Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Rethinking QT, Are There Practical Limits on What the Fed Can Do?

Image courtesy of Vanguard. Link below.

The Fed Will Not Hit its Own Quantitative Tightening Schedule

On July 28, I proposed The Fed Will Not Hit its Own Quantitative Tightening Schedule

That may be correct, but if so, for a reason other than I suggested. First consider a chart I posted.

Fed’s Mortgage Backed Securities forecast from NY Fed. Annotations by Mish.

The Fed has a current cap of $17.5 billion on MBS QT. In the last two months, the Fed has hit $1.7 Billion and $1.1 billion of that cap, rounded to “2” and “1” in the above chart.

Reverse Engineering QT

I suggested that due to falling existing home sales, the Fed would not come close to the cap.

Not so, says John Comisky in Reverse Engineering QT

  • So how can we prove the FED has reduced its reinvestment purchases? By looking here: https://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/soma-holdings (SOMAH)
  • Starting with UST. Coupon USTs typically mature the 15th and last day of the month. You can see the specific UST the FED owns at SOMAH (e.g. click on T-Notes and T-Bonds or TIPS tab), including their value and maturity date. You can also adjust the week-of date for the SOMAH to see how it looked (anc changed) from week to week.

I never doubted the Fed would hit its Treasury Cap. But what about mortgage backed securities?

The bulk of the MBS purchases takes 1-2 months to settle. There is a significant lag. As a result, almost all the MBS adding to the SOMAH in June and July was actually purchased prior to the start of QT. But that is all passed now so MBS BS reductions should reflect 17.5b in August. But do note that there will be a similar lag for when QT ramps to a 35b cap, will just reflect a 17.5b drop in September and October as the MBS purchased in July-Aug settles.

Speaking of that 35b cap, will the FED ever hit that? Maybe, but it couldn’t hit it today and wont hit it unless prepayment speeds rise a bit. Today the FED is receiving about ~29.5b in principal payments/prepayment from all its securities each month. So when the upped cap comes into play the FED will just stop buying MBS altogether (they are purchasing about 12b a month today to reinvest the ~29.5b payments received minus the cap). They might eventually actively sell MBS but they have announced no concrete plans to do so of yet.

Assuming Comisky is correct, that prepayment figure is likely to drop because of declining existing home sales, but it will not be as radical as I suggested.

Appearances Deceive

Practical Limits on QT

Let’s explore another QT idea with a Tweet Thread.

  1. QT will probably end in early 2023, and not because of recession. It will stop because the Fed can’t shrink its balance sheet past $8trn ($8.9trn now) without introducing problems for the system. 
  2. Everyone concentrates on the assets that the Fed has on the B/S. It’s basically all Treasuries and MBS. But, like any bank, assets must = liabilities. It’s the liabilities which tell us how big the balance sheet must be.
  3. It’s when you look at the liabilities that the reason for why the B/S can’t shrink all that much. The structure of the financial system has changed a lot since the GFC through regulation and the fear of another contagion driving deposits far more than they did pre-2007.
  4. What are the liabilities? One: Physical currency outstanding Two: Reverse Repo balances. Three: Reserves held by commercial banks. Each has a minimum in the new post-GFC world.
  5. Currency outstanding. This is at $2.3trn, and represents the amount of printed notes and coins in circulation. This obviously cannot fall without destroying notes and coins which is not going to happen. So the B/S must be at least $2.3trn in size.
  6. Reverse Repo. Due to regulation changes post-GFC, money market funds were dissuaded from investing in short-term bank paper, requiring govt paper only. There isn’t enough T-bills to satisfy this need. So the Fed creates an asset (RRP) for money market funds to invest in.
  7. Reverse Repo. To create this asset they borrow from the MMF to buy Treasuries on “loan”, creating a short-term security out of a long-term. This is $2.3trn. It has grown because rates are increasing and demand for short-term has increased. This won’t change for now.
  8. This is a change mostly from regulation, permanently increasing the BS size. This puts the minimum Fed balance sheet size so far at currency ($2.3trn) + RRP ($2.3trn) = $4.6trn.
  9. Excess reserves were at zero pre-GFC. This is because banks were searching for more return anywhere, driving short-term interbank lending. This totally changed post-GFC because of regulation, and fear. [See Chart Below]
  10. Wile this series is old, you can see how interbank lending collapsed and never recovered. It probably won’t. Banks are wary of contagion, and prefer the safety of reserves over risky interbank lending. Short-term lending puts your deposit attraction ability at risk. [See Chart Below]
  11. The banks are also deposit rich, with no where to lend (the exact opposite of 2006). This has driven demand for Fed reserves as the short-term asset of choice. Barcap puts the minimum for bank reserves at about $2.7trn before huge demand for safe assets hurts the system.
  12. Adding the minimums… Currency ($2.3trn) + RRP ($2.3trn) + Minimum bank reserves ($2.7trn) = $7.3trn Add the current deposit by the US treasury at the Fed ($0.7trn) MINIMUM B/S SIZE = $8trn given today’s dynamics. It can reduce more if RRP demand goes away (unlikely).
  13. The fantasy that the Fed can sell $8trn worth of Treasuries through QT is just that. Fantasy. In reality the balance sheet can be shrunk around $900bn. After that, QT is over.

New Optimum Balance Sheet

On May 16, 2022, Vanguard commented on The Fed’s plan to shrink its balance sheet, quickly

Estimate for the balance sheet roll-off path assumes that monthly proceeds of $30 billion in Treasury securities and $17.5 billion in agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) won’t be reinvested in the three months beginning June 1, 2022. Beginning September 1, 2022, monthly Treasury and MBS roll-off caps will rise to $60 billion and $35 billion, respectively. For MBS, roll-off after September 1, 2022, assumes forecasted MBS prepayments per the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s “Federal Reserve Asset Purchases: The Pandemic Response and Considerations Ahead,” March 2, 2022. Consistent with “Plans for Reducing the Size of the Federal Reserve’s Balance Sheet,” May 4, 2022, the estimated roll-off pace slows and then stops when the balance sheet is within range of optimal to allow assets to grow into the optimal range. The optimal balance sheet estimate comprises a constant $1.5 trillion level of required reserves, currency in circulation grown by 4% nominal GDP, and a constant 2.8% of GDP allocation for Treasury general account and other liabilities as per Fed Chairman Jerome Powell’s March 8, 2019, speech “Monetary Policy: Normalization and the Road Ahead.”

Two Views

  • $4 Trillion is Optimal
  • The Fed cannot come close

One thing is clear, the Fed’s balance sheet is going to be significantly padded for a long time vs 2009, even if the Fed meets its schedule for a while.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

26 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Bank deposits may have stopped growing, but the distributed lag effect of money (money which is miscounted) lasts for at least 24mo.
Deposits, All Commercial Banks (DPSACBM027NBOG) | FRED | St. Louis Fed (stlouisfed.org)
LawrenceBird
LawrenceBird
3 years ago
Stop paying interest on excess reserves and let the banks figure out what to do with the cash
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Reply to  LawrenceBird
The FED not only pays the banks not to lend, not to buy short term securities pending a longer term and more profitable disposition of their lending capacity, but the FED induces nonbank disintermediation (causing secular stagnation).
WTFUSA
WTFUSA
3 years ago
There damned sure weren’t any “practical” limits to the QE supernova the fed unleashed for more than a decade. I have grave doubts that QT goes much beyond November (except for maniacal jawboning).
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
3 years ago
The whole thing is moot. The US is running a global debt Ponzi. Ponzis must increase exponentially or they peak and the collapse into a lower low. Ponzis are manias. So they have to pump it up until the eventual climax and then it will be toast for the next 15 years.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
3 years ago
Yesterday the site President of my company was making his rounds. When he got to our department (research and development) he mentioned our customers are showing hesitancy on capital expenditures because interest rates are too high to make the investment profitable. This is very telling since 1.) interest rates are still near historic lows, 2.) in a rising interest rate environment the first to borrow has a better chance of keeping fixed costs lower, and 3.) efficiencies through automation pay for themselves. It’s point number 3 that is the most important since it implies businesses believe consumers don’t / won’t have the ability to pay for services that operate the capital equipment they manufacture.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear
“customers are showing hesitancy on capital expenditures because interest rates are too high to make the investment profitable.”
Welcome to the club. I quit putting pencil to paper about 5 years on (cash flowing) investments. The small payout not worth the risk.
The upcoming Crash in assets will see a more favorable environment for investment.
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
The risk is not in who owns the debt but in who is going to get stiffed when the loan defaults.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
“The bulk of the MBS purchases takes 1-2 months to settle.”
OK, but what about Treasuries? This isn’t the era of the Pony Express.
jcom
jcom
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
I dont know for certain but seems same day by looking at the balance sheet. June 15th at the SOMA is a good example. A 15b dollar UST matured and the FED reinvested about 5b of that all of which hit the BS on 6/15. MBS taking so long to settle is largely a function of the FED buying in the TBA market.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago

QT will probably end in early 2023, and not because of recession. It will stop because the Fed can’t shrink its balance sheet past $8trn ($8.9trn now) without introducing problems for the system.

Yes. I’ve always felt Federal Reserve’s balance sheet would hit $15 trillion before ever < $8 trillion.

One problem you did not address —> unrealized capital loss. Currently, Federal Reserve remits a nice “profit” to US Treasury (for benefit of taxpayer) from the $9 trillion in assets held.

What does it mean for the Fed to have an unrealized loss position on its securities holdings?

When securities are sold or prepayments from MBS are received, the gains or losses resulting from these transactions become realized and affect the Reserve Banks’ net income and remittances to the Treasury. Any realized gains and losses are recorded in the non-interest income portion of the Combined Statements of Operations on the Federal Reserve’s Financial Reports.

Looking forward, the FOMC has indicated that securities sales are not anticipated to be part of the balance sheet normalization program.

in the unlikely scenario in which realized losses were sufficiently large enough to result in an overall net income loss for the Reserve Banks, the Federal Reserve would still meet its financial obligations to cover operating expenses. In that case, remittances to the Treasury would be suspended and a deferred asset would be recorded on the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet, representing a claim on future net earnings that the Reserve Banks would need to realize before remittances to the Treasury would resume.

https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/somas-unrealized-loss-what-does-it-mean-20180813.htm

In short (unless interest rates drop bigly) Federal Reserve balance sheet needs to be ample in order to have “deferred assets” (future interest income from assets held) to offset (pending) realized losses (unrealized losses around $500 billion iirc currently).

Russell McDowell
Russell McDowell
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Printing money to monetize the debt isn’t a benefit to the taxpayer. It’s a monetary system where a disproportionate amount of wealth gets distributed to the top while a large number of current and future tax payers will be hit with a higher cost-of living and unaffordable housing.
The Fed won’t take capital losses on sales as they will hold the bonds to maturity. It’s possible that if they raised interest rates high enough that the amount they paid out in interest to banks on their excess reserves and money market funds for their RRP investments could exceed what they are getting paid by the Treasury on their bond holdings. But they still would have remitted much more back to the Treasury in the long run.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
“Printing money to monetize the debt isn’t a benefit to the taxpayer.”
Oh, I agree.
But, they do remit something to US Treasury. Better than giving it all to the Federal Reserve’s owners (commercial banks).
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
I started off quite skeptical about QT, and grow only more so. Powell has feet of clay. He’s not serious about anything at all.
radar
radar
3 years ago
So what to do with spare cash? But gold, stocks, oil, bullets or booze? All of the above?
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  radar
Instead of buying a new mattress place piles of cash between the mattress and box springs under the mattress low spots.
jcom
jcom
3 years ago
Hi,
Thanks for posting my article! It is very much appreciated. Quick note that my last name is Comiskey. I dont particularly care, but the “e” will start whining to me about being left out so i figured I would mention :).
Commenting on the second part of the post. I dont agree that the RRP usage is mainly driven by regulation nor that it is a permanent BS expander. Its influenced by regulation sure, but there have been significant periods post GFC where RRP was close to or at zero (see 2018-2020). Rather, in tandem with the massive amount of new liquidity coming into the system starting late 2020, I think the main driver for expanded RRP uptake was the FED’s decision to start paying interest on it in June/21and then continuing to up that rate of interest with each FOMC rate hike. As an MMF, why even bother playing in other investments you are allowed to by regulation when the FED will give you (up to their counterparty cap) truly riskless (no counterparty risk, no duration) 2.3% return (vs. 1 month treasury of 2.1% yesterday). FED could alter that risk/reward by reducing or eliminating the interest it pays on RRP. Why doesnt it do that now? Because money leaving the RRP would loosen financial conditions/increase public market liquidity which it doesnt want to do right now. Eventually though I think decoupling the ON RRP (and keeping it steady or lowering) rate provides the FED an option to continue QT even as market conditions deteriorate by offsetting the public market liquidity decrease from QT with an increase from money flowing out of RRP. So I guess I look at RRP as, well the FED should be able to reduce its BS by at least that much.
Russell McDowell
Russell McDowell
3 years ago
Reply to  jcom
“Because money leaving the RRP would loosen financial conditions/increase public market liquidity which it doesnt want to do right now.”
Good article but the Fed leaving RRP doesn’t loosen financial conditions and increase public market liquidity. Investors keep cash in money-market funds and the fund managers take that cash and invest it in the overnight RRP for the slightly better return. This doesn’t affect the liquidity of the investor as they have immediate access to their cash and aren’t even aware that it is being invested in RRP. The tiny amount of extra interest the investor receives is unlikely to change their asset allocation decisions.
The financial system shouldn’t have been regulated or designed such that the FED has to print money to buy the government’s debt. When interest rates are zero, this is a pure debt-cancellation scheme as all the interest paid to the Fed is remitted back to the Treasury. In any event, the point of the whole operation was to lower interest rates and increase the money supply to drive up asset prices while increasing inflation.
jcom
jcom
3 years ago
If the MMF fund managers did not invest that cash in ON RRP they would invest it elsewhere (to the extent allowed by reg) like treasuries, repo etc. which is the basis of my loosen financial condition/increase public market liquidity remark. I wasnt referring to the additional interest MMF investors get passed back through to them in a a world with ON RRP paying above 1 month t-bill interest vs. not. I agree the MMF investors are there for the liquidity
Russell McDowell
Russell McDowell
3 years ago
Reply to  jcom
Great, thanks.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
I think the FED has lost control. Link: Bank Credit, All Commercial Banks (TOTBKCR)
Bank Credit, All Commercial Banks (TOTBKCR) | FRED | St. Louis Fed (stlouisfed.org)
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
‘Are There Practical Limits on What the Fed Can Do?”
Yes! They can’t sell either treasuries or MBS. To do so would screw the pooch on the soft landing. The later is vastly more important. 30YFRM may breach 4% early this fall. If so, this is going to put the Fed in a really tight spot:
Do you sell MBS to push up mortgage rates back up and commit themselves to getting rid of every single MBS they hold by early 2024? This will certainly tank the soft landing for housing.
Or do nothing and watch mortgage rates drop below 4%, causing housing to do a 180 and having done NOTHING to solve the housing affordability crisis.
Whether they actually make their runoff targets starting in September will matter very little to the economy. The question from above is going to make or break what the Fed does. It’s a paradigm shift from where they’re at now. In other words, do they intentionally tank housing for the good of medium & longer-term housing affordability or not? That’s the question.
So, for the millionth time. The only way the rent & housing price spiral get solved are through a significant 12-month long recession. Otherwise, we’re living in COVID 2.0 in terms of the Fed & Government running amuck choosing winners & losers. But hey, that’s socialism for you, not capitalism like we had prior to September 2008.
MMT baby all the way. Go JPowell!
JeffD
JeffD
3 years ago
Regulations can change in the space of months.
shamrock
shamrock
3 years ago
“This obviously cannot fall without destroying notes and coins which is not going to happen.”
If that’s not going to happen then why would they need any assets to back up that liability? They don’t.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
“If that’s not going to happen then why would they need any assets to back up that liability? They don’t.”
Really?
Mugabe tried that … how’d that work?
jon
jon
3 years ago
“This obviously cannot fall without destroying notes and coins which is not going to happen.” what about central bank digital currencies? we aren’t adopting them now, but could begin anytime. this is easy as issuing a credit card from the fed (horrific, i know). then it becomes a question of how widespread the adoption would be, correct?

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.