commented “It might cost you $30 billion of capital to buy the bank for free.” 

If the run on assets continues, either the Treasury or the Fed is likely to step in. Elizabeth Warren would then moan about the Fed bailing out the wealthy. If the bank went under, she would moan about something else.

Meanwhile, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen repeated her comment that the U.S. banking system remains sound and the U.S. government will take “any necessary steps” to keep it the strongest and safest financial system in the world.

OK Then, Party On Dudes

The Inflation Reduction Act Price Jumps From $385 Billion to Over $1 Trillion

Here’s another reason to party. The Inflation Reduction Act Price Jumps From $385 Billion to Over $1 Trillion

That means there’s still more money sloshing around. Did you get your fair share? 

Worst of Both Worlds, Stagflation Right Now, But What’s Ahead?

We have high inflation coupled with a GDP slowdown but what’s ahead. Here’s a look at inflation and deflation forces.

Finally, please see Worst of Both Worlds, Stagflation Right Now, But What’s Ahead?

Hmmm. Maybe we better hold off on that party.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

34 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Curious Cat
Curious Cat
3 years ago
Capitalism without bankruptcy is like Christianity without hell.
lamlawindy
lamlawindy
3 years ago
Can I buy FR for $1, write down the assets, and book the operating income losses to offset my earned income from now until the end of my days? : )
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Still nothing anywhere other than in American Banker’s trade publications about the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. Until those connections are fully examined, any analysis or regulation is a Potemkin vallage.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
What happens to the investment by JP Morgan & Co? If it’s wiped out, the situation is really critical.
Jack
Jack
3 years ago
Didn’t the six big banks make large deposits last month to strengthen their balance sheet? Wonder if they have all withdrawn their deposits yet.
Cocoa
Cocoa
3 years ago
Reply to  Jack
i think 30 billion
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
3 years ago
If FRC is allowed to collapse, then the FED gets a reduction in the inflationary forces without having to raise interest rates, which is what lead to this interest rate risk problem in the first place.
Tawdzilla
Tawdzilla
3 years ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear
That should be what happens, but will it happen? I doubt it.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
“In one of the biggest bank collapses ever, First Republic Bank is down 96 percent in two months. But look on the bright side. Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) fared even worse.”
The creative destruction of capitalism. Failure is a normal part of the system. I assume that those that believe in capitalism, will applaud this.
“If the run on assets continues, either the Treasury or the Fed is likely to step in. Elizabeth Warren would then moan about the Fed bailing out the wealthy. If the bank went under, she would moan about something else.”
Lol! Apparently, that is what most Americans do these days. Complain, and moan.
“Here’s another reason to party. The Inflation Reduction Act Price Jumps From $385 Billion to Over $1 Trillion. That means there’s still more money sloshing around. Did you get your fair share?”
I am attempting to get “more” than my fair share. How about everyone else here? Probably not.
“We have high inflation coupled with a GDP slowdown but what’s ahead?”
More of the same. Though inflation will be mostly on items in high demand: food, energy, shelter, labor. Some areas will experience deflation (discretionary).
Invest accordingly. Though it seems that very few here do.
klausmkl
klausmkl
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
America has a crony capitalist system. Soon, we will have crony socialism. Klaus Schwab leads the charge.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  klausmkl
Oligarchy is the right term.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Some people here do invest accordingly but don’t talk about it.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78

Lol!!! Thats so funny. They don’t talk about it for a couple of reasons:

  • They are afraid to mention it for fear of being criticized by other people (just like them), for being wrong. Many here like to criticize me, but most of them are cowards, as they won’t state what their investments are. They can all go f themselves as far as I am concerned. Mostly, I just end up hitting the IGNORE button on them for being useless cowards who waste my time.
  • Others like to talk big, but don’t even have investments and are too embarrassed to admit it.
Either way; there are a lot of folks here who are not worth my time. There are only a few bright lights worth reading.
Now where are the brave souls who are willing to state what they are invested in? And the rationale behind their investments.
Just be ready for the inevitable criticism that the cowards here will heap on you.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Come on Papa. You are here anonymously where no one knows who you are let alone your finances or the investments you have really made and where you claim anything you want and you have the gall to reproach others here for not doing what you don’t yourself do. Do you tell us the moment you make a trade and give us the time, the stock and the price at which you bought them? Do that and then you can talk about your results. Everyone here is anonymous and knows that when someone talks their portfolio there is no way to confirm the truth so no one really cares except you it seems. If you want stock tips there are other places that do that. For me it is a total mystery why I should give you my stock trades. It would be like telling the guy at the check-out counter the composition of my portfolio. I suppose you might say that would be a sign of courage but to me it would be absurd.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
I would guess that’s why Mish calls this place “Global Economics Global Politics” and not Pleading for Investment Ideas.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Yes that is what it does very well.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Papa, I already got part of your share and I’m looking for more next week.
Jack
Jack
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Part of my portfolio is made up of anti-ESG such as tobacco – dividends are often upwards of 9-10% – MO BTI IMBBY PM.
There is a lot to criticize there but have done ok from them lol – slow, steady, and below the radar.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  Jack
Well done! Thanks for sharing and good luck with your investments! Nice to see someone brave enough to actually mention an investment here.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Apparently, you have a preference for the Cliff List approach to investing. Try Jim Cramer, CNBC at 6PM ET
I come here for other interpretations of broad economic/political/demographic factors. I do invest. I win more than I lose; and I don’t brag. I despise people who want investment tips, or who toss them out like confetti. WHY? I realize time is a risk-filled continuum with cyclical tendencies, driven by those broad economic/political/demographic factors. Along the way, I have learned you will make money if you buy near the bottom and sell near the top,. This is the best you can do without a) insider trading or b) taking on high risk, or c) knowledge and skills far greater than mine.
Call_Me
Call_Me
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
“The creative destruction of capitalism. Failure is a normal part of the
system. I assume that those that believe in capitalism, will applaud
this.”
It is the way the economic system should work – the possibility of failure leading investors to be more diligent in their actions and not looking to be bailed out if their wager doesn’t pay off. Of course this isn’t how ‘the system’ operates so this thought exercise isn’t going to make anyone a buck.
Call_Me_Al
MPO45v2
MPO45v2
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
There are only a few ways to invest right now and hope to retain your capital. Up until end of May, buy T-Bills and stay out until the debt ceiling fiasco is sorted out.
There other is to buy puts on things we know are crashing like real estate equities dated for late 2023 or early 2024. Oil stocks via covered calls and/or naked puts to hedge is another option. DVN, OXY, XOM, BP, CVX are my faves.
I don’t like anything else, sitting mostly in T-Bills and Cash till we get some more clarity.
Once real estate crashes hard, it may be time to go long some re-priced REITS like Realty Income (Ticker:O) if it survives.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
Thanks for those suggestions! I can’t say that I am as pessimistic as you are. I remain over 70% invested in my stock portfolio as I don’t see the coming catastrophic collapse that so many here seem to see.
Still mostly in oil and gas stocks as they remain very good values at oil prices of $70 and up. Huge cash flows, low debt, minimal capex, increasing dividends, and stock buybacks. Their biggest problem is what to do with all that excess cash.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
Funny. Yet everyone still wonders if we have been in, or are heading into, a recession. Not me! I have the utmost faith in our leaders, and the slaves who worship them, ability to give us , not just a currency crushing depression, but a civilization crushing one.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
They made low interest mortgages to wealthy people who are by definition solvent so in principle those loans will be paid back as opposed to the 2008 sub-prime loans that were given to people who could not pay back. When they sell those loans in a bankruptcy for example, there will be buyers but at a lower price. The catch is that as Mish said because of mark to mark rules buying the whole bank would not make financial sense or perhaps more accurately not make accounting sense. What we have is a bank with a big loan portfolio and few deposits. That portfolio has value but that value will probably be unlocked by the the good bank bad bank method since other banks can’t touch it. The good bank gets the deposits and the bad bank gets the loan portfolio. The good bank gets a high rating and in principle stops the run on it. The bad bank gets the portfolio of loans and gains the time needed to liquidate them in an orderly manner. The wild card is if those loans were to “wealthy people” who actually have a negative net worth. That would then be a bigger problem in pricing the loan book but doesn’t invalidate the good bank-bad bank method.
Jack
Jack
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Wealth could be tied up with capital gains – a lot of folks took cheap loans to pay for day to day expenses instead of selling equity and paying capital gains.
However you are right, a lot of “wealthy” people also live paycheck to paycheck.
OPmoney
OPmoney
3 years ago
Something’s missing? First Republic, a company that IS earning about 1B a quarter and 1.50EPS over the past fourteen consecutive quarters is up for grabs. A company with actual EARNINGS through COVID and even after a run on deposits in its latest /”worst” quarter “ever” has The Bear argument states its value is ZERO and your “No Buyer for First Republic Bank at Any Price, Here’s Why First Republic Bank is yours for free if you want it.
MISH 38 MINUTES AGO” is absolutely ABSURD.

Any deep pocket bank reverses the Balance Sheet just by moving Other People’s Money around the block – pay off debt and Fed’s with its own DEEP Pockets then proceed as if nothing ever happened with FRC’s LOAN BOOK and Investments. It WILL continue “Business As Usual” making at least 1B EVERY Quarter. Asking you here to explain Why Not? FRC making money, for years now at around 1B a Quarter is proven. How can its current Loan Book and Investments not continue to make money and have no value?

FRC’s situation today appears very similar to “Raise the Debt Ceiling” on every spending cycle our own Government blows UP – Is this not the American Way?
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
see Another Banking Crisis Was Predictable – WSJ
Mbartv
Mbartv
3 years ago
Mish, is the fed going to bail out the $30 billion the big banks put in? Hazard either way.
Tawdzilla
Tawdzilla
3 years ago
I was going to post that I’d prefer to let banks live or die based on their own merit (without backstopping them), but we’re so far down the socialist rabbit hole that I’m not sure it really matters anymore. There will probably be some sort of arrangement made that bails out certain individuals (you know, the important people), while everyone else pays the price either in increased bank fees, increased taxes, or increased debt. That’s just the Frankenstein system we have. Meanwhile, there are potholes in our roads bigger than moon craters.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  Tawdzilla
Technically, the important people are the little people. Those are the ones who’s deposits are insured up to 250K.
It’s the bigger guys that are on the hook if it fails. The question is will they be bailed out? The answer depends on political connections.
Tawdzilla
Tawdzilla
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Thanks Captain Obvious. I answered your question in my original post. How can regulators justify bailing out depositors over $250k at SVB but not FRB or the next bank after FRB? They can’t.
Jack
Jack
3 years ago
Reply to  Tawdzilla
Depends who owns those deposits. The little guy <250k and the big fish with the right connections will come out ok.
You have to bank where the important people bank.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Can you hear the sucking sound?
Small-Denomination Time Deposits: Total (WSMTMNS) | FRED | St. Louis Fed (stlouisfed.org)
Large Time Deposits, All Commercial Banks (LTDACBM027NBOG) | FRED | St. Louis Fed (stlouisfed.org)
It’s the paradox of thrift.
Dr. Philip George’s “The Riddle
of Money Finally Solved” works.

“For nearly a century the progress
of macroeconomics has been stalled by a single error, an error so silly that
generations to come will scarcely believe that it could have persisted for as
long as it has done.” & “The logic was that such precautionary holdings are
not intended to be spent and hence do not qualify as money.”

Banks compete for the deposits that the system already owns. There is just a redistribution of deposits among the banks. And the larger banks have economies of scale. Banks must maintain a positive “balance of payments”. Their core deposits must be “sticky” or a stable source of funds (unlike “brokered deposits”). And balance sheet problems must be identified quickly by the FDIC (unrealized losses based on the market value of its mortgage loans), and rescue operations must be completed in short order. The FDIC has failed again.
See: “Should Commercial banks accept savings deposits?” Conference
on Savings and Residential Financing 1961 Proceedings, United States Savings
and loan league, Chicago, 1961, 42, 43. By Dr. Leland James Pritchard, Ph.D.,
Economics, Chicago 1933, M.S. Statistics, Syracuse.

See: “Profit or Loss from Time
Deposit Banking”, Banking and Monetary Studies, Comptroller of the Currency,
United States Treasury Department, Irwin, 1963, pp. 369-386

Available for Sale? Understanding Bank Securities Portfolios – Liberty Street Economics (newyorkfed.org)

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.