Relentless Flattening of the Yield Curve and Powell Accelerated the Move

October Change Synopsis

  • Since October 1, the yield on 3-year notes has gone up 32 basis points.
  • The yield on the 30-year long bond has fallen 26 basis points.
  • That is a relative flattening of 58 basis points, over double two quarter point rate hikes.

Powell Congressional Testimony

Yesterday, in testimony to Congress, Fed Chair Jerome Powell expressed concerns over inflation. 

He also stated it was appropriate to consider wrapping up tapering a few months sooner. Previously, the Fed’s tapering target was June 2022.

Interesting Bond Market Reaction

Yesterday I commented Stocks Decline as Powell Warns of Higher Inflation and Accelerated QE Tapering

The stock market reaction is what I would have expected on the above news. 

The bond market reaction is far more interesting. Yields at the long end tumbled and rose in the middle.  

Given news that the fed would taper (end QE expansion) sooner and then start hiking rates sooner, one would have expected a stock market decline (and been correct).

But if the economy was strengthening, bond yields would normally go up across the board. They didn’t. 

Treasury Yields October 1 vs November 30

The lead chart shows the relative change and the speed at which things are happening. 

Retiring the Phrase “Inflation is Transitory” 

After insisting for over a year that inflation was transitory, Powell finally decided to throw in the towel. 

This brought out some amusing observations from economist David Rosenberg and others.

 Mind Change

Let’s Get This Straight

Time for a New Measure of Inflation

Powell Broke the Market

What’s Next for the Fed?

“You break it you own it. Coming up next, the Fed buys stock market indexes.” 

Bonds Rip, Commodities Roll Over

“I mean, you have to love it. Powell drops ‘transitory’ just as commodities completely roll over and bonds rip. Keep on pivoting, Jay!”

The Next Phrase 

“What will be the next phrase the Fed will regret”

I originally read that as “Next Phase” and was going with the idea of electrical bananas (a tribute to Donovan), or my above idea “Coming up next, the Fed buys stock market indexes.”

Mellow Yellow

I like the graphics in that clip but mysteriously they stopped the video right before the key paragraph

Electrical banana
Is gonna be a sudden craze
Electrical banana
Is bound to be the very next phase

The question: “What was Mellow Yellow?”

When the song was released in 1966, everyone was convinced that it referred to a rumor that smoking banana peels would get a person high. (It doesn’t work.) Donovan said that was never the case.

“I was reading a newspaper and on the back there was an ad for a yellow dildo called the mellow yellow,” he said. “Really, you know the ‘electric banana’ was right in there and gave it away. And that’s what the song’s about.”

The above from Donovan answers age-old question: What was ‘Mellow Yellow?’

The Next Phase by the Fed is Uncertain 

Another Operation Twist is a good bet for the next phase. 

The next phase by the Fed is uncertain, but I am as convinced as ever that the expected dot plot of rate hikes is not that phase.

By the time the Fed gets around to being in a position to hike, the next recession is usually at hand.

The bond market agrees with my view. 

And stock market rally underway earlier today just faded so did a selloff at the long end of the yield curve. 

More flattening is underway as I type.

A Word About Fed Models 

Inflation models are worse than useless. They make central banks complacent.

For discussion of the Fed’s useless economic models please see How Bad are Inflation Models, Expectations, and Forecasts vs Reality?

For a discussion of dot plots of rates hikes expected by the Fed, please see my September 22 post Fed Anticipates Rate Hikes in 2022 and 2023 – Fade This Consensus

Thanks for Tuning In!

Like these reports? If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

40 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
If the FED truly stops asset purchases, either the stock market has to go down or interest rates have to go up. Or both. It’s mathematically impossible for interest rates to remain low and the stock market go up. There won’t be any new money to prop things up. The only caveat is if foreign central banks print and the money flows to the US, but, I think that’s unlikely.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
2 years ago
Who, in his/her right mind (aka a reasonable person) would lock up ‘money’ for 30 years for an overall yield of 1.78 percent? (Note, not  inflation-protected bonds).
With zero risk premium, an expected risk-free rate (approx the growth in real GNP) for the next 30 years, and an expected inflation premium for the next 30 years, 30-year T-bonds should yield… I’d expect AT LEAST 6  to 7% based on historical yields, alone. Less that that results in a massive wealth transfer, or such a miss-pricing of risk that irrational capital markets (thanks to the Fed) will, at some point, implode.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
For the first time in a long time, I’m reading some pundits that think that rates really will have to rise, and devil take the hindmost in markets. And the national debt will just have to balloon. Not sure how that would work out. Sounds very messy to me.
Scooot
Scooot
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
The BOE governor recently said that even though inflation is clearly becoming a problem, raising rates wouldn’t fix it because it’s due to supply problems. I doubt he’s the only CB head thinking along these lines so I think they’ll hold off for some time before they actually hike. It won’t stop the market pricing one or two in though. 
When they do raise rates, they can’t do it by much because it would cripple households with large mortgages, over here anyway. So they have a real problem if inflation gets out of hand. 
Scooot
Scooot
2 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab

I doubt anyone intends to “lock up” money for 30 years at 1.78, they just hope to sell it to someone else at a later date at a lower yield. Or perhaps park some money in a safe haven whilst other risk assets decline in price.

Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
2 years ago
Reply to  Scooot
Intention is NOT an issue, unless you think you know better than the rest of the market. Price and yield is ‘locked’ in at purchase. You are gambling against rational behavior to think the yields will be lower than they are currently. For example, negative yields imply a lender will pay you to borrow. That is irrational (gov’t policy excepted). At zero interest rates, money is ‘free’–it has no value over time. This is a last ditch effort to save the sinking welfare-state ship.
As for ‘safe haven’, when risk assets decline in price, it means yields have increased, which means your bonds are worth less…
Scooot
Scooot
2 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
“You are gambling against rational behavior to think the yields will be lower than they are currently”
Yes I agree, you’d be gambling.
I wasn’t trying to justify the low yields, I agree, they don’t reflect the risk and they’re lower than otherwise because of the Fed’s QE.
By park in a safe haven I was referring to selling equities and buying bonds for example. Bonds being a temporary safe haven whilst stocks were falling.
Christoball
Christoball
2 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Some people must have a very very large amount of cash that they need to park somewhere safe. These bonds do not have to offer much to get takers.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
2 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
“Who, in his/her right mind (aka a reasonable person) would lock up ‘money’ for 30 years for an overall yield of 1.78 percent?”
I did.
The bulk of my paper investments in STRIPS.  The remainder in cash.
EGW
EGW
2 years ago
The Stock Market drops a few percentage points and people freak out.
Christoball
Christoball
2 years ago
Reply to  EGW
I calculated a 6.6% decline from peak. The peak was just 3 weeks ago    
Scooot
Scooot
2 years ago
“Coming up next, the Fed buys stock market indexes.” 
They should realise high stock market prices aren’t good for everybody. Paying high prices for an income stream makes it harder for youngsters to invest for their future and pension managers to generate sufficient income to meet their pension liabilities. 
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
2 years ago
Reply to  Scooot
At the end of the day, it is all about the expected  ‘income stream’, although it is not always visible. Amazon will eventually have an income stream, unless it completely misses the market and goes the way of Sears. The income stream was crucial for the dot-com boom–the companies with income potential survived, the rest did not.
eg. Can Tesla produce enough cars in a competitive market to justify its stock price?
Jmurr
Jmurr
2 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
No
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
2 years ago
“Another Operation Twist is a good bet for the next phase.”
They’ll be chasing rates down.  If they go for this, a good chance 10yr yield goes negative.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
2 years ago
“You break it you own it. Coming up next, the Fed buys stock market indexes.” 
At SOME point, but not next.  At SOME point everyone will realize US been drafting Japan all along.  As for buying stock indices, not allowed by Federal Reserve Act.  Even Yellen admitted that a few years ago and said she wished Congress would alter Act to accommodate.  In absence I imagine some work around (BARELY skirting the law) like last year with Treasury.  Treasury put up $75 billion (first loss position) which Federal Reserve levered up to buy corporate bonds.
Having said that I’m going to channel Hussman here.  Makes (good) point that schemes like this work when appetite Risk On and encourage Animal Spirits.  Buying a few hundred $billion (in domestic equity market near $50 trillion) not going to turn the tide when EVERYONE heading for the exit.
Crash FIRST.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
The yield curve indicate there will be a short uptick, followed by a crash.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
2 years ago
It will crash at some point, but how many aces are they holding?
China wobbling.  If Xi loses control of things …
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
2 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
There are not enough aces at these yields. The Fed’s fundamental assumption is wrong–they are not God.
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
2 years ago
Goldman’s mentioning $300/bbl oil was the kiss of death.
Now at $65 and looking wobbly.
Steve_R
Steve_R
2 years ago
Taper and rising interest rates sink all boats, GS meant $50 crude  not $100, GS math go long while we are short.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve_R
As boats sink, risk skyrockets. Panic sets in. What happens then?   I’m betting gold is the last-resort asset, then land, income-producing real estate, utilities, food, energy…
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
2 years ago
Sure looks like a “Taper Tantrum Crash” is now underway.
S&P lost 140 points from its intraday high right into the close.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
2 years ago
Reply to  Bam_Man
Mortimer: Turn those machines back on! Turn those machines back on!
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Oil is responding to both Omicron lockdown fears and Biden’s meddling in the market. The technicals were smashed on Friday and I expect lots of volatility, for weeks or even months. It’s actually not terrible yet, but it could sure get worse. Today, markets were expecting OPEC to tighten supply. If the results of their meeting have been announced I haven’t seen it.
For the long term this is noise, imho. We still have the winter ahead.
As far as the broader markets, it’s too soon to tell if we’re topping. My best trader friends seriously doubt it, just because we haven’t seen the typical blow-out manic phase in stocks.  Doesn’t much matter to me.
Uranium had a great year but has been in correction phase for a month already. Nothing changes the long term outlook there either, imho.
Scooot
Scooot
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
It all seems very orderly, not sure that’s a good sign.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Opec decides tomorrow, not today, whether to tighten.
Scooot
Scooot
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
I was really referring to the Dow etc, it’s dipped below 34000 in the last half hour.
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
If somebody gets a fusion reactor working, all bets are off for the energy sector.   They will, sooner or later.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Well duh. The universe is full of fusion generators, we call them stars. But it’s hard to build a star inside a containment capsule.. The search for fusion is like searching for the Holy Grail. There are plans right now to try to build one (Canada I think, I was just reading about it) , but I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for cheaper electricity.
Small modular fission reactors are actually being built now. Every day I read about plans for a new generation nuke to be built. In China, Canada , and Korea and elsewhere…..here eventually. The sooner the better.We need to decommission all those fast breeder plants.
In the short run, we ( as in our politicians) have totally misjudged our true need for fossil fuels, and shortages and bottlenecks and lots of price volatility is going to be the norm….probably for years. 
Meanwhile I’m reading about oil companies with so much free cash they will be able to go private in 4-5 years if the management teams were to want that.
WIZWOZ
WIZWOZ
2 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Fusion “research” is just another dead-end govt. sink for our money.  There are thousands of others.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
“…we haven’t seen the typical blow-out manic phase in stocks…”
What is the mean and standard deviation of the long term trend? if we think of the ‘blow out’ phase as a six-sigma deviation, we might already be there
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
I don’t know, but I read some cycle counters who have watched a lot of tops, and none of them are calling a top. They’re calling this a move down into a normal DCL.
Scooot
Scooot
2 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Lots of valuations in this article.
Christoball
Christoball
2 years ago
It looks like investors are fleeing to cash.
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  Christoball
Impossible in aggregate 
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
2 years ago
Reply to  Christoball
They are just fleeing to the same stocks – at lower prices.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
2 years ago
Reply to  Christoball
The question is who buys and who sells. In any con game there must be a bag holder. Getting out in time, is the key to wealth building.
Christoball
Christoball
2 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
For every seller there is a buyer. I think investors are fleeing to cash, and consumer speculators are buying the dips.  I remember back in the day I chased Eastman Kodak all the way to zero. I thought I could catch a falling knife based on the value or their patents and such. Kodak had too many legacy costs and sold off their profitable chemical division to keep their film division alive.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.