This Didn’t Take Long: Appeals Court Blocks Biden’s Vaccine Mandate

Blocked Already

On Thursday the White House Sets OSHA January 4 Deadline Requiring Shots or Tests.

Saturday evening the WSJ reported Federal Appeals Court Temporarily Blocks Biden Administration Vaccine Rules for Private Employers

A three-judge panel on the New Orleans-based Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted an emergency stay prohibiting enforcement of the rules for now, saying they raise “grave statutory and constitutional issues.”

The Fifth Circuit said it would quickly consider whether to issue an injunction against the vaccine and testing requirements, ordering the Biden administration to file initial legal papers by late Monday afternoon.The rules, issued by the Labor Department on Thursday, apply to employers with at least 100 workers. Lawsuits challenging the requirements have been filed in courts around the country. Challengers in the case before the Fifth Circuit include both private employers and a group of Republican state attorneys general.

Seema Nanda, the Labor Department’s top legal adviser, said the administration was confident in its authority to issue the standard and was fully prepared to defend it in court.

The Occupational Safety and Health Act explicitly gives OSHA the authority to act quickly in an emergency where the agency finds that workers are subjected to a grave danger and a new standard is necessary to protect them,” Ms. Nanda said in a statement.

Emergency? Grave Danger?

Excuse me for pointing out this is not February 2020. The emergency has come and gone. 

These were my comments Saturday morning.

Midtem Disaster

Democrats are already headed for a midterm election disaster.

I fully expect this decision will add to their misery in the House and it may easily cost Democrats the Senate as well. 

Finally, there is a very good chance the Supreme Court will strike this OSHA play down further adding to the pain. 

Biden is hugely out of touch with political reality as noted in Democrats Take 180 Degree Wrong Message From Elections.

Regardless of what the Supreme Court does, this is a voluntary kick your own ass move.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Like these reports? If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen.

Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

49 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jackula
Jackula
4 years ago
Forcing Americans to do something like this doesn’t work, in this case blew badly needed political capital. Better to have threatened to give the vaccines to the high risk in 3rd world countries.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
The democrats only have two things to run on. Covid and Trump. Now that Trump is gone, covid is the only thing. They desperately need almost everyone to get the vaccine. Otherwise, they can’t take credit for eradicating it via vaccine mandates. Event though it will be obvious that a US mandate could never eradicate a global virus. But, CNN will push the BS and the those stranded at airports and doctors offices will believe it.
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
This is likely why the CDC is stopping the use of PCR tests for Covid diagnostics come 12/31/2021.  Doing so will make the Covid case counts plummet and they will claim that they have therefore “beaten” Covid via the vaccine narratives.
Call_Me
Call_Me
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
Use of rapid tests will (finally) be ending, haven’t seen that all PCR will (finally) be gone.
“After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of
the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic
Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of
SARS-CoV-2 only.”
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Reply to  Call_Me
The CDC obfuscates so much, it is often difficult to pin down what they are saying. I know this is intentional.
So “RT-PCR” is different than PCR alone?
BDR45
BDR45
4 years ago
The sooner this tyrant Biden is kicked to the side of the road, the better for all of us. 
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  BDR45
Hard as it is to believe, Kamala will be worse.
Webej
Webej
4 years ago
It’s not about Covid, it’s about global Build Back Better compliance!
Christoball
Christoball
4 years ago
It is a slippery slope for employers. If shots are mandated or financially rewarded for by the employer, then if there is an adverse reaction that prevents or affects the employees ability to work it becomes a workman’s comp issue. Just you watch and see.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  Christoball
“It is a slippery slope for employers.”
“..it becomes a workman’s comp issue..”
Such is the result of the idiot cult of progressivism’s obsession with making up entirely arbitrary, utterly pointless categories and classifications for eternal continua.
Back in the somewhat free and civilized era, people weren’t dumb and gullible enough to fall for such nonsense, as Jedediah Smith being infected by Grizzly Bear claws, being neither a slippery slope, nor a workman’s comp issue. Neither of which are anything more than welfare for useless ambulance chasers, lobbyists and wannabe harassists.
In the real world, everyone works for himself. Or for whoever pays him, aka his customers. There are no “employees” and “employers.” All that is just arbitrary drivel. Hence there are no “workmen.” Nor “slippery slopes.” Just guys trying to scrape together enough to get by for another day. None of that magically changed, just because some dilettante children of a few who had scraped together more than most; found it easier, and felt it sounded more impressive, to sit around and deem and judge and hold what others were and must, than to do some real, useful, productive work on their own.
Christoball
Christoball
4 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
Someone, somewhere will file a claim and push the point of injury on the job if negatively affected by  the jab. It will be adjudicated one way or the other if many people are injured. A company mandate potentially leaves the company liable for workplace injury, a government mandate would relieve them of that potential liability.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  Christoball
“Someone, somewhere will file a claim and push the point of injury on the job if negatively affected by  the jab.”
That’s why trashbins were invented.
Any ape can “file a claim.” A million of them a day, even.
What’s important for whether a legitimate court has any business intervening at all, is whether the plaintiff has been: First properly indicted. Then convicted beyond any reasonable doubt for having done something obviously and clearly “wrong” by a jury of peers.
If he has so, throw him in jail or string him up. Of not, leave him alone.
Absent meeting that standard, arbitrary “claims” is one thing and one thing only: Welfare for ambulance chasing leeches too incompetent to do anything productive for a living, and carte blanche for equally useless pathlogical harassists and/or self righteous me-first-me-only garbage.
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
4 years ago
How many Brandon voters now see trump as the lessor of two evils?  Anyone?  I mean, if we are being honest and all…
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
“The vast majority of the Western world has been transformed into a pseudo-medical dystopia in which you have to show your “health-purity papers” to enter a café and get a cup of coffee. People who refuse to get experimentally “vaccinated” against a virus that causes mild-to-moderate symptoms (or, often, no symptoms whatsoever) in about 95% of the infected, and the overall infection fatality rate of which is approximately 0.1% to 0.5%, are being systematically segregated, stripped of their jobs, denied medical treatment, demonized as “a danger to society,” censored, fined, and otherwise persecuted.”
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
There wouldn’t be any where near 750,000 official Covid-19 deaths, if the FDA wasn’t obstructing early outpatient treatment by doctors.
This has been a pandemic of malpractice by the public health agencies. How can public health agencies justify denying health care to sick people? It is unconscionable. Public health agencies have been causing death by denying treatment to patients.
Most of the people who have died, have done so due to malpractice, not because of Covid-19. The virus itself has been largely treatable for a long time, now. But only the PREP Act protocol is allowed. No early treatment, then Remdesivir if hospitalized.
The WHO recommended against Remdisivir, as they said it didn’t work. So why is it being used in U.S. hospitals, especially when it has a 23% severe adverse reaction rate? It can make the patients condition worse. Considering it can destroy kidney function, i have to wonder how many people died because they were given Remdesivir? The death would be counted as Covid-19.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
And it’s obvious there’s a huge gap between official covid deaths and deaths that were primarily caused by covid. In Italy the gap was 97%.
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Perhaps one of the reasons that Biden has chosen to wait until 1/4/202 to enforce the OSHA vaccine mandate order is that currently,there are not any “approved” Covid vaccines available in the USA.  The Pfizer approval was for their vaccine labeled as COMIRNATY but Pfizer is refusing to make that labeled version available here due to fear of legal exposures.  So everyone being forced and aquisting to a mandate order to get vaxxed in the USA is still getting the EUA vax version.  
Here’s an article that explains the legal machinations, which ties into the reason kid vaccines were/are being pushed so hard for full FDA approval.
———-
Here’s the real reason Comirnaty is not available
It’s all about liability. It will magically become available when the vaccine for children is fully approved, not before.
Steve Kirsch
Nov 3, 2021
The reason Comirnaty isn’t available is because those shots would expose the company to liability since the fully-licensed product doesn’t have the liability waiver of the EUA product.
But once the Pfizer vaccine is fully approved in kids, then Pfizer gets liability waiver on all age groups due to a “feature” in federal law for child vaccines (NCVIA). At that time, they are done. They can market the COVID vaccine products under full approval for all age groups and face no liability when it kills or disables you.
….
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Does OSHA Require Employers to Record Vaccine Reactions?
Lisa Nagele-Piazza, J.D., SHRM-SCP
May 26, 2021
Employers that encourage or require workers to get vaccinated against the coronavirus must carefully navigate legal requirements and government recommendations—but the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recently gave employers a break by saying they don’t have to record COVID-19 vaccine reactions.
The federal workplace safety agency requires employers to record certain work-related injuries and illnesses on the OSHA 300 log. OSHA initially said employers would have to record adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines if they require the shot—but not if they simply recommend that employees receive a vaccination.
The agency’s directive, however, led to confusion over what is a “truly voluntary” vaccination policy. Therefore, OSHA changed its position and said it will not require employers to record worker side effects for at least the next year.
Federal agencies “are working diligently to encourage COVID-19 vaccinations,” according to OSHA’s COVID-19-related FAQs, which were updated on May 21. “OSHA does not wish to have any appearance of discouraging workers from receiving COVID-19 vaccination and also does not wish to disincentivize employers’ vaccination efforts.”
Nick Hulse, an attorney with Fisher Phillips in Charlotte, N.C., said the updated guidance “is a welcome reprieve” from OSHA’s recording requirements. “Whether it is through a mandatory vaccination program or simply encouraging employees to receive the vaccine, employers no longer need to worry themselves with recording reactions.”
….
Yooper
Yooper
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
See, this is where conspiracy talk comes in…. If the government was consistent in what they do, great. But, when they start changing the rules of the game to make people believe what is said is true? The only real reason for this is to avoid being called out for bad policy – left otherwise alone and the data proved it out, it would be celebrated as such wonderful action by the gov’t. Just like the CDC saying to stop testing if you are vaccinated… a nice way to make sure the narrative of effective vaccines are held up.
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
“Whether it is through a mandatory vaccination program or simply
encouraging employees to receive the vaccine, employers no longer need
to worry themselves with recording reactions.”
What is OSHA trying to hide? If the Covax is safe, recording reactions shouldn’t be an issue. If the Covax isn’t safe, then OSHA is supporting an unsafe work environment by suppressing collection of important data. The CDC stopped collecting data on breakout infections in May 2021. Data from the Covax studies should have indicated a decline in efficacy and the termination of breakthrough data collection would indicate the CDC knew a rise in breakthrough cases was coming.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
I spent my weekend looking at many, many oil & gas and uranium stocks….and gold and silver miners. I’ll have to say that the entire space of commodity companies……is looking extremely bullish technically. I am looking to add some new names tomorrow.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Given the fact that it isn’t a hard vaccine mandate, I would doubt the federal Court even stays this appeal. The judges wouldn’t even sign their names to the stay.  
bowwow
bowwow
4 years ago
Keep in mind the individual may have to report whether they have been vaccinated or not.  I don’t think they want to test vaccinated people over and over again. 
Yooper
Yooper
4 years ago
Agreed, and I appreciate the rabbit hole you and others sent me down today. A very interesting discussion from the NIH on the whole 1905 vaccine mandate ruling – pre-COVID
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1449224/

I may need to change my perspective on the other topics I posted on.
The 1905 ruling also wasn’t a mandate, and was supported on the premise at the time when a vaccine was the ONLY tool known to protect the public health, and so long as a mandate had an exception or other “way out ie the $5 penalty”, it was constitutional. Today is different in that there are public organizations and other means available to protect public health, so maybe there’s less support now for a mandate?

All I wish is that it would extend to your employer as an existing employee (at least until something comes out that stops the spread).

amalagoli
amalagoli
4 years ago
It is official. This is a nation of idiots. Why stop at vaccine mandates … let’s block mandates to pay taxes, wear seatbelts, follow the law and prohibition to smoke in public places … all of these and more are clearly a violation of our constitutional rights.
Yooper
Yooper
4 years ago
Reply to  amalagoli
“Why stop at vaccine mandates”
I think that’s the issue too… The current vaccines in the US only help you to stay out of the hospital and death if you’re high risk, now at what, 0.23% death rate I think someone wrote today? If that becomes “public health”, then why could they not also ban the major causes of death – chronic diseases and trauma
* ban alcohol and tobacco
* ban any fast food
* ban red meat
* ban unnecessary travel, especially in cars
* ban CO2 (oops on that one)
Now find a real vaccine, or this stuff goes crazy and we’re talking 10% and higher death rates, you won’t need a mandate at all…
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
4 years ago
Reply to  amalagoli
It is only a nation of idiot gullible lemmings that believe people should be forced endure a risky medical procedure if they do not think it is in their best interest to do so.  It is not my job to ensure your health nor your job to ensure mine.  Let the free market guide people on the right course.  Mandates only slow the process. IF the vax is not in fact poison but rather a blessing then people will come around to it because they will be convinced it is in their own enlightened self interest to take it.  But people like me who never take the annual flu shot (which only makes one immunocompromised over time) and who don’t get sick and thus who didn’t get covid (or didn’t even know we had it) do not need to take a jab to benefit you.  I’m not here to serve you, hive mind.  I get one life to live and I will live it for me in my own way.
shamrock
shamrock
4 years ago
The emergency is gone?  It’s still the third leading cause of death, by far.  That’s a pretty significant health hazard.
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
I’m sure you are using the 750k supposed Covid death number as the basis for your statement. 
Unfortunately for your argument, that number is over 20 months.  CDC says ONLY 375k died in 2020.  Now we are 11 months into 2021 and despite the magic, wonderful Covid vaccines, the death number is holding steady with 2020 and looks to even increase a bit in 2021.  Not a good look for vaccine proponents.
Regardless, 375k is less then 1/8 of 1% of the US population.  Hardly any sort of incredible death rate or an emergency!
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
4 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
We will always have bad flu years.  Get used to it.
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
With early outpatient treatment, there wouldn’t be an emergency.
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
My primary MD refused to give me a “just in case” prescription for Fluvoxamine.  Said it wasn’t “approved” in the USA as part of the Covid treatment protocol.  So now I need to find a new MD. 
How the hell do you find a primary care MD who will approve drugs like Ivermectin and Fluvoxamine?
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
4 years ago
take that Hitler joe…..the worst thing to happen to citizens since I can’t even find any pos worse than that 50 yr senator with 8 laws co authored….he is the epitome of term limits….it will never happen, no mandate will take place and get ready for the citizen and taxpayer revolution….it has begun
anoop
anoop
4 years ago
it’s sad, but the old america is over.  it’s only a question of how quickly the new america takes over.  at some point even the constitution will be rewritten.  all the resisting will slow the process, but cannot stop it.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  anoop
I give it 3 more years. Trump will be President again and stay there until his death where by his son will take over. About 20 Democrats in red districts that were redrawn in the house will now retire instead of running again. These districts will permanently flip to red. At some point, I do expect a state like California or New York to secede from the United States and the house and senate and state legislature will approve it.  If The Trump-led Republican party does take over (which I expect it will), America will look more like something out Man in the High Castle by 2030. 
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
4 years ago
I’d rather have Ron DeSantis for president over trump.  We owe trump for single handedly taking on the global elite, calling out the fake news, calling out many acts of corruption.  But he also racked up massive debt just like all the corrupt presidents before him.  Debt is consumption today while leaving the bill for some sucker down the road and that is LIBERAL behavior, not conservative.  So trump was a good battering ram to beat in the door of the liberal industrial complex but now we need someone who can think and act and speak for all Americans.  DeSantis is the obvious choice.
Christoball
Christoball
4 years ago
Reply to  anoop
I agree, America has changed. Its hard to even find a good buffet or smorgasbord anymore. The simple things will be missed.
threeblindmice
threeblindmice
4 years ago
What’s wrong with you Mish?  We need MORE mandates, MORE spending, MORE racialization of society.  That’s how we’ll prosper!
Karlmarx
Karlmarx
4 years ago
would somebody please tell me how this differs from Brandon’s Law

Reich Citizenship Law of September 15, 1935

(Translated from Reichsgesetzblatt I, 1935, p. 1146.)

The Reichstag has unanimously enacted the following law, which is promulgated herewith:

Article 1
1. A subject of the state is a person who enjoys the protection of the German Reich and who in consequence has specific obligations toward it.
2. The status of subject of the state is acquired in accordance with the provisions of the Reich and the Reich Citizenship Law.

Article 2
1. A Reich citizen is a subject of the state who is of German or related blood, and proves by his conduct that he is willing and fit to faithfully serve the German people and Reich.
2. Reich citizenship is acquired through the granting of a Reich citizenship certificate.
3. The Reich citizen is the sole bearer of full political rights in accordance with the law.

Article 3
The Reich Minister of the Interior, in coordination with the Deputy of the Führer, will issue the legal and administrative orders required to implement and complete this law.
threeblindmice
threeblindmice
4 years ago
Reply to  Karlmarx
OK, more than a little over the top…. but I appreciate the effort and even the direction of your point.  One non-trivial distinction is the proviso of being “of German or related blood”, which renders this quote and law extra-offensive.
But point taken on citizens being defined as those who “faithfully serve” the people and the Reich.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Karlmarx
Looks more like Godwin’s Law to me.
OSHA has had broad powers to enforce workplace safety for more years than you’ve been working. Over 50 years now. 
In 1993, for instance, OSHA radically altered the infection control protocols for all healthcare workers in the country, by mandating that every hospital, clinic and doctors office adhere to the CDC’s Bloodborne Pathogens guidelines. This was because of another little health crisis called HIV.
They made it stick then, and they will be able to make it stick now, because the CDC and OSHA don’t get their data from Zero Hedge, they have to adhere to the best real science. They also have a broad mandate to protect workers….that’s the reason OSHA exists. So if you are an employee, OSHA is looking out for you….whether you might like it or not.
The Fifth Circuit has turned into the go-to for all these hot button cases because they lean friendly to the right wing fringe….but we’ll see how long their injunction lasts, and whether the Supreme Court will weigh in, and I expect they will.  I would be very surprised if the Supreme Court comes down against a public health measure that TPTB institute for the broad public good.
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
well it looks like MIT and professors all over are debunking the flu shot and its so called reason for injecting…..it offers nothing to the individual except hopium. Doesn’t stop transmission, doesn’t provide immunity and it help those who took flu shot survive 70% more of 1% death rate…..
If your obese and old, take it, if your a kid or healthy adult, stop in your tracks…. mandates are for nazis
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
“Professors all over”  are not science. The data is clear that the broad population receives substantial benefit from being vaccinated. End of story. 
Yooper
Yooper
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
“The data is clear that the broad population receives substantial benefit from being vaccinated”
This really needs refinement, because on its’ face is ambiguous and dismissive of the real data.
It’s far more accurate to say,
“The data is clear in the US that a select, high-risk population receives critical care benefit from being vaccinated”
Now, you want to argue that 2/3rds of the US is obese with other health risks, ok, but that certainly should not mean a mandate for all because the risks aren’t equal for all. Get a vaccine that is neutralizing for more than 2-5 months with a bit more long-term research, then that’s a whole other story.
Christoball
Christoball
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
These are not vaccines.
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
On real vaccines, that is certainly true. 
Sadly, the Covid mRNA & similar are not real vaccines.  The only “protection” they offer is to reduce the chance of an infected person being hospitalization (under 1% anyway).  Infected vaxxed people can still transmit the virus to others, suffer through the virus, get “long” Covid, wind up in the hospital and even die.
The real benefits of these mRNA type shots is to the improvement of drug company profits.  The need for regular booster shots is significant because that give a recurring revenue number that can generally be counted on in earnings projections.  The various TV doctors pushing vaccines are all hoping to benefit by getting a piece of the revenue action form the Big Pharma companies by being retained for consulting or research projects. 
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
I’ll see your opinionated gut feel statement and raise you using science and facts.
Karlmarx
Karlmarx
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Where on earth is there any science regarding COVID – Statistics aint science, and all CDC is basing anything on are at best statistics.  By the way, in Germany in 1935 they also had science and doctors on their side.  Today we call that science eugenics.
Markab
Markab
4 years ago
Well, by this time, it apparent Biden’s handlers don’t really care about the rule of law, and are hellbent on using agencies through edict or regulation to push their agendas. Think CDC’s patently Unconstitutional claim over the entire rental market in the country. Despite the Supreme Court’s earlier opinion in late June that the Biden Administration through the CDC could not extend the eviction moratorium absent new legislation through Congress, and the admission of such in pressers by the Furor in Charge himself, he backtracked and rammed it through again just three days later–before the US Department of Justice and CDC were handed a final defeat 26 days later by SCOTUS. Similarly, the DOJ has crowed about vaccine mandates being lawful. Remember the DOJ does not have authority to make laws, and quite frankly, they have lost a considerable number of court cases in recent years, something almost unheard of several decades ago. This OSHA mandate is born of the same ilk as the eviction moratorium–using agency regulatory authority under the guise of an “emergency” to do their dirty work for them. But again, federal agencies don’t make laws. They can, in effect, act as laws unless and until they are challenged through the court system. I’m glad the first roadblock on this has already been laid down. But this Administration will continue to attempt to remake the country as it sees fit and presents a massive threat to our Democracy and system of laws. And, he is not even one year into his Presidency. Lots of legal battles to be fought between now and then. Methinks the DOJ is gonna need a lot more seedy lawyers!

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.