Hello President Biden, the Ball Is In Your Court

CBO estimate of the impact of the debt ceiling bill that cleared the House. 

On April 26, the GOP-Led House Passed Bill to Hike Debt Limit and Slash Spending.

“Happy to meet with McCarthy, but not on whether or not the debt limit gets extended,” Biden said. “That’s not negotiable.”

In exchange for raising the debt limit by $1.5tn into 2024, the bill would roll back overall federal spending.

Democrats derided the Republican plan as a “ransom note”, a “shakedown” and “an unserious bill” that was courting financial danger.

Key Provisions 

  • Claw back unspent Covid-19 funds.
  • Impose tougher work requirements for recipients of food stamps and other government aid.
  • Halt Biden’s plans to forgive up to $20,000 in student loans.
  • End many of the landmark renewable energy tax breaks Biden signed into law last year. It would tack on a sweeping Republican bill to boost oil, gas and coal production.

Hello Joe, the Ball is in Your Court

Republicans only had 4 votes to spare but with some last minute haggling, the bill passed 217-215. 

It wasn’t a pretty serve by McCarthy, but the ball cleared the net and landed in play.

The only way to get the ball back in the Republican court would be for the Senate to pass a measure or amend the House bill.

Senate Republicans Say No to Any Clean Debt-Limit Increase

Bloomberg reports Senate Republicans Say No to Any Clean Debt-Limit Increase

A group of 43 Senate Republicans including Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said they’d oppose allowing a vote on legislation increasing the US debt limit with no strings attached, saying “substantive spending and budget reforms” must be part of the package.

The group’s letter to Majority Leader Chuck Schumer included almost every Republican in the chamber and showed they have the votes to block legislation, raising the stakes on President Joe Biden and Democrats who control the chamber.

“Our economy is in free fall due to unsustainable fiscal policies,” GOP senators said in the letter. “This trajectory must be addressed with fiscal reforms.”

Yellen Says No Good Alternative to Congress Lifting Debt Cap

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen says No Good Alternative to Congress Lifting Debt Cap

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said there are “simply no good options” for solving the debt limit stalemate in Washington other than Congress lifting the cap and cautioned that resorting to the 14th Amendment would provoke a constitutional crisis.

“We should not get to the point where we need to consider whether the president can go on issuing debt” without Congress lifting the debt ceiling, Yellen said Sunday on ABC’s “This Week.” 

“This would be a constitutional crisis,” she said.

Constitutional scholars and economists have been split on the idea that the administration continue issuing debt by citing a provision of the US Constitution that says the validity of public debts “shall not be questioned.” 

Yellen deflected several questions on whether Biden might use that option, returning time and again to her insistence that Congress lift the ceiling.

“All I want to say is that it’s Congress’s job to do this,” she said. “If they fail to do it, we will have an economic and financial catastrophe that will be of our own making, and there is no action that President Biden and US Treasury can take to prevent that catastrophe.”

President Biden is meeting McCarthy on Tuesday. But if Biden sticks with his clean hike is not negotiable stance they may as well not meet.  

This is the opposite setup of prior debt ceiling negotiations where the Senate passed a measure and House Republican said they would not budge.

Ultimately they did. 

Waiting Game

The closer this get to the wire without Democrats making a move, the better the setup for the Republicans. 

If Democrats refuse to take a swing at the ball, they lose outright or risk a constitutional crisis. 

CBO Analysis 

Here’s the Congressional Budget Office take on McCarthy’s Limit, Save, Grow Act

President Biden’s Blatant Hypocrisy and McCarthy’s Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023

Let’s review statements made by Senator Biden in 2004 and 2006 when he voted against raising the debt ceiling, also a look at Speaker McCarthy’s Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023.

For discussion, please see President Biden’s Blatant Hypocrisy and McCarthy’s Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023

This post originated at MishTalk.Com

Please Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

42 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kevin
Kevin
11 months ago
The analysis on the fiscal impact was provided by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, not the Congressional Budget Office.
So basically, we go over the cliff at 106 rather than 118 miles per hour.
blacklisted
blacklisted
11 months ago
If everyone would look at all of actions and plans of this administration (and establishment on both sides) through the lens of intentionality, or at least skepticism, then things would make sense. All of the responses to Coronadoom, gloBull warming, the war on terror/drugs/poverty/illiteracy/YouNameIt are on deceitful opportunities to garner more control and power. Biden is a deranged mother WEFer, and is fully controlled by the Neocons and participant in the WEF’s Great Reset / Build Back Better / 4th Industrial Revolution. Biden was even a keynote speaker for Klaus Schwab, and thus he fully intends to hand the US over to the Global Green Communist (GGC), which is a cabal of crazies that includes Schwab, Soros, Fink, Bloomberg, Gates, Macron, Trudeau, Lula da Silva, and many other global leaders and organizations like the UN, CDC, IMF, and most of the Fortune 500.
Whether Biden understand anything is debatable, but the people pulling his strings absolutely know the plan, which includes WWIII to provide the cover for a default and transition to a digital currency in order to track, tax, authorize or cancel transactions, and control behavior the Globalists do not condone, just as what Trudeau did to the truckers. You also have the fact that Putin and Xi do NOT support the GGC, which means the Neocons think they can bring about regime change, and in the case of Russia they will unleash the hardliners behind Putin.
It’s too early for a US default, as the False Flag for WWIII is still 9-12 months away. So, expect another debt ceiling stick, but also expect it to pave the way psychologically for the inevitability of default, especially when the govt defaults around the world start cascading (the European and other int’l banks are in much worse shape that our Regional Banks, as they not only have the problem with rising interest rates, but they also have currency risk on all of those dollar-based loans that must be paid in dollars…and make no mistake, the dollar is headed higher when the house of cards starts to come down).
msspec
msspec
11 months ago
Reply to  blacklisted
blacklisted,
Good summary of the many variables that threaten the US Constitutional Republic (and the West, at large).
Your moniker may prove to be prescient.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
11 months ago
Reply to  blacklisted
I wish I could dig into what you wrote a bit more but ever since my head was hit by a piece of sky this morning I’ve been running around trying to warn as many people as possible.
8dots
8dots
11 months ago
We are a year and a half before Nov 2024 election. The dbl McC might kick the can down with an ultimatum. They will not follow Gingrich footsteps and become [useful idiot] ^2. Since Biden can’t…
8dots
8dots
11 months ago
Trillions of held to maturity prior to Mar 2020 expire now. Post Mar 2020 will start to expire within 3Y/4Y. Warren and Charlie held to
infinity, no expiration date.
RonJ
RonJ
11 months ago
“All I want to say is that it’s Congress’s job to do this,” she said.
“If they fail to do it, we will have an economic and financial
catastrophe that will be of our own making, and there is no action that
President Biden and US Treasury can take to prevent that catastrophe.”
We are already in a catastrophe. It just isn’t a realized catastrophe yet, just as the banks losses that FASB was told by congress to allow them to hide in 2009, weren’t realized at that time. But depositors are realizing now, that banks can’t give them 3% interest on their deposits, because of those held to maturity losses from 2009. So some percentage of depositors are jumping ship for higher returns, leaving the banks capital impaired.
The national debt stands at some 31 trillion
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
11 months ago
In KlownWorld there is an infinite supply of KlownBux and no such thing a a “Debt Ceiling”, which is why this is such a big problem.
Rbm
Rbm
11 months ago
Same clowns that pass the budgets now complain about the debt they caused. Guess when you can blame it on the other party.
How bout this. Cut every dept buy 5percent. Hold dept heads accountable for spending.
Reinstate all tax cuts from Reagan on. You know the ones the bean counters said would lead to a trillion in debt over the next ten years.
Any expense after budget gets put on each individual tax payer.
Want to send 8 mil to Ukraine
Or 4 mil to fla for hurricane damage. Thats fine divide by 328 million tax payers and add to their tax bill with what was for and by whom. With no deductions.
Problem solved.
msspec
msspec
11 months ago
Reply to  Rbm
Occam’s Razor…well done and problem solved….it won’t happen of course.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
11 months ago
Reply to  Rbm
Need to divide by the very roughly 165 million on payrolls instead of 328 million, but I like your idea.
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
11 months ago
The only court that should be important to Brandon right now is federal criminal court. His crime family is being exposed and I suspect presidential pardoning power is not going to save him.
Pontius
Pontius
11 months ago
33 Trillion dollars in debt with SS fund at 0 in 2033. If not now, when does the discussion begin. Need 1% decrease in spending and 1% increase in taxes each year for 5 years with bipartisan commission with up or down voting.
kyronnex
kyronnex
11 months ago
Reply to  Pontius
33 Trillion in debt has nothing to do with SS, by the way. Discussion would begin exactly when people accept the root cause of this spending disaster instead of ascribing it to unrelated things.
How would fixing a “10yr into the future” spending disaster (that added nothing to the debt to date) address the few decade old decadent spending disaster?
Need to decrease spending to 50% of revenue …. and may be, …. just may be, ….. we might be out of debt in ~33 yrs …..
MPO45v2
MPO45v2
11 months ago
Biden should sign whatever the House sent over and let republicans do what they want to do which is ultimately cut social security, medicare, obamacare, etc. I’m sure that will do wonders for the GOP in 2024.
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
11 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
Cut social security sounds so bad but it would be done based on means. The guy with $2mn in the bank doesn’t really need a SS check. I know it sucks because it represents a retrograde tax on success, but a lot of the success of these people was related to how fake money works. They were closer to the spigot in DC and thus got showered with rewards while someone downstream got the dreggs.
Mjs357
Mjs357
11 months ago
Reply to  TheCaptain
Eat the rich theme going, Marx and Mao would be proud. Cut people OUT who have NEVER paid in. I said as much in 1989 when I saw my grandmother getting checks and she had never held a driver’s license or job outside the home. Why pay ppl who never contributed? Scam. My mother was furious. My grandfather was “rich” by standards at the time because he worked his butt off. She didn’t need $400/mo for existing. Ponzi scheme.
And for people to blame one party or the other for the failures of SS, Medicare, Nobamacare shows a real lack of understanding the system, politics, economics – partisan garbage.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
11 months ago
Reply to  Mjs357
Without survivor benefits women that stayed home raising kids and didn’t work much may physically become wards of the State.
Will institutionalization be cheaper?
Mjs357
Mjs357
11 months ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
There was plenty of money for her. If he had died first, certainly she should have inherited his wages paid into SS. Otherwise, she was supported. This is a perfect example of the SS scheme. Why should she get $ she never put in before the bread-winner passed? My friend’s mother in law is from the PI, naturalized USCIT. She gets checks, welfare, food money, all the benefits. Why? She nor her husband never paid in.
Keep letting people take from a corrupted system and you get what you get, broke. Everyone wants to be caring, help the less-capable. Sure, I do to. But not at the expense of the “rich” the original post suggested. Penalize people for working hard, making, good decision, being responsible. Pfft.
The concept of Marxism is easily embraced when you don’t respect or care about other people’s rights and freedoms.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
11 months ago
Reply to  Mjs357
As Thacher kind of said: “Socialism works until you run out of other people’s money.”
MPO45v2
MPO45v2
11 months ago
Reply to  TheCaptain
I’m fine not getting any social security but stop taking it out of my paycheck. I guess if you make past a certain amount like $200,000/year you should be exempt from social security deductions since you won’t need it later because you have the means. Using that logic, billionaires should be exempt from all government taxes because they have the means to take care of themselves.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
11 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
You have to pay in. It functions essentially like unemployment insurance which you also pay into.
If you never lose your job, you never collect unemployment insurance
If you are successful in your career, you never collect social security (which was originally created as a safety net, not as a entitlement for all)
msspec
msspec
11 months ago
Reply to  TheCaptain
….”The guy with $2mn in the bank doesn’t really need a SS check. I know it
sucks because it represents a retrograde tax on success, but a lot of
the success of these people was related to how fake money works. They
were closer to the spigot in DC and thus got showered with rewards while
someone downstream got the dreggs.”
The Cantillon Effect;
Yes, that sucks, but fake money is ‘real’, if you get the meaning, and as such, sucks.
We once believed we lived in a MERITOCRACY; wonder what the pivot point was: 1913, 1933, 1971, OR the chaos that seems to increase with each Marxist regime that permeates throughout our fragile Constitutional Republic….becoming the Administrative State.
Rbm
Rbm
11 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
Everything is connected. Ss/ medicare/ food stamps etc support a lot of businesses.
radar
radar
11 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
Just start forcing rmd withdraws the same year SS starts.
msspec
msspec
11 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
”……..obamacare, etc. I’m sure that will do wonders for the GOP in 2024.”
…as seen through a tiny lens.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
11 months ago
Our
twin deficits have an insidious, if not an incestuous, relationship. Positive
interest rate differentials are significantly responsible for the dollar’s
exchange rate support. And an “overvalued” dollar in turn is the
principal contributor to our burgeoning trade deficits.
The viability of the U.S. and Foreign-dollar as international units of account
is threatened by our protracted huge trade deficits (since the
U.S. became a debtor nation in 1985). Given the present and prospective trade
deficits, this situation is not likely to continue for long. Foreigners will
simply be saturated with excess dollars.
The volume of dollar-denominated liquid assets held by foreigners is extremely
large. Any significant repatriation of these funds, by reducing the supply of
loan-funds, will force interest rates up – thus increasing the federal deficit
and the burden of all new debt. These events alone could trigger a downswing in
the economy resulting in more unemployment, more unemployment compensation,
less tax revenues and larger federal deficits. Truly a vicious cycle.
KidHorn
KidHorn
11 months ago
They could easily cut defense spending by 50%. When was the last time we had a military success? It’s like education. Spending more does not yield better results.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
11 months ago
Reply to  KidHorn
For your consideration: What happens when 50% of the well paid engineers and technicians working for Raytheon, Lockheed, BAE Systems, etc., don’t have a job or income? Most of the defense dollars do NOT go into Swiss bank accounts. They go into the economy through Target and Walmart. Does the US spend too much? Undoubtedly. But the fix is not as simple as insty-cuts.
.
Christoball
Christoball
11 months ago
Reply to  KidHorn
The medical industrial complex accounts for over 20% of GDP, of this 85% is already socialized medicine and is paid for by the government. So much of this is spent on ones last 12 months of life. People work their fingers to the bone, with stress, physical toil and lots of paycheck to paycheck and their big bonus comes at the end of their life hanging off an IV Tree. Perhaps the next generations will enjoy life more along the way and not feel the need to cling on so much at the bitter end. Maybe not even have a bitter end because their life was lived in a healthier way.
As the saying goes, “If I’d known I was going to live so long, I would have taken better care of myself.”
Directed Energy
Directed Energy
11 months ago
Reply to  KidHorn
That’s a firm NO.
dtj
dtj
11 months ago
“The federal budget deficit was $1.1 trillion in the first half of fiscal
year 2023, the Congressional Budget Office estimates—$430 billion more
than the shortfall recorded during the same period last year—and
consistent with projections CBO released in February.”
30% of all dollars spent by the federal government are borrowed. The only way to stop the runaway spending is for the government to default.
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
11 months ago
Reply to  dtj
Oh, the government will default alright.
The $64 Trillion question is, “How?”.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
11 months ago
Reply to  Bam_Man
At first slowly.
Then all at once.
😉
.
1-shot
1-shot
11 months ago
This country needs a real economic crisis to wake up and stop throwing money down the toilet so pandering politicians can get re-elected. It’s time for all of us to start paying tab weve been running up during the ost 30 years. My country has gotten fiscally fat and lazy. Its time to start dieting and working out!!!!
Take item #1 – claw back unspent covid 19 funds. The Covid crisis is over … several years ago. Stop throwing my money at it. If a business cant make it in 2023/2024, its not because of Covid
msspec
msspec
11 months ago
Reply to  1-shot
”…Take item #1 – claw back unspent covid 19 funds. The Covid crisis is
over … several years ago. Stop throwing my money at it. If a business
cant make it in 2023/2024, its not because of Covid”
In California, you wouldn’t know that Covid is over, and has been for years, by the fear porn that persists from the PTB and the behavior of many among the population (they’re now thoroughly brainwashed from the incessant propaganda thrust upon them….still wearing useless masks and avoiding crowds, wearing rubber gloves and constant handwashing, etc.)
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
11 months ago
Oh yes, the debt ceiling crisis! Makes for some great tv for the slaves to get all excited about. Good fodder for the election year lying coming up as well. This is different than the normal lying, as they focus strongly on misrepresenting what they’ve done and emphasizing how evil the other team (that they just had margaritas with the night before) is. Sort of like prime time for politics. For the slaves do love their misery.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
11 months ago
Charges
on all debt, public and private sectors, are related to a cumulative figures;
and since the multiplier effects of debt expansion on income, the ingredient
from which the charges must inevitably be paid, is a non-cumulative figure, it
is inevitably that a mathematical time will arrive when further debt expansion
is no longer a practical or possible expedient, either to provide full
employment or to keep debt charges with tolerable limits.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
11 months ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
You can always expand the debt when you have a central bank.
Even when it’s intolerable.
ThinkEconomically
ThinkEconomically
11 months ago
Would anyone be all that surprised if the Dems and Biden let 6/1 come and go and refuse to even compromise on even 1 dollar in spending cuts ? I wouldn’t be. I know its crazy. But everything these nut jobs have done over the last 2 years would have been unthinkable just 4 years ago. I am truly beginning to believe they want to bring it all down.
Avery
Avery
11 months ago
Who’s on the other side of the court, Riggs?
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
11 months ago
Reply to  Avery
Bankers. Always the bankers.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.