An Invite You Cannot Refuse, JPMorgan Takes Over First Republic Bank, Big Get Bigger

Image of J.P. Morgan courtesy of Investopedia

Sweetheart Deal

On April 29, I wrote No Buyer for First Republic Bank at Any Price, Here’s Why

My post did not include loss guarantees, $50 billion in financing, or refunded deposits.

I should have said, “No Buyer at a Fair Market Price”. 

But the Run on First Republic continued, and the Fed needed a buyer. And so here we are.

An Invite You Cannot Refuse

Our government invited us and others to step up, and we did,” JPMorgan Chief Executive Jamie Dimon said Monday.

Invited or told? Given the guarantees, what’s the difference? 

First Republic Bank Is Seized, Sold to JPMorgan in Second-Largest U.S. Bank Failure

The Wall Street Journal reports First Republic Bank Is Seized, Sold to JPMorgan in Second-Largest U.S. Bank Failure

JPMorgan said it will assume all of First Republic’s $92 billion in deposits—insured and uninsured. It is also buying most of the bank’s assets, including about $173 billion in loans and $30 billion in securities. 

As part of the agreement, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. will share losses with JPMorgan on First Republic’s loans. The agency estimated that its insurance fund would take a hit of $13 billion in the deal. JPMorgan also said it would receive $50 billion in financing from the FDIC.

San Francisco-based First Republic, the second-largest bank to fail in U.S. history, lost $100 billion in deposits in a March run following the collapse of fellow Bay Area lender Silicon Valley Bank. It limped along for weeks after a group of America’s biggest banks came to its rescue with a $30 billion deposit. Those deposits will be repaid after the deal closes, JPMorgan said.

The deal means JPMorgan, the largest bank in the U.S., is poised to emerge from the current crisis even bigger. The lender has said it got about $50 billion in new deposits from panicky customers looking to move their money to a too-big-to-fail bank following March’s failures. JPMorgan had $2.4 trillion in deposits at the end of the first quarter.

Both First Republic and Washington Mutual are now substantially owned by JPMorgan. First Republic’s 84 branches will reopen as part of JPMorgan Monday during normal business hours, and customers will have full access to their deposits, the FDIC said.

The Big Get Bigger

Allegedly there was a competitive auction but the FDIC said it went with the offer that it  projected to cost the deposit-insurance fund the least.

Of course, JPMorgan would cost the FDIC the least given everyone knows the Fed would never allow it to fail. 

Then again, the FDIC did not go with the best offer for Silicon Valley Bank because Elizabeth Warren and others did not want the big to get bigger. 

Also, we do not know details of those other supposedly competitive offers. Nor do we have details of that $50 billion in financing. 

Picking Winners and Losers

In this odious process, the Fed seems to be picking winners and losers.  

Why not just guarantee every bank and be done with it? 

The Fed won’t say that, but I suspect that is precisely what just happened.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com

Please Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

28 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
OPmoney
OPmoney
11 months ago
Unwrapping the gift JPM bought for itself:

Equity: JPMorgan is getting about $186 billion of assets for about $182.6 billion ($122 billion of assumed liabilities, plus $10.6 billion in cash, plus $50 billion borrowed from the FDIC), meaning that it will have about a $3.4 billion equity cushion against these assets.
JPMorgan was the highest bidder – Bloomberg reports that its bid “was more appealing for the agency than the competing bids, which proposed breaking up First Republic or would have required complex financial arrangements to fund its $100 billion of mortgages.” And this is a pretty high bid: JPMorgan is paying $182.6 billion, total, in cash and assumed liabilities, for a bank with about $180 billion of loans and bonds at their current fair value; it is paying a bit extra for the other assets and the intangible value of the First Republic franchise. Still, it is acquiring the total package of assets for less than they are worth. ByMatt Levine Bloomberg May 1, 2023 at 11:35 AM MST

Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
11 months ago
Where’s Thomas Hoenig?
The Fed’s Doomsday Prophet Has a Dire Warning About Where We’re Headed – POLITICO
MPO45v2
MPO45v2
11 months ago
Of great interest to me is how bond yields are all spiking. The 20 year is approaching 4%….something is afoot.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
11 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
FOMC meeting starts tomorrow … and since the World didn’t collapse with First Republic … likely 25bps hike Wednesday.
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
11 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
Debt ceiling.
CDS on US Treasuries are spiking (relatively) also.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
11 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
It was suggested that saver-holders are moving out of banks, into MMMFs, who invest in the O/N RRP.
The O/N RRP is prima facie evidence on how bad monetary policy has been.

The O/N RRP turns inside money into outside money. Contrary to
the FED’s spurious accounting, re: “the bond underlying the repo transaction is
still recorded on the Fed balance sheet”, O/N RRPs are contractionary.

That, of course, is an accounting error according to the Federal
Reserve Bank of Chicago’s “Modern Money Mechanics”. “If the buyer of a reverse
repo or a security sold by the Fed is a nonbank (which 90% of RRPs are), and
pays for the purchase using its bank account, the money supply is directly
affected”.

Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
11 months ago
At this point, the options are slim: failing banks will be sold to too-big-to-fail banks creating banking behemoths. The alternative is to grim to contemplate. More small banks will be sold this way.
This way, the FED can create an illusion of stability and keep interest rates high rather than cutting furiously when another panic hits.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
11 months ago
What I want to know is where is the FDIC getting the 50 billion to loan to JPM?
My guess is that there is no 50 billion loan. It’s just a lie in order to calm the markets and prevent another depositor rush.
On the ‘plus’ side this apparently only cost the FDIC 13 billion which it will recoup from all the other banks (which means you and I via fees).
Dubronik
Dubronik
11 months ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Out of thing air and tax payer’s money
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
11 months ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Correct. By a long loop, you will be paying for it by bank fees, but that’s how insurance works.
In the broken system, it’s a least bad option. Would you rather everything bubble was kicked further down the road?
KidHorn
KidHorn
11 months ago
They were going to pick whoever is least likely to have negative blowback. JPM is the safe solution. I would have probably done the same.
The big banks are going to be the biggest beneficiary’s of small bank failure. You can complain or you can buy their stock.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
11 months ago
“In this odious process, the Fed seems to be picking winners and losers.”
First Republic 52 week high $171 … currently $0.
Winner?
No doubt favorable terms for JPM … but what alternative? Much much better than TARP.
“As part of the agreement, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. will share losses with JPMorgan on First Republic’s loans. The agency estimated that its insurance fund would take a hit of $13 billion in the deal.”
The DIF restocked with assessment on banks … not taxpayer.
Dr Funkenstein
Dr Funkenstein
11 months ago

Anyone going to jail for bankrupting First Republic? Silly me. It’s easier to find a herd of unicorns grazing in a field of four leaf clovers than to find responsible corporate leaders and politicians in the hoosegow.

RonJ
RonJ
11 months ago
Reply to  Dr Funkenstein
Ben Bernanke pretended to lament that he hadn’t referred anyone- after he left the FED. There are people that are being held above the law.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
11 months ago
Reply to  Dr Funkenstein
If they were responsible, they wouldn’t have gone belly up. I know I’m taking advantage of your misspeak, but it suits my purposes.
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
11 months ago
Now that ALL deposits are effectively “insured”, I would imagine that
the FDIC will have to increase the annual assessment rates for all
member banks and perhaps even require a one-time “special assessment” to
bring the fund’s reserves up to the level necessary to cover all
deposits.
This will represent a cost increase for the member banks, but it eliminates the possibility of future “bank runs”.
The problem is that depositors can now just shop for the highest rates on bank accounts, regardless of the safety and soundness of the institution (moral hazard), which opens another whole “can of worms”.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
11 months ago
Reply to  Bam_Man
“This will represent a cost increase for the member banks, but it eliminates the possibility of future “bank runs”.”
Not necessarily. Sure, if bank run based on whether bank deposit is uninsured … but if “run” based on reach for higher yield (park $$s in a money market fund) … when debt ceiling charade settled, Yellen will need to restock Treasury Department’s checkbook … by issuing a cool $trillion in high yield t-bills. Good luck to banks currently sitting on large unrealized losses due to interest rate mismatch … boosting interest rate to keep deposits will carve into profitability … as country enters a recession.
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
11 months ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Sure, “rate-sensitive” depositors will migrate to banks offering the highest yields and this will put pressure on less competitive banks to increase their yields. So in a way it is a win for depositors.
nsheth11
nsheth11
11 months ago
Reply to  Bam_Man
Some same depositors are tax payers too! And tax payers lose big time with this
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
11 months ago
Reply to  Bam_Man
“So in a way it is a win for depositors.”
Yes (for now) …. interesting they decided to discontinue this … cartel here we come …
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
11 months ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
But rest assured, the banks will find a way to pass along much of the higher cost of deposit insurance and higher deposit rates to customers, in the form of higher fees and service charges.
Intelligentyetidiot
Intelligentyetidiot
11 months ago
I could have bought it too if the Fed gave me the money and FDIC insured against losses.
This is a travesty.
As that hateful Karl Marx said, history repeats first as a tragedy then as a farce.
We have gone down so far this rabbit hole that now is a clown show with the taxpayers footing the bills for evth and no way out.
MPO45v2
MPO45v2
11 months ago
So if you had 250k CD at FRC and had 250k at JPM to spread your risk to keep under the FDIC limit, you now have to move money out of JPM to yet another bank. It’s this kind of money move cycle that will cause havoc because we’re just getting started with the banking mess. There are over $1 trillion in soon to be bad loans for CRE.
babelthuap
babelthuap
11 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
Jamie Dimon said this morning the banking crisis is over. He’s not wrong either. He won! He was also kind enough to to tell all us losers where we will lose next:
“Down the road, investors are still exposed to risks created by the Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes and their impact on assets including real estate, Dimon added.”
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
11 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
Technically, today the FDIC guaranteed all deposits regardless of size so there is no need to spread your money around.
MPO45v2
MPO45v2
11 months ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
I wouldn’t bank on that (pun intended). FDIC is not a bottomless pit of money. The new law is a bail-in not a bail-out so if JPM fails, you lose your money but get shares of JPM which would probably be worthless if the bank fails.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
11 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
That’s not what happened in this case. Share holders (and many bond holders) got wiped out. Depositors were all made whole (as per Yellen’s comments of a couple weeks ago about making depositors whole).
In a perverse way the FDIC is a bottomless pit of money. The treasury can give it any amount of money it wants to (via bail out) in order to keep it solvent. As you well know, money is all digital these days, there is really nothing physical anymore (gold or cash itself). So if the FDIC runs out of money the treasure can simply fat finger whatever it needs to in order to prevent a general panic.
In fact, if it ever came to that, I doubt the FDIC would ever admit it ran out of money, it would quietly be bailed out behind the scenes to prevent a panic.
Dubronik
Dubronik
11 months ago
Reply to  TexasTim65

Be careful, they are guaranteed until they are not…

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.