Real Hourly Wages Have Risen Less Than a Penny a Year Since 1973

BLS Notes     

Hourly wage data for production and nonsupervisory workers dates to 1964. 

The data for all private workers only dates to 2006.

The BLS uses slightly different deflators for each series, CPI-U (the standard CPI) for all workers, and CPI-W for production workers.

Key Points

  • In nominal terms, the production and nonsupervisory worker made $4.05 per hour in 1973. Today that worker makes $26.40 per hour. 
  • Accounting for inflation, using 1982-1984 as the base rate, a worker made $9.38 in 1973 and makes only $9.63 per hour today.
  • In 48 years, real wages have risen $0.25. That’s just over half a penny per hour each year.
  • Between 1964 and 1973 workers came out ahead. Since then it’s practically $0 and that assumes you believe the CPI is not understated.

It’s Criminal

For the past decade, until now, the Fed has been begging for higher inflation. 

Promotion of inflation is purposeful theft for the benefit of banks, the wealthy, and the asset holders. 

The poor and those on fixed income suffer the most from Fed policy.

Every Measure of Real Interest Rates Shows the Fed is Out of Control

All the bottom half of the nation has to show for Fed policy is the third asset bubble since 2000.

Bad things happen when the Fed ignores asset bubbles. And the way to ignore asset bubbles is to pretend housing, land prices, speculation in Bitcoin, and insane stock market valuations are not inflation.

It’s difficult to state the inflation effect on stocks or Bitcoin but housing is one most human beings easily see even though the Fed and Martian economists can’t.

On December 29, I commented Every Measure of Real Interest Rates Shows the Fed is Out of Control

My housing-adjusted CPI measure stands at 9.31%.

Try buying a house now on an additional penny per hour. It was actually possible factoring in a second wage earner per household until about the year 1999.  

 See link for details.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Like these reports?

If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish     

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

42 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Since2008
Since2008
2 years ago

1973 is when Joseph Robinette Biden Jr entered public “serve-us”. Democrats like steady wages.

GodfreeRoberts
GodfreeRoberts
2 years ago
Since 2020, Chinese factory workers have cost their employers more than US factory workers cost theirs. Real wages there are doubling every ten years, which is why their home ownership rate is 98% and ours is 62%.
The key to a healthy economy is rising real wages.
Anon1970
Anon1970
2 years ago
50 years ago, many US factory workers were overpaid, given their skills. This was especially true in the auto industry, where wages were very high and the US car companies developed a reputation for turning out poor quality cars.
RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago
Reply to  Anon1970
Hollywood production diversified away from Los Angeles. The first season of MacGiver was shot in Hollywood, with the rest of the series being shot in cheaper Vancouver, which became Hollywood North.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  Anon1970
Yep. And then Japan came along with better cars and US car companies were stuck dealing with unions. AMC went bankrupt. Chrysler had to be bailed out. Followed by GM. Ford barely scraped by.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
Reply to  Anon1970
“50 years ago, many US factory workers were overpaid, given their skills.”
And yet, they were somewhere between 10 and infinite times as skilled as some illiterate “making money” from a decaying shack. Or from some “portfolio” which the Fed pumps up by robbing others, including car makers. Or from chasing ambulances. Or from hawking “insurance” against ambulance chasers. Or to people mandated to “insure” against things they have zero interest in “insuring” against….
Yet, have the wages of the undifferentiated mass of nothing but rank idiots comprising those sectors also fallen?
Rbm
Rbm
2 years ago

Part of some big plan.  Or just unintended consciences of closing the gold window and globalization.   Followed by individuals with the knowledge and means to better themselves at the expense of society at large.   

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
I was working a union job making 7 bucks and change as recently as 1978 or so. Sure looks like my decision to finish college was a good idea, viewed in hindsight.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Depends on the union. If you were in public service with guaranteed pensions you could easily be generating millions of dollars in pension benefits for far less work that you do now as a business owner.
A friend of mine just retired as a firefighter (he was the chief of a small station) and gets 100K for life on top of his military pension (not sure what that is). He’s 55 years old. Pension is indexed and comes with health benefits and his wife gets the pension benefits (not sure how much reduced) if he dies. So he’s now living a very nice retirement of say 120K+ a year plus health paid for. Say he lives 30 years to 85 and he’ll pull down ~4 million. Not a bad gig and he retired long before you are and he doesn’t worry about investing / markets etc.
BowserB46
BowserB46
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Your friend should be worried.  The same market that has made the pension fund flush with assets can go the other way, and then the fund will be dependent on taxpayers.  Stories like your friend’s will be published, and taxpayers will start voting NO to new taxes.  City pension funds are a time bomb that has had its timer bumped by the artificially high stock market, and is a reason thousands of people are moving out of the big cities.  I know three plus myself.  Ask pensioners in Detroit about those guarantees.  At one point there were more people collecting pensions in Detroit than paying taxes.  It’s better now, but all the (Democrat controlled) cities are in the same position.  Wait until the 29 million illegal aliens suddenly get amnesty and welfare benefits.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  BowserB46
I’ve told him something similar many times but he doesn’t believe it. Mostly because there aren’t any real examples yet of public pensions being dramatically slashed (by dramatically I mean on the order of 50% or more). He could easily live on half that much pension given the free health care and the fact his home is paid off etc.
I also believe a day of reckoning will come for public pensions but it’s hard to say when given some states and cities are in far better positions than others so it could be 10 or 15 or even 20 years before his particular one is in trouble.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
I have patients like that.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T

Never had a
union job. I have pumped gas, served food, drove trucks, loaded dirty carpets
into gigantic industrial washing machines, installed air recyclers into the
weirdest places and many other things. That is how I made my money in high
school and worked my way through college. That’s what we did at the time. It
was normal. In a way I feel more kinship with those who scramble over the border
to get here than those who came contract in hand with a signing bonus and in an airplane . They have
the “root hog or die” attitude which is the same as ours.

KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Financially people are far worse off then in 1970. While day to day living expenses may be about the same relative to income, one time big expenses like buying a home and paying for college are far higher. These aren’t taken into account with CPI. Or at least not realistically. It doesn’t obviously manifest itself because people borrowed at low interest rates to pay for these. But the principle does increase monthly expenses which take a bite out of their net savings.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
+a lot.
The interesting (although much harder to pin point) metric, would be free and clear money, after taxes, “mandates”, levvies etc.
Also, to be of much use, the comparison has to be measured in something solid and hard to fake. Like square feet of San Francisco housing. Rather than arbitrarily debased Zimbawean dollars.
So, how many square feet in San Francisco can the median worker buy per hour of work today, vs 1973?
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
2 years ago
ADP numbers for December. Private payrolls continue to grow rapidly. 
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
2 years ago
“Private payrolls continue to grow rapidly.”
Sure, why not?  The free handouts from fedgov mostly over.  Time to go back to work.
Of course, a few months ago some thought people did not go back to work due to covid … and not free handouts.
I guessed covid vanquished ….
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Also, hand some yahoo enough stolen loot, and he can be counted on to hire prostitutes and “brokers” of Jimmy Choos and “superyachts.”
Or, he can even hire guys to stand around make-believe assembly lines making politically, though not economically, correct “cars.” At a loss. After all, why not, if what one builds doesn’t have to be worth more than the cost of building it? With the difference being made up for many times over, by simple looting of those less value destructive and their grandparents.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
OT…the little fracas in Kazakstan is the shot heard round the world in the energy markets this morning.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
2 years ago
Unfortunately, the post-1971 100% credit money system requires this to happen – forcing people into debt to maintain a first/second-world standard of living.
This issue was non-existent during the Bretton Woods (1945-71) era, and that is no coincidence.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
2 years ago
Reply to  Bam_Man
Decades of offshoring good jobs a key dynamic in current predicament.
All bow down to owners of capital.
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
2 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Yes, offshoring of good jobs is part of the same dynamic. People have to go into debt to maintain a certain standard of living. The current monetary system demands that aggregate debt increases constantly.
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
This seems normal. If everyone made a lot more money, it would result in the inflation that brought everyone back to the same relative purchasing power.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
If that was true, noone could possible get any wealthier than people were during the stone age.
As long as production of valuable goods get more efficient, overall wealth increases. Worker efficiency is closely tied to how much capital each worker has available. A guy with an 18 wheeler, can add an awful lot more value for his clients, hence command a greater salary, than he could back when he had to handcarry beef from Texas to New York.
Problem is, capital depreciates. Once you stop adding to the stock, capital which was once there, withers away. And to add value, you have to 1) invest wisely, and 2) not spend every penny you add and more.
Neither of which has happened since 1971, All purchasing power since then, has been handed to people too dumb to do anything more productive than live off rent, “their portfolios,” FIRE rackets and kangaroo court shakedowns. None of them competent enough to invest / allocate capital efficiently. Predictably resulting in today’s workers having less capital available than they did before. What they once had, has either depreciated away (like houses in San Francisco, which are mere decaying carcasses of what they were 50 years ago), or simply been stolen, so that idiots with no brains nor competence at all could burn it on “superyachts,” feelgood nonsense for children of all ages, and bomb craters halfway around the world.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
2 years ago
Expect to see more governments fall around the world as inflation takes hold.  The problem with embracing high prices is you get unrest across the globe. That’s something this generation of Fed bankers forgot.
soupcon
soupcon
2 years ago
Also not using the official CPI, as that is rigged as we all know, how about calculating wages adjusted for inflation over the same time period using the stats of John Williams aka Shadow Gov’t stats.
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  soupcon
Shadowstats is Nuts
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  soupcon
Mr. Williams is off far to the upside on inflation in my opinion. I know he uses the old metrics…..but they don’t capture a true picture now any more than CPI-U does, imho. The true number is probably 2% or so above CPI (averaged over time) because that is enough to inflate away the debt, which is the real objective.
LawrenceBird
LawrenceBird
2 years ago
It is not just inflation.  What has been the increase in real wages and assets of the top 1% over that time span?  Huge.  Congress and the executive branch both contributed to this by continuing to relax and remove regulations related to buybacks and mergers, among others.  That is money that would pull up the figure significantly for the rest of the population. The Fed gets their large share too but they are more akin to gasoline on the fire already lit by others.
amigator
amigator
2 years ago
Reply to  LawrenceBird
Excuse me but they (a lot of congress) are in on it too. They are getting their cut its just too much money to say no! 
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  LawrenceBird
it’s always been that way. It was worse in the 1800s when people like Rockefeller, Morgan, and Mellon were relatively far richer than the richest people today. And this was long before the FED existed.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Oh, no!  Wages have *risen* (even by less than a penny)??!!    Time to abolish the minimum wage!    That will make sure the wages will fall – which is what the unwashed masses deserve!  </sarc>
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
It would raise real incomes. Just not in the way you think. It would lower inflation.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
LOL.   That is the crap that people have been sold for 40+ years.  Everything has gone up – except the wages.  
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago

Here is a
nice table showing the dance between GDP growth, Inflation Rates and
Unemployment Rates since 1929. Although GDP is not a proxy to wage growth the
Unemployment rate probably is. The Inflation rate is the official one and not
Mish’s. If you has a table using his figures for inflation not necessarily
going back to 1929 I would appreciate viewing it. I believe it would support your case very well since it would show how much the Fed’s policies have disconnected in the last twenty years or so.

amigator
amigator
2 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Good stuff. But hasn’t the calculation for GDP actually changed? GDP 1950 would be much different if calculated using todays parameters?
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  amigator
I am sure it has changed but I can’t say how. 
soupcon
soupcon
2 years ago
Now how about calculating wages adjusted for inflation vs productivity over the same time period.
BowserB46
BowserB46
2 years ago
Assuming all the numbers are correct, that is good news, not bad.  You’re saying wages have kept up with inflation–and that’s all they should do.  Doing the same job day after day, year after year, is not how you get ahead.  Your earn more in real wages by getting better and better jobs.  You get a better job by improving your job skills and abilities.  In 1970, the job I had was minimum wage.  I went to college to improve that while I continued working at that job.  Over the years I learned more, including through experience, took and passed the CPA exam, and got better jobs.  Still later I started my own I.T. consulting business.  Now I’m retired.  I would not expect to have made as much in my original minimum wage job as I made as a CFO before I started my business.  That would be insane and a HUGE cause of massive inflation.
Again, your bad news is actually good news.  Workers with no advancement at all have kept up with inflation.  Well done, America!
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  BowserB46
The key phrase is kept up with ‘reported’ inflation (ie the number the government tells us is the inflation rate). That’s not likely the true inflation rate or certainly no one I know believes it is.
It’s also easy to see why too. Most companies give a flat ‘CPI’ raise to workers doing the same job year after year so their wage increases by the CPI value.
Your 100% correct that the only way to get ahead is by doing what you did, constantly improving yourself and getting promoted, taking new jobs etc.
Karlmarx
Karlmarx
2 years ago
Reply to  BowserB46
While I agree with Bowser on an individual basis, from the perspective of an entire economy he is not correct.  Over the period, zillions of dollars have been invested in higher education and other forms of human capital.  There have been huge investments in capital as well (think computers).  Flat wages are telling me that either capital (or to be the classical economist i am) land rents, have taken all of the gains from these investments.  
On the other hand, all of these investments have been meaningless in that they have not grown the economy any faster than population and inflation.  Knowing what I do about college education, I would argue that much of the investment in human capital has probably led to declining productivity.
Capital investments have probably added some to growth, but again a lot of that has been wasted.  A lot of investment in “technology” has done nothing but create social media bulletin boards that have added zero to the economy (think stuff like the facebook and Tik toc), while other investments in things like medicine have lengthened life expectancy meaning that people live for more economically unproductive years.  While life may be  better if you can live long enough to see your grandkids grow up, from an economic perspective this subtracts from the economy.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.