Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

US Sanction Policy Drives China Into Russia’s Loving Arms

Image WhiteHouse.Gov, Caption by Mish

The China Connection

My March 6 Comments

  • Outside of hard currency, what does Russia need? 
  • Technology? 5G? Parts and supplies from the US via China?
  •  Look for China to take advantage in many ways.

March 7 Eurointelligence: China Will Bail Out Russia

Please consider China Will Bail Out Russia by Eurointelligence founder Wolfgang Münchau.

We read about a small, but revealing anecdote of how Huawei, itself sanctioned by US, is helping the Russian government fend off western hacker attempts. This is not what we call a verified story. It appeared on a Chinese website, and was then deleted. But Huawei later said that it would use its capacity to train 50,000 technical experts in Russia. The two most sanctioned entities in the world, Huawei and the Russian government, are colluding.

Huawei is a cautionary tale for trigger-happy sanctions advocates. Trump’s sanctions mean that Huawei was no longer able to use Google’s Android operating system for Huawei smartphones. Nor could Huawei source US developed microchips. Huawei’s phone sales plummeted. Its flagship model launched last year was not available for sale in Europe and the US. But Huawei has since replaced its Android with its own operating system, HarmonyOS. Western sanctions had a negative impact on Huawei’s sales and profits in the short term. But they will make the company stronger in the long run.

The whole idea of economic sanctions is premised on the notion of western monopolies and monopsonies. This was the world of a bygone age. The only real monopolies we see emerging are China’s and Russia’s hold on important raw materials, which the west needs to import. Western-dominated financial infrastructure, like the Swift payment communications system, are losing their monopoly status. China and Russia have built their own infrastructure. And when Visa, Mastercard and American Express stopped business in Russia over the weekend, Russia switched to a Chinese system.

Russia vs Germany and France

Münchau notes seriously wrong analysis of Russia by Western media along this line of thinking: Russia is only the economic size of Belgium. That line of reasoning is based on the plunging Ruble.

But the Russian 2020 population is 144 million. The German population is 83 million and France 67 million, totaling 150 million. 

That’s a better comparison. But here’s an even better way of looking at things.

Russia and Ukraine Exports

  • Russia and Ukraine are key exporters of C4F6 and neon gas. Ukraine produces about 25% of the neon used in global semiconductor production.
  • Russia produces about 12 percent of platinum and 40 percent of palladium used in automotive catalytic converters. 
  • Russia produces 3.9 metric tons of aluminium (6% of world supply). Russia and Ukraine together account for about 10% of global steel exports, according to SteelMint.
  • Russia is the third-largest producer of petroleum after the U.S. and Saudi Arabia, exporting almost 5 million barrels a day of crude oil in 2020, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
  • Russia produces about 12 percent of the world’s oil and 17 percent of its natural gas, according to estimates from J.P. Morgan. 
  • Russia and Ukraine account for about one third of global wheat exports.
  • Russia supplies about half of Airbus titanium needs, while a U.S. industry source said  Russia provided a third of Boeing’s requirements.
  • Caspar Rawles, chief data officer at specialist consultancy Benchmark Mineral Intelligence (BMI), said that while Russia accounts for 5% of global nickel production, it supplies about 20% of the world’s high-grade nickel.

Spotlight Titanium 

Reuters reported yesterday that Boeing Suspends Russian Titanium as Airbus Keeps Buying

“We have suspended purchasing titanium from Russia. Our inventory and diversity of titanium sources provide sufficient supply for airplane production,” Boeing said in an emailed statement.

The head of state-controlled VSMPO-AVISMA hit out at Boeing’s decision to suspend the contract, which had been renewed four months ago at the Dubai Airshow where Boeing pledged to keep the Russian company as its largest titanium supplier.

For now it appears Boeing had a stockpile and Airbus doesn’t. Then again, Barron’s says Boeing Might Have a Russian Titanium Problem

Given US sanctions forced Boeing to halt business with Russia, Boeing’s statement reads a bit hollow.

Spotlight Nickel

Yesterday I commented Nickel Market Breaks, Price Doubles to $100,000 In 1 Day, Deliveries Fail

Palladium, Lead, Tin, Zinc

Oil Question of the Day

My Comment to US Senator Ed Markey

Not That Simple

Dear Venezuela Please Send Help!

How stupid is this?

U.S. Officials Meet With Regime in Venezuela, to Discuss Oil Exports to Replace Russia’s

Gold 

Ban Bans?

We can safely rule that idea out.

Senator Rubio says “I am working on legislation that would impose sanctions on #China if we catch trying to use their Cross-Border International Payments System (CIPS) to help #Russia get around SWIFT sanctions

Great Idea Senator! 

Let’s halt global trade altogether! 

What can possibly go wrong? I am sure Biden can work out a deal with Venezuela that will save us all. 

Let’s ban all of Russia and China too (on top of Venezuela and Iran). 

Six Reasons Huge Demand Destruction Coming Up

  1. Stimulus wearing off
  2. Fed tightening
  3. Mortgage rates low but rising will kill cash-out refis and reduce purchases
  4. Wealth effect of stock market collapse will be enormous
  5. Neither China nor the US can save the global economy
  6. Massive commodity inflation

Not to worry, nearly everyone tells me “No Recession”.  A few brave souls agree with me.

Buy Gold

In case you missed it, please see Macro Dream Team Videocast Parts One and Two

A Recession Looms, Blame the Fed and Biden, Not Russia

A recession fueled by collapsing demand, a liquidity crunch, and fading stimulus effects is coming up. Inflation sure doesn’t help.

My March 3 Call: A Recession Looms, Blame the Fed and Biden, Not Russia

To stem off ridiculous replies, Russia will not be the “cause” but the war in Ukraine and the global reaction to it will make things dramatically worse.

Oil Irony

Today we have Oil Irony: US and UK to Ban Russian Oil, Russia Threatens the Same

Question to Fed: Can you print oil, titanium, nickel, wheat, aluminum, neon, or gold? 

If not, what do you propose?   

Meanwhile, let’s all pray Biden does not follow Rubio’s suggestion and start a global depression.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

73 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
I will go out on a limb and say this won’t end quickly in Ukraine. Both Putin and the west seem to be in it for the long haul and are pushing more chips to Ukraine. So I say 1 year global recession and proxy war between the West and Russia. It will take a full year and it will be ugly. It’s gonna be like Rocky IV.
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Old Chinese proverb – There are many ways to skin a cat.
=======
Chinese companies that aid Russia could face U.S. repercussions, commerce secretary warns.
Gina Raimondo, the commerce secretary, said the U.S. could take “devastating” action against Chinese companies that defy Russian sanctions.
March 8, 2022
Gina Raimondo, the secretary of commerce, issued a stern warning Tuesday to Chinese companies that might defy U.S. restrictions against exporting to Russia, saying the United States would cut them off from American equipment and software they need to make their products.
The Biden administration could “essentially shut” down Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation or any Chinese companies that defy U.S. sanctions by continuing to supply chips and other advanced technology to Russia, Ms. Raimondo said in an interview with The New York Times.
….
prumbly
prumbly
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
Yes, open up a new trade war with China. That’s going to work out well.
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
Yeah – let’s shut down chips
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
We are where we are because so few wanted to take real action in past crisis as they feared the effect on economies, trade, diplomacy or their personal wealth. A strong response is necessary.  There are always costs to every action. If China chooses to support Russia warmongering and its wanton killing of innocent Ukrainians, then they need to incur a serious cost.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
Yep. I work in semis and this war with China may come to a head finally. 
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
The irony of all this Trump kept calling out China and Russia last week and supporters ate it up. They should love a Biden trade war with China and Russia and bring more industry back home right ?
prumbly
prumbly
4 years ago
Hard not to think again of that old Obama quote: “Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f**k things up,”
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  prumbly
Obama is the same guy that was told by Biden that Crimea would come back to haunt the US. 
Eighthman
Eighthman
4 years ago
Could Russia wreck the US without firing a shot by triggering a “currency payment panic”?
Have billions of US dollars been transformed from an asset into a dangerous financial liability in the past couple weeks?
Dollar reserves can be vanished or frozen forever by a keystroke hit by sanctioners for whatever reason.  The global dominance of US banks suddenly flip into a danger to any dollar reserves.  Click, gone…
Do nations suddenly demand their own currencies while the US is running record trade deficits? Could Russia trigger that by demanding rubles? Making the US dollar an internal currency catastrophically?
ColoradoAccountant
ColoradoAccountant
4 years ago
Reply to  Eighthman
I think you have it right. We seized Russia’s dollar reserves. That will destroy the dollar’s reserve status over the next few years. And that will destroy the dollar. 
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Eighthman
If the Russians default on their bonds then they are bankrupt. They have bigger problems than they can deal with. 
Reptilicus
Reptilicus
4 years ago
It definitely doesn’t make sense to continue business as usual with China when we’re sanctioning their best buds. It’s a complete waste of effort. Obviously we cannot sanction every dictatorial regime. 
Can we perhaps settle for sanctioning only those dictatorial regimes that threaten the rules-based international order? That includes Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea but probably not Venezuela, Syria, or Cuba. 
DennisAOK
DennisAOK
4 years ago
Yes, the two totalitarian giants will get together, with Russia being a major commodity supplier to the Chinese industrial machine. No doubt we are going to feel some pain. Wars are not good. But most of the world decided after WWII that we would not allow countries to attack other countries. Appeasement does not work. Soon Putin will want more. Short of war, all we can do is treat Russia as a pariah state. Let their people realize there are costs to their government’s actions. 
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  DennisAOK
You do realize that every year since WWII there have been multiple wars waging around the world between countries. The idea that we won’t allow countries to attack other countries is laughable. We tolerate it all the time as long as it’s countries we approve of.
yooj
yooj
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Countries that violate human rights forfeit sovereignty, have no claim to sovereignty that other countries are bound to respect.  The U.S. usually but not always invades or approves  invasions of rights violators.  Usually it is counterproductive for it to do so, but it usually gets the sovereignty right. Not all invasions are equal. For example Russia is invading a country that did not  forfeit sovereignty.  Iraq, by wholesale violation of human rights forfeited sovereignty. So, although the U.S. invasion was asinine, idiotic, tragic folly, it is morally distinguishable from Russia vis a vis Ukraine. Other U.S. positions are hardener to distinguish.  Still, the U.S. has been on the right side of invasions more often than other countries in a given era. One qualification is that sometimes the U.S. has installed or supported the rights violator (Noriega ), creating the rationale for invasion. 
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  yooj
“The U.S. usually but not always invades or approves  invasions of rights violators.”
If I get to arbitrarily decide who deserves to have their stuff taken, I’d find it rather easy to only take stuff from people who deserve it as well….
But, of course, in the naive minds of children, My Dear Leader is always bestester than all the other Dear Leaders. Never mind they all doing the exact same thing. After all, The Man on my TeeVee says so. And he say’s he’s an expeeert!!!
yooj
yooj
4 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
To say they’re “all doing the exact same thing” is a childish copout.  William Buckley said that saying that ” is like saying that the man who pushes a little old lady into the path of a bus is morally equivalent to the man who pushes her out of its path, because they both push little old ladies around.”  Yes, the U.S. invades and Russia invades.  But look a little deeper.  Don’t be arbitrary. Be principled. Say no to moral relativism.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  yooj
But they are doing the exact same thing. To make the Buckley analogy relevant, the US would, instead of dropping bombs on Iraq, have either jumped in front of bombs already falling there, or have moved Iraqis out of the way of already falling bombs.
Which they never did. Instead, the only actual difference is: Whether the little old lady gets run over by a bus which is driven by a Russian or an American. Which is is pretty darned irrelevant, to all but the most hopelessly indoctrinated of partisan naifs
yooj
yooj
4 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
Both the Russians and the Americans did the same thing, yes. – drop bombs.  That can’t be the end all be all of your judgment, unless you’re a pacifist. 
The Buckley point is that something matters besides what is done.  The why. The reason for and intent of action matters.  Good intentions don’t always excuse or even mitigate causing harm, and especially harm to innocent persons.  But sometimes they do.  Would you prosecute the one who pushes the lady out of the way of the bus for battery? No. But you would prosecute the one who pushes her into the path of the bus. Same acts, different moral significance.  It is not who is doing the pushing, but why.  
My claim is not that the U.S. has always or even usually been in the right in invading or supporting invasions, but the much more modest one that for most of its history, the U.S. has been on the right side of invasions and the use of military force more often than its contemporaries. 
If you have to cross the street of history, you’d be much safer if the busses on that street were driven by Americans than Russians. No guarantees that you’d not get run over by an American, just better odds.  
In any case, while Putin is killing is not the time to play, “but what about.”  
Call_Me
Call_Me
4 years ago
Reply to  yooj
The U.S. supported Iraq’s former head and that led to a few decades of ‘fun’ (and substantial profits for everyone from Blackwater to Haliburton to Raytheon).
The U.S. has a record of violating human rights, will they forfeit sovereignty?  Perhaps Trudeau can clamp down on them?
Call_Me_Al
yooj
yooj
4 years ago
Reply to  Call_Me
In some periods, the U.S. forfeited sovereignty.  For example, if European powers had invaded to end slavery, then their invasion could not have been adjudged wrongful as a violation of sovereignty.  Again, as I wrote above, the intent of an invader matters, not just the state of the invaded country. 
Call_Me
Call_Me
4 years ago
Reply to  yooj
Altruism isn’t a trait found in governments.  Their drive is to perpetuate their existence (and occasionally to increase their power 😉 so I think you’d be hard-pressed to find examples of pure intent and justified invasion in the world’s history.
Casus belli is an old term for justifications of war against another state due to a threat or aggressive action, is there a similar term for what you speak of?  Would the ‘forfeited sovereignty’ end as soon as the offending action ceases or is there a lag until sovereignty is restored (presumably dependent on the duration and severity of the offense)?
Call_Me_Al
 
prumbly
prumbly
4 years ago
Reply to  DennisAOK
“most of the world decided after WWII that we would not allow countries to attack other countries”
So how’s that working for you?  Since WW2 the US has attacked: Korea, Vietnam, Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Grenada, Libya, Panama, Yemen, Syria …
yooj
yooj
4 years ago
Reply to  prumbly
Korea worked out quite well. 
Which of the other countries are like Ukraine? 
Was it wrong to invade Somalia? No. Foolish on a cost benefit basis, but Somalia’s various rulers were killing, intentionally starving Somalis. 
——
U.S. is on the wrong side on Yemen. 
—-
And you have to look at the intention. The U.S. in your examples did not seek territorial conquest, annexation, colonization. At most, as in Iraq and Afghanistan, the U.S. sought a friendly government, probably not even a puppet one. Russia is annexing, some or all, in a war of territorial conquest. The U.S. did not claim that Grenada or Panama did not have a right to exist, as Russia now claims about Ukraine.  
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  yooj
So, if only Russia had claimed that all they want is a friendly government in Ukraine, that would have justified the invasion?? 

Hilarious.   Or pathetic.   Your pick!

Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Russia is not a proponent of democracy anywhere. 
prumbly
prumbly
4 years ago
The US has installed, re-installed, or supported plenty of “friendly” dictators over the years. We still do it today – Saudi Arabia being a particularly lovely example.
yooj
yooj
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
The claim matters as evidence of intent, but is not conclusive. Putin says Ukraine doesn’t have a right to exist. He wrote and recites a false history in support of the claim. Then he acts accordingly, with official enactments annexing the parts of Ukraine he has occupied. So, by words and deed, the best conclusion is war of territorial conquest. Even If Putin only wanted a friendly government, the invasion would  be unjustifiable because Ukraine was sovereign.  Intent upon victory matters only if the invasion is of a human rights violator, or aggressor. Then the justness of an invasion depends on intent.  An invasion, could be just if for purpose of regime change, but not if for the purpose of expropriation of natural resources. 
Call_Me
Call_Me
4 years ago
Reply to  yooj
The situation on Somalia wasn’t self-inflicted.  There was plenty of outside actions that went unpunished which led to ‘various rulers’ coming to power and their arms were not domestic.
“The Greenpeace report briefly made the news and was followed up by the
European Green Party tabling a question in the European Parliament about
‘the dumping of toxic waste from German, French and Italian nuclear
power plants and hospitals’ in Somalia.”
Call_Me_Al
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
 Biden sanctions Rusky oil while prices are escalating  in a recessionary environment. Never waste a good crisis to push your agenda.
This anti fossil fuel , green utopia hysteria will plummet us into the Dark Ages (literally) .    Buttigieg: Buy a  Electric Car, So You Don’t Have to Worry About Gas Prices Anymore . 
Kamala Harris says “our transportation sector has reached a turning point” to make a “transition” on energy . 
E. warren – Warren: ‘We’re Going to Be on’ Oil Companies, ‘Profit Margins Should Not Go Up’
 Biden double down : Boosting U.S. Oil Production ‘Will Not’ Lower Gas Prices; Electric Cars Will
Ya right .  green energy can complement fossil fuel energy  but let the free markets/technology  evolve to accommodate . This doesn’t have to be a revolution’    
Got a charging station ??
 
Rbm
Rbm
4 years ago
Russia and china deserve each other
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  Rbm
If they end up developing; and make increasingly available to more people; viable alternatives to current monopolies, that would be a really good side effect of this conflict. Monopolies are always problematic. As in, monopolies are problematic in and of themselves. Without exception. Period. It makes exactly zero difference who happens to have such a monopoly.
I don;t necessarily believe a payment system ran by the Chicoms will, in and of itself, be any “more fair” than one ran by the US. But, as always, having two, or more, of them available, and copeting for takers, is the only way any of them can be relied upon to be even halfway decent. So: Go Russia and China! Keep busting monopolies wherever they currently exist. 
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
China controls a large part of mineral deposits directly or indirectly, too.
If you make up more than half the world manufacturing, it makes sense.
China objected to Bernanke pritalooza by saying it devalues her treasury holdings which were accumulated in sweatshops rather than printing presses, but was told to suck it up.
That was the birthday of BRI, investing in tangible assets, and infrastructure.
Much like the rest of the accidental investors enriched by incredible, stupendous asset appreciation.
Thanks to the quacks of the central banking cabal.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
4 years ago
wonderful post, mish.  might be one of your finest.  hat tip.  keep it up.  i agree with you.   
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
Seems like you post this same statement in every thread.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
The sanctions are a direct stress test for the petrodollar and the whole Eurodollar system. So far the dollar is being driven higher, but at some point an overly  strong dollar is not really a good thing for anybody, including us. The whole idea of the BRICS figuring out workarounds to stay out of dollar denominated debt and non-dollar means of trading oil and commodities is liable to shift into high gear.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Short everythin’ Ed,  the umpteenth US provoked  war will be over this very   week !
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
It will be good to see Putin torn apart by Russian mobs and his scraps tossed to the hungry Ukrainian dogs.
Cocoa
Cocoa
4 years ago
Russia needs liquidity
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  Cocoa
Definition?
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
More money.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
With oil, gas and nickel prices where they’re at, that doesn’t seem all that big a problem……
For going on two decades now, it has definitely been a somewhat fundamental problem that one of the world’s superpowers, Russia, has an economy which to such an asymmetric degree benefits from increased instability. They sell oil, gas, metals, weapons and mercenary services. There’s very little in that mix, which would make a more stable world their immediate interest.
Now that America is increasingly in the same boat; stuck with little more than a big military…….; no wonder the two of them are falling over each other stirring up trouble everywhere they can. To everyone else’s detriment.
Europe and Asia, China included, really ought to look into to aligning and blunting/bypassing both of them….
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
4 years ago
$USD’s days as Global Reserve Currency are numbered.
Low triple digits.
Roadrunner12
Roadrunner12
4 years ago
“US Sanction Policy Drives China Into Russia’s Loving Arms”
x1000

“Isaac Newton’s third law of motion basically says that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. The same might be said about economic sanctions.

If Russia can’t sell its oil and natural gas to the United States, it will turn east and sell them to China. That market switch is already under way. Beijing probably has already concluded the war in Ukraine might do more good than harm to the Chinese economy. Last week, it hedged its geo-economic bets by declining to condemn Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in a UN General Assembly vote – China abstained.

Russia’s motivation to expand its already enormous economic ties to China increased on Tuesday, when U.S. President Joe Biden announced an embargo on imports on Russian oil and oil products; Britain was quick to follow.

The move was expected as the U.S., Britain and the European Union tighten the economic noose around Russian President Vladimir Putin’s neck, and it propelled already surging oil prices up by 6.5 per cent. In London trading, Brent crude, the international benchmark, went to US$131 a barrel, for a one-year rise of 93 per cent.

Oil prices might have gone far higher if the U.S. and Britain were bigger consumers of Russian oil. The U.S. Energy Information Administration says only about 3 per cent of all the country’s imported crude came from Russia in 2021; the figure rises to 8 per cent when petroleum products are included. Both figures were falling even before the American embargo was announced.

Mr. Biden’s move will still hurt, since a few per cent of the world’s biggest oil market is not nothing, making the announcement, unlike Canada’s, more than symbolic (Canada hasn’t imported any Russian oil since 2019). The big question is whether the EU will also put an oil embargo into place at some point. It might, but not any time soon.

The EU’s mistake was making itself overly dependent on Russian energy exports; it can’t possibly wean itself off them overnight and keep the lights on. That’s why German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi, among other European leaders, lobbied to make Russian energy exempt from European sanctions.

To be sure, they are now motivated as never before to veer away from Russian energy, a process that will take many years. Watch them buy American and Qatari liquefied natural gas (LNG), ramp up their renewable energy efforts, rebuild old nuclear reactors and launch new ones, and perhaps stay the planned executions of their remaining coal burners.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/world/article-allies-consider-sending-warplanes-to-poland-if-warsaw-delivers-soviet/

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/commentary/article-banning-russian-oil-exports-might-hurt-europe-far-more-than-the-us-or/

In the meantime, Mr. Putin’s rage will be tempered by China, which, in spite of its economic slowdown in recent years, still has a voracious appetite for hydrocarbons, including coal, and has little incentive to curb its carbon dioxide emissions in the near term.

China and Russia had been expanding their economic ties in recent years and sanctions against Russia, which China does not support, will only bring them closer.

Trade between the two countries leapt 36 per cent last year to almost US$147-billion, according to official Chinese data, and has been steadily rising since 2014, when Russia’s annexation of Crimea landed it in the sanctions doghouse. China is now Russia’s No. 1 export destination; China buys Russian agricultural commodities as well as hydrocarbons.

There is no doubt that any oil Russia cannot sell to the West will be happily bought by China, all the more so since Russia’s benchmark Urals crude is trading at a steep discount – as much as US$30 a barrel less than Brent crude in recent days. Oil is mobile; the tanker ships that were headed west will do a U-turn and go east.

The same cannot be said for gas, which is generally delivered by pipeline. China would like to buy more Russian gas but can’t, at least not right away. Mr. Putin cannot divert the gas he sends to Germany, Italy, Austria, the Netherlands and other EU countries to China because the pipelines that supply Europe are not connected to the ones in the far east of Russia that go to China.

In time, Russia will expand its gas pipeline network to China, but that would take years. In the meantime, it seems likely Russia will keep exporting gas to Europe because Europe has no alternative to Russian gas and is willing pay a fortune for it. It seems unlikely Russia will turn off the gas taps, just as it seems unlikely Europe will slap an embargo on that gas.

You can see where this is going. Not only will Russia sell more oil and gas and other commodities to Europe, but Russia will import more Chinese technology and use Chinese financing to invest in Russian hydrocarbon projects. Already, there are rumours Chinese companies might buy the stakes in Russian energy plays being abandoned by Western companies. One is BP’s 20-per-cent stake in Kremlin-controlled oil giant Rosneft, which the British company wants to sell.

There might be more. China and Russia will be tempted to create their own interbank payments system now that Russian banks are being banned from the SWIFT network. They will also try to boost the profile and acceptance of their national currencies, a process that will not be quick, because the U.S. dollar utterly dominates international trade settlements. Still, Russia and China will push hard to de-dollarize their foreign transactions.

The theory of unintended consequences already seems in fully display. The U.S. and Europe are working hard to isolate and punish Russia for it invasion of Ukraine, as they should. But in doing so, they can only push Russia and China closer together, making China stronger as it feeds off cheap and plentiful Russian commodities. Dealing with a stronger and potentially expansionary China will be the next U.S president’s problem.”

Cocoa
Cocoa
4 years ago
Reply to  Roadrunner12
If thats the case, then it’s intentional as the Democratic Party is “elite-captured” by CCP bribe money anyways
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  Roadrunner12
Fn incredible how stupid  the totally deluded  brainless EU circus actually is ….I do hope that thanks to this conflict it all falls apart for fn once and for always !  
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
The Huawei experience is why US tech firms, especially Apple are going to face a lot of trouble going forward in the coming years. Their decision to halt Apple Pay is Russia hasn’t gone unnoticed by the rest of the world. It doesn’t take a genius to realize other countries are going to have to develop alternate payment  systems, phones etc in order to avoid using US tech firms.
Long term that means less Apple products sold world wide. The US market is huge, but Apple needs world wide presence to justify it’s stock price, growth etc and one can see China, Russia and other countries eventually banning Apple products, Google products etc. So instead we get a huge hodgepodge of phones, payment apps etc.
US tech firms are going to be big losers in the aftermath on the world wide stage in the coming decade.
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Excellent Comment TT
I want you on my macro team.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
That is making a lot of assumptions on what life in Russia looks like in 2 weeks and 2 months. 
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
“US tech firms are going to be big losers in the aftermath on the world wide stage in the coming decade.”
They were headed that way, even long before this conflict.
Less and less hard value of even nominally “US” products, is added in the US. “Smart guys” have been leaving Silicon Valley; and to an even greater extend never bothered to come in the first place; for over a decade. And while their predecessors did build a rather impressive pile of seedcorn back before that was the case; no amount of now parting it out and burning it; by ambulance chasers, realtors, “investors” and other FIRE dregs; will ever add anything but increasing irrelevance.
The US produces paper pieces with dead guys’ (soon to be living no doubt, as stupid people have a way of being vain people) faces on them, now. Pretty much everything else, others produce better and more efficiently.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Americans , got news for you ,  by the end of the week, this umpteenth US provoked  war will be over ….so start shortin your oil and arms positions ….this is REALLY  over …..Russia WON  !  What did you expect anyway ?   Buy Ruble,  the US $  is worth NOTHING  !
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels

Your kooky has gone to 11… time to call the men in white coats!

Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
Buy yuan, the ultimate winner.
Johnson1
Johnson1
4 years ago
I read everyday how the Ukraine Army is destroying army columns and helicopters and Russian troops.  I just read an article that the Ukraine army destroyed 30 helicopters and much of the crew when they shelled a Russia base.  Then I read they just destroyed two more columns of Armored vehicles today.   On the flip side, I rarely hear of any Ukraine troops or armor getting destroyed.     
I read Ukraine has destroyed 290 tanks, 50 MLRS, 33 planes, 2, boats, 37 helicopters, 404 cars,  60 fuel tanks, 150 artillery pieces, 3 UAVs, 939 armed personnel carriers and 18 anti-aircraft warfare vehicles.
Everything I read appears that Ukraine is way ahead.  They do say  2000 Ukraine civilians killed.  I cannot find anywhere high or low that lists if the Ukraine army has taken any casualties but I am guessing the must have some?   Maybe they are just calling them civilian casualties.  Nobody reports on this Ukraine Army casualties though?   
Of course…who knows what is true. 
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  Johnson1
CNN ? or BBC, for that matter , do,you really fn believe them  ???  LOL !
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
Pravda is the only true news, eh comrade?
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Pravda is a Communist Party newspaper.   If you travel forward some 40 years from where you are, you will get to the year 2022, where you will see that the Communist Party in Russia is a marginal entity.
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  Johnson1
The first casualty in war is the truth.
The truth was the first casualty of the Covid Pandemic.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
None of these product and produce shortfalls are insurmortable in the medium term. Business as usual has not not detered Russia before so let’s try eye-poping sanctions on them to see if that works. In any case it will make it much harder to do what he wants to do.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
What does ‘he’ want to do if I may ask ,apart from doin business with Europe ?  Excuse me,   I don t think you got the right mentality to live here ….
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
Well FromBruzzels, he wants Ukraine as his vassel. Could you ask the FromBrussels from the morning shift to come back? The afternoon shift FromBruzzels is just too dumb.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Looks like you too ve been busy all day long too …..and running out of arguments by now  ….
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
You never had any.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
….and to  think that the ‘morning’  FromBrussels told me you’ re quite ok,….I told him never to trust anyone, mfr will never learn….. and ‘we’ don t work past midnight , so that’ s it for today….doodelooo!
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
Better work better or you might find yourself guarding a Russian supply truck in Ukraine.
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Why China Can’t Bail Out Putin’s Economy
March 7, 2022
Paul Krugman
In deciding to invade Ukraine, Vladimir Putin clearly misjudged everything. He had an exaggerated view of his own nation’s military might; my description last week of Russia as a Potemkin superpower, with far less strength than meets the eye, looks even truer now. He vastly underrated Ukrainian morale and military prowess, and failed to anticipate the resolve of democratic governments — especially, although not only, the Biden administration, which, in case you haven’t noticed, has done a remarkable job on everything from arming Ukraine to rallying the West around financial sanctions.
I can’t add anything to the discussion of the war itself, although I will note that much of the commentary I’ve been reading says that Russian forces are regrouping and will resume large-scale advances in a day or two — and has been saying that, day after day, for more than a week.
What I think I can add, however, is some analysis of the effects of sanctions, and in particular an answer to one question I keep being asked: Can China, by offering itself as an alternative trading partner, bail out Putin’s economy?
No, it can’t.
….
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
Ukraine will soon surrender ….don t you worry …..if you ever did anyway…
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
Seriously, are you getting paid for this? Because if you aren’t, your protestations of reality are pathetic.
On second thought, they are pathetic even if you are being paid.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Givin some advise to deluded americans , that s all …..You DO like wars, don t you mfr ?  Especially at the other side of the pond , as usual…. 
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
I like watching you freak out.
yooj
yooj
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
“In deciding to invade Ukraine, Vladimir Putin clearly misjudged everything.” How do you know this? Maybe there’s some intelligence supporting that commonly expressed view, but  circumstantial evidence suggests that substantial resistance was prepared for. Russia massed immeasurably more resources than necessary for a surgical decapitation, suggesting that Putin contemplated prolonged battle against a powerful military.  The claim that high casualties evidence that Russia was caught by surprise assumes that Russian military doctrine resemble western doctrine. Possibly, if not probably, Russia planned on sustaining mass casualties. Russia didn’t attain air supremacy not out of hubris, but because it doesn’t need it to win.  Russia is willing to lose men and material, so it doesn’t need air supremacy.  
Winning by attrition is not the western way. Not feasible in a democracy, but dictators have more leeway to fight a war of attrition.  
Putin might have strategy that will successfully defeat Ukraine, and it may be going more or less according to plan even though it is not the way the U.S. would conduct a war.  
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  yooj
“How do you know this?”
It’s just Krugman being Krugman. Knowing full and well he’s talking out of his rear. Yet also knowing full and well that the, at best semiliterate, third raters which debasement driven redistribution have handed all wealth, influence and power in The West to; don’t know nor understand anything at all. As well as that dumb little them, clueless and incapable of independent reasoning as they can always counted on being, are guaranteed to line up behind him. Simply on account of wanting to appear “smart,” by mindlessly regurgitating what someone with a very public Nobel says. Krugman’s idol, Keynes, played the suckers of his era in a similar manner, after he decided that being an economist, was less important than being chief mandarin to the then-as-well not-so-bright-but-oh-so-vain-and-insecure clique of ruling leeches.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.