Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

UK Average Electricity Cost Will Soar to $5,370 Per Year By 2023

Image from NimbleFins article quoted below

Net Zero by 2050

Outgoing UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson pushed for a net zero carbon policy by 2050.

Let’s discuss the costs.

Please consider Britain’s Net Zero Lesson for the U.S.

Households are likely to see the average bill for electricity and natural gas climb to £4,400 ($5,370) a year in the first half of 2023, according to a report this week from Cornwall Insight, a consulting firm. This is after the regulatory price cap shot up 54% to about £2,000 in April with another 40%-plus increase due in October and further increases after that.

Britain’s median income after direct taxes is £31,400. Skyrocketing fuel prices could push 10.5 million households, or one-third, into fuel poverty next year, says the End Fuel Poverty Coalition. Fuel poverty is when energy costs drag household disposable income below the government’s official poverty line.

That doesn’t include the energy costs households pay indirectly. Businesses, whose prices aren’t capped, have seen electricity costs rise in the past year between 45% and 122% depending on company size, and gas prices between 131% and 185%. 

Average Cost of Electricity per kWh in the UK 2022

Also note the rising cost of Electricity per kWh in the UK 2022

According to official figures, the average electricity bill in the UK was around £764 per year for 2021, but it will be significantly higher in 2022—possibly 2.6X higher.

Due to the energy price cap rising on 1 April 2022, households on default tariffs paying by direct debit are seeing an increase from £1,277 to £1,971 per year for both gas and electric (an increase of around £693 or 54%). And projections for October are now anticipating a further 82% rise.

By the end of 2022 we could see costs of 51 p/kWh for electricity and over 13 p/kWh for gas, assuming an 82% rise in October.

Pounds to Dollars Math

£764 * 2.6 * $1.2/£ = $2,384 for 2022. Cornwall estimates will double again in 2023.

If we go with Cornwall’s estimates, the average household makes £31,400 but will spend £4,400 on electricity in 2023.

If accurate, that’s 14% of the entire after tax budget just for electricity. 

Britons will have to choose between heat and eat.

Scotland Cut Down 14 Million Trees For Wind Turbines

In other news, Scotland Cut Down 14 Million Trees For Wind Turbines

The tree removal seems especially ironic given that world leaders supposedly agreed to end deforestation by 2030 at the recent COP26 climate summit in Glasgow, Scotland.

“‘The figure for trees felled for windfarm development on Scotland’s forests and land, as managed by FLS, over the past 20 years is 13.9 million. However, it should be noted that these trees – being a commercial crop – will have eventually have been felled and passed into the timber supply chain in any case.’”

Yet once wind turbine instillations are placed on the site where the trees once were, the trees can no longer be regrown there as part of a sustainable timber supply chain.

Not to worry. 

None of these things can possibly happen in the US because of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

81 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
“Scotland Cut Down 14 Million Trees For Wind Turbines”
Amazing. I didn’t know that wind turbines were made of wood. (LoL). Destroy an environment to protect an environment. In Germany, i believe they wanted to cut down a forest to build a Giga Factory for Elon. Can’t see the forest for the batteries.
“Outgoing UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson pushed for a net zero carbon policy by 2050.” “Households are likely to see the average bill for electricity and
natural gas climb to £4,400 ($5,370) a year in the first half of 2023…”
Somehow, it and what is happening to Dutch farmers reminds me of The Great Leap Forward, in China. Millions died.
Anon1970
Anon1970
4 years ago
My current electricity rate is about 35 US cents per kwh in Northern California. PG&E is my service provider. Fortunately, I can afford to pay the bill and keep the air conditioner on when needed. I agree with Brussels2 that the US has played a major role on provoking the war in Ukraine. Back in 1962, when I was in high school, I remember President Kennedy threatening the USSR with war if it did not remove its nuclear weapons from Cuba. So you can’t blame Russia for being concerned about NATO expansion to the east for over 2 decades.
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  Anon1970
Do we have nukes in Ukraine?
Anon1970
Anon1970
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Probably not. But the US is in the process of setting up a major military presence in Poland. https://kafkadesk.org/2022/06/30/us-announces-permanent-military-base-in-poland/
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  Anon1970
Why didn’t they invade Poland then? Because they would have gotten stomped flat immediately instead of over a period of months.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
We have biological weapons labs in Ukraine.
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Source?
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
4 years ago
The same here in Belgium, 500 euro/month for gas and electicity is the new normal. LOL, screwed Belgium, the hub of a burlesque farce called the EU, housing a criminal US’ run organisation aka NATO on top of that. In fact Europe has to pay for a US provoked war with Ukraine, a war that could ve been avoided if only we d had smart people for leaders within the EU circus instead of bank account focused emptyheads. In the meantime I read and hear msm prostitutes propaganda saying that Russia is ‘losing this war ‘, ‘running out of soldiers’ , depleted ammunition etc . Let me LOL again though if you don t mind, so far Russia has deployed merely a 10% of its military capacity, Russia has known all along that it has been the US aim since the fifties to destroy and carve up a too big Russia, or the USSR at the time, for the entire benefits of a rogue fantasy democracy at the other side of the pond. Russia has been preparing for this moment for decades, especially under Poetin , smarter than any other world leader. We re in for REAL bad times if western idiots, even at the other side of the pond, aren t willing to consider diplomacy as an option ! Russia will NEVER give up in pursuing its legitimate interests within a multipolar environment… Slava Rossiya, I d say once again !
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels2
So what are you personally doing to offset the energy price increases?
And what are you investing in to take advantage of this situation?
Or do you simply spend all your time complaining?
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
If you’re not trying to capitalize on people’s misery, there’s something wrong with you.
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels2
Comrade, your denials sound desperate. Where is smug Cossack of days gone by? Has Belgian potato given you vapors? Come home and fight for Russia! Show you not afraid of HIMARS fist of doom!
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Now you are fkn PapaDave too? ….what a pathetic loser you are…
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels2
I am everyone you see online, comrade! Your internet has been rerouted to my secret lair, so I can pretend to be everyone in the world, telling you what a chucklehead you are.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
the truth hurts ,….don t worry though, the truth , these days, don t matter anymore ….good luck man, I am not as spiteful as you are under all your fn avatars…that s why I remain ‘frombrussels’ whether anyone likes it or not ….my thanks go to Mish for allowing other points of view …
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Another lame humor attempt. You remind of the Russian comedians back in the 80s. ‘In Russia, hamburger eats you.’
Bhakta
Bhakta
4 years ago
Good Morning from Bangkok Mish!
We are living in a world gone totally mad, that is certain. My Mom lived in Cornwall the last 35 years of her life. It is a lovely part of the planet, but the winters are very cold and damp. She used to take off on a 4 month cruise every winter, to avoid the cold. This WEF/ NWO thing is obviously intended to destroy the middle class, and bring back the ancient system of the few aristocrats, and the rest serfs. So far they seem to be able to hold back the masses through deception and power, but can that last when masses are hungry, cold and do not give a hoot any more?
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  Bhakta
They believe the world has too many people. So, the solution is to starve them to death.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  Bhakta
Not really, Bhakta. Back in the day the royalty took care of the serfs. Not particularly good care, but enough to keep the grain, vegetables and livestock coming. Now, with an oversupply of educated interchangeable serfs they don’t need to care.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
This would have been hilarious were it not so tragic. The western governments did almost nothing over the last 40+ years towards transitioning to green energy, but now that they want to boycott Russia, they expect green energy to magically take over!

You can’t escape out of a door in the wall that you really didn’t bother to construct in the first place.

Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Blame must be shifted… we absolutely cannot take responsibility for our past decisions. Villains must be identified and sacrificed to our ignorant certainty!
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
UK will end coal by 2025, stop Russia imports by end of this year, and has climate regulations on NG production.
The UK government regulates the oil, natural gas, and carbon storage industries through the Oil
and Gas Authority (OGA). Since
2021, OGA has encouraged a North Sea energy transition, finding that closer coordination of
offshore fossil fuel and renewable energy sectors (for example, wind, wave, and tidal) could help
the United Kingdom meet its 2050 net zero emissions target.
The UK’s Carbon Price Floor policy, increases the cost of carbon emissions.
This is not all Green related, but as in the US, the UK is not prepared for the mandates it wants to deliver.
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Okay. Nice to see you state it isn’t just about “green” energy advocates. Clearly there are a lot of moving parts in this picture, including GB’s free market approach vs France’s regulated approach. Not to mention Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the resulting western sanctions.
Still waiting on your investment recommendations.
Anon1970
Anon1970
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
I am over weighted in energy and mining stocks.
8dots
8dots
4 years ago
English gentlemen are going broke. Chinese home buyers got a stroke. In May Walmart plunged, because investors feared that
Chinese banking problems are spreading. If China cut our balls, AAPL and Dollar General will fall. C/S is detached from reality. Their method is impaired. Pairs should have a cutoff of one generation, or a decade. You cannot race Olympic sprinters with an old
man with a cane.
shamrock
shamrock
4 years ago
Why do you pin this on green energy advocates? The price of natural gas has quadrupled, the wind still blows and the sun still shines for free.
MPO45
MPO45
4 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
I was wondering the same thing. As far as I can tell, what politicians are doing is subsidizing one industry over another and they have always done that. Oil & gas received huge tax incentives, subsidies and other goodies from the taxpayer and now the taxpayers want those going to green energy, people voted for Biden in the US and the dems that just passed a climate bill for more green. They are giving the people what they want.
I am 100% sure if Repubs take control again they will simply try to kill green subsidies and give them back to oil and gas.
When millenials and zoomers get off their butt and take control of government it will all be green energy because that’s what they want and we are in a system of “by the people…for the people.”
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
Please list the “huge tax incentives, subsidies and other goodies from the taxpayer”, other than deductions/credits for capital investment, depreciation, and depletion that were in the US Tax Code and available to ALL COMPANIES.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
Did you read the Yale ‘report’?
Explicit subsidies accounted for only 8 percent of the total. The
remaining 92 percent were implicit subsidies, which took the form of tax
breaks
or, to a much larger degree, health and environmental damages
that were not priced into the cost of fossil fuels
, according to the
analysis.
Tax breaks are “deductions/credits for capital investment, depreciation, and depletion that were in the US Tax Code”.
The rest is WOKE bullcrap for mindless readers.
MPO45
MPO45
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  MPO45

facts aren’t fair!

Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
The UK has natural gas. Greens do not want the industry developed.
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Okay. That works for me. Now that you have identified the culprit in this story: what are the investment opportunities?
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
More precisely, the UK imports natural gas from Norway. There’s an undersea natural gas pipeline from Norway to UK.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
The sun shines, and the wind typically blows stronger during the day. The problem is storing energy for the night. What is needed is an alternative system of energy generation for night, peak loads etc. Green gov’t has turned on coal (and nuclear) plants, and in Britain’s case, not developed natural gas.
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
So, what is the better investment opportunity? Renewable energy companies because they can expect more govt incentives? Coal companies? Natural gas companies? Oil companies? And specifically which companies. And the rationale please.
Why is everyone here afraid to make specific investment recommendations? Other than MPO45 and myself, who will give specific recommendations, everyone else just seems to want to hide out in gold and cash for their entire lifetime while they await the next depression. Doesn’t anyone here have a set of balls? Pathetic.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
When something is free, it is worth nothing. That goes for investment advice.
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
The truth is you don’t have a f*cking clue, do you?
All you can do is play the political blame game.
You’re f*cking useless.
I will now block you so I never have to see another one of your useless posts.
Bye.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
So, investment advice…. new battery storage technologies (not lithium) , superconductor technology (green requires a continent spanning grid), proton exchange membranes (because batteries do not cut it for many energy uses), mini-reactors.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
short fuse hey ? !
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels2
Yep. Time is precious. Shouldn’t be wasting it on morons.
Webej
Webej
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
How do you block? This isn’t twitter.
Where are those settings?
MPO45
MPO45
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
I think you need to temper your expectations. You are expecting an exchange of ideas from the “investment class” of society and there are few of those people here. The main reason I am here is because I aggregate data from many sources to make investment decisions. They say 80% of the wealth is control by 20% of the people and now you are seeing that theory in terms of the ratio of comments/investments.
You hit the nail on the head, from the hundreds of commentators only a handful were providing any useful information or commentary, the rest was endless noise. You have grumpy and angry boomers here that just want to argue endlessly every little point and there is no convincing them because “they know it all” from their “vast years of experience.” We’re probably the only ones that ever listen to these clowns which is why they are here to begin with so I suggest you do what boomers hate the most: ignore them. Don’t respond to their comment, don’t engage, just ignore. I forgot that lesson with someone just now but I am now reminded.
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
Sigh. You are probably right. I have hit the ignore button on Ahab. I guess I will have to do that for quite a few more now. And try to focus on those who actually have something useful to say. Sadly, most here are just cranky old men who complain full-time. Useless.
MPO45
MPO45
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
And there will be 60 million more in 2030. Sigh….
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  MPO45

OMG! You’re right!

Kimbo252
Kimbo252
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
I’ve got 3 balls for you to consider:
1. Geo-thermal, the shale drillers are developing the technology.
2.Fusion,but will it be cost effective?
3.Storage of energy.
Anyone of the above will be game changers.
Webej
Webej
4 years ago
Reply to  Kimbo252
Well, that might be interesting someday, but this hardly amounts to an investment proposition.
Not actionable, not investable.
Here’s another one: Invest in the future.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
PapaDave, your balls and mouth are big enough for everyone here. Many times over.
prumbly
prumbly
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Not just storage from the day to the night. Quite frequently you can go WEEKS or even MONTHS with little or no wind. Show me the battery that can store the amounts of energy required for weeks.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  prumbly
Well, we usually don’t go weeks without the sun. There’s that.
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago

Here is an interesting article on why GB has soaring electricity prices and France does not. Interesting, since the two electrical systems are interconnected.

GB chooses a Free Market system and France chooses a regulated system.

Please note, I don’t care much what the systems are; I only care about the real world results and the investment opportunities they provide. I will leave it for others to waste their time arguing over which system is “better”.

Lip
Lip
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
In contrast, the French approach uses a mixture of subsidies by the government and a public energy company, which costs taxpayers billions and postpones big decisions on energy efficiency and investment in future production.
The Brits pay directly for the electricity and the French indirectly through taxes.
The French system is far from perfect, however. The significant cost to taxpayers is not transparent and electricity prices do not reflect the cost of the most expensive unit. The absence of market incentives has also prompted the government to re-nationalise EDF to ensure future investment in renewables and next generation nuclear power plants.
They miss the plot with the following though.
The GB power market is generally an ideal way to allocate consumption and production of electricity. But efficiency is not everything. A rich country that cannot warm its homes has failed its citizens and so further action is needed to ensure this does not happen this winter.
Missing is the why. The why is because of sanctions on the Russians making the procurement of energy more expensive. Supply and demand (lack of supply in this case) together with disrupted and significantly longer supply chains point to the cost of energy increasing until demand destruction occurs and equilibrium is reached. The Brits do this via direct electricity costs meaning that the response is quick. The French delay the suffering by hiding the cost. Until it can no longer be hidden.
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  Lip
Mish says its all because of green energy advocates. You say its all because of Russia.
I say its because of those two things plus probably a dozen more.
But I don’t give a crap about playing the useless blame game. What does that get me besides an ulcer?
Instead of wasting my time playing the blame game, I prefer to look for the investment opportunities that arise from the situation.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Generally, when something is taxed, there is less of it. The corollary, when you subsidize, you get more of it. Applied to energy, the French will continue to use more energy (unless it is rationed). In Britain, rationing is price driven. Guess where waste is reduced and energy is used more efficiently? Are there investment opportunities? You bet there are.
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Care to share those investment opportunities?
Scooot
Scooot
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Investment opportunities?
I’d guess there’s going to be a lot of Brits looking into installing solar panels etc, anything to help with energy costs.
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  Scooot
Thanks for that. Nice to know that some folks here are interested in investing.
prumbly
prumbly
4 years ago
Reply to  Scooot
Solar panels? In Britain? Good luck with that, especially in winter when the days are short and the Sun is weak, if it shines at all! In Britain, winter is when you need energy the most.
Scooot
Scooot
4 years ago
Reply to  prumbly
It’s already very popular. A bit of info about it here, higher prices will make it more so.
prumbly
prumbly
4 years ago
Reply to  Scooot
Willing to bet you that those people who installed solar panels (using huge taxpayer subsidies) will get almost all their energy from the grid during winter.
prumbly
prumbly
4 years ago
Reply to  Scooot
The basic problem for countries like the UK is this:
When do you need energy? Winter.
When do solar panels produce energy? Summer.
Scooot
Scooot
4 years ago
Reply to  prumbly
Yes of course.
The point is they reduce the amount you drawdown from the grid and therefore reduce your exposure to the high and rising prices. Whether the investment payback ratio is worth it just depends on efficiency and current prices. They can’t replace the grid totally.
All I was suggesting is that as electric prices from the grid have soared so much and are set to continue to rise, more people will look into it and take it up. So I’d be amazed if Solar energy companies didn’t have a few bumper years, if they can meet the demand that is.
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Sort of like say, unregulated TX vs. regulated CA?
I seem to recall something a couple of years back about sky-high prices for energy in TX due to an unexpected cold snap.
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
One difference is that GB and FR have an integrated electrical system where TX deliberately wants to isolate its grid from the rest of the US. Politics over practicality and sensibility. You can’t fight stupid.
Webej
Webej
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Yes you’re on to something. The gas price in the Netherlands is the highest in Europe even though they are among the least gas constrained. Not only that, they’re sitting on a trillion m³ of gas (Slochteren was the biggest gas deposit in Europe; it is no accident that gas price benchmarks always quote the Dutch TTF) that they say they will leave in place, but this winter I’m sure they will open the spigot again.
Why the high price? Because of the neo-liberal/privatization model. Also applies to the EU as a whole, which has concentrated on integrating and liberalizing the EU energy market, which means everybody is largely subject to spot market prices instead of say, signing a 30 year contract with Russia at double discount pricing. Long term contracts are important for suppliers, as everybody is finding out now that they are attempting to buy LNG in Qatar and the US, etc. Suppliers want to know that they are going to be able to amortize pipeline or liquifaction infrastructure.
  • Public/private covenants (like price caps) can work. In England about 60 providers have gone bankrupt, canceling their customers’ contracts; in Germany the government has used their credit to bolster the providers. I am in the lucky position of having signed a fixed price contract for energy for 3 years, which works as long as your provider does not go belly up.
  • Demand destruction through pricing will not work out well for the English if France, Germany, and Italy subsidize residential gas consumption … moving all the demand destruction to less than prosperous English households.
  • Rationing can work in a situation like this, cutting out the direct propagation between prices at the margin and consumer prices, since the pricing is being bid up by scarcity and not by production costs. Much of the gas that is available is produced for far less than nominal pricing (Saudi and Russian oil also often has only a few dollars/barrel of actual production costs). No amount of demand destruction through pricing is apt to yield an acceptable result.
  • Russian gas is obviously the best solution. Open up NS2 and sign a long-term contract with Russia for double discounted prices … it could be done by the end of the week.
As for investing. I am about to hit mandatory retirement. I’m toying with the idea of producing/selling of some kind of cheap, lightweight, indoor enclosures, like tenting propped up against the ceiling with a telescoped pole. Small enclosures can be warmed quite easily with body heat (frost is light in N Europe) and can avoid turning up the heating. All the talk about cooking/showering is marginal BS … >93% of residential gas goes into heating. I know from experience how much a single candle can do for the temperature in a pup tent, and small bathrooms start to warm up noticeably just by reading the National Geographic while seated. People in Europe used to sleep in cupboard beds, enclosed in wood, with a curtain or other shutters … so you could even present it as a revival of forgotten cultural traditions and wisdom.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
4 years ago
Boris Johnson should consider himself lucky he is not being held responsible for spiking energy prices.
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Okay. So what is the investment opportunity here? Any specific recommendations?
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Manual, hand powered fans will be huge.
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
Winter is coming.
How about a real recommendation.
F*ck me. I miss Realist and Eddie.
MPO45
MPO45
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Glad you asked. My take: If British are going to be broke paying for energy then that means less money for other goods or services meaning less imports too. You could short the british pound or british companies by buying puts in their ETFs: FXB, EWU, respectively. I am guessing Tesco will take the biggest hit on this list of companies.
For every crisis, there is a way to make a profit, don’t let the opportunity pass you up.
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
Agreed. Though apparently, the vast majority here would rather spend all their time trying to play the political blame game. They seem to find that useless pursuit more important than looking for opportunities to make some money.
159 comments on the FBI retrieving classified documents from Trump . What a f*cking waste of time. I couldn’t be bothered to read any of them because I know that all the Retardicans would spout non-stop conspiracy sh*t. Too bad I can’t make money by knowing what they are going to do. Lol!
MPO45
MPO45
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
That’s why you won’t see a comment from me on any more political posts although technically, everything is political these days but I hope you get the drift. I know Trump is great for clicks but I’m sick of the guy and his zombie followers. Same for Biden and crew but he’s the president making policy decisions now so I might chime in every now and then.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Go to the top of this webpage. It clearly says… “MISH TALK Global Economics Global Politics”
Now, why would Mish have that if the goal for his blog is to hand out investment advice?
IMHO, “Global Economics and Global Politics” are the key fundamentals.
MPO45
MPO45
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
And yet we get “housing crash” and “stock crash” more frequently than you would expect from a purely economic and political blog.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Finally the Captain has put MPO45 and PapaDave in proper perspective.
These two whine more constantly and consistently than any others.
This is not a financial blog, there are plenty of those.
This, as Mish says, is about Global Economics Global Politics.
Scooot
Scooot
4 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
UK businesses are already being hit with the higher energy prices, the price cap doesn’t apply to them. They need higher prices to cover their higher costs at a time when their customers will have and will have less disposable income. Same in mainland Europe I guess. One reason GBP and the Euro have been very weak. So on the face of it your “take” is probably right but as always how much is already priced in?
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
1) Reddit
2) RobinHood
3) Cramer
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
I will leave those 3 for you. Good luck with your suggestions.
MPO45
MPO45
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
I bought puts on Robinhood a while back. I predict it goes to zero.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
See, you’re starting to ‘get it.’
Some advice… It is easy to make money in a rising market.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.