Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Trump Is the Elephant in the Room, He Owns It All

Charlie Cook at Cook Political has some interesting election observations.

The Elephant in the Room

Please consider GOP Is Losing Control of Events—and Trump Owns It All by Charlie Cook.

Donald Trump is the elephant in the room for this election; indeed, he seems to be the elephant in every room. A consultant to a Republican gubernatorial nominee last week told me that each of the last two times Trump came to their swing state, they took a hit of a point or two, indicating that they really didn’t want him to come back. In fact, I got the impression that many GOP campaigns had to weigh the cost of a return Trump visit with a potential attack from him on Truth Social if they declined.

Two months ago, this column argued that the political environment for the GOP had deteriorated to the point that the three most likely scenarios for the party were “bad, really bad, or truly horrible.” It should never have gotten there. Republicans were protected by guardrails. Three decades of gerrymandering have left few congressional districts naturally competitive, and the House is less elastic than it was in previous bloodbath midterms. A party cannot lose a seat it doesn’t have; with Republicans holding 220 seats, there were fewer seats they could potentially lose.

In the Senate, rarely has any party gone into an election with a friendlier map than Republicans this year. The oft-cited statistic shows that 20 of the 22 GOP seats up this year are in states Trump won by double digits, plus North Carolina, which he carried three times by narrow margins. It goes even deeper than that: Six of the 22 GOP seats have not voted for a Democrat for president since Lyndon Johnson; five more, not since Bill Clinton carried them in 1996.

Those guardrails now appear to have been dismantled. Eight months of surging energy prices, the result of Trump’s highly questionable and deeply unpopular decision not just to attack Iran on Feb. 28, but to do so without putting together a coalition of allies other than Israel, has resulted in incalculable political damage for Trump’s party. The initial closure and subsequent constriction of the vital Strait of Hormuz shipping lane, and the accompanying damage to energy infrastructure in the region, had the totally predictable impact: sky-high gasoline, diesel, fuel-oil, and fertilizer prices.

This was on top of Trump’s promiscuous use of tariffs, even against our neighbors and closest allies, with the equally predictable retaliation from our trading partners, creating a series of trade wars that jacked up prices on all manner of goods. Even voters who had never taken an economics class could figure out where this was headed.

What makes this situation so damaging to Republicans is that these policies seemed almost calculated to target one of the most loyal elements of the GOP base: those who lived in rural America, smaller cities, or exurbs. They drive the longest distances and are more likely to be driving pickup trucks, own farm equipment, use diesel and, oh yes, be hurt by tariffs and a liberalization on the importation of foreign beef. The fact that it came at the hands of a president that they had repeatedly voted for just made the pain even greater.

Exacerbating the situation is the growing perception that Trump’s real focus is not on the potential impact of his policies, but rather on demolition of the East Wing, construction of a $600 million White House ballroom, renovation of the Reflecting Pool, construction of an arch that would overshadow the entrance to Arlington Cemetery, a takeover of the Kennedy Center, and a goal of naming anything possible after himself.

The irony, of course, is that in our binary political system, when voters decide to severely punish one party, the result rewards the other party, whether they deserve it or not. Democrats have yet to understand why they lost the House in 2022, as well as the Senate and presidency in 2024, so what makes us think they will understand this year that they will be less victors than beneficiaries? They will owe this win to Trump, though they’re unlikely to see it that way.

A Word About Mandates

  • In 2016, on a flimsy win in terms of actual votes Republicans thought they had a mandate.
  • In 2020, Biden thought he had a mandate. After promising to be a healer and a uniter, Biden flouted the Supreme Court and passed amazingly inflationary free money handouts.
  • In 2024, Trump and MAGA took the word mandate to unbelievable heights with executive orders, unconstitutional actions, idiotic tariffs, immoral deportations, and the stupidest war in history.

Is There a Mandate Now?

Yes, in a way. The country voted in an unmistakable message against Trump and his corruption. This was not a narrow win. Unlike 2016 and 2020, this was a legendary massacre.

However, Democrats did not lay out an economic agenda. All they did was smash a well-deserved brick into Trump’s face.

There is no mandate for policies Democrats were too chicken to discuss in the campaign. That includes DEI silliness and inflationary free money programs.

What’s Immediately Fixable?

I can think of a few things. The first is immigration. The farm states need labor and so do homebuilders. There is a shortage of nurses.

Deporting solid workers is economic madness and racist.

Trump has hinted many times that he is willing. Done correctly there should be some bipartisan support. Unfortunately, Trump’s choice of Stephen Miller dictates the immediate outcome.

Regardless, force Trump and Republicans to take some stands. Do something about Tariffs. Trump will veto such legislation, but force Republican Senators to take a stand.

Vote to release the Epstein files. All of them, That’s something that stands a chance of a veto override.

Figure out a fix to Social Security. Everyone knows it’s a problem.

But a radical swing to the Left if going nowhere for at least two years. And it’s not what the country voted for anyway.

A mandate against Trump is not a mandate for a return to the Bidenomics the country threw away just two years ago.

But yes, Trump 100 percent owns this outcome.

Related Posts

November 5, 2026: Did the Endless War Just End? What About the War in Iran?

Endless wars don’t end by definition. So what about Iran?

November 5, 2026: Trump’s Legacy and a Word of Thanks to MishTalk Readers

My reflections on one of the biggest political wipeouts in history, plus a word of thanks.

November 6, 2026: Trump Doubles Down, Appoints White Supremist Stephen Miller to Chief of Staff

Stephen Miller, the architect of Trump’s ICE Gestapo tactics, is the new Chief of Staff.

November 7, 2026: What Impact Did Trump’s ICE Deportations Play in the Midterm Elections?

Vance admits the war, but downplays immigration. He’s wrong on the latter.

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

61 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
TEF
TEF
2 minutes ago

The president had a good CNN interview. He might surprise everyone in working with the democrats to accomplish some positive domestic agenda in his last two years. His legacy appears to be important to him.

yippee
yippee
1 hour ago

i’ve said for ages i would bet anyone, couldn’t pass a blind test on which party was president or ran congress over the past 60 years. now that trump has recreated the smoot hawley tariffs X 100 and made enemies with all our natural allies like canada……..who are boycotting usa products…………plus bombing Persia and retreating usa bases from the saudi peninsula………i am going to have to cease with that bet. the past 2 years of Donald from queens stands out for idiocracy. i was born in queens, too. i must say, we all knew he was an asshole in nyc area for the past 45 years at least.

SheepVSwolf
SheepVSwolf
2 hours ago

Why can’t American businesses and farmers hire legal immigrants? What is with this obsession with hiring illegal border crossers? It is not “racist” to deport people who enter the country illegally. Neither is it “racist” to give them speeding tickets or charge them if they beat their spouses.

If you need 10,000,000 people to work on farms and factories, issue 10,000,000 work permits to vetted workers. This is not complicated. Did you know that 199 other countries figured this out decades ago?

Phil in CT
Phil in CT
2 hours ago
Reply to  SheepVSwolf

Dumb take, migration is a problem all around the world

Also, only a MAGA would equate beating their wife with skipping a border to look for work.

TexasTim65
TexasTim65
39 minutes ago
Reply to  SheepVSwolf

They do. Texas for example has for decades imported Mexican labor to work in the fields. They send home the money and go back when the labor is finished having earned way more than they could in Mexico. It’s a huge win-win.

But talking about it doesn’t fit the narrative for either party’s purposes so it never gets talked about as an example of something that works.

JCH1952
JCH1952
3 hours ago

A bitterly disappointed America was so looking forward to seeing a UFC fighter break Kaitlyn Collins’s neck.

Mike
Mike
3 hours ago

Republican party owns it. They controlled congress and the senate. They could have been passing good legislation he would have signed off on and taken credit for. Controlling the purse they could have stopped funding the wars. They could have shut down the H1B program which Trump put a brake on with the $100K fee which a federal judge Leo T Sorokin appointed by Obama struck down ruling only congress had that authority. Expect there is quite a bit of buyer’s remorse among the party failing to work with him and the voting public starting to realize very doubtful things are going to improve over the next two years. Massie for all his blustering hasn’t read out any names like he promised. Now calling for a second vote. Billionaire investor Leon Black filed a $7.25 million to $7.5 million federal defamation lawsuit against California Democratic U.S. Representative Robert Garcia which should open the files to him under discovery.

Last edited 3 hours ago by Mike
Mike
Mike
3 hours ago
Reply to  Mike

AIPAC posted “Congressman Massie’s defeat on Tuesday sets a clear precedent elected officials are free to disagree with us but only briefly” which was viewed by 31 million people before it was taken down.  

Now Massie is calling for a second vote. Billionaire investor Leon Black filed a $7.25 million to $7.5 million federal defamation lawsuit against California Democratic U.S. Representative Robert Garcia which should open the files to him under discovery.

President Donald Trump has vetoed two bills during his second administration. Both vetoes were issued on December 29, 2025, during the 119th Congress:

• H.R. 131 (Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act): Sponsored by Rep. Lauren Boebert, this bill aimed to adjust financing and extend repayment terms (from 50 to 75 years) for a drinking water pipeline project in eastern Colorado. Trump vetoed the measure to protect federal taxpayers from shifting costs and special interest spending.

• H.R. 504 (Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act): This legislation would have granted the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida greater control over a section of tribal lands in the Everglades for flood mitigation and a village area. Trump cited opposition due to the tribe’s legal challenges against the administration’s immigration policies and the “Alligator Alcatraz” detention facility.

Congressional Status

• House Vote: The House of Representatives voted to override both vetoes on January 8, 2026, falling short of the required two-thirds majority (voting 248–177 on H.R. 131 and 236–188 on H.R. 504).
• Outcome: Both vetoes were sustained

Last edited 3 hours ago by Mike
Tony
Tony
3 hours ago

The next two years are going to be anything but dull.

MPO45v2
MPO45v2
4 hours ago

Trump on 60 minutes.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-says-some-of-his-immigration-policies-may-have-been-too-tough-60-minutes/

“But I get hurt because we also took people that had good jobs, that created one violation, or breaking of the law, and that was that they came into the country illegally,” the president continued. “Now, there is a large part of the country that think that they should be put out. And there’s a large part of the country that think that they should be allowed to stay if they’re good people working in a landscaping company, or working in a hotel, or doing something, right? And in some cases, paying taxes.”

He continued: “So I think it was too tough.“

“A lot of people would say that it’s great, but a lot of people think it’s too tough,” he said.

The president also said he’d “love to do something on immigration” with congressional Democrats, who will control the House and Senate starting next year.

Remarkable Trump has this level of self-reflection once in a lifetime.

JCH1952
JCH1952
3 hours ago
Reply to  MPO45v2

Well, it’s how Mar-a-Lago runs.

Feral Finster
Feral Finster
5 hours ago

As far as Team D is concerned, there always is a mandate for the things that they want and no mandate for anything else…

“Israel today, Israel tomorrow, Israel forever!” -Hakeem Jeffries, 2014, in response to another Israeli murder of children.

Yes, he knows full well that he was echoing George Wallace in his infamous University of Alabama speech defending segregation.

JCH1952
JCH1952
3 hours ago
Reply to  Feral Finster

Since then he has changed his stance on Israel.

Mike
Mike
2 hours ago
Reply to  JCH1952

Hakeem Jeffries has not publically reversed his core stance on supporting Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish and democratic state, though his public statements and positions have evolved to incorporate calls for a two-state solution and criticism of specific policies of the Israeli government.

Key Facts on His Stance:

• The 2014 Quote: In July 2014, during a pro-Israel rally in New York, Hakeem Jeffries stated: “Israel today, Israel tomorrow, Israel forever!”.

• Continued Support: Jeffries has consistently maintained strong ties with pro-Israel organizations, including receiving support from groups like the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). In July 2026, he voted against an amendment in the House to cut off U.S. military assistance to Israel and announced opposition to a Republican measure targeting U.S. aid.

• Calls for Policy Adjustments / Two-State Solution: While maintaining backing for Israel’s security and right to exist, Jeffries has also criticized aspects of the war in Gaza, referred to the humanitarian toll on Palestinian civilians as “unacceptable”, and pushed for a “major reset” in U.S.-Israel policy that supports a two-state solution and addresses West Bank settler violence.

Sentient
Sentient
12 minutes ago
Reply to  Mike

Israel can be a Jewish state or a democratic one – but not both. It’s currently a faux democratic state.

I’m back robbyrob
I’m back robbyrob
5 hours ago

UK columnist Ian Dunt warns that although the Midterm results are a relief, the UK should not fall back in love with the USA. The country is basically mad and we should distance ourselves from it as quickly as possible.
https://iandunt.substack.com/p/dont-fall-back-in-love-with-the-usa

MPO45v2
MPO45v2
4 hours ago

The UK? What’s that? Is that the remnants of a failed empire? Last I heard they were one bank crisis away from becoming “emerging market” which is code for third-world country. How’s that Brexit going? When is it going to pay off? I also heard they want back in the EU now. Lol.

And surprisingly, America was under the same isolationist path with Trump, let’s see how the next two years go.

Mike
Mike
2 hours ago
Reply to  MPO45v2

UK doesn’t put you in jail for writing bad stuff about USA just writing & posting stuff criticizing the government for persecuting people flying their country’s flag or identifying what demographic is causing most of the problems. Even dug up four woman woman to lock up R Brand. No evidence years past. No police reports. Just believe all women he said she said.

Webej
Webej
6 hours ago

There is no easy way to reverse Trump.
Oil, refineries, gas, sulfur, fertilizer — these will not return to the status ante for years.

Figure out a fix to Social Security. Everyone knows it’s a problem.

Nowhere near the problem that Medical Spending is (almost the entire budget deficit and compounding exponentially).
But DEMs will focus on exacerbating it.

Name
Name
4 hours ago
Reply to  Webej

social security and budget are all congress
they constantly spend more than they take in and
create constant inflation by doing so

JCH1952
JCH1952
3 hours ago
Reply to  Name

Trump has signed off on every dollar. He has the right to veto spending bills. Most fiscally irresponsible President in American history.

whirlaway
whirlaway
6 hours ago

“A mandate against Trump is not a mandate for a return to the Bidenomics the country threw away just two years ago.”

Bidenomics is little more than a “nothing will fundamentally change” deal. Big corporations enjoyed big giveaways from the government. Like they have been doing for decades now.

Mike
Mike
7 hours ago

A racist is a person who holds the belief that one race is superior or inferior to another, or someone whose actions, remarks, or policies discriminate against people based on their race or ethnicity. Trump fails to meet that definition.

Dwight
Dwight
7 hours ago
Reply to  Mike

And yet we are known by our actions and associations. Your creation of a credibility test misses by a mile.

Mike
Mike
7 hours ago
Reply to  Dwight

Words have meaning and that is a definition of racism. Trump does not meet that standard.

Neil
Neil
6 hours ago
Reply to  Mike

His actions against al Sayed by themselves show he is a racist by your definition. And you don’t have to go much further back to find much more.

Flavia
Flavia
7 hours ago
Reply to  Mike

You apparently have not read his remarks about Somali immigrants.

KPStaufen
KPStaufen
7 hours ago
Reply to  Mike

Trump requires a different assessment because he believes that everyone is inferior to himself.

JCH1952
JCH1952
6 hours ago
Reply to  Mike

HILARIOUS.

MPO45v2
MPO45v2
6 hours ago
Reply to  Mike

Why are you here defending Trump? Do you think anyone here is going to believe you over their own beliefs? You think you’re going to change anyone’s mind?

Most puzzling of all, Trump is irrelevant lame duck at this point, he will be castrated by the incoming blue Congress in a couple of months and won’t accomplish anything but more bloviating.

Strange die hard MAGA apologists still worshiping this failed messiah.

SleemoG
SleemoG
6 hours ago
Reply to  MPO45v2

Mike’s a cunt, dude.

Jon
Jon
8 hours ago

For those here without access to the Internet(/s), you can find the platform of the democratic party here:

https://democrats.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/2024-Democratic-Party-Platform.pdf

Mike R
Mike R
8 hours ago

from Mish
Going on a 3-day 2-night backpacking trip.
I will not be able to approve anything that gets caught up needing approval. Multiple links are one possible snare.
Coyote Gulch
Grand-Staircase Escalante
Need a break from this.
But I have many posts scheduled. Three Saturday and I think Three Sunday too. So keep checking.
Some really cool ones Including “Texas Goes Purple and What It Means”
Someone please post this message on my Saturday and Sunday articles.
Mish

David O.
David O.
8 hours ago

What do we do with the broken system that we have?
Perhaps best would be to forget those words “One nation, (under God,) indivisible, “, pick up the Tenth Amendment and walk away from the dysfunction of Washington DC and the two parties there and take responsibility for ourselves.

More likely we will remain in this unsatisfactory game of ping-pong.

American Citizen
American Citizen
9 hours ago

“A mandate against Trump is not a mandate for a return to the Bidenomics the country threw away just two years ago.”

Exactly!

Frosty
Frosty
5 hours ago

Correct, It is a mandate to do away with everything Trump!

MPO45v2
MPO45v2
4 hours ago
Reply to  Frosty

Where’s the coffee clutch report? don’t let the group down Frosty.

Lefteris
Lefteris
9 hours ago

Some doubts:
— The vast majority of recent immigrants move to inner cities to live on welfare. Very few take construction jobs. Republicans claim that less than 1% take farm jobs, and there’s already a visa program for them anyway (guest workers). Texas new governor already declared that they won’t cooperate with ICE, so it’s becoming a sanctuary State (aka completely open border).
— DEI and woke will go on steroids. None of the Democrats said they won’t do it again. AOC implied there’s woke 2.0 coming (by saying “woke 1 was crazy“).
— Why do you think the Democrats didn’t lay an economic agenda? Maybe they don’t want to commit to anything?
— What do you think they’ll do with the H1B visas? They know that if they restrict it (or cancel it), that’s “nationalism”. Plus, they can’t attack Big Tech, because they control the algorithms.
It sound like you’re just projecting your own thoughts, without evidence, on a political party that shares none of them. So you’d have to clarify what makes you believe that the Democrats won’t be as complacent and arrogant as the Trump admin did. Their main voter mandate is “cost of living.” You know what happens to cost of living (starting with gas prices) under a green new deal agenda, 3 years from now.

Jon
Jon
8 hours ago
Reply to  Lefteris
  1. You have no plausible information that shows “the vast majority of recent immigrants move to inner cities to live on welfare.”
  2. Woke and DEI are primarily corporate programs to expand profitability by expanding the labor pool and providing better products to different ethnic communities.
  3. The Democrats economic agenda can be found at the link I provided above.
  4. The Democrats have no issue with H1B visas. It was their idea to start with 40 years ago, and has done wonders for big tech.
I’m back robbyrob
I’m back robbyrob
8 hours ago
Reply to  Lefteris

The vast majority of recent immigrants move to inner cities to live on welfare Republicans claim that less than 1% take farm jobs
Really? Tell that to the immigrants who live in Immokalee Florida

Mike
Mike
7 hours ago

Perhaps multiply that number by a hundred.

Neil
Neil
6 hours ago
Reply to  Lefteris

“ You know what happens to cost of living (starting with gas prices) under a green new deal agenda, 3 years from now.” -> would it be worse than, say, start a war in Iran?

MPO45v2
MPO45v2
6 hours ago
Reply to  Lefteris

I’m confused, I thought all the illegals were at farms and those rural meat packing plants, construction sites, suburban landscapers, now they are all in big cities collecting benefits? By that measure illegals basically ARE the population and everyone else is just an enabler by paying them. And I thought everyone was leaving big cities, especially the blue ones but now they are overrun by illegals?

Try to get your story straight. Better yet use something called google or your favorite AI chatbot to provide some links to real data otherwise you’re just a moronic fool.

Sentient
Sentient
7 minutes ago
Reply to  MPO45v2

They work in the slaughterhouse and the. drive to the city to get welfare.

MPO45v2
MPO45v2
9 hours ago

How apropos to use a fat elephant and current dilemma for repubs. If you’ve ever been around elephants, you know how much they stink and how much they sh!t. In this case, America has been pooped on by the turd king himself enabled by now stomped scumbag republicans.

https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2026/10/15/houston-construction-industry-faces-labor-shortages-amid-immigration-enforcement/

“I think people are concerned, they are concerned for the crews, they want to ensure they have the kind of labor that they need in order to continue to build homes,” Bertrand said.

NAHB has issued guidelines to contractors outlining steps to take if Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids their job sites.

The people have spoken and they want profits back on the table.

The Window Cleaner
The Window Cleaner
10 hours ago

Trump is the head, MAGA is the reactionary body of the problem. Authoritarianism/domination is contrary to Democracy/Americanism.

And the key to resolving these opposites is to change the monoply monetary and economic paradigm of Debt Only…with you know what.

eighthman
eighthman
10 hours ago

I am fearful that we will witness an utterly cynical response by Democrats. Don’t impeach Trump, Allow/encourage a stalemate – for 2 years. Why?
So that they stroll into the White House in 2028, easily. The American people be damned.

El Trumpedo
El Trumpedo
9 hours ago
Reply to  eighthman

If they don’t manage to get rid of Schumer and Jeffries, this is exactly what will happen.

Nedd Ludd
Nedd Ludd
8 hours ago
Reply to  El Trumpedo

To lighten yet liven everything up regarding stephen miller whom does he resemble more a defrocked priest or the creep driving the ice cream truck that everyones parents warned you to stay away from? My vote creep driving the ice cream truck

Nedd Ludd
Nedd Ludd
8 hours ago
Reply to  Nedd Ludd

Other possible question whom does stephen miller resemble more fearless leader from bullwinkle or an actual ss and or sa member? I was thinking goring rohm hess and or eichman so my vote is actual ss and or sa member. B4 I get attacked bear in mind that this sycophant henchman boot licking ass kissing jerk off has gotten innocent men women and children injured and killed. Free speech use it and there is no being niece to corporate fascists

Nedd Ludd
Nedd Ludd
8 hours ago
Reply to  Nedd Ludd

And stephen miller self hating gay man like lindsay graham AKA in the closet

Nedd Ludd
Nedd Ludd
8 hours ago
Reply to  Nedd Ludd

Finally we are raising money for a hair brush and a comb for stephen miller. Note I am an American man and I have zero fear of this ugly twerp and he should be deported along with musk thiel and ramaswamy and throw in loomer whom I am not sure if that is a man or woman haha

El Trumpedo
El Trumpedo
8 hours ago
Reply to  Nedd Ludd

Fun fact: A twerp is someone that bites his fart bubbles in the bathtub.

yippee
yippee
58 minutes ago
Reply to  Nedd Ludd

joseph goebbels

Mike
Mike
3 hours ago
Reply to  El Trumpedo

Seniority is a reality which is why you rarely get rid of your establishment representative crook while crying out for reform.

Mike
Mike
7 hours ago
Reply to  eighthman

Trump is the political whacking bad Trump pinata.

Neil
Neil
6 hours ago
Reply to  eighthman

Why impeach Trump when you don’t have the Seats in the senate for a conviction? It was tried after Jan 6 and even then republicans didnt dare hold trump to account.

whirlaway
whirlaway
6 hours ago
Reply to  Neil

You need 2/3 of the Senators voting. Not 2/3 of the Senate. Assuming 56 Dem senators, if 10 Republicans don’t participate in the vote, then the Dems need just 4 more votes to convict.

Make that 5 more votes. Not 4. I forgot about Fetterman 😀

Mike
Mike
3 hours ago
Reply to  Neil

More theater pretending they are hard at work instead of constructive legislation.

TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 hours ago
Reply to  Neil

And it makes even less sense now that he is in his final 2 years and can’t run again. Might have made sense in his first term if they could have gotten the 2/3 votes to prevent him running again.

Sentient
Sentient
1 minute ago
Reply to  Neil

There are gop senators who would love to convict. Not sure Dems will want to promote Vance to president. His getting re-elected in ‘28 seems unlikely now, but things can change.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.