Search
All
Economics
Politics

Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Biden Declares Climate Emergency, Supreme Court Will Shoot Down His Executive Orders

•

•

99 comments on Biden Declares Climate Emergency, Supreme Court Will Shoot Down His Executive Orders

•

,

Image From Tweet Below

Climate Emergency

Best Response

https://twitter.com/Trump2094578522/status/1549575345153753093

“Is Joe Biden really going to issue a climate emergency less than a week after flying thousands of miles to Saudi Arabia to beg OPEC for oil?“

Sweeping Regulations

Please note Biden Calls Climate ‘an Emergency’. 

President Biden said he considered the environmental risks created by climate change to be “an emergency” and signaled plans to use his presidential powers “to turn these words into a formal, official government action.”

“Let me be clear: Climate change is an emergency,” Mr. Biden said, adding that he plans to announce formal actions in the “coming weeks.”

“Since Congress is not acting as it should,” Mr. Biden said, he considered climate change “an emergency. And I will—I will look at it that way.”

Gina McCarthy, Mr. Biden’s top climate adviser, told reporters aboard Air Force One that the administration would be rolling out a number of climate-related executive actions in the coming weeks.

“We’re not ready to give up on our strong goals. We’re going to double-down to make sure we get those,” she said. “And while it’s disappointing that Congress couldn’t get it over the finish line, that in no way precludes the president from using the full range of his executive authorities to get us to where we need to go.”

Uncensored Truth 

How Stupid Could This Get?

Carbon Tariff Borders

To answer my question as to how stupid this can get: “Use existing executive branch trade and tariff authority to establish a carbon border tariff for imports from countries with worse relative carbon emissions, based on industry carbon density.”

Executive Beast Mode

Democrats moaned about Trump’s executive orders. What they seek is orders of magnitude greater.

The Supreme Court has already ruled 6-3 that the EPA does not have the power to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from power plants without Congressional approval. 

The Court has also stricken Biden’s Covid mandates and eviction moratoriums. 

Climate change has been a subject of debate for decades and has been ongoing forever. There is no sudden emergency.

Like it or not, there is little Biden can do that will survive Supreme Court scrutiny.

Alleged EU Environmental and Climate Change Progress

Meanwhile, Let’s Investigate Alleged EU Environmental and Climate Change Progress

Also note Germany’s Climate Protection Minister Mandates More Coal to Produce Electricity

This post originated on MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Mike Shedlock

Recommended Articles

Comments to this post are now closed.

99 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
billmatt2
billmatt2
4 years ago
Perhaps he will ban Al Gore and John Kerry from flying around the world in their private jets. Maybe Congressmen/women should have to drive home or take a train. That would be just too damn bad. No jet home for Nancy to tell her husband what next weeks trades will be.
0
0
jiminy
jiminy
4 years ago
Reply to  billmatt2
Drive home? I was a bike commuter for twenty years, why not congress? hypocrites every one!
0
0
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Climate change has been a subject of debate for decades and has been ongoing forever. There is no sudden emergency.
—
Not true at all. There is very little to debate based on science and evidence based data.
The libertarian answer to everything is to do nothing at every turn no matter the circumstances and then say even less should have been done. This is akin to the captain of a ship seeing an iceberg and doing nothing to avoid it. The worse analogy here would be standby and watch someone being raped and do nothing because it didn’t involve them. Libertarianism means everyone should do nothing and say nothing about anything that doesn’t involve them.
0
0
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  Casual_Observer2020
“Not true at all. There is very little to debate based on science and evidence based data.”
There is plenty to debate. Science is never settled. The climate is complex. It is not just Carbon Dioxide. It got colder in the U.S. after the hot 1930’s,into the 1970’s, even with CO2 increasing.
Climate change is a political narrative, just as the Covid response has been. Safe and effective is a marketing slogan, not scientific fact.
0
0
WaldoGC
WaldoGC
4 years ago
Reply to  Casual_Observer2020

Thanks to America’s free and prosperous economy, technological innovations, and reasonable environmental regulations, the U.S. has reduced the aggregate emissions of the six “criteria pollutants” listed in the Clean Air Act by 77% since 1970. These improvements have come as U.S. GDP has nearly tripled and energy consumption, primarily from fossil fuels, has grown by 48%. The WHO reports that U.S. cities have lower densities of particulate matter than most cities across the world. In fact, our ambient air pollution levels are so low as to be near natural levels.

Of course, there’s always room for improvement but as is typical with rabid Democrats they will inflict $$Billions of damage to the US economy and solve virtually nothing because the planets pollution is coming from India and China. And Democrats wrongly blame man for the climate change even though since the 2020 lockdowns global emissions have been drastically reduced. Our current heatwave is not a crisis caused by man, it is a natural change that the planet goes through periodically.
So, yes, there is much to be debated but people like yourself don’t want to think – they just want to knee jerk react.
0
0
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Why should anyone accept what the Supreme Court says since we now know several judges lied under testimony to get appointed. At the end of the day the court should be another elected office where the holder can be voted out. Libertarians will love this court when it comes to regulation but they will soon rue it as well.
0
0
Agave
Agave
4 years ago
Many have no idea how bad the climate crisis is going to get without rapid and major energy use transformation, and how wrong the deniers are. Saying idiotic, ignorant things like the climate has always changed, or it’s sunspots!, or picking ridiculous random data points not informed by a knowledge of climate history and science is not going to impact that one bit. You literally have no idea. It’s only getting started, and accelerating faster than expected. By the time you understand this, it will be too late. Failed agriculture, massive migration of starving desperate people, swamped shorelines, drought destroyed water supplies, armed conflict, all coming sooner than you think.
The Extreme Court is a court stolen by Moscow Mitch, a pack of theocratic extremist nut cases whose views are supported by no more than about 30% of the population. That is a recipe for disaster. They are the activists that they projected on the rest of us, and worse, they are driven by their idiotic religion, and want to impose a white male patriarchical autocracy. Essentially, they are christofascists. They have no validity in the minds of a majority of Americans.
They want to get in your bedroom and tell you what you can and cannot do there, and elsewhere too. They want raped 10 year old girls to have their rapist’s baby. Huh? That’s just the beginning. They are coming for many of your other rights as well. They are drunken on false power, and have lost their minds.
We will not tolerate this Extreme Court or its antediluvian rules. When they ask if the country is on the wrong track, this is another reason why we say YES.
This country is heading for very bad times politically when a despised minority like the Extreme Court tries to foist their unwanted jack boot idiocy on the majority, through judicial legislating by Federalist groomed judges put there to protect the wealthy and elite while riling up the ignorant white supremacist racists for some imaginary glory they flail over.
Those who may scoff, realize this. You will eventually see.
0
0
WaldoGC
WaldoGC
4 years ago
Reply to  Agave
I understand it is very difficult to have your rabid leftist ideas overturned by the Supreme Court – when you consume MSM lies month after month, year after year, and don’t think through the positions you hold on a given subject, it can be very hard to accept when sanity is enforced via leadership. Fixing the trickle of pollution coming out of the US, Canada, and Europe won’t solve the planets pollution problem when the firehouse of pollution is running full throttle in China and India. Your have your eyes on the wrong problem. Further, we are in a natural cycle of global heating – if it were man made we would have seen some reversal since the lockdowns that started in 2020 because global emissions have been drastically reduced. I know you’ll explain that away – that’s what rabid leftists do. Listen to your master and don’t think for yourself LOL
0
0
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  Agave
You are absolutely right.
But we have more people than we need.
We should kill as many as possible and reduce CO2 and pollution and Republicans.
Especially dispose of people that don’t think like you, Agave you’re our only hope.
0
0
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
“Executive Beast Mode”
That is an attack on our democracy. Odd that Democrats are silent about that, considering they love that phrase.
0
0
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
We are caught between a rock and a hard place. Two big problems; lack of energy and global warming / climate change. The immediate, and more important problem of the two right now is not enough energy to meet growing demand. More people are probably going to die from that this year than from climate change (though plenty will die from climate change).
Insufficient energy will be a problem for the rest of this decade. That’s why I am heavily invested in oil and gas stocks. However, I suspect the energy problem will get sorted out by around 2030. And by then, global warming and climate change are going to be much worse than today.
For those here who keep talking about sunspots, global cooling, the flat earth, and other nonsense, I am not going to bother debating your stupidity. You simply aren’t worth the effort.
0
0
billybobjr
billybobjr
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Yep , Anyone who doesn’t agree with you is stupid . You sir are and idiot . The Head of UN said in 1972 they only had ten years , yet here we are 50 years later . Your prediction is 8 years from now . It too will be wrong . The sun represents 99+ percent of all energy in the solar system but lets
control the cow farts . You are correct debating someone like you is not worth the effort !
0
0
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
There is no perfect climate. Climate is always bad somewhere. People in Fairbanks Alaska sufferer from the climate every winter. There are no cities in Antarctica, either. The population of Canada is small, considering it is frigid every winter. Few people live in the Outback in Australia as it has always been hot and dry in their summer.
Los Angeles is packed with people, as it has a nice climate. Seldom does it snow. We have a drought every year, called dry season. In 1977, when it was cooler, Lorne Greene was on TV ads calling for water conservation,when i moved here. The California state water board flushes near 50% of water out to sea for environmental purposes, without use by Californians. Eight years ago there was a bond measure passed to increase storage. No projects have been started. Government is at fault.
Climate change alarmism has become a religion.
0
0
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
Go sell your religion and your climate stories to someone who gives a f*ck. I don’t debate with morons.
However, if you want to discuss investments, I am interested.
0
0
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
You are selling your religion.
0
0
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Looks like he decided not to. Must have gotten a call from a donor.
0
0
wmjack50
wmjack50
4 years ago
The world is burning as much coal as it ever has to produce energy—Is the CCP bribing Biden to handicap America?
The Federal Administrative Swamp is the problem we suffer with —Trump was working to dismantle these Agencies by being able to fire these fools
0
0
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  wmjack50
Trump was flailing around like the idiot manbaby he is. If he did anything useful, it was by accident or someone flattered him into it.
0
0
WaldoGC
WaldoGC
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
It’s time to redefine your understanding of the word “idiot.” Look at the current President and the man in the mirror and you will have your new definition.
0
0
Wizard1966
Wizard1966
4 years ago
How disgusting that the insiders in power are parading this demented person to push their agenda and every day and getting away with it.
Where are the voices to stop this elderly abuse?
0
0
kansasdude
kansasdude
4 years ago
What’s wrong? Are the ice cream cones melting too fast in the July sun?
0
0
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
4 years ago
you mean Biden’s handlers right, the guy has few working brain cells left, he is probably given a shot of speed every morning just to get him up to podium
0
0
Billy
Billy
4 years ago
Remember when Al Gore said Manhattan would be under water? Search images of the Statue of Liberty to compare today’s water level vs. when it was first constructed. There is no change.
China is the worst contributor of carbon than any other country in the world. If our politicians truly cared, they would ban importing from any country who abuses the Earth more than the USA.
0
0
WaldoGC
WaldoGC
4 years ago
Reply to  Billy
Sshhhh, you are making leftist heads explode!
0
0
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
4 years ago
In other words, “If only you paid more in taxes, the guvvamint would be able to fix this”.
LOL….
Oh. and by the way, can anyone name a bigger emissions-emitter anywhere on the planet earth than the US military?
0
0
Thetenyear
Thetenyear
4 years ago
Joe Biden is the strongest man I know.
He is singlehandedly fighting cancer, covid, and climate change!
I wonder if Kamala is quietly working on her inauguration speech.
0
0
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  Thetenyear
Please, don’t ever scare me like that again!
0
0
dwkeller
dwkeller
4 years ago
And then there is the very real cooling in the S. Hemisphere. Woke science.
0
0
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
4 years ago
Reply to  dwkeller
We are into the 3rd solar cycle with significantly reduced sunspots. We’ll know in a couple years if the current solar cycle 25 continues to decrease as we approach solar maximum for the 11-year cycle. As you well know, the same thing happened from 1645 to 1715 and is known as the Maunder Minimum that created widespread crop failure due to lower temps. If this is happening again, we’ve been given a gift in terms of lowered temps. But if this is true, then we’d better do something about it, since we’re approaching the 1/2 point into what may be more or less a 70-year cycle.
0
0
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
The problem is too many folks see the problem as black and white. Sort of a bi-cycle.
Just how does the 3rd cycle and 11 year cycle and 70 year cycle relate to each other?
Where was the sun before the first of these 25 cycles?
0
0
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  dwkeller
No matter how many times you say it, or how many lackwits you can get to parrot it, that just ain’t true.
0
0
Nonplused
Nonplused
4 years ago
There is no climate emergency. CO2 at 400 parts per million is not driving large wholesale changes to the earth’s long term weather patterns or climate. It won’t at 800 ppm, and we’ll run out of fossil fuels by then.
What there is instead is an energy crisis due to the fact that fossil fuels are nonrenewable and “scarce” according to the economic definition. We always knew we would “run out” of fossil fuels eventually, that peak oil would come eventually (the argument was over “when” not “if”), and that alternatives would need to be found if we wished to continue with modern civilization. That’s why they built and still build nuclear reactors when we had lots of fossil fuels left. It is understood that fossil fuels are not a long term solution. It was seen as wise to try something else. Wind and solar were already known to be insufficient and non-scalable due to well understood thermodynamic limits. Technology cannot overcome thermodynamics. If it could, we’d have a perpetual motion machine by now.
The real emergency, from the point of view of the powers that be, is that the general population is competing with them for the limited remaining fuels. The powers that be would far rather reserve the remaining fuels for their jets, yachts, 40,000 sqft airconditioned mansions, and militaries. Untold consumption for them, none for you.
But how do you sell the idea that fossil fuels should be reserved for the rich and powerful? Well, there is the price mechanism in the markets, but the rich and powerful don’t want to pay more either. Competing with 1 billion Chinese people who all want a few liters for their scooter is going to make filling up that yacht mighty expensive. So why not make you feel evil for consuming fuel? Sell you on the solar-wind scam? Let you spend your entire life savings on a battery powered car and a solar array which, conveniently, they will sell you? (And a bicycle so you can get around while waiting days for the panels to recharge the car.)
So that is the plan they came up with. Manipulate you into believing you are evil for using fossil fuels while they remain available. Use the tax system to make it preventatively expensive for you. Sell you a bill of goods that if you buy a (useless) solar panel you’ll be fine. Then sell you the (useless) solar panel.
Folks, it is an energy crisis, not a climate crisis. They (TPTB) are lying to you about what is happening, why, and what they propose to do about it.
There is probably a way forward, although I don’t know if the economics pan out. That would be advanced (and thus hopefully safer) nuclear. But maybe the powers that be know something about the viability of that too that they aren’t telling us. The Chinese and the Russians don’t seem to be afraid of building reactors though. They also aren’t panicking about the climate. If climate change was real, and the Chinese government knew it, well, look what they did with Covid to get an idea what they could do. Yet they do nothing.
0
0
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  Nonplused
“They (TPTB) are lying to you about what is happening”
That is the truth.
0
0
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
Unfortunately, so is almost everyone else.
0
0
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  Nonplused
Nuclear has much lower operating costs than other steam generating fuels. That’s why it was used. And there’s a limited amount of Uranium too. Problem is it has a really bad rap because of two accidents and people connect it to nuclear bombs.
0
0
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
The risks are pretty bad. If the people at cherynobl had been a little dumber, they would hav killed millions.
I wish we weren’t so stupid as a species. We could have fission powered everything if people weren’t so prone to moronic decisions.
0
0
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Currently it has some very nasty leftovers.
0
0
Billy
Billy
4 years ago
Reply to  Nonplused
The latest generation of nuclear is the most safest form of energy available today.
0
0
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  Billy

… if kept out of the hands of morons.

0
0
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
4 years ago
Reply to  Nonplused
la nina is responsible for most of extreme temps right now….surfers know the weather better than anyone
0
0
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
4 years ago
Ozone layer depletion is what causes global warming.
0
0
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
And that just happens right ?
0
0
WaldoGC
WaldoGC
4 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
Have you looked at the ozone layer statistics since 2020 when lockdowns started? No, I didn’t think so. You are throwing out an idea that was disproved many years ago.
0
0
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
You people drive me crazy.
It’s obviously Putin’s fault.
Putin is writing naked natural gas calls to prop up the markets.
0
0
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago

“By John Kemp, senior market analyst

Global coal-fired
electricity generators are producing more power than ever before in
response to booming electricity demand after the pandemic and the
surging price of gas following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.”

No electricity, no economy.
“Dutch Government Accused Of Following Globalist Policies Which Will Lead To Food Shortages”
Who wants to starve to death for a non existent climate crisis?
0
0
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
Considering what they eat, I have some Democrat friends that appear to be trying.
0
0
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
There is no climate emergency. It is a political fraud.
0
0
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
And even if there was, anything we do now is going to take decades to actually matter.
In those intervening decades a lot of things might happen including finding out that what we do today is the wrong thing or too much or too little.
0
0
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65

We’ll blame the other guy and have a nice global war to sort it all out.

0
0
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
It would perfectly sort things out because a reduction of 50% or more of humanity would result in 50% or more carbon emissions. That should meet any green target.
0
0
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Exactly. Just nature doing a little rebalancing.
0
0
FrankieCarbone
FrankieCarbone
4 years ago
Pray tell, how is this any different than being a colonist under King George?
On a similar note, Rand Paul offered an amendment in The Senate (aka, the Loyalists to The Crown) that merely reaffirmed that it is CONGRESS that has Constitutional authority to declare war and not NATO.
It was rejected.
Riddle me this: Do you guys think it is possible that this BS situation with our empire-like gov is going to come to such a head that several states attempt to secede? I used to think that was nutty talk but now I am not so sure.
0
0
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  FrankieCarbone
The problem is that in the US it is very difficult to hide from the Government in the jungle.
0
0
8dots
8dots
4 years ago
US gov increased our energy options : the sun, the winds, waves, coal, nuke, natgas, waterfalls, H3… redundancy cause clogging and
bankruptcies, but Chaz and Acab are happy.
0
0
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  8dots
The US gov did NOT ‘increase our energy options.’ They meddled with the costs of those options to achieve political objectives, regardless of the consequences, both short term and long term.
0
0
Jmurr
Jmurr
4 years ago
Biden is a tyrant and a fascist.
0
0
Wizard1966
Wizard1966
4 years ago
Reply to  Jmurr
His master’s are. Biden is a demented tool.
0
0
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
4 years ago
Reply to  Jmurr
sure is. he even stole election.
0
0
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
Not true! He bought and paid for the election.
0
0
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Timed with a heat wave in Europe, that lasted a few days, but will soon go away. The other is a heat wave in Texas, that isn’t unusual in any way. Like every time we are hit with a hurricane. The world is ending and then a week later, everything is back to normal. And every year is basically the same as the last one.
0
0
CRS65
CRS65
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Weather variability is not climate! Weather is not correlated with climate in the short-term. Climate changes include ocean temperature trends, particulate matter in the atmosphere, glacier melt, average annual global air temperature, etc. Yes, the earth’s climate changes over time, but such changes have been measured by analyzing ice cap core samples. Those core samples indicate that on average global average temperatures have changed 1.0 degrees Celsius per 1000 years. Since 1880, global annual average temperatures have warmed by 1.1 degrees Celsius. So, the emergency of climate change is not that the climate is changing, but that it is changing 10x faster than it has over the last 500,000 years.
0
0
Nonplused
Nonplused
4 years ago
Reply to  CRS65
So what you are saying is that currently climate trends are within the historical range? How is that an emergency?
Carbon dioxide can cause a greenhouse effect, but not at the 400 ppm (parts per million! Or 0.04%! Or think of it this way: If the atmosphere were $100, CO2 would be 4 cents of that. It’s what they call a “trace element”.). It won’t be a significant greenhouse driver at 800 ppm, and by then we’ll have run out of hydrocarbon fuels.
And plants need it to live. Where we were at, CO2 wise, before the industrial revolution, plants were in danger of dying out completely in the next 100 million years due to not enough CO2 in the air to support photosynthesis. That would have meant the end of all life on the planet, although realistically nobody cares about the planet in 100 million years. But as far as the planet goes, we extended the amount of time life can exist on the planet by several hundred million years by injecting some CO2 back into the atmosphere, from which it came.
0
0
quantzic
quantzic
4 years ago
Reply to  Nonplused
not $0.04. $0.0004
0
0
shamrock
shamrock
4 years ago
Reply to  Nonplused
As little as 100 ppm of mercury in your blood can kill you.
0
0
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
Yeah, but fentanyl works better.
0
0
CRS65
CRS65
4 years ago
Reply to  Nonplused
Earth is warming at 10X the pace that temperature changes have occurred over the last 500,000 years. As temperatures in the atmosphere rise, the oceans absorb excess trapped heat and that thermal change within the ocean expands the size of the water molecule and contributes to sea levels rises. Additionally, rising temps accelerate the melting of glaciers and the polar ice caps, which adds water volume to the oceans, further increasing sea levels. As Gretzky famously said, don’t skate to where the puck is, skate to where the puck is going. This trend is well established and must be slowed down and eventually reversed.
0
0
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  CRS65
So when one finds fossilized sea creatures 700 feet about high tide, is that the result of oceans expanding from heat? And where did all that water go to, anyway?
See, I thought the sun warmed the surface of the ocean, increasing evaporation, thereby creating clouds and reducing the effect of the sun… Plus hot water rises to the surface… Of course, underwater volcanic activity would change things… And the biggie in the equation, the Sun; does its output vary at all?
Any climate discussion should begin with the truth: Climate is very complex system with many interacting components, of which we know very little.
0
0
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  CRS65
So, thermodynamically, how do you propose to get rid of the “excess” heat?
Heat, not temperature.
0
0
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  CRS65
I don’t doubt that. But, it’s not an emergency.
0
0
CRS65
CRS65
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Don’t doubt it, do a few minutes of research. Intuition does not cut it when it comes to science such a climatology.
0
0
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  CRS65
Says the conspiracy climatologist
0
0
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  CRS65
I don’t understand your reply. I agreed with what you wrote. And I would guess I understand the science far better than you. When I was in grad school studying thermodynamics, I was by far the best student when it came to how radiant heat transfer works. I got 100% on every exam. Even did a thesis on it.
0
0
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  CRS65
Do those core samples indicate a standard deviation for global average temperatures? How many core samples have been taken, and where, to generate these averages?
That said, let’s assume the planet is warming–not because of carbon emissions, but there are too many people demanding too good a lifestyle. The long-term solution is fewer people, NOT more solar panels
0
0
CRS65
CRS65
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
I will let you do the research. However, here is an article from Scientific American that goes into quite a bit of detail. I think if you research further you will find that their is a meaningful positive correlation between carbon particulate in the atmosphere and the unusually fast pace of warming over the last 100+ years. This is probably why around 90% of the world’s peer reviewed publications on the subject in the field of climatology demonstrate that climate change trends are unusual and positively correlated with carbon emissions. https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scientificamerican.com%2Farticle%2Fevolution-of-earth%2F&data=05%7C01%7C%7C0fb1b40c6fee44a21c6908da6b456cad%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637940243157645529%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=43ShgItKqDs3c1WcdYnCrVaIE9tFdUXxA4DSa9YohKw%3D&reserved=0
0
0
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  CRS65
As a broad generality, he who claims a fact needs to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
Let’s begin with your supporting hypotheses–per S.A. What exactly, is the ‘meaningful positive correlation’. R-square of 0.1, 0.2….0.99? Because this is where bull$hit starts. How much variance was explained by the model? Sample size? Is the data available?
Another broad generality: you usually find what you are looking for.
Now, I do not deny that humans have expanded to the point that they now have a noticeable effect on the planet. Seven-odd billion–acting like cockroaches… Enormous cities creating vast clouds of pollution, people zipping around in cars and planes…. etc.
0
0
CRS65
CRS65
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Sorry, I was responding to KidHorn’s comment at the top of this thread. All of this research is readily available. Here is a start: https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2017/03/10/the-science-of-carbon-dioxide-and-climate/
0
0
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  CRS65
I think what Ahab said is more accurate.
Global warming is highly correlated to the volume of humanity.
And not just the last 100+ years.
We have more people than we need.
0
0
prumbly
prumbly
4 years ago
Mother Nature must be scratching her pretty little head. “Whatever got them so riled up?”, she must be thinking.
The only climate change we really need fear is the next period of glaciation, but that probably won’t be coming for a few thousand years. When it does come, most of Europe and North America will get squashed under enormous glaciers and half the world will freeze or starve to death. We should be enjoying this brief warm period while it lasts!
0
0
BDR45
BDR45
4 years ago
Reply to  prumbly
Mother nature is presently in the process of evolving Homo Sapiens off the planet.
0
0
shamrock
shamrock
4 years ago
As others have noted, this was entirely predictable after Trump used the Emergency power to steal money for a wall that congress had not authorized. Also, gun violence can be an emergency too.
0
0
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
I feel that really-stupid-politics is an emergency.
0
0
PreCambrian
PreCambrian
4 years ago
I agree that Biden is overstepping his authority. I also agree that the Supreme Court will overrule most of his executive actions. However I would say that diverting funds to pursue some climate program would be similar to Trump diverting funds to build a wall. These executive actions from both parties are a symptom of no political cooperation which started in earnest when Obama was elected. The US will go down on a third world country unable to get anything accomplished.
0
0
oee
oee
4 years ago
You are wrong bud. Biden did not such thing. Trump declared a national emergency in 2019 for his wall. The Supremes upheld it.
0
0
shamrock
shamrock
4 years ago
Reply to  oee
That’s correct but Supreme Court decisions are along party lines now. So border is an emergency for the Republican justices but climate is not. So 6-3 against Biden.
0
0
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Saw this coming with trump’s “border emergency “…. Which resulted in no wall, but some well connected construction grifters got paid. The result of this “emergency “ will be about the same. Eventually we will have a dictatorship propped up by an endless stream of ‘emergencies’
The constitution is hacked and ratf**ked beyond all recognition.
0
0
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
The difference is one was a real problem that required immediate attention. And still does. The other isn’t.
0
0
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
The wall was never built. It did nothing.
0
0
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Agreed. While exactly none of Bidens proclamations will survive any challenges it will unfortunately enable him to start spending billions (if not trillions) on them until they get over turned by the Supreme court.
So yeah grifters will make out like bandits and this includes the biggest grifter of all, Hunter and Joe Biden who will get their 10% for the big guy.
0
0
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
What’s their climate angle?
0
0
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Hunter is on barrowed time.
0
0
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
I think he’ll be used to get Joe to go along with everything. Otherwise hunter goes to jail. As long as Joe cooperates, Hunter gets a slap on the wrist at worst.
0
0
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
All he can do at this stage is read a teleprompter and mumble.
0
0
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
And either he either has cancer or he mistakenly said he did. Not sure which is worse. Having cancer isn’t something healthy minded people get wrong.
0
0
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
It’s shameful that the Dems fobbed off on us this senile old man as president. Couldn’t they have found someone else?
0
0
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
As you’ll recall, there was a legit panic in the primaries that Bernie was going to get the nomination and likely would not have beaten Trump with his kooky left wing policies.
So they trotted out the only person who would appear to the middle voters that he was a good alternative to Trump. The added bonus being that since he was senile, he wouldn’t make waves and could easily be controlled from behind by the people who really wanted to be president. In other words, I think it was by design that he was senile.
0
0
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
That shows how few people of talent are left in the Democrat Party. They couldn’t even find a middle roader that wasn’t senile.
0
0
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
There’s “Dems” and there’s “Dems”. It looked like the DNC+ desperately tried to find someone, but South Carolina voters picked Biden as the only recognizable candidate name. Kind of ironic, in a way, given the “South Carolina voters” probably ran heavily toward Black voters, and Biden … well Biden. If Biden were (R), his media image would have been the definition of racist.
Anyway, Biden’s campaign was toast before SC. But after? Super Tuesday, a one-shot deliberation which, unsurprisingly, went to the most recent, SC, winner.
Anyway, Biden was kinda the perfect Dem president. A total tool for technocrats on the federal payroll, and for professional political power players on the Dem side. That is, the furthest possible power center from Trump.
0
0
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Maybe he meant his astrological sign, and is secretly consulting wit astrologists
0
0
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
He’s wealthy. No other explanation for the wrist slap is needed.
0
0

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.