Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Ford and GM Seek Tariffs on Each Other, Consumers Want Neither

Ford wants tariffs on GM’s South Korea-made cars. GM wants tariffs on Ford batteries.

Which Automaker Is More American?

Here’s an amusing but unsurprising story in the Wall Street Journal regarding the rent-seeking behavior of big US automakers.

Please consider Ford and GM Are Locked in a New Battle Over Who’s the Most American Carmaker

The century-old clash between Detroit’s auto giants has a new battleground: America’s trade war with the rest of the world.

Behind the scenes, the crosstown rivals are clashing as each company jockeys for tailored tariffs and policies while claiming to be the most American automaker.

Ford, for instance, wants higher tariffs on imports from South Korea, where GM builds its most inexpensive cars. GM is targeting aspects of Ford’s electric-vehicle battery strategy.

Ford employs more factory workers and assembles more cars in the U.S. than any of its competitors; some 80% of the vehicles it sells in the U.S. are built there.

It is a point company executives highlight as they argue for higher tariffs on imported vehicles, particularly those from South Korea. That is where, they note, GM builds some 400,000 vehicles a year that it imports into the US—some of its most affordable models, but ones with already-thin profit margins.

Ford, meanwhile, wants lower duties on imported parts and materials, especially aluminum, which is subject to 50% duties. Ford is the industry’s biggest buyer of aluminum, which it uses for the bestselling F-150 pickup, and it has been forced to rely more heavily on imported aluminum after factory fires sidelined its biggest supplier. Administration officials have so far rebuffed Ford’s pleas on the issue.

GM makes a different case. The company argues that Ford relies on foreign parts and on Chinese technology for its electric-vehicle batteries. It is GM, they say, that is the bigger overall contributor to the U.S. workforce, when factoring in salaried employees as well as hourly workers. And that the pint-size SUVs that GM imports from South Korea are popular and accessible to everyday buyers.

GM last year tried to block federal funding for a huge Ford battery factory in Michigan, and continues to chide the other automaker for its reliance on Chinese battery technology. While GM is temporarily importing Chinese batteries to help keep costs down on its Chevy Bolt EV, it is scaling its own battery program and developing low-cost batteries in-house.

“We are not licensing somebody else’s technology from China. We’re building on GM battery know-how in America,” Kurt Kelty, GM’s vice president of batteries and sustainability, said in June as the company rolled out a plan to develop its own sodium-based batteries. 

The companies have clashed over a bill from Sens. Bernie Moreno (R., Ohio) and Elissa Slotkin (D., Mich.) that would ban internet-connected Chinese vehicles from the U.S. market.

While the bill in its current form would ban many Chinese electric-vehicle components, it doesn’t include batteries themselves, allowing Ford to keep its battery venture in Michigan with Chinese firm CATL. GM has criticized that point and pushed for the bill to be changed, said a person familiar with the situation.

On one critical issue, the reworking of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, the automakers are presenting a united front behind the scenes. Ford and GM, along with Jeep and Ram owner Stellantis, have all pressed the Trump administration to renew the continental trade deal and provide lower tariffs for cars and parts from North America than for the rest of the world, say people familiar with the conversations. 

Aluminum Prices Soared

The Consumer Always Loses

This economic madness goes beyond cars. For example, the car-makers want tariffs on cars but not steel or aluminum.

The steel and aluminum workers want their tariffs but they don’t like higher prices on the cars they buy.

As a result of Trump’s inane tariffs on aluminum and steel, the US pays the highest prices in the word.

Trump vs the Automakers on USMCA

Both GM and Ford want to keep making parts in Mexico.

However, Trump doesn’t. He wants Ford and GM to make parts here with more expensive labor, more expensive steel, and more expensive aluminum.

On August 13, 2026 I noted Trump’s Trade War With Canada on Verge of Becoming Economically Nasty

A USMCA trade deal breakdown with Canada is increasingly likely.

Neither automaker wants what Trump wants on USMCA.

If this economic idiocy does not convince you the loser of Trump’s tariffs and trade wars is the US consumer, then you are incapable of rational thought on tariffs.

Related Posts

January 24, 2026: Trump Threatens 100 Percent Tariff on Canada If it Makes a Deal with China

King Deal now decides who can make a deal with whom.

February 24, 2026: Fact Check on Trump’s Claim “Canada Ripped Us Off”. What’s the Real Story?

In a rambling Speech, Trump signals out Canada.

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

34 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Avery2
Avery2
7 days ago

The Detroit- Windsor (etc.) – Detroit Shuffle is well over a half century old.

Casual Observer
Casual Observer
7 days ago

Trump is starting an auto company. It is the true American car company. So much winning. Like something you’ve seen before..

yippee
yippee
8 days ago

the us military since 1945 has been nothing but a grifter enterprise to wash money from MIC. including auto and jetplane makers……. we haven’t won a war because that is NOT the goal.  only the naive still think it is.  sorry old sport.  

Augustine
Augustine
8 days ago

Discerning buyers pass both Ford and GM.

PapaDave
PapaDave
8 days ago
Reply to  Augustine

Lots of non-discerning buyers then.

Rank Brand 2026 Sales YoY

1 Toyota 1,986,954 +4%
2 Ford 1,960,338 +2%
3 Chevrolet 1,730,075 +2%
4 Honda 1,291,490 +11%
5 Nissan 865,938 +11%
6 Hyundai 836,802 +4%
7 Kia 782,451 +2%
8 Subaru 667,725 +5%
9 GMC 614,177 +9%
10 Jeep 587,725 –9%
11 Ram 439,039 –4%
12 Mazda 424,382 +17%
13 Volkswagen 379,178 +17%
14 BMW 371,346 +2%
15 Lexus 345,669 +8%
16 Mercedes‑Benz 324,528 +9%
17 Audi 196,576 –14%
18 Buick 183,421 +10%
19 Cadillac 160,204 +9%
20 Dodge 141,730 –29%

CaptainCaveman
CaptainCaveman
8 days ago
Reply to  PapaDave

Americans LOVE their pickup trucks, which skews those numbers by a lot. I’ve been saying for years that Hyundai and Kia are leaving tons of cash on the table by not selling full-size (and mid-size) trucks stateside. People would scoff at first, but if they could save 8 or 10 grand…

PapaDave
PapaDave
8 days ago
Reply to  CaptainCaveman

Foreign automakers can’t import their trucks into the US market. They have to build their pickup trucks in the US because there has been a 25% tariff on imported pickups (and SUVs) since 1964 (yes; a 25% tariff for over 60 years). Which is why US companies have focused on those models instead of sedans (which had a 2.5% import tariff till Trump upped it). That’s why profit levels on trucks are so high. US manufacturers had no competition in this market for a long time.

CaptainCaveman
CaptainCaveman
8 days ago
Reply to  PapaDave

Yeah, that’s right, I forgot that part. That’s how they’re able to sell 25K pickups for 45K all day long…and those are just the entry level/work rigs. Amazing how we the people allow our politicians to screw us over so hard.

PapaDave
PapaDave
8 days ago
Reply to  CaptainCaveman

Europe had a 10% tariff on US car and truck imports till recently. Now it is 0% on US vehicles. But Europe doesn’t want many US vehicles, and certainly not in large numbers. Europe wants the much less expensive Chinese models.

Trump now has 15% tariffs on European cars. Not sure if it’s 15% on trucks now, or if it’s still 25%. And 100% tariffs on Chinese vehicles.

Feral Finster
Feral Finster
7 days ago
Reply to  PapaDave

American vehicles, by and large, do not appeal to eurotastes, nor are they practical in euroconditions.

Jon
Jon
7 days ago
Reply to  PapaDave

There is no ability to park a pickup or large SUV in much of Europe. Not to mention gas prices are way too high to make those things even marginally sensible for all but the wealthy. American auto manufacturers have no intenton of making cars that anyone else in the world wants, and exporting them from the US. There is no way the US can become a manufacturing powerhouse again.

Augustine
Augustine
7 days ago
Reply to  PapaDave

The same lack of discernment was noticed in the last presidential election.

Six000MileYear
Six000MileYear
8 days ago

If all manufacturing were done in the US there would be much less need to keep a large army as the global police. The peace dividend would pay for unwinding the labor arbitrage. The consumer would see this as cost neutral and reduced threat when taking a vacation to other countries.

RonJ
RonJ
8 days ago

“Ford, for instance, wants higher tariffs on imports from South Korea, where GM builds its most inexpensive cars.”

When i was in the Army, assigned to Korea in the mid 1970’s, the USO had tours to some factories. One was to the local GM Korea factory in or near Seoul.

Feral Finster
Feral Finster
8 days ago

Since when did anyone start to care what consumers want?

I’m back robbyrob
I’m back robbyrob
8 days ago
Reply to  Feral Finster

Oh no! The price of a Costco hot dog has gone up
https://sina.bio/posts/costco-hotdog.html

El Trumpedo
El Trumpedo
8 days ago
Reply to  Feral Finster

We can build AI consumers now, and cut out all that meat.

RonJ
RonJ
8 days ago
Reply to  El Trumpedo

I hear Tyson is permanently closing two beef processing facilities.

njbr
njbr
8 days ago

This means more opportunity for graft from Trump

a bidding war, in other words

Brutus Admirer
Brutus Admirer
8 days ago

A fascistic organization of the economy (such as the US leans towards) makes company “rent-seek”. Spending their time trying to use the power of government against their competition, rather than competing. And as Mish observes, the marriage of govt and corporate interests always hurts the consumer and taxpayer.

Last edited 8 days ago by Brutus Admirer
RonJ
RonJ
8 days ago
Reply to  Brutus Admirer

The government gave China favored nation trade status, which sent numerous American factories to China, lowering consumer prices, due to much lower labor cost. It was American workers who were hurt, as they lost those manufacturing jobs.

Jon
Jon
7 days ago
Reply to  RonJ

Which was a response to American labor unions demanding higher pay for workers as corporate profits increased which hurt shareholders. Guess who won that fight.

Brutus Admirer
Brutus Admirer
7 days ago
Reply to  RonJ

RonJ, part of the fascistic structure I’m referring to is the extremely heavy hand of regulation that makes US manufacturing inefficient and too expensive. Adding more govt interference (always laced with favoritism to particular companies)–tariffs–is not the answer. The present lightening of the regulatory burden on mining/refining rare earths in the US is an example of the way to go.

Last edited 7 days ago by Brutus Admirer
Tony Frank
Tony Frank
8 days ago

No doubt, this makes taco happy as he loves nothing better than “to stir the pot” while creating additional controversy and discord.

MPO45v2
MPO45v2
8 days ago

“If this economic idiocy does not convince you the loser of Trump’s tariffs and trade wars is the US consumer, then you are incapable of rational thought on tariffs.”

Oh I’m convinced. So much so that it was time to exit and start fresh elsewhere. Almost everywhere else, you can buy a nice electric BYD car at low cost, low insurance, and low energy use. The car is probably subsidized by the people of China for the benefit of everyone else too. Lol. Use the savings to splurge on other things like an extra vacation or two….only suckers and losers get stuck with Trump’s stupidity. Suckers and losers.

Tollsforthee
Tollsforthee
8 days ago
Reply to  Mike Shedlock

LOL! You’re spending too much time here, whoever you are.

MPO45v2
MPO45v2
7 days ago
Reply to  Mike Shedlock

Well you certainly deserved one. With all the money I’m saving being out of the US, I am spending it on Michelin star restaurants though.

1-star MIshelin award granted.

Harry
Harry
8 days ago
Reply to  MPO45v2

Well done! You executed on your exit stategy.

yippee
yippee
8 days ago
Reply to  MPO45v2

good for you. best of luck.

Augustine
Augustine
8 days ago
Reply to  MPO45v2

Now that BYD and Toyota formed a joint venture, I’m no time you’ll be able to buy a BYD EV made by Toyota stateside.

peter
peter
7 days ago
Reply to  Augustine

I hope so….BYD are beautiful cars….Totoyta are the best built…..a marriage in heaven.

Tollsforthee
Tollsforthee
8 days ago
Reply to  MPO45v2

Hey! I resent being a “sucker and loser”!

I have five kids, two grandkids, one on the way.

No way we’re all leaving. Despite all the pessimism in the commentariat, the US is still a great place to be, and I’m optimistic for the future.

Had to give you an upvote, because you’re a good-quality poster and pretty funny, too.

Luke
Luke
7 days ago
Reply to  Tollsforthee

This is my feelings on MPO exactly

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.