Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Biden Fully Embraces a Green New Deal With a Clean Energy Timeline

While Democrats battle each other over details of how to spend $3.5 trillion, Biden’s Department of Energy released a Clean Energy Future guideline.

Key Proposals

  • Carbon pollution-free power sector by 2035.
  • Large-scale decarbonization of the electricity sector.
  • Solar goes from 3 percent of generation today to over 40 percent by 2035.
  • Billions in investment including in low-income and community solar. 
  • Strong labor standards, project labor agreements, prevailing wages, and a free and fair choice to join a union and bargain collectively can diversify pathways to high quality solar jobs.
  • Solar deployment would need to accelerate to three to four times faster than its current rate by 2030.
  • Clean Energy Tax Credits. 
  • Federal programs that invest directly in transmission lines to connect and deliver clean electricity and support better regional planning.
  • Direct pay tax incentives for transmission and storage.
  • Given concerns about forced labor in the solar energy supply chain in China, the need for domestic capacity to meet goals has expanded.
  • Low-Income and Community Solar – Increasing solar deployment nationally must include households and communities that have historically lacked access to affordable solar technology. 
  • 2030 goal to cut the cost of solar PV to $0.02 per kilowatt-hour without subsidies for utility and residential scales.
  • Cost target of $0.05/kWh for next-generation CSP plants.
  • To address one of the main soft costs drivers, permitting, DOE, in partnership with NREL, industry, and local governments, developed a new, free, web-based tool – the Solar Automated Permit Processing (SolarAPP+).
  • DOE will support training opportunities for the workforce, which could include apprenticeship-based career pathways. 

Cost Estimate

None

But the plan mandates prevailing wages, government apprenticeships, direct pay incentives, federal sponsored transmission lines, mandated collective bargaining, tax credits, a free and fair chance to join a union, and low income subsidies, and massive tax credits.

Oh wait, I get it. 

There’s not a shred of inflation in this. And best of all, it will pay for itself. How can it not? 

No Time for Amateur Hour

Meanwhile, back in the House of Representatives, “No Time for Amateur Hour” Says Pelosi Who Fights With Nine Moderates.

65 Progressives plus Nancy Pelosi demand the infrastructure bill be put on hold until a resolution to waste $3.5 trillion passes first. 

It’s 65 vs 9 because the 9 wrote a Letter to Nancy Pelosi demanding the $1 trillion infrastructure bill pass first.

Some have suggested that we hold off on considering the Senate infrastructure bill for months – until the reconciliation process is completed. We disagree. With the livelihoods of hardworking American families at stake, we simply can’t afford months of unnecessary delays and risk squandering this once-in-a-century, bipartisan infrastructure package. It’s time to get shovels in the ground and people to work. We will not consider voting for a budget resolution until the bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act passes the House and is signed into law. 

What’s In the $3.5 Trillion Package?

On August 9, the WSJ reported Senate Democrats Outline $3.5 Trillion Antipoverty, Climate Plan.

At least a dozen mainstream articles referred to a plan or outline but I never located a plan.

I discussed my findings in Investigating Missing Details In the Democrat’s $3.5 Trillion Antipoverty, Climate Plan

I finally concluded there was no plan, not even an outline. 

Now we know why. 

Pelosi does not want anyone to know details of the plan, not even an outline, because if they understood details the Greens and Progressives intended to ram through, some will be against it

AOC’s Threat

AOC threatened to kill the whole thing over climate.

For details, please see AOC Goes After Senator Krysten Sinema With a “No Climate, No Deal” Threat

There are no votes to spare in the Senate and only 3 votes in the House where 65 petulant Progressives threaten to kill everything if they do not get higher taxes and a Green New Deal. 

Don’t Fall For Joe Biden’s Big Lie On Inflation

The bills are all so flawed, the best hope is these fishy deals flop to the ground where deprived of oxygen quickly pass away.

I discussed that idea in Don’t Fall For Joe Biden’s Big Lie On Inflation

These new disclosures are even more preposterous than we previously expected.

Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

31 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Lot Balonem Voucher
Lot Balonem Voucher
2 years ago

You have a real talent for writing content that’s both informative and enjoyable to read.

StickToEconomics
StickToEconomics
4 years ago
blah, blah, blah
You get what you voted for!
But at least we have no mean tweets now!
LM2022
LM2022
4 years ago
I’m surprised the “free market” never seems to come up with any solutions to our problems.  I wonder why?
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
This is better than embracing insurrection and overthrow of the government. 
Rbm
Rbm
4 years ago

Wonder whats cheaper moving to a zero carbon world( if that can even be done) or just paying the cost of doing nothing.  Ie sea walls for the coastline/ fire fighting / continually rebuilding infrastructure destroyed by climate change/ paying for health issues/ famine drought/ displacement.  Wars over resources.  The list goes on. 

Maybe 3.5 trillions cheap.  
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Pork for the donor class. It will be a feeding frenzy for the lobbyists if any of this passes. And something will, I’m sure.
It’s high unlikely that we can stay powered at present levels using renewables over the medium term, say 30-50 years. We’ll try to go green, but it won’t quite work out the way AOC dreams it will. After it proves insufficient, nukes and FF’s will make up the difference.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Eventually we wil have to go nuclear because renewables will never generate enough electricity to power civilization. 
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
4 years ago
Getting 40% of our energy from the sun means the average temperature will increase from the air blowing over the solar arrays. The best “green” solution is to increase vegetation that will pull carbon and water out of the air and replace them with O2.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear
Exactly. I saw this on a Netflix documentary. Large scale farming and use of pesticides and other chemicals is mostly to blame for climate change. It use to rain here in California’s breadbasket. Overfarming killed the goose that laid the golden egg. One farmer near San Diego figured out how to reverse it all by not competing but bringing back biodiversity. 
Science experts and celebrity activists unpack the ways in which the earth’s soil may be the key to combating climate change and preserving the planet.
Jdred
Jdred
4 years ago
Mish, if you haven’t take a look.  Very interesting and bona fides for both sides of the aisle.  Incredible the miss information that we are moving forward on.  Its not a hoax but its not the end of the world either…
KS123
KS123
4 years ago
Reply to  Jdred
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  KS123
“Surging sea levels are inundating the coasts.”
“Hurricanes and tornadoes are becoming fiercer and more frequent.”
“Climate change will be an economic disaster.”
Too much hype already in the synopsis
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
I then looked at the review.
Unfortunately, “Unsettled” is a book you can accurately judge by its cover. Koonin’s title hints at a logical fallacy called the “strawman” argument. The blurb on the flap confirms this with its opening sentence. 
That I 100% agree with.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
You live in Utah now. Think the fires are all hype and water problem is all hype ?
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Jdred
Why don’t you book a conference room as I stare out my window here watching California burn. 
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
Mal investment on steroids . The dems using green energy/climate change as a decoy for increased Federal control/power. States and individual rights will be weakened.    Anything is this spending Godzilla  for western  USA potable  water distribution ?   Anything about some promising nuclear power generation ?  Equally  importantly is how the Feds and markets  will react to the  massive funding requirements. Not sure the Feds can swallow this pig in a python.       
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
While we are worrying about global climate change and flushing $3.5 trillion down the gov’t waste hole, please consider the linked chart.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
I ran out of time to edit the preceding post. 
Of particular interest to all should be this: “The correlation study indicates that there is strong positive and negative correlation among the global earthquake rates with surface air temperature and sunspot numbers respectively.” 
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Climate change is an umbrella for everything that’s going downhill with the planet. Little brains regurgitate the same tired solutions, when there is only one culprit, and noone dares to utter a solution for that: 8 billion and free to breed.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Forgot to mention there is exactly zero mention of what we are going to do with all the waste from Solar / Wind. Those windmills and panels wear out in 10-20 years time. Right now solar/wind doesn’t represent much waste product given it’s small footprint and how new it is.
But to reach 40% by 2035 means lots of it will have to be in place at least 10+ years at that point (ie we aren’t suddenly going from 4% to 40% in the last 2 years) so the amount of waste product will have to be accounted for and massive new industries will need to be in place to recycle or dispose of that waste.
IB6
IB6
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
this map gives “carbon-intensity” for produced electricity. Curious minds may want to compare carbon intensity of electricity produced in Germany or Denmark (so-called green energy proponents) with that of France, which uses nucular energy.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Another question is land use. Those solar farms required for economies of scale require massive amounts of land. One side effect on agriculture may be to send prices soaring, and cause global starvation. And while we think of trees as the primary converters of CO2, the fact is all plant life contributes–is the net result of solar panels to actually increase CO2?
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Since California has lots of sunshine and is running out of water, perhaps they can switch from growing Almonds and other water intensive crops in the central valley to massive solar farms.
I suspect part of the plan is to have a large percentage of homes having solar on the roof so that you won’t be losing valuable land to solar farms. That will work much better in southern states obviously. The northern ones will have to use wind or import power from the south.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
Every consumer lithium battery or solar panel on Amazon is made in China. Even ostensibly American brands manufacture there. The situation is somewhat better in industrial installations. China manufactures about 70% of solar panels: https://www.statista.com/statistics/668749/regional-distribution-of-solar-pv-module-manufacturing/.
In the wind turbines, the Danish Vestas, and German/Spanish Gamesa are still the leaders. However, six of the top ten manufacturers are Chinese.
Has the Biden team join the CCP Belt and Road initiative, or is the US establishment as clueless as they were about Afghanistan?
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
Sure not only do we export inflation to China , we export pollution . 
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
Reply to  thimk
Solar panel production is very polluting.
Wind turbines sit on a giant base of reinforced concrete which will be as difficult to remove as radioactive waste.
But that’s a job for next generations, and far beyond the four-year election cycle, so let’s drink some more hopium.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Whats interesting about the prevailing wages part is that it seems to imply that green energy will now be controlled on a federal government basis rather than a state basis (think Pacific Gas and Electric in Cali).
I say that because many states are right-to-work and not unionized other than federal employees (Postal Workers). So for this to apply to everyone in the green energy sector it would mean they would entirely be federal workers and not privatized workers.
The US has plenty of trouble supplying electric power on a state wide basis. Imagine the boondoggle of trying to do it on a federal level with 50 states with 50 competing interests, rules and regulations.
Rbm
Rbm
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Pge sucks.  
IB6
IB6
4 years ago
Three of the nine dissenters – Filemon Vela (TX), Henry Cuellar (TX) and Vicente Gonzalez (TX), are from South Texas. If they vote yes for the “clean energy” boondoggle, they will be voted out in next elections as their constituents love fracking. Although Vela is not running for re-election, if he votes yes, he may be replaced by a R.
Bungalow Bill
Bungalow Bill
4 years ago
I can’t say this enough. That little stunt Trump pulled declaring a national emergency to rob Congress of its Constitutional control of the purse and eminent domain in order to build a border wall is going to come back to haunt is in the form of a global warming national emergency to get funding for this green new deal crap. They simply don’t have 60 votes in the Senate. 
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  Bungalow Bill
It only take 51 votes with Harris deciding, but you hit one good idea. 
The non-budget items (prevailing wages etc,) may take 60 vote depending on how parliamentarian rules.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.