The undeniable truth is easy to see in pictures. 
Advance International Trade in Goods
- The international trade deficit was $101.5 billion in June, down $4.4 billion from $105.9 billion in May.
- Exports of goods for June were $204.7 billion, $3.8 billion less than May exports.
- Imports of goods for June were $306.2 billion, $8.2 billion less than May imports.
Tariff Front-Running and Rebound
- In late 2024 and early 2025 corporations rushed to beat Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. Imports surged. Red Highlights
- In mid-to-late 2025 and early 2026 imports fell because stock inventories were high.
- The current goods trade deficit is worse than every month but one between June 2022 and March 2025.
- Tariffs did nothing to improve trade deficits. We are now right back where we started from, if not a bit worse.
Goods Exports and Imports
The increase in exports and imports is largely a measure of inflation. But there is no improvement in the net balance.
Balance of Trade Goods and Services
The advance numbers are goods only. Goods and Services are as of May 2026.
Balance of Trade Goods and Services Detail
Between July 2021 and May 2026, the US trade services surplus increased from 19,136 and 28,899.
That’s an improvement of $9.8 billion or the goods and services deficit would now be 87.348 billion instead of 77.585 billion.
Tariffs have done nothing to improve trade deficits but they sure have increased costs.
Musical Trubute
Tariffs Will Not and Cannot Fix Trade Deficits
Tariffs will not and cannot fix trade deficits short of causing a recession reducing demand.
Note the balance of trade goods and services full chart with three recession bars.
The only improvements in the trade deficits were in periods of recession.
Trade Deficits a Symptom of a Problem
Trade deficits are not a problem, they are a symptom of a problem.
The real problem is there is no constraint on fiscal spending in congress.
This happened on August 15, 1971, when Nixon ended gold redeemability.
Coupled with the reserve currency, US consumers became the global consumers of last resort and there were no bakes on deficit spending by Congress.
Credit soared, and so did deficit spending.
Total Credit Market Debt Owed vs GDP
TCMDO vs GDP 2026 Q1
- TCMDO: 115.556 Trillion
- Nominal GDP: 31.866 Trillion
- Real GDP: 24.180 Trillion
On August 15, 1971 president Nixon temporarily suspended redeemability of gold for dollars.
It turned out to be permanent. Since then, there has been no constraints on the expansion of money, national debt, or trade deficits.
Nixon Shock
I have been writing about the fundamental problem for nearly two decades. Here’s a synopsis from September 2019.
Please consider Nixon Shock, the Reserve Currency Curse, and a Pending Currency Crisis
In 1971 President Nixon appointed the then Democrat John Connally as Treasury Secretary. That’s when things started rolling.
Our Currency But Your Problem
Shortly after taking the Treasury post, Connally famously told a group of European finance ministers worried about the export of American inflation that the dollar “is our currency, but your problem.”
By 1971, US money supply had increased by 10%. In May 1971, West Germany left the Bretton Woods system, unwilling to revalue the Deutsche Mark. Switzerland also started redeeming dollars for gold.
On August 5, 1971, the United States Congress released a report recommending devaluation of the dollar to protect the dollar against “foreign price-gougers“.
On August 9, 1971, as the dollar dropped in value against European currencies, Switzerland left the Bretton Woods system.
On August 15, 1971 Nixon directed Connally to suspend, with certain exceptions, the convertibility of the dollar into gold or other reserve assets, ordering the gold window to be closed such that foreign governments could no longer exchange their dollars for gold. He also issued Executive Order 11615, imposing a 90-day freeze on wages and prices in order to counter inflation. This was the first time the U.S. government had enacted wage and price controls since World War II.
The American public believed the government was rescuing them from price gougers and from a foreign-caused exchange crisis. Politically, Nixon’s actions were a great success. The Dow rose 33 points the next day, its biggest daily gain ever at that point, and the New York Times editorial read, “We unhesitatingly applaud the boldness with which the President has moved.”
So Much for Temporary
The move was not temporary. There have not been any restraints on deficit spending since.
Wars became easy to finance. Deficits? No problem.
In 2011, Paul Volcker, who replaced William Miller as Fed Chair in 1979, expressed regret over the abandonment of Bretton Woods.
“Nobody’s in charge,” said Paul Volcker.
As long as the US is the global reserve currency, US consumers are the global consumers of last resort, and Congress ignores big deficits and massive building debt, nothing is going to reduce trade deficits short of a big recession.
And that is precisely what the charts show.
Amusingly Trump has threatened nations if they try to end US reserve currency dominance. The irony is despite all their talk, China does not want it because it would be the end of their export mercantilism.
Credit Growth vs Real GDP
For further discussion please see How Much Credit Growth Does It Take to Expand Real GDP?
It is shocking how much exponential credit growth it now takes to prevent recession.
Click above for more charts and details.
Also see What Would It Take to End US Dollar Dominance Over Global Transactions?
Those two posts are the key to understanding the total futility of tariffs as a means to fix anything.
– In your article, you leave with: Those two posts are the key to understanding the total futility of tariffs as a means to fix anything.
> While I agree with you, the much bigger issue now, is what are we going to do with the existing tariffs? If we can’t live with them, the way they stand and yet they still exist, what’s next? If we are forced to live with them, can we change the way we are doing so in regards to the fabric of the intent, as long as the other party agrees I suppose? Could they end up working, as we go through the process, and changes are made, or concessions are agreed upon? Not so much as the original intent, but tariffs exist, and have worked historically in the past.
Internet: Yes, tariffs have historically worked for countries by protecting domestic industries, raising government revenue, and sometimes reducing trade deficits. For example, in the 19th century, U.S. tariffs helped foster industrial growth by shielding American manufacturers from foreign competition.
Current Tariff Rates:
Country/Region Tariff Rate Notes
General (60 trading partners) 10% to 12.5% Applies to most imports, including China and the EU.
Canada Up to 35% Varies by product; specific exemptions exist under USMCA.
Brazil Up to 50% Specific products may face additional duties.
European Union Up to 15% Tariffs depend on product type; some goods may be exempt.
China Up to 84% Varies significantly based on product classification.
Even with the highly inflated and expanded oil and Natural Gas exports?
Trump is a failure by any rational measure.
> Forbes has assessed his wealth, currently estimating it at $6.5 billion as of February 2026
> Donald Trump has 16.7 million followers on TikTok, making him the most followed world leader on the platform.
I guess Tens of Millions would disagree with you on one, and Millions upon wealth abilities, or the other one…
Imo part of the problem is there is a whole world full of people who will work for less and can have a better life. .
I’m so relieved we are doing something about the slave labor camps in Canada and Liechtenstein!
Our electorate will reject any politician who demands that public goods be realistically funded. Dems must promise more goodies to the poor, and Repubs must promise more tax cuts to the rich. Dems cannot raise explicit taxes on the rich, and Repubs cannot significantly repeal much of redistribution. Either of these if actually done might endanger the economy, such as it is, or social order.
Hence gaping and growing debt and deficits. We have met the enemy, and it is us.
One way out is stealth tax hikes that dare not say their name out loud: tariffs and inflation.
That’s all true, but Republicans are also now pushing this war that’s opposed by 70% of the people and radically increasing military spending. Republicans need to be punished at the ballot box.
The people don’t count. Israel has The Files and Israel wants this war.
Watch this and educate your self about the purpose of Tariffs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNg5U-ijEZA
I skimmed this – Don’t have 40 minutes.
Some of what I did skim is what I have been preaching for decades
The paper gold stuff is mostly bullshit
So it’s a hodgepodge of on and off point stuff, not worth watching and not educational.
Thank you for taking this for the team.
The Fake Core Inflation Index does not take into account food and gasoline, the two most expensive items in every household. Plus Utilities.!
Mortgage, insurance are more expensive for most.
If are fortunate enough to actally build equity, maybe
Why should Trump care?
By potentially saving 100s of billions, fraud investigations will expand the deficit. Our lame economy needs every stimulus it can get. See Senator Rick Scott.
Because the US legal system is famously fast and efficient and lawyers are so cheap.
Taco: I see an opportunity to enrich myself, I take the opportunity to enrich myself. What more do I need to know about economics???
Who cares?
“da ma-kets”
Just look at the outstanding debt, unfunded liabilities and the trajectory — it’s over mi amigo….so over.
…and enjoy what little life you have remaining with your photography and other pursuits…following and writing about this stuff is wasted effort with so little precious time remaining — even if that time is measured in years or decades.
I think it is interesting to think about what it will look like and when the US will collapse, it is inevitable. My guess is 50 years and China
Certainly a fun thought experiment — the handful of American purebreds remaining will be enslaved and tortured until they are out of existence altogether — and then, according to the “complaining class” — all the world’s problems will be solved because “whitey” and his “oppression” is no more.
Be prepared for and watch Israel’s pivot to China and abandonment of the US once the debt truly does collapse the system. By then they will have absconded with massive amounts of military intelligence (recent military merger, cough cough) and commercial IP which they (the parasite-class) will offer up to their new host. Then the process repeats.
As if China would want to deal with those Zionist genocidal maniacs….
Not sure how many of them are living it up in China but once they’re in you can’t get them out. They’re nothing but big time trouble makers wherever they colonize.
This is anti-Semitic, racist, and you should be ashamed to post it. Anyone who upvoted your post should be ashamed.
My grandfathers fought in WWII and I know better.
“Anti-Semitic”. Here we go again. I thought the Palestinians were semites not these europeans.
So it’s just a “coincidense” time and time again. No one likes to be bamboozled. The sympathy game is over….
You fancy yourself a purebred, but you think like an inbred.
Probably more like Argentina. A series of defaults and currency devaluations.
Schizo alert.
Remember when Team R wailed so piteously over the deficit? Now they’re spending like drunken sailors with someone else’s credit cards.
“Conservative” became some form or other of wrecking crew some time ago. It became market fundamentalist/globalist, militarized neoconservative, then reverted to populist social-conservative, paleo-conservative, on and on. Fiscal conservatives seem to have been ejected from the bus. It has jumped all over the philosophical map, but remains a careening wrecking crew, claiming to conserve God-knows-what.
They’re riding the short bus now, there just wasn’t room.
Fiscal conservatives like myself no longer have a political home.