Who Won the US-China Trade War?

Chart source as noted via Wall Street Journal

The WSJ has an excellent article today asking Who Won the US-China Trade War? 

That’s a non-paywalled link for interested parties. 

Both the US and China claim victory.

US Won Theory

Robert Lighthizer, President Trump’s trade representative, who acted as the U.S. field general for the trade war, says the U.S. came out ahead in a much more important area.  “My objective was to convince people that China is a problem—an existential threat to the U.S.,” says Mr. Lighthizer. “I think we convinced people.”

There is also plenty of data to show that China was the loser in the trade war because it took a bigger economic hit than the U.S., with much of the evidence compiled by Chinese economists. China’s economy is more dependent on trade for growth than the U.S., so tariffs make China more vulnerable. President Trump had that in mind, according to aides, when he would tell them the Chinese will “run out of bullets first.”

China Won Theory

Charlene Barshefsky, President Clinton’s former trade representative, also thinks that Beijing came out ahead politically. “They did not change their economic model one iota, reinforcing to Xi Jinping that their economic model can withstand even aggression by the United States.”

Overall, Chinese officials believe the trade war hurt the U.S. more than it has hurt China, pointing to the heightened inflationary pressure as a result of American tariffs on Chinese products. Inflation is now presenting a powerful threat to the Biden administration as November midterm elections approach. “Tariffs are a poisonous legacy of the last administration that this administration should remove,” says a senior Chinese trade official.

The trade war also reinforced to Beijing the need to reduce its reliance on American technology—a longtime Chinese goal. To that end, China has doubled down on the state-led economic model the Trump administration had set out to change.

Last year Beijing pledged at least $1.5 billion in the coming five years to support more than 1,000 smaller, privately held firms, dubbed “little giant” startups. 

Curious Definition of Winning

Once again we see a curious definition of winning. To paraphrase, “We won the war because we lost an arm but they lost a leg.” 

Lighthizer said “I think we convinced people.”  Absolutely! Trump, convinced China to reduce its need on US technology. 

On that basis, who lost the arm, and who lost the leg? 

Six Phases of a Project 

Different countries are at different phases. 

The US is not quite at the panic stage yet. But praise, honors, and congratulations are owed to some of the non-participants.

Vietnam the Winner

Who won the U.S.-China trade war? In many respects, it’s been Vietnam. According to calculations by Kearney, China shipped $50 billion less in manufactured goods to the U.S. in 2021 than it did in 2018, as tariffs increased the cost of Chinese imports. During that same time, Vietnam—free from those U.S. tariffs—increased its factory goods shipments to the U.S. by $50 billion. Looked at from another angle, exports of manufactured goods from 14 low-cost Asian nations, including China, tracked by Kearney, increased by $90 billion in 2021 compared with 2018. Vietnam accounted for about half that increase.

Vietnam had become a manufacturing hub well before the trade war. Following the path pioneered by other export-heavy Asian countries, Vietnam welcomed foreign investment, improved its infrastructure and benefited from being close geographically to China and paying cheaper wages.

According to Moody’s Analytics, a market data firm, 46% of Vietnam’s exports to the U.S. now consist of electrical machinery, three times the percentage as before the trade war. Lower-value textile and apparel shipments also increased but at a much slower rate.

Over this period, America’s trade deficit with Vietnam also exploded nearly threefold to $90 billion. During the Trump administration, that gap attracted the attention of Mr. Lighthizer, who launched two investigations into Vietnamese trade practices that could have resulted in tariffs.

Luxshare Precision Industry Co., a supplier of components to Apple Inc. and other American companies, was one of many Chinese firms to cite U.S. tariffs as a reason to expand in Vietnam. In 2019, Luxshare announced it would build four factories in Vietnam. So far it has invested more than $3 billion there and plans to eventually shift one-third of its production to Vietnam.

Translation: Not content with losing an arm or a leg (take your pick), Lighthizer urged Trump to start a trade war with Vietnam. 

And here’s the amusing kicker.

Chinese manufacturers also rushed to set up operations in Vietnam. More than half the fresh exports from Vietnam to the U.S. during the trade war originated from Chinese-owned factories, estimates Patrick Van den Bossche, a Kearney partner. Since 2017, Chinese investment in Vietnam more than doubled to $1.9 billion in 2020.

MishTalk Flashbacks

March 2, 2018: Trump Tweets “Trade Wars are Good and Easy to Win”

In one Tweet, Trump proves he understands neither trade math nor trading partner psychology. 

Trump’s trade policies are set to exacerbate the next global recession, but economic illiterates are egging him on.

May 31, 2018: Trump Started a Global Trade War Today: Canada, Mexico Responded, So Will Europe

Trump has been itching for a global trade war ever since he took office. He just confirmed one. Regardless, of Trump’s primary target, if any, Trump wanted a global trade war. And he just started one.  Only fools cheer.

June 3, 2018: Trade Talks With China End in Impasse and Threats from China

All sides lose in a trade war. One does not win a trade war by losing less. Trump is clueless about trade and barking up the wrong tree.

Exacerbate the Next Recession

I wish to emphasize my March 2, 2018 prediction.

Trump’s trade policies are set to exacerbate the next global recession, but economic illiterates are egging him on.

All of these tariffs, sanctions and supply chain disruptions, now expanded by Biden as well, have certainly exacerbated the inflationary pressures in this global recession. 

The economic illiterates in the Biden administration have doubled, if not quadrupled down on Trump sanction ideas. 

De-Globalization: New Supply Chains Are Inefficient and Will Drive Up Inflation

Flashback April 4, 2022: De-Globalization: New Supply Chains Are Inefficient and Will Drive Up Inflation

“Piped gas from Russia can be supplied to northern China at prices that are competitive when compared with LNG,” said Ken Kiat Lee, analyst at consultancy FGE.

And as Russian oil gets diverted to China, China will then buy less oil from the Middle East and then Middle Eastern oil will now have to be shipped to Europe with the same loss of efficiency as the shipment of Baltic oil to China.

If this sounds convoluted, it’s because it is. 

US Sanction Policy Drives China Into Russia’s Loving Arms

As a result of US and EU sanctions on Russia, the price of Natural Gas has exploded, especially in Europe. 

The price of oil is up everywhere, even as recession hits. 

With all this going on, it’s debatable if anyone was a winner. But on a relative scale, Vietnam won. 

The biggest losers of de-globalization are the US, India, food and energy importers, and any countries hurt by the surging US dollar.

No, president Trump, trade wars are not good, nor easy to win. 

Here is one final flashback.

March 8, 2022: US Sanction Policy Drives China Into Russia’s Loving Arms

The global response to Russia has one huge beneficiary, China. The war accelerates a trend in place set in motion by Trump.

A recession fueled by collapsing demand, a liquidity crunch, and fading stimulus effects is coming up. Inflation sure doesn’t help.

Russia will not be the “cause” but the war in Ukraine and the global reaction to it will make things dramatically worse.

Hello president Biden, your sanctions on Russia have backfired just like Trump’s tariffs and sanctions on China.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

17 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
Mr. Lighthizer, who launched two investigations into Vietnamese trade practices that could have resulted in tariffs.
It just never stops. It’s like whack-a-mole. Every time you sanction one country, another takes its place, poor people dumping the product of their labor for less than it costs to produce, all to ingratiate themselves with American consumers.
But the US government sees through their ploys: they’re stealing our piggy bank!!
Bungalow Bill
Bungalow Bill
3 years ago
Just like Japan in the 80s, and more recently China, soon Vietnam will capture the attention of an America demagouge who will use it to ignore the huge benefits we get in trade with Vietnam, and we will see a repeat in policy as fear of Vietnam spreads across the land. Then there will be another manufacturing revolution taking place in the successor to Vietnam.
LPCONGAS99
LPCONGAS99
3 years ago
Hi Mish. In reading yesterdays article in WSJ; it does look like the Mfg exports China lost, while not made up in USA exports, they were at least moved over to Vietnam……..I take that as a net positive , for now anyway…..And are we seeing some benefit from multiple supply chain routes?
I get it, we are never going back to being a manufacturing power house exporter, but I like that we are at least trying to not be dependent upon Communist China for everything important that we need.
I do not mind paying more for that
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Long before trade war, there was talk that China was becoming too expensive, so no surprise Vietnam picked up the slack, and the Chinese are quicker to take advantage to outsource low value added production. That is actually the problem, high value added stuff at lower price anybody in the West can match.
prumbly
prumbly
3 years ago
The real winners from the trade war will be Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, etc.
It should be very clear that the US now wants a war with China, but first they have to minimize their dependency on Chinese trade.
It should be noted that the US has only had wars with third-world countries since WW2, and even so it lost most of those. It will be interesting to see how they do against a powerful, modern military like the Chinese now have. In any case, win or lose, the weapons manufacturers will do great.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  prumbly
If there is a war between China and Taiwan, it will certainly be provoked from the other side of the Pacific. China has a winning hand, and a system where politics isn’t based on bluster, chest pounding and hot air.
Jackula
Jackula
3 years ago
Robots will eventually reshore a lot of manufacturing back to the good ole USA. In the meantime tho almost everyone is in for a lot of pain
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
What will happen to supply chains in the event of a war between China and Taiwan? How likely is such a war?
prumbly
prumbly
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
The history is that in 1949 a large bunch of Chinese traveled to another part of China now called Taiwan, and decided to call the island their own. The indigenous people already living on the island had no say and have been ruthlessly discriminated against by the invaders ever since.
In the same way that the Union was pissed when the South tried to secede, China was not happy about this, but China was unable to do anything about it militarily at the time. It has been a huge sore point with China ever since, and one they are determined to correct.
So it’s not ‘if’, it’s ‘when’.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  prumbly
You’re right that a group of marauders with guns took over small fishing villages, but don’t underestimate the power of propaganda and brainwashing. History is full of instances of civil war in which the same people with small differences in beliefs fought each other to death.
Brain is a rare commodity in mankind.
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Regarding Friday’s Close
My Chart Tweet of Max pain was at 9:32 AM · May 20, 2022·
Roadrunner12
Roadrunner12
3 years ago
What will be interesting to watch will European politics over the next 2 years. In sanctioning and trying to exert regime change on Russia, will this actually backfire and exert regime change in the EU? The EU is just beginning to feel the pinch in Russian sanctions. Increased energy costs, economy in decline, very possibility of food and immigration issues coming.
I believe it is crunch time for the EU to see whether they want their economies to prosper or become an economic deadzone going forward. It looks like a battle of which the political elite look after themselves or the interests of their people.
Regarding the natural gas chart above, it makes 100% sense economically for the Nordstrom to supply natural gas. There is no way, the US can provide secure and cheap natural gas. Severe lack of infrastructure and capability and as well, the US is near a or at a peak in natural gas production. A question to ask if it may be more profitable for companies to compress gas, ship it and decompress it overseas resulting in more less US gas for US consumers. How will that play out for US consumers?
I posted about a month ago a Stansberry interview with Byron King where he expects consumers to be paying possibly triple what they are paying now. Natural gas was approximately $7.00 a month ago. Will have to keep an eye out for this and see if his prediction comes to fruition.
Italy actually increased their imports of Russian oil 4x as much since the war started. The Europeans look to be playing a shell game with Russian oil saying their not buying it but they are.
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  Roadrunner12
Excellent comments. Spot On.
Dr_Novaxx
Dr_Novaxx
3 years ago
Reply to  Roadrunner12
Nordstrom? LOL, I believe you speak not of JWN, but Nord-Stream.
Roadrunner12
Roadrunner12
3 years ago
Reply to  Dr_Novaxx
Thanks Mish and yes I was referring to Nord Stream, not Nordstrom, sorry.
Dr_Novaxx
Dr_Novaxx
3 years ago
Reply to  Roadrunner12
No problem, just having a little fun. And I do appreciate your analysis.
prumbly
prumbly
3 years ago
Reply to  Roadrunner12
It’s rather fun to watch the EU politicians squirming. They really want to join the playground bully and be a part of the mob attacking Russia, but they must be starting to realize they are fairly powerless to do so.
Interesting to see how quickly the EU countries have devolved back to their natural racism and animosities. They are now openly discriminating against Russians. In Germany there are hospitals that refuse to treat Russians. Russian sports people are being ditched, simply for being Russian. You can have your wealth stolen from you by government for the crime of being Russian, without any due process. This doesn’t bode well for the future of the EU – you can see the centuries of rivalries and hatred between these nations are still there, just below the surface, waiting for the right catalyst to ignite them once more.
Grab the popcorn!

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.