The Social Security Cost of Living Adjustment is 2.8 percent.
Happy with 2.8 Percent?
The Wall Street Journal reports Social Security Is Giving Retirees a 2.8% COLA Bump for 2026
Starting in January, the average monthly check for the nation’s 53 million retired recipients will be $2,064, up $56 from this year.
The annual COLA is based on a Labor Department inflation measure that tracks how much Americans paid for a range of goods and services in the third quarter, compared with a year ago.
Inflation this year has been far below the surge that pushed the COLA to 8.7% in 2023, its highest in more than four decades. But the modest increase in the COLA for next year reflects a recent uptick in inflation that has Americans paying more for items including coffee, ground beef, produce, electricity and used cars and trucks.
A September poll by AARP found that 72% of adults ages 50 and older said they would need at least a 5% annual increase in benefits to keep up with rising prices. Less than a quarter said a 3% COLA would cover the rise in their costs.
With inflation close to zero from 2010 to 2021, “retirees are in a state of constant sticker shock,” that fuels dissatisfaction with the COLA, said Joel Eskovitz, senior director of Social Security and Savings at AARP.
An experimental inflation gauge by the Labor Department that aims to capture the rate of inflation faced by people ages 62 and older has recently been running slightly ahead of the inflation index that the COLA is based on. The gauge gives greater weight to medical costs, among other adjustments, but the Labor Department warns it might not accurately capture the use of senior discounts, among other limitations.
For many retirees, the annual COLA raise will be somewhat eaten up by higher premiums for Medicare Part B, which pays for doctor’s and outpatient visits and is typically deducted from benefits checks.
Next year, the standard Part B premium is slated to rise $21.50 a month, from $185 to $206.50, according to estimates Medicare’s trustees released in June. That would consume about 38% of the average $56 projected COLA raise.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services typically releases the new Part B premium in the fall. The Social Security Administration also said Friday that the maximum amount of earnings subject to the Social Security tax will increase to $184,500 in 2026 from $176,100 in 2025.
Will 2.8 Percent Cover Cost of Living?
Of course not, if calculated properly. Most older Americans own their own home and the CPI on which the COLA is based does not include property taxes or homeowners’ insurance.
The latter is soaring everywhere. The former is capped in states like California but rising big elsewhere.
A COLA Cap
The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget CRFB wants to cap the COLA for high earners.
Please consider A Social Security COLA Cap
Social Security is rapidly approaching insolvency. The retirement trust fund is seven years from exhaustion, and the theoretically combined trust funds are nine years from running out. Without legislative action, retirees will face an estimated 24 percent across-the-board benefit cut in late 2032. Restoring long-term solvency will require slowing the growth of benefits, raising revenue, or some combination.
Under the Social Security program, benefit levels are increased every January through an annual Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA), which is meant to ensure benefits keep pace with inflation. All beneficiaries receive this annual COLA based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W).
In the past, several plans have proposed modifying COLAs to lower future program costs. A common proposal involves using a more accurate measure of inflation known as the chained CPI (C-CPI-U) to calculate COLAs. Another proposal would means-test the COLA to eliminate increases in years beneficiaries have high incomes.
This Trust Fund Solutions Initiative white paper offers a new option to cap COLAs at the amount received by a relatively high earner. Under the proposed COLA cap, all beneficiaries would continue to receive an annual COLA, but that COLA would be limited in size for those with the largest benefits (and highest lifetime income). A COLA cap could be enacted in place of or in combination with other COLA changes.
Under this Trust Fund Solution, the COLA would be limited each year to the amount received by a beneficiary with a relatively high benefit level. All beneficiaries would continue to receive a COLA under this proposal – many would receive the same COLA as under current law – and initial benefits would continue to be indexed to wage growth as under current law. However, beneficiaries that would otherwise receive a COLA above the cap – retirees with the largest benefits and the highest lifetime incomes – would instead receive a COLA equal to the cap.
Solvency Extension
A COLA cap would extend solvency at the expense of those with the highest benefit levels.
Here’s the kicker: Setting the cap somewhere between the median and 90th percentile of benefits could close between one-twentieth and one-quarter of Social Security’s 75-year solvency gap.
To go beyond closing a mere 10-25 percent of the gap, benefits would have to be reduced more, or more tax revenue collected.
Congress is reluctant to do either, so don’t expect any changes.
Meanwhile, Social Security recipients are already in the hole vs better calculations of a COLA.
Not Enough? Too Much?
Related Post
August 11, 2025: Is Homeowners Insurance Understated in the CPI? Shop Around!
Our Insurance went up by $2,000. Then another $2,000. Here’s our story.
What’s the Insurance Weight?
The BLS says shelter is 35.473 of the CPI. Of that, Tenants’ and household insurance is allegedly 0.414 percent.
Sound right?
If you own a home, what percent of your income is spent on your homeowners’ insurance?
Under 1/2 of 1 percent?
Click on the above post for more details.


Recessions can be fun.
I usually expect decent discussion for the most part here. This is the most nonsensical discussion I’ve ever seen here. This is like going on the Off-Topic section of a college football team forum. Social Security apparently brings out the bad in people.
I knew to ask this because I read the post-GFC book, “Greenspan’s Bubbles: The Age of Ignorance at the Federal Reserve.” I’d change that title to “Intentional Ignorance.”
Q: Has it ever been publicly admitted that efforts to make US inflation calculations “more accurate” are actually primarily intended to reduce COLA payments?
Grok 3 AI:
[many detailed proofs not included in this post]
Yes, there have been admissions—particularly from the Boskin Commission and associated fiscal projections—that “accuracy” improvements to CPI calculations were designed with reducing COLA payments as a primary goal. The commission’s report and related policy actions openly quantified the savings to federal budgets, including Social Security. While BLS emphasizes methodological purity, the political and economic context reveals COLA restraint as a deliberate outcome. Ongoing debates (e.g., proposals for CPI-E to increase COLAs) highlight how these reforms continue to favor fiscal restraint over beneficiary protection.
Just as with the disproportionate ratio of downward revisions of economic and employment data after the have already pumped equities, more “accurate” inflation calculations always produce LOWER figures. Go figure…
Billion$ for Israel, Ukraine warmongering, even Argentina….pennies for retirees and elderly. The predatory oligarchs are turning the US into a 3rd world overlord/serf society. Even China has figured out how to give everyone a fair share. The US Empire eats its own.
The 2.8 percent cola is only better than nothing.
For the related homeowners insurance cost, my 2025 cost is 60% higher than 2019. The owners of mutual insurance companies are the policyholders who have to pay higher premiums to cover the inflation costs.
It is too little, unless SS becomes tax-free. We pay taxes all our working lives. The CPI should be inflated by 35% to account for taxes….ie real after tax increases in taxes is close to 4%.
I love how all these people talk about “insolvency” wrt SS yet are all so happy to print Billions of dollars for a “golden battleship”
Been here reading Mish for a good decade or two, and people still don’t realize the USD is printed from the ether, we’re just debating whether it goes to the wealthy or the poor.
“We can guarantee cash benefits as far out and at whatever size you like, but we cannot guarantee their purchasing power.” – Greenspan
I love watching all the geezers who were just complaining about snap sally out to defend this travesty. Hmmm, I wonder what the difference is for them?
A high-earners cap would be rather unfair given the already extremely progressive nature of Social Security pension benefits. High earnings’ benefits calculation formula is a measly 15%, compared to the low-earnings benefit formula value of 90%.
Yes, I realize this is about social security, but the underlying problem is government dependency. Obviously, SNAP and EBT did not fix the US’ food problem since the ‘numbers’ keep increasing…
I’m referring to both # of people and physical weight.
SNAP enrollment increased 17.3 million in 2001 to 42.1 million in 2023. That’s 6.1% of the US population in 2001, becoming even more government dependent…12.6% in 2023.
Obesity increased from 30.5% in 1999-2000 to 41.9% by 2023.
(there’s an embedded logic issue, but I GUARANTEE the obesity is concentrated in SNAP/EBT recipients)
If you think SNAP/EBT is a roaring success–you are WRONG. SNAP is a failure! It is time to end it.
Maybe the solution is found in the ‘proverb’:
Give a Man a Fish, and You Feed Him for a Day. Teach a Man To Fish, and You Feed Him for a Lifetime.
That is deep, real deep. Did you go to India as a boomer hippie and learn this.
A deeper saying for today’s time goes something like this…….
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Teach a man to dumpster dive, he eats for a lifetime.
The most cruel boomers just Marie Antoinette it and say, Let them eat cat food.
If you want a better solution, here is a better proverb.
“When you find yourself deep in a hole, the first thing you do is, Stop Digging”. Ending COLA is the best way to force everyone to open their eyes and actualy fund SS for the next 50 years, not just the: patch, lie, barrow, steal, cover up and conceal system we have been using for decades.
Wages don’t keep up with inflation. Low-wage jobs increase. Retired seniors SS doesn’t come close to keeping up with inflation.
SNAP is based on a percentage of income vs poverty level gov set numbers.
Every year we have more poor and fewer middle class.
Social security is an expression of solidarity between generations.
All attempts to exempt wealthy people who don’t need it erodes that solidarity and opens the door wide to more financial tinkering that will transform it into something else than solidarity.
Not saying this to be a friend to the wealthy, but under inflationary policies there’s no such thing as savings … every attempt at saving/investment includes risk.
Maybe it’s only me, but I have the impression that food price inflation has suddenly accelerated over the last few weeks It’s most obvious for seafood and meat, but it seems to be across the board. Maybe it’s not just the direct effect of Trump’s tariffs, but also that the agro-food complex exploits his chaotic tariff policies to hike their prices.
Maybe it is paying higher wages because there are fewer illegal immigrants?
Interesting. The last few weeks the sales at the grocery store have been unusually good. Beef is high but chicken is not. I can’t. Say on the sea food because it’s always priced out of reach when you live inland.
I think it is very generous.
SNAP might be pd in weekly tranches in most states. Most governors will take care of the poor as much as they can. They might be smaller a smaller if the shutdown cont. Future gov goodies might be cannibalized.
The obvious question is why is SNAP a Federal issue?
SNAP pays about $ 8 billion a month to grocery stores. That money pays processors, truckers, farmers, new equipment, loan payments.
Remove $8 billion a month from the economy and what happens?
The SNAP benefit suspension thing should reduce cola consumption.
Will Trump allow all Americans to receive the COLA? Or will such benefits be limited to people who can prove they voted for Trump? Normally you could call this an insane claim. But examine Trump’s record of punishing people who disagree with him through the legitimate and illegitimate use of his power, and you know it’s a very reasonable wonder. Bring your opposite claims, they’re welcome here.
Especially your claims about prosecuting Trump’s political foes, let’s discuss any of those.
Just asinine, and lacking any evidence of the claims, which is typical of Democrat scare tactics–the idiot masses believe it.
However, I do not deny that Trump uses his platform to draw attention to such injustices as:
the treatment of people with Trump yard signs in the flood-ravaged areas after Hurricane Helene, or debanking Trump supporters, ordisparate treatment of people as a result of DEI policies, orcorrecting past injustices concerning the fraudulent RussiaGate ‘investigation’
Had enough yet?
Care to name the people he has illegitimately punished?
That was an easy AI search. You can look up the actual names yourself but you’re either a cult member or just really don’t want to know.
Numerous individuals and groups have alleged that they were unfairly or illegitimately targeted by the Trump administration during both his first term and in the period since he left office. Allegations include politically motivated firings, retaliatory investigations, and abuses of power against government employees, journalists, political opponents, and others who were perceived as disloyal. Many of these claims are documented by watchdog groups such as Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and have been the subject of congressional investigations and lawsuits.
Retaliation against political rivals
Intelligence officials: In April 2025, during his second term, Trump revoked the security clearances of dozens of former national security officials and political rivals, including former President Joe Biden, former CIA director John Brennan, and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper.Political opponents: In October 2025, the Senate Judiciary Committee released subpoenas that Special Counsel Jack Smith issued to over 400 Republican individuals and entities during his investigation. Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) referred to the subpoenas as an “indiscriminate election case” and suggested the investigation was politically motivated.Department of Justice officials: Federal prosecutors and FBI agents who worked on investigations related to Trump or the January 6th insurrection have been fired. Many believe these actions were retaliatory.Federal law firms: In March 2025, Trump targeted prominent law firms, such as Perkins Coie and WilmerHale, with sanctions and restrictions. Perkins Coie was accused of “dishonest and dangerous activity” for its past work with the Hillary Clinton campaign, while WilmerHale was targeted for its association with former special counsel Robert Mueller. Federal judges blocked these actions, with one stating that the executive order was an attempt to punish WilmerHale for representing Trump’s political opponents. Abuse of power and ethics violations
Targeting government watchdogs: The Trump administration repeatedly attacked independent government inspectors general (IGs) and fired several who were investigating misconduct by his cabinet members. For example, in February 2025, he fired 17 IGs across the federal government.Weaponizing the Department of Justice: The Department of Justice, under former Attorney General Bill Barr, was accused of intervening in cases involving Trump allies, such as Michael Flynn and Roger Stone, and misconstruing information to protect the president. In June 2025, the Trump administration reportedly sidelined the DOJ’s Public Integrity Section and cut its staff.Violating the Hatch Act: Watchdog groups filed numerous complaints against Trump officials for violating the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from using their official position for political activity. The Office of Special Counsel, for example, recommended that Kellyanne Conway be removed from public service for egregious and repeated violations, though she faced no consequences. Actions against other groups
Immigrants and asylum seekers: The Trump administration was criticized for its “zero tolerance” immigration policy, which led to the separation of thousands of children from their parents at the U.S. border. Watchdog groups like the ACLU reported systemic mistreatment and neglect of children.Journalists and protestors: Federal law enforcement agents were deployed to stifle protests in Portland, Oregon, unlawfully arresting journalists and legal observers. In addition, civil liberties and academic freedom advocates have challenged executive actions taken against colleges and universities for allegedly “promoting gender ideology” and “anti-American values”.Internal critics: Government officials who refused to support Trump’s claims of a stolen 2020 election faced retribution. For example, in October 2025, Trump called for the criminal prosecution of Special Counsel Jack Smith. In December 2024, Trump pushed for an FBI probe of Republican Liz Cheney over her role on the Jan. 6 committee.
Long post, but appreciate the sentiment!
Fed cuts 0.25 so expect inflation to get worse not better and just wait till the tariff inflation kicks in.
The social security COLA should be zero. The whole program needs to be scrapped. Take whatever is left in the fund and return it to the people as a one time payment.
We have $130+ billion dollars being handed out every month with this program and people can’t put 2 and 2 together to figure out what’s causing inflation, it’s the free money handouts!
Clearly the fact our currency is a fiat currency is blameless according to you, correct?
Did I say that? No, I didn’t. Yes, there are many parts to this whole ugly pig and it needs to die before we all die from it.
The #1 problem right now is too much debt. What is causing the debt? Spending. Where is the spend? After these social programs (medicare, ss), the next big waste is military spend.
I am in favor of cutting it all across the board. The US is following the classic pattern of empire collapse.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb39CeK_yWg
With a proper exit strategy, you won’t need SS and medicare anyway!
We saw how making major cuts worked out with Elon Musk and friends.
How will it end? IMHO, the US $ will be worth about 5c.
That is already true: $1 today buys what 5c did in 1920.
Not bad for 100 years, though. My $1 > 5c is in 5-10 years.
Social Security surpluses are invested in US Treasuries that are used to fund or regulate much if the crony capitalism that forms the core of the US economy. The non surpluses benefit countless million who may or may not have been able to navigate the whiplash principles of fiat currency. Take your place in line and report to window B9.
That used to be true. Now there are no surpluses and the SSA funds its deficits by redeeming those special US Treasuries.
This good news. The system is working as designed.
I seem to remember a politician who wanted to stop Social Security and replace it with investment accounts.
Oh, I remember… President George W. Bush (2005 State of the Union Address!)
He proposed reforming Social Security to allow younger workers to invest part of their payroll taxes in personal retirement accounts,
I seem to remember DEMOCRATS stopped it… actually congressional Democrats uniformly opposed
Now, imagine how much you would’ve had in your retirement account after 20 years
Sure that was 20 years ago. Those accounts would be growing and the amount in stocks would be huge. In another 10 years those individuals will be retiring just after the stock market crash losing 80% of it’s value….good job Brownie.
The “powers that be” will continue to inflate away the value of the dollar, as well as under report the true inflation rate; in order to keep the broken government financial system afloat as long as possible.
That’s okay, when the music stops, there will probably be a chair for you, and for me. This time anyway.
It will probably be the electric chair!
Until the SS is stable and able to pay all benefits into eternity, any increases should be zero.
SS is headed for a fiscal cliff and no one seems to care.
I agree with you. Why this hasn’t been done is because people don’t want to hear the bad news. They want to hear Good News. Even if it is a lie.
They haven’t announced the 2026 Medicare part B premiums yet, but I’ve read projections of 11-12% in addition to deductible increases. Those extra expenses could take up a third of the COLA.
Federal workers are doing much worse. They’re looking at 1% raises next year along with 11% increases in their health insurance contributions which have exploded to insane levels.
For example, the federal Blue Cross Standard family plan now has an employee contribution of $11,889 per year.
Everyone is being pushed to lower cost plans, but the irony is the cheap plans are increasing in price even faster – some close to 30% this year. There’s no escape.
Gone are the days where health insurance was a small and manageable budget expense.
2.8% won’t cover food costs. Many people on fixed income, me included, are being forced to trade down.
https://wolfstreet.com/2025/10/24/food-inflation-the-price-spikes-of-beef-coffee-eggs-and-dairy/
OT:
Who wants another Beautiful Vaccine?
https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/deadly-cancer-causing-chemical-bpl
Think about it:
https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/deadly-cancer-causing-chemical-bpl
It’s a mums and pops rally: bs. Wall street gangs have a target. They are using the mag7 to climb in rolling hills to their target. Once there SPX will start to descent. If the downturn cont for more than a year the Real COLA 2027 might be negative. The mag7 will fail to lift SPX. Lower SPX, higher inflation rate.
2.8% is much better than the 2% I will receive for my teacher’s pension in Ontario. Having been retired for almost 15 years, my experience is that I have been falling behind further and further with each passing year as the actual price increases I have been subjected to are easily double (if not triple) that of the official Canadian CPI. Every month those numbers are published I can’t help but think: There are lies, damned lies, and statistics!
2% is also what US federal retirees under FERS are getting, plus they have to pay 11% more for health insurance.
Social Security _already_ includes a provision where benefits are reduced if what it takes in (and has in assets) is insufficient to cover benefits.
So all of these suggestions seem to be ‘How about we cut your benefits _now_ so we don’t have to cut your benefits later?’
Which is not going to grab much support.
Healthcare clearly a _much_ larger driver of deficits than SS so should be dealt with first.
After the burning of the White House and Capital Building in the 2027 riots every thing will be much worse for several years. The new Republic will eventually turn things around. After 2050 everything should be back to an 1890 level. s
Most groceries do not increase 2-3% per year.
They stay flat for 2-3 years.
Then they increase 15-30% at one stroke.
Except, of course, for the items that increase 50%. Or 100%. Or more.
Some through price inflation and some through quantity depletion and some through quality degradation. Raise the price or lessen the product gotta increase those profits or risk a CEO pay cut.
Corn-finished ribeyes from Argentina – Trump’ Milei Steaks – can’t get here soon enough.
Especially after that “free market” advance of $40B.
The irony of Argentine beef is that MAGA was all about boosting local production so why is Trump throwing ranchers under the bus? I guess throwing farmers under the bus wasn’t enough.
I like Argentine beef but prefer Japanese wagyu.
I grew up on corn-fed bison. Started very early. I have no idea how many pesos it takes to buy a wagyu, but we gots bunches of pesos.
wagyu beef dumplings at my local japanese restaurant are to die for.
That might be true. But I retired on a “chuck wagon” budget. /s
Actually, it was a ribeye budget, up until recently. Now I eat whatever is on sale.
It’s the three year time delay between “let’s raise more beef” and the grill that is the problem.
Not close- on its most benign years inflation is around 5-6 percent- but when you can monkey with the numbers like they do and make them anything you want them to be, you see why we get CPI prints like we do and thus adjustments to COLA for pensions like this. The reality is all of these programs based on inputs from current workers to support retiring workers was doomed from the start. No way to right size the generations, not that Mao/Stalin didn’t try, but eventually you end up with an outsized generation that puts a strain on subsequent smaller generations and the whole thing implodes. That is why COLA adjustments have been nothing short of a sham, a lie for the better part of the last 25 years.
It is a real joke versus the realistic inflation rates currently experienced by the average US citizen.
If you think that’s true, I hope you are writing letters to your Congressman to force them to tell President Trump to stay out of the Fed persuasion arena.
Lower interest rates are going to make inflation worse, not better (look at Turkey and its President’s past such errors for more context).
I’m guessing that “write your Congressman” was sarcasm?
At this point I’ll take what I can get