Wharton Analyzes Biden’s Lies, Concludes Build Back Better Costs Over Twice As Much

Lie of the Year 

The Wharton BBB Budget Model shows the true cost of Biden’s Build Back Better plan which Biden actually said costs nothing. 

See Fact Checkers Replaced by Unicorns After Biden Tweets “My Build Back Better Agenda Costs Zero Dollars

Wharton Spending Analysis 

In the illustrative permanent spending scenario, the total cost over 10 years is instead $4.26 trillion. Transfers and tax expenditures make up 66 percent of new spending under the permanent spending scenario.

The largest proportion of this spending is on the CTC  [Child Tax Credit] extension, which totals $1.8 trillion in new spending over the budget window. The Premium Tax Credit expansion is the next largest expenditure in Transfers and Tax Expenditures, requiring $385 billion of new spending over the budget window.

Extending the EITC results in $125 billion of new spending. Labor Productivity boosting spending is the second largest new spending category in the permanent spending scenario, receiving 19 percent of new spending over 10 years.

The dollar amount of the spending is twice the cost under the White House’s proposed framework because the White House proposed three small spending years, followed by three years of preschool and then an end to preschool and childcare programs; in this scenario, we extend preschool and childcare programs. Other federal spending and public infrastructure investment remain unchanged in dollar terms and now make up 12 and 3 percent of new spending, respectively.

Revenue Projections

Build Back Better Economic Impacts

In the illustrative scenario, government debt increases by 19.9 percent and 25.2 percent in 2040 and 2050, respectively. This new debt crowds out private investment, decreasing the capital stock by 7.6 percent in 2050. More scarce capital decreases the productivity of workers, lowering wages by 1.5 percent in 2050. In turn, lower wages and the transfer provisions in the proposal decrease hours worked by 1.3 percent in 2050. Overall, the fall in both labor and capital decreases GDP by 2.8 percent in 2050.

Manchin’s Fears

The Wharton Model specifically outlines the scenario Manchin fears. That is, once started, government programs never end. 

The Progressissives understand this as well, thus their efforts to play games with durations rather than fully fund programs for 10 years.

Manchin Calls Timeout to Study Build Back Better, May Vote Against

On November 1, I noted Manchin Calls Timeout to Study Build Back Better, May Vote Against

  • “As more of the real details outlined in the basic framework are released, what I see are shell games and budget gimmicks that make the real cost of this so-called $1.75 trillion dollar bill estimated to be twice as high if the programs are extended or made permanent,” said Manchin
  • “Simply put, I will not support a bill that is this consequential without thoroughly understanding the impact that it will have on our national debt, our economy and most importantly all of our American people,” he said.
  • “To be clear, I will not support the reconciliation legislation without knowing how the bill would impact our debt and our economy and our country. We won’t know that until we work through the text.”

Pelosi’s Curious Response

The response from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was more than a bit curious: She added items to the proposal instead of taking any away. 

What’s Going On?

I discussed what I thought might be happening in Pelosi Pushes for a Vote That’s Doomed in the Senate, What’s Going On?

Regardless of what game Pelosi is playing, Manchin needs to not only push for more time but also read and understand the true costs of Build Back Better as noted by Wharton.

Dear Senator

Thanks for Tuning In!

Like these reports?

If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

15 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kiers
kiers
2 years ago
Hey man, you’re cutting into the inflation bid!  If you keep exposing this money giveaway, how’s inflation gonna take hold?  You know inflation is gov policy right?
shamrock
shamrock
2 years ago
You know the Washington Post fact-checked bidens statement about the BBB costing nothing a day before your fact checker unicorn post.  Posted on September 28th versus your blog post on September 29th.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Whoa, governments and political parties always lie (aka make unrealistic assumptions).  It has been equally true, if not even more so, of the supply-side economics BS and the Laffer Curve BS as well.   And remember the BS about “the war is going to pay for itself”?   How did any of those things go?   
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
2 years ago
Liberal bolsheviks lie like rugs….what else is new….the woke whackos of the left will hopefully soon feel the weight of taxpayers saying shine it! Democrats definitely are the definition of brainless and flocked….
my collie herds in Golden gate park daily, sheep
PreCambrian
PreCambrian
2 years ago
I am not saying that you are wrong in stating that Biden’s program will cost more than advertised. However did you state that Trump lied when he said that the TCJA would pay for itself?
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Reply to  PreCambrian
It goes way beyond Trump all the way back to 1980 when supply-side economics was foisted on the American people.   It started with Reagan tripling the national debt and GHW Bush adding his trillion dollars.  We haven’t stopped since then.   The whole path is paved with false promises about how cutting taxes for the corporations and the super-rich will eventually reduce the debt.  
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  PreCambrian
As a matter of fact I was against Trump’s tax cuts for 2 reasons.
1. He lied and everyone knew it
2. The cuts did little or nothing for the middle class
Karlmarx
Karlmarx
2 years ago
It should be noted that this is based on a Keynesian General Equilibrium model that in and of itself is biased toward consumption.  If you look at this from a micoeconomic perspective the damage to the economy would be much worse.
tbergerson
tbergerson
2 years ago
To analyze Bidens lies would probably take a supercomputer.  Every word out of his mouth fits in that category.  Then again, as he rarely appears, maybe you could do it with off-the-shelf hardware.
Manchin put the lie to their legislation.  All gimmicks and games.  Pretend it only costs x and raises y.  When an honest decent person would recognize that the former is multiple times what is stated and the latter much less. 
The biggest and frankly funniest lie, as it is so patently absurd, is that it costs nothing, zero.  Which they say with an apparently straight face.  Just simply absurd.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Margaret Thatcher famously said the problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.
Let me update that for the here-and-now with my own corollary:
The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of grandchildren to saddle with oppressive debt.
TechLover1
TechLover1
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
That train left a long time ago! Both Republicans and Dems have saddled the nation with tons of debt over time. Republicans did their damage with wars and supply side policies of cutting tax for the rich and Dems spent on social programs. For each their own regarding which is better or worse.
The game now is to make that debt load much lighter. I don’t believe anything else will work.
That means inflation runs hot for quite some time and rates run super low. Across all of the developed world.
Are you in or out on that plan? If you are out, what is your plan? I don’t believe anyone can suggest with a straight face that controlling spending and tightening the belt is a viable solution going forward. That will hit the grandkids really poorly, might even dethrone the US immediately.
No nation has remained a superpower forever, our time will come as well. The game is to prolong the process and not go out like the USSR. British were smart to ease into the sunset. They are still prosperous. So are the Dutch.
Curious-Cat
Curious-Cat
2 years ago
Isn’t this the same school that gave a degree to Donald Trump?
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  Curious-Cat
Not gave. Sold to his daddy.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  Curious-Cat
Bachelors in Economics, Class of 68.
Big whoop.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
2 years ago
As Speaker of the House, Pelosi is so “serious’ that … House is not in session next week? … or week of Thanksgiving??
What a joke.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.