Hoot of the Day: Germany’s Electricity From Coal Soars to 33 percent

Germany Revives Coal as Energy Security Trumps Climate Goals

Bloomberg reports Germany Revives Coal as Energy Security Trumps Climate Goals

Europe’s largest economy is burning the fossil fuel for electricity at the fastest pace in at least six years, data compiled by Bloomberg show. It’s also poised to be one of the few nations to increase coal imports next year. 

Across the globe, highly polluting — and relatively cheap — coal is making a comeback as countries seek to prevent soaring energy costs from triggering an economic meltdown. 

“Everyone is keeping their climate targets, but it’s true that when you face the dilemma to keep the lights on or decrease carbon emissions, the choice is to keep the lights on,” said Carlos Fernandez Alvarez, the acting head of gas, coal and power at the International Energy Agency.

Germany now generates more than a third of its electricity from coal-fired power plants, according to Destatis, the federal statistical office. In the third quarter, its electricity from the fuel was 13.3% higher than the same period a year earlier, the agency said.  

 “The coal phase-out ideally by 2030 is not in question,” a spokeswoman for the German Economy Ministry said in a statement. “Against the backdrop of the crisis situation, the most important thing is that we have apparently succeeded in consuming significantly less energy in 2022, especially natural gas.”

At times this month, German electricity became as polluting as power produced in South Africa and India, after lower wind speeds curbed renewable generation and coal consumption spiked, according to Electricity Maps, an app that aggregates grid data. 

Hoot of the Day

The most important thing is that we have apparently succeeded in consuming significantly less energy in 2022, especially natural gas.” 

Really? 

Why is Germany building more liquid natural gas LNG terminals?

Please note that we take natural gas in the US, liquify it to LNG via energy-consuming compression, then ship it across the Atlantic Ocean to Germany in diesel-powered ships. 

Given the nuclear reactor issues in France, Germany finds it self in the unusual position of being a  net exporter of electricity to the rest of the EU. 

This is the first time since 1990. 

Weasel Statements

 “The coal phase-out ideally by 2030 is not in question,” said the German Economy ministry.

Ideally by 2030 is not in question, but what about actual practice? Is that in question? 

EU Imposes the World’s Largest Carbon Tax Scheme

Meanwhile, please note EU Imposes the World’s Largest Carbon Tax Scheme, Inflationary Madness Sets In

To prevent “carbon leakage” the European Parliament reached a deal on a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, CBAM for short. 

Neither a Tax Nor a Tariff

The EU says CBAM is neither a tax nor a tariff. It’s an “adjustment mechanism” to “level the playing field“.

This means top trading partners like the U.S. will now face a steep carbon bill when docking at the ports of Rotterdam or Antwerp.

The EU is Very Worried About Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA)

On November 30, I commented The EU is Very Worried About Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA)

Tit for Tat?

Perhaps CBAM is the EU’s way of striking back at the US for Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act that illegally subsidizes US manufacturers detrimental to the EU. 

More likely, it’s just economic stupidity across the board as noted in Al Gore and John Kerry Aim to Hijack the World Bank for Climate Agenda

On November 12, president Biden’s climate ambassador, John Kerry, made this statement:

It’s a well-known fact that the United States and many other countries will not establish…some sort of legal structure that is tied to compensation or liability. That’s just not happening.

Guess what happened.

For the answer, please consider President Biden, the UN, and the Climate Lobby Seek to Spread More Fossil Fuel Misery

Three Things CBAM Will Do

  1. Increase inflation
  2. Reduce global trade
  3. Hammer developing countries

And the one thing it will not do is much of anything, if anything at all, for the environment.

50 Years of Dire Predictions

Finally, Let’s Review 50 Years of Dire Climate Forecasts and What Actually Happened

Many of the predictions are outrageously funny, especially AOC’s 2019 announcement that the world will end in 12 years.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

32 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JonLabman
JonLabman
1 year ago
Mike, has anyone come up with efficient ways of moving out of fossil fuels? We know the supply is finite and the pollution is bad, even if most don’t agree on anything else. We also know that fusion is decades away. Are the new smaller nuclear reactors safer? Do they create less radioactive waste? Thanks, Jonathan
Carl_R
Carl_R
1 year ago
Re: “Please note that we take natural gas in the US, liquify it to LNG via energy-consuming compression”
Pardon me, but CNG (compressed natural gas) and LNG (liquified natural gas) are two different things. CNG is made by compressing natural gas to about 4000 PSI. CNG is stored at room temperature, but in heavy, thick-walled tanks capable of holding that much pressure. LNG is made by cooling natural gas into a liquid state, around -260 degees F. It needs to be stored at that temperature in a vessel capable of keeping the temperature sufficiently low.
Call_Me
Call_Me
1 year ago
Reply to  Carl_R
Be that as it may, but both routes are energy-consuming — you gotta give him that 🙂
-Call_Me_Al
Carl_R
Carl_R
1 year ago
Reply to  Call_Me
Indeed. I was just trying to clarify the difference for those who don’t know. LNG and CNG have been vying with each other as fuel for Semi’s. They take totally different infrastructure, and while they are both “natural gas”, they are for all purposes totally different fuels.
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
1 year ago
If you can just look past arrogant comments that sound like they came from a 14 year old, everything trump said would happen is happening. That is just a fact. The Germans laughed at him for saying Russia pwned their energy future. Not much laughter out of the fadderland these days as the childishly stupid kinder-folk rush out with axes to cut down the forests for firewood even though it is illegal to do so.
tractionengine
tractionengine
1 year ago
Reply to  TheCaptain
Superficial thinking Cap’n. Two points: there’d be no issue if the US had not stirred up a proxy war in Ukraine nor if the EU & UK wasn’t financially (and therefore politically) dependent on the US for its defense. If you think the US didn’t have its Ukraine strategy planned out long ago, you are deluded. This plan was hatched long before Trump’s ‘prediction’.
billybobjr
billybobjr
1 year ago
After 100s of failed predictions by governments you still have idiots who want
to believe the science is settled and believe their next dire prediction . The Germans and
Europeans are burning records amount of wood because the politicians have created
a distrust in reliable power with their actions . People decide to take action and get wood burners
and other small heating devices to protect their selves. These things are or will add more carbon and are
much less efficient in most cases . There are many here on this blog and in fact boast
about ignoring anyone who doesn’t agree with their view . That is their echo chamber
come to a discussion board and block the discussion except for the views that they believe
in . Now that is the Hoot of the day !!
Doug78
Doug78
1 year ago
Reply to  billybobjr
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
1 year ago
Reply to  billybobjr
Maybe it s just my braincell or my flawed english to blame …Don t get exactly what your point is…. Mishtalk is definitely NOT an ‘echo chamber’ ! in recent years I ve become pro russian, against the US/NATO CRIMINAL ASSOCIATION and of course anti EU circus in its disgusting quality of a fn fumbling degraded self destructive US vasal….. yet here at least I can vent my opinions whether anyone likes them or not, always willing to consider any argument . There s even someone on the Mish blog using 5 or 6 avatars posting clownish rant, we all appreciate the ‘contribution ‘ though ….. If only society in general would be like the Mish blog within the context of a totally controlled deceptive devious diabolical western(=US) msm narrative environment !
?
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
1 year ago
Could be translated into a wisdom: when the SHTF, everbody clings to dear life instead of lofty ideas.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Wise words…. link to youtube.com
8dots
8dots
1 year ago
China 2023 openness is a good thing for the global economy. It will boost demand for Lithium, energy and other commodities. BF-7 virus tsunami will not derail China. The debt ceiling will climb with higher interest rates. China have 14 land border countries.
They flare one at a time, risk free, to cover their internal problems with BF-7. China must have an enemy. Without one they die. They like it so much, they accumulated enslaved enemies all over the globe, on the silk road, China South Sea, the Indian Ocean, Gwadar, Baluchstan and South America.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
1 year ago
Reply to  8dots
…..what about US’ accumulated enslaved enemies, becoming failed states , ALL of them, Ukraine and even the worthless EU bein the latest victims ….
spa sidechats
spa sidechats
1 year ago
Like a beautiful flower blooming in a time of despair and hopelessness. I bet some of those workers get good at charcoal grilling and open a bustling ribs shack.
Doug78
Doug78
1 year ago
Germany is just doing the logical thing to keep its citizens warm and its industry working. Even though it took some time for them to understand the problem and to act on it and in the end they did act. Russian energy imports had to be replaced so the built in record time gas terminals, kept their nuclear reactors open and burned more coal. They paid high prices because it was a crash program and energy was needed immediately. That is understandable. The problem of supply looks manageable now contrary to what many pundits claimed before. Going forward they will tackle the problem of price. As an aside French nuclear reactors are at 68% capacity now compared to 52% a couple of months ago with more reactors coming online. France will be exporting electricity again soon. Things are moving fast. The price cap on Russian oil and gas to my surprise seems to be having true effects on the price the Russians can sell them for.
The CBAM is obviously an industry-protection measure to keep industry within the Union and the Inflation Reduction Act does the same thing for the US but I am sure many have noticed that the Free Trade movement has not provided the promised benefits for over twenty years and maybe more so it is about time that this dogma be dropped and other measures put in place.
hmk
hmk
1 year ago
Reply to  Doug78
Have the Germans considered the most logical cost effective and green plan to become energy independent, ie nuclear? I thought the Germans were logical, good at engineering and problem solving, abandoning nuclear was outright idiotic.
Doug78
Doug78
1 year ago
Reply to  hmk
Give them a bit of time. They have kept the reactors going which is a first step and we will see for the rest. The Ecologists are in the coalition and they signed off on the reactors so there is progress. Eventually common sense prevails when you are faced with a true crisis.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
1 year ago
Reply to  hmk
Nuclear power requires abundant water supply, and most of the suitable sites are already taken.
It is dumb to shut down nuclear power with some life to spare, but in a densely populated country, there aren’t plentiful sites to build new ones.
Doug78
Doug78
1 year ago
Germany used to have 17 operating reactors vs two now. Just putting the old ones back into operation would furnish 30% of Germany’s electric needs. Water is not the problem. Germany has lots of it and you can use wastewater if you want. Public acceptance is the problem.
hmk
hmk
1 year ago
Reply to  Doug78
Hence the problem with the political class. More interested in maintaining power than doing what’s right. Or in the case of the US doing the bidding of their money masters.
Doug78
Doug78
1 year ago
Reply to  hmk
The German coalition saw that if they did nothing then they would definitely not be in power in a year so they decided to do the right thing.
JRM
JRM
1 year ago
Reply to  Doug78
Wait, so the worse drought in decades in Europe is over???
Doug78
Doug78
1 year ago
Reply to  JRM
Nobody has been talking about drought since it started to rain.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  Doug78
Japan has had a change of heart about nukes too. It’s only a matter of time.
Mouse
Mouse
1 year ago
While the Prohibitionists probably had good intentions (the best of intentions?), the totalitarian way they went about their political objective never had public support. The heavy handed, self righteous way they enforced their goal pretty much guaranteed they would fail in their broad goal of eliminating alcohol. Lots of people made a public statement in favor of prohibition on their way to a speak-easy. The public was afraid of being canceled, censored, and branded “sinner” in the eyes of their friends. Fear of being canceled is not the same as support.
Should we all try to keep our alcohol consumption under control? Yes. Should we have totalitarian laws banning any and all consumption, with nasty gestapo destroying the lives of anyone who even thinks the word “beer”? No, that’s crazy.
The same is happening with the heavy handed, totalitarian way environmentalists are trying to save the environment… except there are also politicians who don’t care one lick about environment but are using environmentalism as a means to get more and more political power. Some environmentalists have good intentions, bad technique. Many “environmentalists” (in air quotes) just want political power.
Good intentions does not mean the science is on their side — many environmentalists have been caught wildly exaggerating to get attention for their cause. Bad politics almost never has science behind it (except by accident), and bad political actors are never afraid to lie often and everywhere. If Al Gore or John Kerry actually believed in any of their sh!t, they wouldn’t be flying private jets everywhere they go. They believe in political power.
The public does not support COP or Greta the pimple or the Gore/Kerry political show. The public was not invited and does not support the shameless WEF political power grab (which is the essence of the WEF, no matter what their political slogans claim). The public is terrified of being canceled, censored, cast out of their profession / ability to support their family.
Fear of political oppression is not the same thing as support for dumb politics. Not even in Germany.
Should we all try to limit our impact on the environment, and try to leave the Earth in a similar condition as we found it? Yes. Should we have totalitarian laws requiring everyone to live in caves and eat bugs? Should we have gestapo enforcing onerous taxes and life sentences for anyone who dares to question political power? No, that’s crazy.
RonJ
RonJ
1 year ago
Siddharth Kara, author of “Cobalt Red: How The Blood of The Congo Powers Our Lives,” appeared on Rogan, saying there is no such thing as clean cobalt, which is an element in every Lithium Ion battery. Stating that cobalt mining conditions are inhumane.
I’ve read Denninger repeatedly saying that 500,000 pounds of earth has to be “moved and processed,” just to create one car battery pack. What is the multiplication factor? And earth moving equipment runs on fossil fuel.
What of the Sodium Ion battery? How does it compare to LI?
Mouse
Mouse
1 year ago
Reply to  RonJ
No battery technology available today, in industrial production or in a lab, has the energy density required to make EV viable. Battery technology has come a long way, but it still has a decade or two before battery tech becomes viable in passenger EVs. This is a physics question, not a politics question. No amount of mis-allocated tax money is going to change the laws of physics.
The electrical grid in the USA simply cannot charge any battery type. It doesn’t matter how one stores energy when the energy to do so is not available.
Anyone who was coherent over xmas weekend should know the US power grid was on its knees for a brief cold snap. It has problems every July / August when people turn on air conditioning. The notion that the grid is going to support terajoules of extra power — the amount currently generated by gasoline engines — is absurd. Only a political extremist with their head buried up their backside would even suggest something so stupid, especially after last weekend.
Everytime there is a big hurricane in the USA, utilities scramble to find replacement transformers to go on telephone poles. They beg, borrow and steal transformers from nearby utility companies. Current manufacturing capacity produces only a limited number per year, and a lot of it depends on China. The notion that thousands of transformers will magically appear because some idiot holds an awareness concert is offensive. Copper for transmission wires is not available in quantity. Electricians and welders are not available and take years to train.
Lithium versus sodium batteries is the wrong question. Energy density is the question on batteries. But batteries are only one part of the problem, and ongoing research will probably find a way in a decade or two. Not definitely, but probably.
Finding trillions of taxpayer dollars to pay for renovating the power grid may be the biggest obstacle — especially in G7 countries with trillions in official debts and even more trillions in unfunded political promises. When (not if) you are asked: pay for a new power grid, or pay for social security? Which are you going to say? There isn’t enough money for both. Will your neighbors support a new power grid, or will they vote for social security? There isn’t enough for both.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Mouse
Hmmm. Perhaps they will vote for Medicare/Medicaid before they vote for Social Security before they vote for a new grid? You have to be alive to cash your SocSec, let alone drive an EV anywhere.
8dots
8dots
1 year ago
Trump cancelled EPA regulation for fun..
8dots
8dots
1 year ago
Nixon EPA became a useful tool for the environmentalist to extract fines from the little guys and suppressed industries in the most polluted flyovers areas. Results : the blue collar workers lost their jobs, but breathed better. The German idealists were even more extreme. They were against everything, including nuke. Trump knew that Angela is stupid, a clown…
Putin invasion forced more realistic politicians to face reality. Alberta Clipper shut down LNG production and froze Canadian pipelines. The price of LNG and coal might rise.
PapaDave
PapaDave
1 year ago
Just another example of how poorly the worldwide energy transition from fossil fuels to renewables is going. As predicted by some very insightful people on this site several years ago. Which is why they were recommending oil and gas stocks in the early days of the pandemic. Glad I was paying attention.
We are going to be consuming “more” fossil fuels as this decade progresses; coal, oil, and natural gas. Even as we build out more and more renewables. Because our demand for energy keeps growing faster than our ability to add renewables. That will change eventually, but not till the end of this decade.
Of course, since coal is the dirtiest fossil fuel, it’s usage will be the first to get cut back, whenever possible. Which is why it is difficult to invest in coal. Not so, with oil and gas.
In the case of oil, demand has been growing by 1 Mbpd on average, every year for the last 30 years. And demand is expected to continue to grow by 1 Mbpd per year for the rest of this decade. It is similar for natgas. Which means upward pressure on oil and gas prices for the rest of this decade.
RonJ
RonJ
1 year ago
Reply to  PapaDave
“Of course, since coal is the dirtiest fossil fuel, it’s usage will be the first to get cut back, whenever possible.”
Denninger says that coal can be mined to obtain thorium, to power LFTR reactors. Of coarse, at the moment there is no big push in the U.S., to develop those as an electrical power source.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.