Stablecoins Plunge in the Collapse of SVB, Circle Caught in a Lie

USDC Stablecoin Depegs

Coindesk reports USDC Stablecoin Depegs, Crypto Market Goes Haywire After Silicon Valley Bank Collapses

USDC’s normally stable price sank to $0.869 from $1 while Ethereum gas fees soared hours after the crypto-tied bank failed.

Stablecoin prices wildly swung and gas fees soared as investors scrambled to move money around hours after regulators shut SVB amid a run on the bank, which had ties to crypto. It was the second crypto-linked bank to go under this week.

In the aftermath, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen convened top financial regulators to discuss the collapse of SVB. Not long after, crypto markets went into turmoil, suggesting the more-than-year-long bear market has entered an even darker phase.

Circle Internet Financial’s USDC stablecoin massively depegged from its intended $1 price – a harrowing development for a product designed as a place for investors to safely park money. 

USDC Transactions Halted

What’s the Bear Case

What’s Missing? 

  1. A huge run on the exchange could cause it to collapse.
  2. Haircuts 

Unless Circle has other issues, the main risks at the moment is haircuts and a huge loss in trust.. I will do a post later on what I think will happen and how big the haircuts will be.

But my bottom line is don’t expect bailouts. Depositors in amounts above the FDIC limit are highly likely to take a haircut. 

How Circle parses those haircuts is unknown. Also unknown is the size of the run on Circle because it halted redemptions.

Circle’s USDC Stablecoin Breaks Peg With $3.3 Billion Stuck at Silicon Valley Bank

The Wall Street Journal reports Circle’s USDC Stablecoin Breaks Peg With $3.3 Billion Stuck at Silicon Valley Bank.

USD Coin fell below 87 cents on Saturday morning, according to data from CoinDesk. The virtual currency, known as a stablecoin, is designed to trade exactly at $1. It is backed by real U.S. dollars and short-term government debt, and sits at the heart of cryptocurrency trading.

Another stablecoin, Dai, also broke from its $1 peg, trading as low as 90 cents Saturday. Dai, the fourth-largest stablecoin worth around $5 billion, is partially backed by USD Coin, also known by traders as USDC.

Circle isn’t the only crypto company affected by the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank. Crypto lender BlockFi, which filed for bankruptcy in November, had roughly $227 million in unprotected funds at the bank, the U.S. Trustee, a unit at the Justice Department overseeing bankruptcies, said in a court filing Friday.

Asked if Circle was a moneymaking machine in an interview in January, Circle founder Jeremy Allaire said, “It is.” He added: “Monetization really scaled up in 2022.”

The USD Coin reserves remaining at Silicon Valley Bank comprise about 8% of the roughly $40 billion in assets backing the token, according to Circle. Circle has said it maintains around 20% of its holdings in bank deposits and 80% in three-month government securities. Without access to the bank deposits, Circle may face difficulty meeting redemption requests.

What About Trust and Lies? 

Let’s take a look at Circle’s Website for inaccurate statements.

Stability you can trust

Known as a fully-reserved stablecoin, every digital dollar of USDC on the internet is 100% backed by cash and short-dated U.S. treasuries, so that it’s always redeemable 1:1 for U.S. dollars. USDC reserves are held in the custody and management of leading U.S. financial institutions, including BlackRock and BNY Mellon.

Sorry, that’s false. Given that it halted redemptions, it’s not always redeemable.

More importantly, “Every digital dollar of USDC on the internet is [NOT] 100% backed by cash and short-dated U.S. treasuries.”

Known Lie or Bad Assumption?

This can be a known lie by Circle or a bad assumption by Circle.

What did SVB promise Circle? Higher yields on long-dated treasuries perhaps?

Did Circle knowingly take on extra risk seeking yield on 10 percent or so of its assets?

Reserves Composition  

Known Lie

Forgive me for asking a second time, but what about the long-dated treasuries at Silicon Valley Bank?

And if I can ask further, what is the duration on the assets held at Blackrock? 

We need to see the deals Circle made at SVB and Blackrock to be sure. But one thing we do know, and Circle now knows for sure, is the above chart is a lie. 

Circle is not 100% backed by short-term treasuries and cash. That’s a fact. and we need to find out whether this was on purpose or an accident. 

Hoot of the Day

Silicon Valley Bank Collapses, 93 Percent of Deposits Not Insured! What Now?

To help tie some of the missing pieces together, please see Silicon Valley Bank Collapses, 93 Percent of Deposits Not Insured! What Now?

Later today I will take a stab at how big the haircuts will be.

Meanwhile, ponder the idea that Blackrock undoubtedly knew Circle’s claim that “every digital dollar of USDC on the internet is 100% backed by cash and short-dated U.S. treasuries”.

So, what is the duration of Circle’s assets at Blackrock?  

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

17 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
3 years ago
And Warren Buffet called derivatives “weapons of mass financial destruction.”
Crypto’s are doing a smash-up job.
Mac Timred
Mac Timred
3 years ago
Everyone needs to understand, most of thecredit markets function based oncredit ratings.
SVB Financial was rated A1, very strong investment grade, until Wednesday March 8. On that date they downgraded to Baa1. No one but no one is or in theory given past 48hrs, should ever be worried about parking cash with a Moody’s A1 rated institution. In fact that’s what you do so that you can sleep well at night. Baa1 is still quite safe.
The biggest lapse in this entire affair by far, from what I know, is the lapse by Moody’s. It was only AFTER MARKET CLOSE on FRIDAY, that Moody’s downgraded. Then too late to help anyone.
So Circle wasn’t lying by saying they parked cash in a super safe place. Credit markets function in reliance on credit ratings.
How to ameliorate that is another topic.
hmk
hmk
3 years ago
Reply to  Mac Timred
Deemed the “bank of the cycle” in the Nov. 15, 2019, edition of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer (it was no compliment), SVB wilted under the weight of the dramatic interest rate whipsaw seen in recent years, even as shares tripled over the two years following that bearish analysis. In tandem with that euphoria, the lender attracted a surge in venture capital-driven deposits as borrowing costs cratered during the pandemic, investing much of those funds into longer duration Treasurys and other “low risk” securities at interest rates now far below prevailing levels, thus setting the stage for this week’s fireworks.
Someone obviously thought differently about its creditworthiness back in 2019. Makes you wonder about how reliable Moody’s really is.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Beyond “Juan Guacamole’s” blabbering economic idiocy, I have a theory that NFT’s in general are being used for Russian money laundering and pump n’ dump manipulation.
I clicked the link to “Guacamole’s” Twitter, and sure enough, all his retweets are anti-American/Pro-Russian bull s*hit.
So, yeah, money moves from A to B, A=American Gen z’s to B=Oligarch’s.
lakerz
lakerz
3 years ago
Man oh man does Mish have a hard on for crypto LOL. Failure of SVB really has nothing to do with crypto and everything to do with a standard ‘run on the bank’ scenario. Yes Circle had 6-10% of its assets stored at SVB which is very unfortunate for them. However why is Mish saying (accusing?) Circle of having it stored in long duration USTs? Just because SVB balance sheet was full on long duration mark to market losses doesn’t mean Circle was doing that. Circle was just a depositor right? Once you deposit money at bank your hands are tied as to what the bank uses that money for. SVB as creditor doesn’t tell Circle jack sh!t what they are doing with said money, so it is not Circle lying about backing 100% of assets with cash or short duration USTs as they literally *DID* have cash deposited at SVB!
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  lakerz
1: “Failure of SVB really has nothing to do with crypto and everything to do with a standard ‘run on the bank’ scenario.”
Never said or even hinted otherwise.
2: “so it is not Circle lying about backing 100% of assets with cash or short duration USTs as they literally *DID* have cash deposited at SVB!”
False
Circle is lying. They posted a chart on March 9, that proves a lie. Whether purposeful or not. Circle made a claim 100% known to now be false.
Circle is not 100% backed by short-term treasuries and cash. That’s a fact. and we need to find out whether this was on purpose or an accident.
Moreover, Circle now knows its chart is a lie. Period. What we do not know is whether Circle knew what was going on or not. Regardless, the chart as published is a lie. Period.
Q: What does this make LakerZ?
A: A crypto faith-based religious believer
lakerz
lakerz
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
You’re a smart guy Mish, and I read a lot of what you write. However you have a character flaw when anyone pushes back against your assertions you try and make it personal with name calling. I am agnostic on crypto for the most part, I just find it funny how much time & effort you put into attacking it. Frankly I have no problems with your attack on Tether and Terra (and algorithmic stablecoins in general) along with ponzis like Celsius and FTX. However when you call out Circle as lying about being backed by cash when they deposit said cash in a bank that seems over the top to me. What would satisfy you to not call Circle a liar? Put all their cash stuffed in Circle’s CEO mattress?!? Stored in a vault? You are blaming Circle for having no choice but to participate in the fractional reserve CeFi banking system when it comes to figuring out where to put billions of dollars to back the coin. Circle never owned long dated treasuries that was SV Bank that *took* Circle’s deposits and used it that way.
PreCambrian
PreCambrian
3 years ago
I am not a big believer in stablecoins but I am unsure of your logic stating that it was a lie by Circle that their stablecoin is 100% backed by cash and short term US Treasuries. If they put cash in the bank in a demand account and the bank invested it on their own (which they do with everyone’s money) in a long term treasury, that is a bank issue not a Circle lie. They expected (as everyone else does) to be able to withdraw cash when needed. As long as the remainder is in short term ( 1 year or less) treasuries then it would seem to me that they were telling the truth. So perhaps we will see a lot of larger depositors (such as businesses) move funds from smaller regional banks to one of the Big 4 banks. But even then it wouldn’t necessarily prevent a run on the bank. If everyone tried to withdraw from JPMorgan Chase on Monday it would probably result in some type of frozen accounts or insolvency.
SVB might just have enough assets and reserves to pay everyone off in full. There will be some companies hurting to make payroll and other obligations next week for sure.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  PreCambrian
Then why didn’t Circle buy the Treasuries itself and keep them itself to insure that the parity remains under control? After all Circle’s business depends totally on that. Is it because those who run crypto have no idea how money works and are clueless about banking?
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
I dunno man, pro crypto guys make a strong argument that it’s the inverse, people that understand how money works are the illiterates….and they sound really confident when they say it.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
They are salesmen which is why they sound confident. If you are giving a pitch to someone who has so much money he doesn’t know what to do with it that’s all you need.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
I was kidding about crypto types…”…and they sound really confident when they say it.”
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
Yes and I appreciated it. It’s fun to make fun of salesmen and those who buy from them, myself included.
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  PreCambrian
Proven Lie
1. Circle now understands that it is not 100% backed by cash and short term treasuries does it not?
2. Since it does, the March 9 chart is a lie
It should post an accurate chart with an explanation [not our fault]
And the facts better show that Circle is not knowing involved in speculation
We have no such explanation from Circle.
Why?
PreCambrian
PreCambrian
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
March 9 SVB was still operating. It seems like a valid (if somewhat ignoring the imminent risks). It is hard to go back in time to change the statement they already made. If Circle published the chart after March 10 when the FDIC took over SVB then it would be a lie. Let’s say they had 100% in US Treasuries and then in August Congress fails to increase the debt ceiling and defaults on some of Circle’s bonds. Would that be a lie that their stablecoins are 100% backed by US Treasuries? I agree that Circle probably doesn’t know how to respond and wants to put on the best face. They definitely shouldn’t make any further representation of 100% backed unless they had more than the $3 billion in excess reserves that they lost at SVB.
Listening to you on Wealthion as I type.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Low-hanging fruit, round 2. I’m with Hippy Dippy. Was this ever foreseeable?… A resounding yes!
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
Every time I read one of these crypto crashes, I remember this one bitcoin zealot I had met once. And then I smile.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.