The Strong Dollar is Getting on the Nerves of Foreign Central Banks

Capital Flows

“Foreign central banks’ holdings of US Treasuries at the Fed custody facility are dropping fast (almost $40bn in just one week).”

Why the Dumping?

It’s not really dumping in the classic sense. Foreign central banks seek to shore up their currencies. 

China’s SOEs in On the Act

Japan and China are both in on the act, the latter perhaps more than anyone knows.

China’s SOE reserves are not in official estimates of China’s US treasury holdings. What many considered “dumping” of official assets was really hidden in SOEs.

Huge Structural Shift Creates Feedback Loops

  • The Fed now wants a stronger dollar to stop inflation.
  • Previously the Fed wanted a weak dollar to stimulate inflation. 
  • And previously, foreign central banks wanted weak currencies to support exports to the US consumers, the buyers of last resort.
  • Now foreign central banks are screaming “uncle”.

Nations that import food and energy are getting hurt even more than the US on the inflation front. 

Even though the dollar is getting stronger, the Fed is attacking export mercantilism of Japan, China, and Germany by recession-inducing rate hikes to kill consumer demand. 

Fed Portfolio Losses

Meanwhile, the Fed is now underwater on it’s huge pile of QE holdings. John Hussman sums up the situation nicely.

Mark to Market Accounting

With $8.8 trillion in bonds averaging ~8-year maturity, year-to-date market losses of ~15%, and just $48 billion in capital, the Federal Reserve would definitely be insolvent if it needed to mark to market.”

Questions of Legality

https://twitter.com/pinebrookcap/status/1576770815994912768

Dollar Scarcity?

Richard Russell discussed dollar scarcity in 1964.

Curiously, a literal explosion in dollars results in a “scarcity”. But countries that borrowed dollars are having a terrible time paying back those loans.

Free Money Via QE

Let’s also discuss free money via QE. The Fed forced money down banks throats and it now pays interest on those reserves parked at the Fed.

The Fed reports this data monthly, last updated September 27. 

Reserve Balances

Reserve Balance Rate

Free Money Calculation

The Fed gives taxpayer money to banks at an annualized rate of 3.15%. 

3.15% of $3.3 trillion is $103,950,000,000. The Fed is shrinking its balance sheet but with every rate hike bumps up the interest it pays on reserves. 

Reverse Repos

Simultaneously, the Fed is doing $2.425 trillion daily in overnight reverse repos. These are allegedly “temporary” but the amount keeps growing over time. 

I think we need a new definition of temporary. 

Until the Fed Breaks Something 

Many people, including me, have stated the Fed will keep hiking until it breaks something. 

Actually, it should be clear the current central bank governance system is broken beyond repair. 

It’s Our Dollar But Your Problem, 2022 Style

To understand what’s going on with the dollar, interest rates, and credit gone wild, we need to review history.

This monetary madness all stems from Nixon ending convertibility of gold.

Please consider It’s Our Dollar But Your Problem, 2022 Style

At this point it is unclear what will replace the current broken setup, but please don’t suggest Bitcoin because the odds of that are roughly zero.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

63 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
whirlaway
whirlaway
1 year ago
“Nations that import food and energy are getting hurt even more than the US on the inflation front.”

Western Europe for sure. Now that Nordstream 1 and 2 have both been sabotaged, they have to import expensive LNG all the way from US – which of course, has been an innocent party in all this 😉

8dots
8dots
1 year ago
Ian destroyed tens of thousands cars and homes. What will happen to bank’s loans.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  8dots
Banks will get bailed out one way or another. Most have insurance. And FEMA will dump whatever is necessary to get things humming again. Always have.
8dots
8dots
1 year ago
In Sept 21 the British Pound was pounded. Unsecured wholesale interbank rates for three months – LIBOR3M – have reached 3.75%. Across the pond UST3M was 3.31% in Sept 21. In Sept LIBOR3 – UST3M was 0.43, well below 1.4% in Mar 2020, indicating no serious troubles.
In Sept 21 2022 LIBOR3 – SOFR was 1.35%. LIBOR3 went crazy. Ten years ago the Fed deleted LIBOR3, but it’s still in use, because there is no alternative. SOFR stayed cool. JP maginot line held. // In 2019 LIBOR3 – SOFR was negative (-)0.36%, but in Mar 2020 it popped up to 1.44%. Since the Ukraine invasion LIBOR3 – SOFR volatility is rising, clustered together for seven months, just slightly below Mar 2020 peak. The seismic tremors are rising. Putin might be digging an underground tunnel to blowup the global financial system…
prumbly
prumbly
1 year ago
If our leaders are happy to blow up a key ally’s critical infrastructure, I don’t think they’ll worry too much about getting on the nerves of foreign central banks.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  prumbly
They don’t care about how CBs feel, but they care a lot if CBs start dumping long dated treasuries. If you think mortgage rates are high now, they’ll explode if China and Japan start selling 10 yr+ treasuries in large amounts.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
1 year ago
Ron Paul may finally get to see the end of the FED within his lifetime.
Esclaro
Esclaro
1 year ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear
Dream on.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Why am I not surprised? I’ve been saying there was a looming theoretical FED bankruptcy ever since interest rates started to increase from near zero, sending prices plummeting. The loss of value in longer duration bonds going from a yield of 1% to 3% is significantly different than going from 4% to 6%. With $8 trillion in 8-yr duration, dumping long duration bonds as interest rates increase will get worse before the Fed stops hiking. Not only is the Fed in the hole for $1 trillion or so, so are other countries.
The only way out is to get rates back near zero–meaning another decade of irrational markets. More inflation. More reliance on the Fed. My POV, the Fed has now lost control.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
PS. I did not run actual numbers for the above post. They are at best approximations based on assumptions of the Fed rate getting to a ‘normative level’ and staying there.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
The FED will never go bankrupt. Worst case is they hold their securities until maturity.
Roadrunner12
Roadrunner12
1 year ago
Strong US Dollar?
I kinda use the analogy that a flotilla of economic country ships have struck an iceberg. There all gonna go down to the bottom of the ocean. One ship has a few more watertight compartments and therefore deemed safer than the others and as a result some passengers on the less sea worthy ships make it over to the king dollar ship. What are the passengers on the king dollar ship gonna do once that ship starts going under?
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  Roadrunner12
Only strong relative to other currencies. All currencies are going down.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
Must. Have. Daily. Starbucks.

As of August, 60% of Americans were living paycheck to paycheck, according to a recent LendingClub report — a number that hasn’t budged much since inflation hit 40-year highs. A year ago, the number of adults who felt stretched too thin was closer to 55%.

Even high-income earners are feeling the strain, the report found. Of those earning more than six figures, 45% reported living paycheck to paycheck, a jump from the previous year’s 38%.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
“foreign central banks are selling US treasuries at a strong pace.”
Works for a while. Depends on Cash Burn Rate. Then??
Soros’s of the World circling the herd … waiting patiently for the weakest member to fall behind …
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
1 year ago
People have been duped by the ABA. The welfare of the banks is dependent upon the welfare of the nonbanks putting savings back to work. The NBFIs are not in competition with the DFIs. The NBFIs are the DFI’s customers. Savings flowing through the nonbanks increases the supply of loan funds, but not the supply of money. Savers never transfer their savings
outside the banks unless they hoard currency or convert to another National
currency), but the banks can outbid the nonbanks for loan funds resulting in
disintermediation (a term that only applies to the nonbanks since the Banking
Act of 1933). The deregulation of interest rates, Reg. Q ceilings, was a ruse.
All monetary savings originate within the payment’s system, derived from shifts from demand to time deposits. Scott E.D. Skyrm: “There is no real definition of a “shadow
bank”, a nonbank is simply a customer of some commercial bank (a customer that
activates pooled savings).” Transferring
deposits from the commercial banks to the nonbanks simply results in a shift in
the ownership of bank deposits held in the payment’s System.
The only way to activate those savings is for their owners,
saver-holders, to spend/invest either directly or indirectly outside of the
payment’s System. One way that is accomplished, providing an outlet for
savings, is by the purchase of Treasury and agency securities in the open
market, the secondary securities market (where savings are factually matched
with investments).
Louis Stone — whom the movie “Wall Street” was
dedicated to – Vice President Shearson/American Express wasn’t fooled:

WSJ: “In a letter of March 15, 1981, Willis Alexander
of the American Bankers Association claims that: ‘Depository Institutions have
lost an estimated $100b in potential consumer deposits alone to the unregulated
money market mutual funds.’

As any unbiased banker should know, all the money taken in
by the money funds goes right back into the banks, in the form of CDs or
bankers’ acceptances or other money market instruments; there is no net loss of
deposits to the banking system. Complete deregulation of interest rates would
simply allow a further escalation of rates by the banks, all of which compete
against each other for the same total of deposits.”

Dean_70
Dean_70
1 year ago
Could the Fed be creating a cushion for the recession on the horizon? Seems like they are out of tools and once the recession deepens or something breaks they’ll have something to counter it in an attempt to prevent severe deflation.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
How long will today’s rally hold?
weeks?
days?
hours?
The shorter the rally the closer to Event Horizon.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Notice how everything went up, stocks, gold, silver, bitcoin? The expectation has to be the Fed caves and QE reigns victorious, for ever.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
I wouldn’t count on it. As bad as a recession or depression would be, they pale in comparison to out of control inflation. Currency death has to be avoided no matter what.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
“3.15% of $3.3 trillion is $103,950,000,000. The Fed is shrinking its balance sheet but with every rate hike bumps up the interest it pays on reserves.”
Yes. Their window of operating gain closing. Congress has long since turned its back to Federal Reserve’s monetary policy shenanigans since it accomplished two things: 1) drove down interest rates … allowing Congress to borrow with near impunity 2) QE “profits” returned to US Treasury (offsetting deficit). Thru first 11 months of FY22 $105 billion.
Now operating gain will soon turn into a loss:
“The deputy manager ended with an update on SOMA net income. Staff projections suggested that net income would likely turn negative in coming months.”
What if Congress has to come to rescue (if present course continues Federal Reserve will be sitting on massive unrealized capital loss + negative operating income)?
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Exactly! Bankruptcy is theoretical for the Fed. Not true for other big bond holders. I expect the US is rapidly losing ‘friends’. I wonder if Putin realizes? How long before he jerks the chain?
Crenvy
Crenvy
1 year ago
What should be getting on the nerves of foreign CBs is not the strength of the dollar but how their own fiscal/monetary policies have caused their own currencies to screw the pooch (pardon my French).
hhabana
hhabana
1 year ago
It’s become a comedy that we have one cure for an ailment and you already have another ailment waiting. It’s getting ridiculous to the point of causing mass chaos for the average person trying to make a living.
I recall maybe 23 years ago or so, Greenspan was talking to some members of Congress and mentioned that they needed to control their spending, but in “Greenspeak.” I enjoyed his ambiguity.
I’m not a fan of the Fed, but I understand they were created to control the monsters running our country, but now they’re complicit in our financial problems and definitely serve “the too big to fail” crowd evidenced by 2008. Anything defunct back then should have been shut down or held in conservatorship under the US Government and sold to the highest bidder. QE, QT and all this other nonsense just clouds true price discovery. I think we’re screwed.
MarkraD
MarkraD
1 year ago
Reply to  hhabana
Call me a “Socialist”, but any private business that becomes so big that it can jeopardize our entire economy by an “error” that can benefit individuals within the company should be required to split.
Beyond the danger of that, TBTF’s (not just banks) also exude an insanely disproportional level of control over the government and economy via monopolistic price fixing and lobbyist/campaign funding control over the government.
Billy
Billy
1 year ago
Reply to  MarkraD
Call me a “Socialist”, but I think businesses that big should have to pay more in taxes, not less. It doesn’t matter who’s elected, big business never pays their fair share in taxes.
MarkraD
MarkraD
1 year ago
Reply to  Billy
“Call me a “Socialist”, but I think businesses that big should have to pay more in taxes…”
The problem with that is businesses pass on that cost to consumers, an inadvertent consumption tax.
Income tax & capital gains tax is the problem, Bezos 1% effective tax rate, for example.
radar
radar
1 year ago
Reply to  Billy
The owners that make a profit (stockholders) have to pay capital gains taxes on company profits when they sell their ownership. If the company paid more direct taxes and made less profits, which would be reflected in a lower stock price, there would be less capital gains to pay when the owner sells his part. I may be missing something but raising corp taxes just seems like a wash to me.
GetMOITVated
GetMOITVated
1 year ago
Reply to  Billy
Corporations are simply a pass through entity.
Academic research shows that corporate taxes are actually paid by a combination of shareholders, workers, and consumers. A 2020 paper, for example, estimated that “the incidence on consumers, workers, and shareholders is 31 percent, 38 percent, and 31 percent, respectively”—thus showing that corporate taxes aren’t very good at taxing “capital,” and that a substantial share of corporate taxes are simply passed on through retail prices or lower wages.
This is of course a hugely important point.
Those who say that “companies should pay more tax” are simply being ignorant. Companies do not pay tax, cannot pay tax, and thus to call for them to pay more is just displaying that ignorance. Not one single cent or penny has ever been paid in tax by a company and no system of taxation will ever be able to make them do so. To call for higher corporate taxation is simply nonsensical.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  GetMOITVated
However, liberals are not smart enough to figure this out. Instead, corporations are evil and must be punished
prumbly
prumbly
1 year ago
Reply to  GetMOITVated
What if you only taxed corporations and not workers, shareholders and consumers? Wouldn’t the workers, shareholders and consumers then be the pass-through entities (they receive money from corporations and spend it on stuff from corporations)?
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
Reply to  hhabana
“I recall maybe 23 years ago or so, Greenspan was talking to some members of Congress and mentioned that they needed to control their spending, but in “Greenspeak.” I enjoyed his ambiguity.”
Please. Greenspan was no Saint.
During the Clinton years AG rarely visited White House … and more or less preached fiscal responsibility. Once W became POTUS he was a regular (almost weekly) visitor to WH … and gave his Pope’s blessing to W’s tax cuts.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
At the time of W’s tax cuts the US was a surplus nation and had been for a few years so it made sense to cut taxes and not run surpluses.
Those cuts needed to be rolled back and taxes needed to be raised to pay for the fiasco in Iraq/Afghanistan along with Homeland security. Had that happened and people got a vote on it, my guess is we’d never in a million years invaded Iraq (Afghanistan yes), Syria etc or implemented Homeland security (which is all the airport crap, NSA spying, Patriot act that any sane person should be opposed to).
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
You forget the reality of 9-11. Like the assassination of Kennedy, there was a huge change in the nation’s psyche. Given how easy it was to carry out the 9-11 attacks, without a doubt, there would have been more attacks on the homeland. CIA. NSA, and FBI were fundamentally flawed after the Clinton administration–affirmative action removed expertise, limited on-ground surveillance, crucial failures at Logan Airport because of affirmative action programs etc. Bush did the smart thing–send a message of what will happen if you support terrorism. He wisely chose the low-hanging fruit–Iraq. He was smart enough not to go to Afghanistan (left that to the warlords), and Saudi Arabia was supposed to be an ally (the real conspiracy was to cover up their role).
JRM
JRM
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Death by a thousand cuts, is how AQ/ISIS is operating!!!
Is it just a coincidence whenever AQ would call for an attack on US refinaries, with 2-3 days one goes up???
Now US food manufacturing facilities seem to be going up in flames in the last few months, all over the USA!!!
I believe many cells are now operating within the USA, now, with the fly over of people from Afghanistan with “ZERO” background checks and the porous border!!!
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
1 year ago
Reply to  hhabana
Greenspeak is borrowed fortune teller’s language for the “educated”.
Apparently, you can never go wrong with that ambiguity.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
1 year ago
Reply to  hhabana
“I’m not a fan of the Fed, but I understand they were created to control the monsters running our country…”
You “understand” wrong. The Fed was created to BAIL OUT, secure, facilitate etc. the “monsters” running THEIR, not “our”, country.
As in, providing a backstop for when; initially; initially JP Morgan’s; then later the dilettantes following in his footsteps, inevitably wasted, by malinvestment, whatever wealth, no matter how great, they started with.
That’s why The Fed was created. Not for any other reason.
You don’t “control” clueless dilettante A by robbing everyone else, then handing the loot to A. Instead, what you do is facilitate A controlling everyone else. Hence, why America, and The West, is now controlled by clueless dilettantes. It’s not as if even a single one of them have, in any way whatsoever, “earned” any of it by their own talents, insights nor efforts.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  hhabana
Indeed, your proposal makes sense. The ‘banks’ preferred too big too fail, so the underlying problem was never resolved. Hence, wave two. This is what happens when a country lives beyond its means using ‘faux debt.’
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
The ROW (Rest of the World) either has to raise rates or suffer currency depreciation.
For countries with no debt, they can afford to suffer the depreciation and wait things out as long as they are reasonably self sufficient (don’t import too much energy or other things denominated in US dollars). There are precious few countries in this situation (ironically Russia is going to be in this position).
I wonder how many currency crisis are going to happen in the next 6 months in the developed world (ie BRICS, Europe, North America).
Crenvy
Crenvy
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Sorry, but I fail to see the “irony” in Russia’s superior handling of their economy for many years. I do see the irony, however, in how the world’s supposedly strongest economy has spent itself into unfathomable debt with unproductive spending.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  Crenvy
The irony is in the fact that sanctions designed to weaken the Ruble essentially forced them into the position of not being able to import essentially anything denominated in US dollars. It’s likely the Ruble will make out much better than the money of all the sanctioning economies other than the US.
I don’t think the Russian economy has been managed in some superior fashion. If it was, they wouldn’t still have debts in US dollars (which they do) and they would be a creditor nation due to strong exports (which they aren’t).
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Russia lives within its means, more or less. It affects the national psyche. The US throws money (it does not have) around like confetti.
William Janes
William Janes
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Interesting. You appear to be a big supporter of Putin and Russia. Russia now appears to be extremely unstable at this time and not capable of having any affect internationally.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
So many classic quotes it is hard to chose one.
For me, this says it all. “… it should be clear the current central bank governance system is broken beyond repair.”
Keep up the good work, Mish. Plus more photos. Please?
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Picture of a UK man getting ready to pay his electric bill 🙂
Crenvy
Crenvy
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
For those who’ve read When Money Dies, this is not funny. So many parallels in that time to what’s happening now. E.g., the British public embracing Labour over the Tories now probably thinking more helicopter money will surely solve the problems.
Billy
Billy
1 year ago
Reply to  Crenvy
I haven’t read it but I have a couple of questions.
Does gold or silver die or are they outlawed from private possession?
Does it talk about made up currencies like Bitcoin?
Does it discuss Central Bank digital currencies?
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  Billy
The book is quite old (1970s) so clearly does not discuss Bitcoin or Central Bank digital currencies.
Gold and Silver was outlawed in many places (including the US). Of course it became very valuable in the Weimar Republic as it was the only store of value since their money was worthless so despite being outlawed it circulated on the black market as it always does in any country.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  Billy
Gold could play a very key role if Putin gets his way, meaning it might be confiscated in the USA. If so, gold might better be stored in other countries.
Scooot
Scooot
1 year ago
Reply to  Crenvy
Nothing to do with helicopter money. Like the US we effectively have a choice of one from two parties so when one proves to be grossly incompetent the other gets the vote. Even hardened Tories will vote differently or abstain.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  Crenvy
Also hoping Labor puts a cap on energy prices and taxes Oil profits to death. Neither of which is going to make more energy appear.
The helicopter money is only meant to save the pension funds and UK bond markets. The tradeoff is going to be 10-15% inflation as the pound sinks due to low interest rates compared to the US.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
I can only hope the gold-faux dollar relationship holds 🙂
MarkraD
MarkraD
1 year ago
The Fed was originally established to separate monetary policy from politics, but that created a problem where the Fed controls rates, but has no say on fiscal/tax policy.
Whether you like him or not, Ben Bernanke commented on the limits of the Fed right before he left, stating that Fed policy alone will not fix our current debt/disparity woes and it will require fiscal intervention.
Our political system having control over fiscal/tax policy is the real problem – despite the Constitution stating bribery is a high crime, campaign funding has become the way for the wealthy to dictate fiscal and tax policy, as the SCOTUS erroneously said “Money is free speech” – with no consideration to the Constitutions mention of bribery.
In turn, the Fed can only react with Band-Aid policies to induce consumption and employment by making debt cheaper for both households and the government.
The problem isn’t the Fed, it’s Congress doing the bidding of the wealthy, economies don’t “trickle down”, they trickle up.
While Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren are branded “Socialist”, they are correct in their math as they rant about “billionaires”.
A billionaire doesn’t buy any more of my goods or services than a waitress does, but he does pay a small fraction what she pays in taxes.
When there’s a crisis, politicians doing the wealthy’s bidding always resort to cutting social spending that has no effect on the wealthy, but does affect consumption, in turn affects my own business
Since 1980, the default fix has been the Fed, using rates to make debt cheaper to offset lack of wage growth and increasing government debt service payments.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
1 year ago

In the context of their
lending operations, it is only possible to reduce bank assets, and deposits, by
retiring bank-held loans, e.g., for the saver-holder to use his funds for the
payment of a bank loan, interest on a bank loan for the payment of a bank
service, or for the purchase from their banks of any type of commercial bank
security obligation, e.g., banks stocks, debentures, etc.

I.e., the E-$ market is contracting. The U.S. $ is in a self-reinforcing upward spiral. PPP is being artificially skewed. This will increase our trade deficits. A turnaround later will force oil and inflation higher.
The economic engine is being run in reverse. Banks aren’t intermediaries. Like I said, the 1966 Interest Rate Adjustment Act is prima facie evidence. Bonds are suffering a double whammy. Under the payment of interest on reserve balances, the FED induces non-bank disintermediation, a decline in the supply of loanable funds. And QT exacerbates this decline.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
“by retiring bank-held loans,”
Yes. But you left out another way. My favorite. Bank eats it by dipping into capital to write down / write off loan.
RonJ
RonJ
1 year ago
“It’s Our Dollar But Your Problem, 2022 Style”
Considering the rate of U.S. inflation, the dollar is our problem as well as theirs.
SAKMAN
SAKMAN
1 year ago
LOL- so the US dollar is “good” when it is promoting price stability in the face of massive productivity increases due to the trust, trade and technology it promotes. Yet it is bad when it is promoting price stability in the face of a breakdown in productivity due to a pandemic and war.
What is intended to break is consumption because the goods aren’t there to support it.
Sunriver
Sunriver
1 year ago
The Fed may invert the Fed funds rate with the 10 year treasury rate 2022 style.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
So much for countries holding USD assets because of deep markets, rule of law, etc… . They only held them to suppress their currencies. And now that they want to prop up their currencies, they’re dumping them.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
The only countries holding any significant amount of USD assets are the surplus nations (China, Germany etc).
Nations that are in debt can’t have a lot of foreign currency holdings. But now they are selling what little they do have to either prop up their currencies or pay down debt in US dollars. Those countries (eg the UK) are screwed as they have no chance to really move the market so they just delay the inevitable.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Good point, UK is a perpetual deficit country like the US but without the fallback of the reserve currency.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
By far, the two biggest holders are Japan and China. They accumulated USD to weaken their currency and are now dumping USD debt to strengthen their currency. I don’t see how my post is wrong in any way.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
I didn’t say it was.
My comment was merely to add to what you wrote to note that only a couple of countries can go this route. The rest can’t.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.