
According to CME Fedwatch, the single most likely action by the Fed is a pause all the way until a rate cut at the November meeting. But the path isn’t necessarily a flat one.
Odds of 5.00 Percent to 5.25 Percent
- June 14: 81.5%
- July 23: 80.6%
- September 23: 55.9%
- November 1: 20.9%
Across the board, the market has penciled in a much tougher Fed than immediately following the last FOMC meeting.
The lead chart shows the weighted average of market bets. The market has penciled in a rate hike in July then a cut in September.
Nonetheless, the market still anticipates an aggressive path of rate cuts starting in November and continuing in 2024.
What About the Debt Ceiling and Possible Default?
For now, the market seems little concerned about the possibility of a default. Neither am I.
For discussion, please see Biden Accuses Republicans of Extreme and Unacceptable Positions as Budget Optimism Fades
This post originated at MishTalk.Com
Addendum
Minutes after I finished the post, the market took back odds of a hike in July.
Please Subscribe!
Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.
Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.
If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.
Mish


A quote from Richard Werner:
Solving the enigma of the ‘velocity decline’
The problems arising from the implicit assumption that nominal
GDP (that is, PY) can be used to represent total transaction values (PT) are
obvious. GDP transactions are a subset of all transactions. The mainstream
quantity equation (2) that uses income or GDP to represent transactions will
thus only be reliable in time periods when the value of non-GDP transactions,
such as asset transactions, remains constant (thus dropping out when
considering flows). However, when their value rises, this will cause GDP to be
an unreliable proxy for the value of all transactions. In those time periods we
must expect the traditional quantity equation, MV ⫽ PY, to give the appearance of a fall in the
velocity V, as money is used for transactions other than nominal GDP (PY). This
explains why in many countries with asset price booms economists puzzled over
an apparent ‘velocity decline’, a ‘breakdown of the money demand function’ or a
‘mystery of missing money’ – issues that severely hampered the monetarist
approach to monetary policy implementation.”