Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Let’s check in on Quantitative Tightening, How Much Progress is the Fed Making?

Fed Securities Held Outright, chart by Mish

Progress looks meaningless but it has started. Let’s step back and see how we got here.

Monthly Change in Securities Held Outright

Change in Fed Securities Held Outright, chart by Mish

We had an unprecedented surge in QE which the Fed intends to roll back, starting very slowly.

Monthly Change in Securities Held Outright Detail 

Change in Fed Securities Held Outright, chart by Mish

I created the above charts after seeing this Tweet.

At a weekly level, MBS looks like a bowl of spaghetti. So I used monthly averages.

Mystery? 

I fail to understand the mystery. QE goosed asset prices on the way up and QT rates to do the opposite. 

The Fed added liquidity and artificially lowered mortgage rates. Now it’s taking some of that back albeit very slowly.

Fed Statement 

On May 4, the Fed announced its QT Schedule. 

  • For Treasury securities, the cap will initially be set at $30 billion per calendar month and after three months will increase to $60 billion per month. The decline in holdings of Treasury securities under this monthly cap will include Treasury coupon securities and, to the extent that coupon maturities are less than the monthly cap, Treasury bills. 
  • For agency debt and agency MBS, the cap will initially be set at $17.5 billion per calendar month and after three months will increase to $35 billion per month. The Desk will reinvest into agency MBS the amount of principal payments from SOMA holdings of agency debt and agency MBS received during each calendar month that exceeds the cap amount for that month. 

Snails and Ants

Many people following various charts have complained the Fed is not shrinking its balance sheet.

It is. Slowly. The problem is that most treasuries mature mid-month, the rest at month-end. Week to week mortgages are extremely volatile. 

I elected to watch monthly averages as a better measure of progress. QT rates to escalate soon from a snail’s pace to an ant’s pace.

Should the Fed move faster? I believe so. 

The Fed certainly had no qualms about blasting trillions of dollars lickity-split. 

I would not say that QT has lifted off in a “big way” but it has happened. But we used to get by with less than a trillion dollars in reserves. I doubt we ever see that level again.

Meanwhile the free money to banks rolls in.  

Hooray, More Free Money

The Fed pays interest on all reserves. At the end of May, the total reserves were $3.318 trillion.

The Federal Reserve currently pays 1.65% interest on reserves IOR.

If the Fed hikes to the range of 2.25-2.50 percent as expected, then expect IOR to jump to 2.40%.

Q: On an annual basis, how much free money are we talking about?
A: 2.40 percent of $3.318 trillion is $79.63 billion!

Q: We are giving banks $79.63 billion in free money?
A: It’s a moving target.

The IOR keeps rising but the reserve balances keep declining.

That $79.63 billion reflects a hike that has not taken place yet. If the Fed keeps hiking at a pace that exceeds QT, then the amount will rise further. If not, the actual amount of free money will drop.

For further discussion, please see Reverse Repos Hit a New Record High of $2.33 Trillion: Plus a Q&A on Free Money!

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

53 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Tony
Tony
4 years ago
Mish. there’s an easier way to track the Treasury Q.T. (not the MBS part of Q.T.).
For each month just total all the maturing Treasury Notes & Bonds that are 2 years or greater duration (A).
Do the same for all purchases of Treasury Notes & Bonds of 2 years or greater duration (B).
Subtract A minus B, then you get the total Q.T. for that month.
For example during June 2022:
(A) Total Notes and Bonds maturing was $48,255,388,400
(B) Total Notes and Bonds purchases was $18,255,388,300
June Q.T. (A – B) = $30,000,000,100 That’s the target.
If you go by Wednesday Totals in h.4.1, the Treasury BILL maturities and purchases will just confuse you. There’s a lot of short term T bills that mature and get repurchased each week.
In addition if you include Agency MBS, that’s a very noisy pattern of data of pre-payments and re-purchases that close much later.
For July, Notes and Bonds maturing will be $41,712,108,300. We have to wait till July 28th for the last note purchase.
Hope this helps
Gotgold
Gotgold
4 years ago

Hope the banks preserve the $79B which is a preemptive bailout from the pending auto loan crisis they are about to see in the next two quarters.

JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Speaking of mortgages, I had lunch yesterday with a couple who I’ve known for a decade. They’re buying a house, and are locked in at 4.85% for a 30-year fixed, no points.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
I missed the memo for a higher rate for “savings accounts” – my reserves.
Where do I sign up for the current 1.65%?
I could use the money as the price of groceries is going up.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Buy I-Bonds. They are currently paying over 9% if you don’t need access to your money anytime soon.
That’s what the US Treasury thinks inflation is.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
I think you can only buy $10k/yr.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Per tax payer SSN. So a couple can get 20K and if you file in your kids names (even if they get nothing) I believe you can get 10K more per kid.
Not many have 20+K in general savings anyway (most have the bulk in their 401K) so for most people 20K-30K a year is plenty.
WTFUSA
WTFUSA
4 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
You could buy treasury bills at treasurydirect.gov
All t-bill durations except 4 week have been exceeding 1.65% lately. Refer to https://treasurydirect.gov/instit/instit.htm?upcoming and click the ‘Auction Results’ tab to see the returns for the different maturities.
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
4 years ago
It is ridiculous to think that the government needed to inject all this cash in order to stop the collapse of their Global Debt Ponzi but now it’s all good and they can just take it back out without causing yet another crash warning. A Ponzi does not work like this! Just google for “Economati brace for impact” and you will see that when idiots were saying the fed was making good on its promise to deleverage its balance sheet back in 2019 that my models were saying a huge expansion was coming.
After 5 waves up in the fed’s balance sheet are getting a pullback but this too shall pass and it will have to be reversed. The fed is screwed at this point and to win all you have to do is cost average into a big pile of silver bullion, the key words being to COST AVERAGE. It could take a couple years to play out so this is not a quick trade but it will be a big winner with little doubt and no risk because physical silver is not speculation, it is saving. And no matter what the dollar price does, you will always own the same amount of physical silver.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  TheCaptain
Silver will help, but not like you expect. To have $1 million in silver would be 52,083 ounces, or 3,255 pounds or 1.5 tons. It works for small transactions only. There is a reason why central banks are buying gold.
ajc1970
ajc1970
4 years ago
Reply to  TheCaptain
“google for “Economati brace for impact””

I’m old and my neuron destruction outpaces creation

I’m not sure I could handle the IQ drop from doing this
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  TheCaptain
All I know is that in L. Frank Baum’s The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, the allegorical story of the Gilded Age battles over gold v silver, Dorothy followed the yellow brick road while wearing silver slippers.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
So what do the Ruby slippers represent in that battle over gold vs silver?
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Tex, they represent much, much better color cinematography than plain old silver slippers. Apparently the fungibility of slippers is not an issue around the Emerald City.
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
She had ruby slippers in the movie because they wanted to show off Technicolor. Honest.
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Original script was silver shoes – later changed to ruby
OZ is short for ounce
Dorothy is whipped out of Kansas by a tornado with her little dog “Toto” (short for teetotalers, who made a loud noise yip-yapping but were otherwise ineffective political companions).
Tin Man (or Tin Woodman). The working class man, once a true human, is now just a cog in the industrial machine.
The Cowardly Lion, then, was William Jennings Bryan himself. Capable of a great roar—his speeches were legendary—alas, to mix metaphors, he was all bark and no bite.
prumbly
prumbly
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
It works today too: Hillary is the Wicked Witch of the West, Biden is the Scarecrow (if he only had a brain), Powell is the man behind the curtain…
WTFUSA
WTFUSA
4 years ago
“The Fed certainly had no qualms about blasting trillions of dollars lickity-split.”
Agreed. QE went from $0 to $120 billion/mo in a single move and the Fed slammed the EFFR down 154 basis points in one month. Compared to those moves, QT and EFFR increases by the Fed are moving at a pace that makes glaciers seem to be galloping by comparison.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
A slow-motion train wreck looking for a truck on the tracks?
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
4 years ago
Maybe I just don’t understand the process of MBS runoff (i.e., principal payments passthrough). If MBS is mostly a 30-year amortized loans where the principal payments start out being small (say 25% of the payment) and takes time to really pick up. I just don’t see how $2.7T is going to runoff as quickly as the Fed thinks it will, especially since home sales will continue to drop for possibly 12-18 months, further reducing passthrough from mortgage payoffs. And, if we find ourselves in a situation a year from now where a real recession has hit and the unemployment rate starts ticking up, then that means even less runoff.
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
There is plenty of room for QT of treasuries even at double this pace. Mortgages are another matter if home sales crash
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
I wonder if the Fed is still buying newly issued Treasury Notes while letting older Notes and Bills run off, for a net decline. It would not surprise me if they’re playing it that way in an effort to keep bond prices higher than they’d be in an authentic bond market. With inflation at this rate, a 3% yield on the 10-year Note does not look like the result of a free market in Treasuries.
Tony
Tony
4 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
They bought $18,255,388,300 in June with the new (high) yields.
Remember FED SOMA ADD-ONS are at the highest yield (Non Competitive) for the auction.
Where do you think the Fed gets the money to pay IORB and interest on ON-RRP and their day to day expenses?
ajc1970
ajc1970
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
“Mortgages are another matter if home sales crash”
“If…” but what are the odds of that happening…
Inconceivable!
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  ajc1970
You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means 🙂
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
Good questions, but the issue is even more complicated.
As the name suggest, MBS aren’t individual mortgages but bundled tranches of mortgages. Now, even if they were originally the same maturity, the individual mortgages are paid down at different times.
The treasuries are an equal puzzle. They tried to push down the long end, hence the frequent yield reversals, but that means the bulk will mature some decade from now.
I am sure, them know what they’re doing. /sarc
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
So are those tranches like the age statement on Scotch, an average? Or are they year-specific, like the malts from a single year?
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
The tranches are based on risk of default, but I am sure if the prudent guardians of monetary policy only buy the highest rated securities. After all, they must be experts in Ponzi schemes.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
“I am now convinced that Dr. di Sanza’s greatest strength was his utter stupidity. He was such
a successful swindler because he himself could not, even after two convictions, understand what
was inevitably catastrophic about a Ponzi scheme.”
– Kurt Vonnegut, Jailbird.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
So, like the 2022 mortgage tranches resemble those of 2006-8… LMAO. Slice and dice anything and the result is mush, not fruit salad. The only risk remaining is systemic–blah blah blah. I’m thinking the Fed will rue the day it got into MBS.
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
The MBS would’ve been fine but for the rampant origination fraud.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
They are like the Scotch the Doc made for ensign Pulver in the film Mr. Roberts. As long as it looks OK everything is fine. 😉
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Thus far, it’s all talk. Even if they do get rid of $60B in Treasuries every month, it would take them 7 years to get back to where they were in 2008. Call me a Doubting Thomas.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
4 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
And anyone who thinks the runoff is going to last anything more than 12-18 months before the Fed is forced to reverse course like they did in late 2019 is crazy! For that to happen, the Fed will have to have a perfect touchdown / landing of the economy.
Just like our national debt is now into an ever-spiraling higher climb, we can make the same argument for the Fed’s balance sheet. It will go down, of course, then we’ll hit a rough patch sometime in the next two years or so, and the Fed will have to ramp up QE again.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
Agree 100% . At low interest rates, I suspect diminishing returns set in–lots of marginal investments, high risk loans misspriced, wasted resources etc. Under-utilization of capital compounds the diminishing returns problem and reduces productivity. Are we looking at decades of slow growth because of the Fed? Japan is the prime example, with the EU a close second.
At higher interest rates, required yields must be higher, so more ‘value’ must be extracted to support borrowed funds and equity.
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
I’ve been consistently saying that the Fed is in a tight spot. They never sterilized the first QE before reupping on a much bigger scale in 2020-22. They managed to turn the patient into a junkie, and withdrawal is going to be quite difficult.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
4 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
The 2019 repo spike was due to disintermediation. Disintermediation is a term that should only be applied to the nonbanks since 1933. The IOR was higher than 3mo T-Bills. I.e., the banks were thus able to outbid the nonbanks for collateral.

Bankrupt-u-Bernanke destroyed nonbank lending (where the
nonbanks/shadow banks shrank by $6.2 trillion, while the DFIs were unaffected,
expanding by $3.6 trillion). The 1966 Savings and Loan Credit Crunch (when the
term “credit crunch” was coined) is prima facie evidence. He mistakenly
thought that the GFC was a capital crunch (which destroyed $1 trillion in
demand deposits).

8dots
8dots
4 years ago
The Fed sucked liquidity from the market, providing good collateral to the o/n market. RRP is down from $2.33T to $2.14T.
The Fed net assets : Total Asset – RRP = $6.34T.
blacklisted
blacklisted
4 years ago
I’m confused – do you want to force more foreign countries into bankruptcy and accelerate the capital flows into dollar-based assets?
With the US dollar nearing a
20-year high, the euro at a 20-year low, and emerging market currencies
spiraling into hyperinflation, capital continues to flee the periphery to the
US-dollar core. Central Banks are trapped. They can’t raise rates because it
explodes interest expense, kills businesses, increases currency cost for all the countries that sold dollar-based debt, and it doesn’t thwart inflation
because this inflation is driven by govt-caused shortages. Also, the govt is
the biggest borrower. Will they stop borrowing because the Fed raises rates? Of
course not, but it will increase their interest expense.

On the flip side, if the Fed
lowers rates, all of the funds that must invest in govt bonds, like Social
Security, pensions, and insurance companies will spiral faster into insolvency.

The solution is downsizing and
privatizing as much of govt as possible, imposing short term-limits, and
unleashing freedom to increase supply and entrepreneurs. We all know that
none of this will occur proactively, which means we must prepare to endure the
next 10 years, as govt’s pull out all stops to hold on to power, while their
ability to borrow to keep the natives subdued is vanishing with defaults and
increased borrowing risk. Expect the endless stream of “divide and conquer” distractions to cascade into a non-conventional war, which will of course will necessitate a draft and rationing.

Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  blacklisted
it is quite the conundrum, isn’t it? Out with a big bang, a whimper, or business as usual (which is actually possible given the irrational masses)… who knows? Unlike 2007-8, this time is loaded with uncertainty.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
4 years ago
Reply to  blacklisted
The FED has been running the economic engine in reverse for a long time, since c. 1965. The way to get a grip on inflation is to impose reserve requirements across the board (like Volcker did against NOW accounts in April 1981). Then, at the same time drive the banks out of the savings business (which doesn’t reduce the size of the payment’s system). The 1966 Interest Rate Adjustment Act is the paradigm. But that’s against the interests of the banksters, the ABA. Eventually the banks will have to be nationalized.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
Perhaps the banks will take the US private before they can be nationalized.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
QT will be glacially slow – if it happens at all. The Fed will instead keep raising interest rates. QE boosts asset prices and benefits the rich and so, QT will be kept as small as possible. Interest rates hurt mainly the poor. So, the Fed will use that as a weapon to beat the working class, which is showing signs of mobilization for the first time in 40+ years.
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
I did live in Missouri for 2 years, and on QT I am absoutely, positively from the “Show Me State.”
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Obviously a big reason it’s so slow is that a lot of the run off is simply homeowners / business owners etc paying down their mortgage every month. Since only a small part is principal in the beginning it takes a while for things to ramp up. It’s going to be a years long (perhaps decades) process to unwind everything.
That’s why there was the danger of doing so much QE so fast because QT takes a very long time.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
No one is pre-paying right now, so, what you stated is probably true. But doesn’t the FED hold a lot of different maturities? Wouldn’t some of them be from mortgages issued 15 or 20 years ago?
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
It probably does. But remember MBS’s have been for sale for a long time now and ones that are 10+ years old may in fact be owned by actual investors rather than the FED.
Some pre-paying happens naturally when a home owner sells before the mortgage finishes. This in fact probably happens to well over half the mortgages so even though they were taken out as 20 or 30 year mortgages if you move in 5 years, the mortgage gets paid off and removed from the MBS. Of course your new mortgage (assuming you have one) get rolled into a newly issued MBS and once again in the early years there is very little principal payment.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
4 years ago
see: June 03, 2022 “Understanding Bank Deposit Growth during the COVID-19 Pandemic”
“the deposits may leave the banking system if the holder of the deposits exchanges them”… “in the Federal Reserve’s Overnight Reverse Repurchase (ON RRP) facility.”
The problem is that the injection of new money had no precedent. It was the largest increase in the money supply ever.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
4 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
“No precedent” Totally agree, but don’t worry, it won’t be the last precent setting intrusion by the Fed.
They are owned by MMT-based thinkers these days.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
4 years ago
Just imagine the lack of need of QT and QE if we didn’t have the FED taking their commission out of every crumb.
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
The goal to rein in the housing market is definitely seeing progress.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
It will be months before Zillow says my house drops in price. We’ll see.
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
Look at the drops in asking prices of people currently trying to sell. Most houses in my area have them, many have multiple drops. Zestimates won’t reflect this for at least 3 months. Most of what I see actually selling goes for at or less than the z estimate.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.