Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Low Mississippi River Levels and 2000 Barge Logjam Send Barge Prices Soaring

Race Against Winter

The northern sections of the Mississippi River are shutting for winter. Meanwhile low water levels has created a 100-ship backup downstream.

Bloomberg reports Grain Shippers Slowed by Mississippi River Drought Also Race Against Winter

While it’s normal that barges stop moving each winter when the river freezes, the low water levels have left more than 2,000 barges downriver waiting to pass sections near Stack Island, Mississippi, and Memphis.

“There’s always this race to get something unloaded in the northern areas — Iowa, Wisconsin, Minnesota — and have it back before the drawbridge closes behind you due to cold weather and ice accumulation,” said Mike Steenhoek, executive director of the Soy Transportation Coalition. “That becomes all the more tricky when the river isn’t functioning as efficiently as normal.” 

Shippers need the barges to get up north to drop off fertilizer and pick up one last load of corn or soybeans before heading south for winter. If they can’t, thousands of bushels will be stranded unless space can be found on more-expensive trains to the Pacific Northwest or the Gulf Coast, or until spring.

It doesn’t help that the corn and soybean harvests are lagging behind last year’s pace. Corn is just 20% harvested as of Oct. 2, and soybeans 22%.

There are two results if barges are slower to get upriver, according to Peter Meyer, Platts head of Grain and Oilseed Analytics. “The first is that barge freight goes way up, as we are seeing, it’s just skyrocketing. The second one is that supplies get backed up upriver and this could not happen at a worse time now that we are in the middle of harvest.”

Mississippi Barge Snag Forces Goods Onto Pricey Rail, Truck

Yahoo!News reports Mississippi Barge Snag Forces Goods Onto Pricey Rail, Truck

Shippers are scrambling for other ways to move goods after low water levels on the Mississippi River have forced barge companies to stop taking orders for immediate delivery of everything from metals to agricultural products to fertilizers.

Now, companies are paying a premium to move steel, aluminum and other goods by rail and truck, despite cost that are up to five times more than what they’d normally pay by barge. Shipments of coal and petroleum also have been rerouted, but these other modes of transportation aren’t an effective solution.

“The beauty of our navigable rivers is that they are capable of transporting heavy freight, like soybeans and grain, long distances in an economical manner” Mike Steenhoek, executive director of the Soy Transportation Coalition, said in an email. “One 15 barge tow has the same freight capacity as 940 semi-trucks. However, this efficiency is predicated on normal water conditions, which, unfortunately, do not currently exist.”

Barge Traffic Standstill 

gCaptain reports Mississippi River Barge Backlog Swells as Water Levels Shrink

Commercial barge traffic on southern stretches of the Mississippi River was at a standstill on Tuesday as low water levels halted shipments of grain, fertilizer and other commodities on the critical waterway,shipping sources said.

The supply chain snarl comes just as harvesting of corn and soybeans, the largest U.S. cash crops, is ramping up and as tight global supplies and strong demand for food and fuel have sent inflation soaring.

Around 100 tow boats hauling some 1,600 barges were lined up for miles waiting to pass through one trouble spot near Lake Providence, Louisiana, that has been largely closed since late last week, shipping sources said.

Shippers have been loading less cargo per barge so vessels sit higher on the water, and towing companies have reduced the number of barges per tow by nearly 40% as the low water conditions narrowed the navigable channel.

Many U.S. Gulf exporters have pulled offers for corn and soybeans loaded in October and November as it is unclear if they can source enough grain, threatening already sluggish export sales.

“We can’t commit to new sales right now,” one exporter said.

Force Majeure Due to Low Water on Mississippi

Finally, please note Ingram Barge Declares Force Majeure Due to Low Water on Mississippi

Ingram Barge Company, one of the country’s largest barge shippers, said Thursday it was “providing formal notice of a force majeure event” as low water on the Mississippi River disrupted its operations on the major shipping waterway.

The declaration would affect the portion of Ingram’s operating network at locations downriver from Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Ingram Barge Chief Executive John Roberts said in an emailed statement.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com

Please Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish 

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

66 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Christoball
Christoball
3 years ago
This could be one of the simple Ecclesiastes 3 kind of moments,
To everything there is a season,
A time for every purpose under heaven:………..
billybobjr
billybobjr
3 years ago
Just a article where scientist caution about the exaggeration of climate change
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
3 years ago
“If we only paid more taxes, this wouldn’t be happening.”
Jmurr
Jmurr
3 years ago
When I was in college, I interned with a grain company in Lake Providence, La. Back then there was a similar issue with low river levels so please don’t say it is climate change.
shamrock
shamrock
3 years ago
On the plus side, the freezing of the river will be shortened by weeks, months, or forever.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
This is only typical as we enter the Hubrisoscene era of the Cretinaceous Period. (thanks to Tom O Mason)
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
And the price will come down when it rains which happens around this time of year. Aside from that solution is to dredge more and deeper. To pay for it I propose we put a tax on California pig inspector expenses when they work outside of their state.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
Beyond Oak Island. The Atocha. Sank in a hurricane on 9/06/1622. A second hurricane on 10/05/1622, scattered the wreckage along a 9 mile path. Two hurricanes in the same place a month apart, in 1622. No global warming then.
“The Little Ice Age was a period of
wide-spread cooling from around 1300 to around 1850 CE when average
global temperatures dropped by as much as 2°C (3.6°F), particularly in
Europe and North America. Cooling happened in phases, with an initial
drop around 1300 and an even colder climate starting around 1560 and
lasting to 1850.”
Yooper
Yooper
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
Are we not technically still in the end (warming) stage of the last ice age now – an interglacial period in the Pleistocene Epoch? “We are currently in a warmer interglacial period, called the Holocene Epoch, which
began about 15,000 years ago. If the glaciation cycles continue, the peak glaciation of the next ice age
is expected to occur in about 85,000 years.” http://www.atmo.arizona.edu/students/courselinks/fall16/atmo336s2/lectures/sec5/pleistocene.html
My lawnmower and weekend fire pit probably had little to do with warming
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  Yooper
It says here that interglacials last 10000 years. And that the current period should have ended around 1500 years ago. Or according to your post, it should have ended 5000 years ago.And temperatures were already beginning a slow decline till recently.
So instead of a normal 10000 year interglacial, man might make this a 150,000 year interglacial.
Interesting. We are preventing the next 90,000 year glacial period from starting.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
That is why this is called the Hubrisoscene.
Some of us simply believe that we are very very important.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
I am important to me, myself and I.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
I remember being told that three is a crowd.
You have convinced me that it’s true.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Still think it’ll be cheaper to let climate change happen?
billybobjr
billybobjr
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Doesn’t matter it is going to happen whether you like it or not . Its been happening for many millions of years.
Yep, droughts ,floods ,hurricanes, Ice ages have been happening for a long time and humans weren’t even here.
The planet goes thru cycles and we can’t do a damn thing to change it . Yet we build and put millions
of people in these areas and scream climate change when it happens what a silly species . Politicians
sell it to people they are the reason and some people buy it hook line and sinker .
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  billybobjr
Don’t forget earthquake, tsunami, volcano, mudflow and wildfire zones.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
You can’t prevent climate change from happening.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
Correct. Because we are going to continue to pump CO2 and other greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere. It is inevitable that we will keep warming up the planet and cause more climate catastrophes.
And you and I can’t do anything about it. But we can profit from it.
Are you heavily invested in oil and gas stocks like I am?
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
“Correct. Because we are going to continue to pump CO2 and other
greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere. It is inevitable that we will
keep warming up the planet and cause more climate catastrophes.”
Climate change is going to happen whether we do that or not. Regardless the climate, there are catastrophes. There is no Goldilocks climate.
The Sahara has been a desert for some time.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
I don’t understand why you feel the need to deny the obvious. But then, it doesn’t really matter, does it?
We both agree that global warming and climate change is happening, and its only going to get worse.
The question becomes; what to do about it personally.
The way I see it; almost every important decision maker in the world today is aware of AGW, and is taking it into account in decision making: government, military, agriculture, corporate, etc etc. And I pay attention to what they say and do in order to profit from it.
Because of what these decision makers are doing, we are in a decades long energy transition, where we try to wean our way off fossil fuels and towards renewables. Which is why energy companies all over the world have reduced their capex spending for almost a decade now. However, we are not building enough renewables to meet our ever increasing energy needs. So we are entering a period of shortages of fossil fuels.
That’s why I have loaded up on oil and gas stocks.
How about you?
billybobjr
billybobjr
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Same old , same old crap coming from you can you link to some CNBC article or something that backs your view and settles the
debate as far as you are concerned please . Here is one where 1200 scientist say there IS NO CLIMATE EMERGENCY . and they have
credentials unlike you smoke this in your pipe papa .
billybobjr
billybobjr
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
CO2 is part of the makeup of the earths atmosphere plants need it to live been way higher than it is right now before we were
even part of the equation try again .
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  billybobjr
Lol! Nice ritin’ there billybob. Yessiree bob. CO2 is part of the atmosphere and plants need it. I betcha you learned that in science class, right? Durn good for you.
And, of course, you also know that CO2 has been even higher before. And how do you know that? Could it be that info came from scientists as well? Of course it did.
And now the same scientists that you learned all that from are telling you that man made CO2 emissions are warming the planet. But suddenly, you disagree with the science and scientists. Now you know more than them because you have personally spent billions on studies to prove that they are wrong. Or maybe you just listened to some non-science types who actually know SFA about science.
And of course, you are also aware that when CO2 levels were much higher in the past, that all the ice on the planet had melted, the oceans were 500 feet higher, and half of the current visible land was under water. And that most of the species that live on the planet today (including man) could not survive the conditions that existed on the planet back then when CO2 and temperatures were much higher.
Try again.
In fact. Don’t even bother trying.
I am going to hit the ignore button on you right now so I never have to see another one of your posts again.
Bye bye billybob.
billybobjr
billybobjr
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Thanks no need to try and waste my time with a bumbling fool like you but you already said you ignored everyone that didn’t
agree that the science is settled but thousands of scientist have said its not ,so believe the ones you want . Go make some more
money selling and buying energy stocks , shorts ect. Rest assured I will respond to your ridiculous posts whether you ignore
me or not fools need to be confronted and challenged when spreading garbage like you do ,
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Non sequitur. And even if this is caused by climate change, it would be far cheaper to have low water levels on the Mississippi than eliminate burning fossil fuels.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Low water on the Mississippi is just one of many unpredicted things that will happen… in addition the the predicted ones we see happening.
Your Tucker Carlson parochialism prevents any kind of big picture thinking.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Connect the dots for me. How did higher greenhouse gasses cause the Mississippi river levels to drop? And why doesn’t this happen frequently if this is caused by the climate?
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Added more energy to the atmosphere, changing the way it moves around, which in turn made the rain and snow that fed the river before fall somewhere else.
Do you have an alternate explanation? Thirsty gnomes from the center of the earth came up and drank that water? A Soros hoax that involved secretly gluing false bottoms on to barges and falsifying the readings of depth measurement equipment? Gods punishment for not burning transexuals at the stake?
I expect the typical response that’s a dressed up version of ‘nu-uh and what about Nancy Pelosi’, but I’m open to being surprised.
Why do you think the Mississippi (and the Rhine) ar so low?
billybobjr
billybobjr
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Uh no the Mississippi river has been low many many times before . Way before man was ever here and
it wasn’t noticed because there wasn’t any barges running on it . It is simply part of the short and long cycles.
C02 has been way higher than it is now many times and sea levels way higher than they are right now but men
were not here . Our ability to measure the temp and ice accurately really just in recent times with satellites
and they may even manipulate that .
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  billybobjr
If no men were there, who recorded the depth? Those thirsty gnomes?
billybobjr
billybobjr
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Here we go . River has periods floods and droughts only people like you try and manipulate it into sum kind of modern day doomsday scenario.
This a just a snippet of time considering earth history so yes it has probably been lower hundreds of times . Also we dredge it so yes we do
manipulate that part of it
How low is the Mississippi? The river gauge at St. Louis has an observed value of -0.74 feet, 17th lowest on record (-6.10 feet on 01/16/1940 is record low). Memphis, Tennessee’s river gauge has an observed value of -8.73 feet, 4th lowest on record (-10.70 feet on 02/10/1937 is record low).
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Can you explain how the rain and snow fell somewhere else? Where did it fall and why?
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
“Now, companies are paying a premium to move steel, aluminum and other
goods by rail and truck, despite cost that are up to five times more
than what they’d normally pay by barge.”
That can’t be making the FED happy.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
The most immediate concern is agriculture.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
We’ll suddenly get concerned when massive crop failures happen, and not one moment before. We shall cry out to the heavens “who could have foreseen this?” And a voice with a slight lisp will whisper “this is super cereal”
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
La Nina is in it’s third year.
In 1977, when i moved to California, we were having a serious drought. Lorne Greene was in ads, urging residents to conserve water. No one was talking about Global Warming then.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
And what did lake mead and the Colorado river look like in 1977? We’re there wildfires in Denver at Christmas time? We’re there wildfires in London?
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
Not true. 1977 was an important year in the discussion of global warming.
In 1977 Exxon scientists formally presented the case for global warming to Exxon executives.
In 1977 scientists presented similar info in a memo to President Carter.
And of course, scientists have been discussing global warming since the 1800s.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
Regardless of history, political or scientific beliefs, we are experiencing drought all over the world, midwestern aquifers have been drying up for decades.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Sad and true, whenever science displays the need to intervene, lobbyists fight to prevent cost increases involved.
We are in dire need of water infrastructure in the mid west, aquifers are depleting.
I’m in grains, while I know Ukraine has a lot to do with recent surges, long term it’s a smart move.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
Meaning you invest in grains? How do you trade commodities? I am still a novice investor, relatively speaking. And I want to learn more.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
There are a handful of ETF’s, though not as efficient.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
Which do you do? Are you a commodities trader as an occupation? Do simply trade a personal commodities account? Or ETFs?
Yooper
Yooper
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
Maybe it’s a blessing… The Ogallala Aquifer can’t last much longer, so a warmer north would be an interesting development for crops.
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
California doesn’t have a sovereign interest in regulating farm animals in other states. If its regulations are allowed to stand, why couldn’t it also prohibit the sale of goods from companies that don’t comply with its CO2 emissions caps? Or why couldn’t Texas ban the sale of meat by slaughterhouses that employ undocumented workers?
California’s law will invite more extraterritorial regulation by other states and open up interstate regulatory battles that will disrupt commerce and further polarize politics.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Nah. Texas should ban the sale of lettuce grown with stolen water.
Besides, extraterritorial regulation will be great for unemployed lawyers and politicians.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
California does ban products that don’t comply with it’s regulations, everything from automotive to household fixtures.
I used to live in Massachusetts, they also have high regs and in many cases, where a consumer purchases an item outside the state, they can force that consumer to repurchase a state approved item.
It happened to a family member, he purchased a gas boiler online and had to rip it out and replace it even though it’s approved in most states, that state can also impose fines to any brick and mortar selling unapproved items.
I personally object for the fact that this promotes conflicts of interests, a manufacturer can fund targeted campaigns to attain “approval”.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
A friend had a similar problem in Illinois where votes for Republicans had to be ripped out and replaced with votes for Democrats.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Is he currently doing time for Jan 6th? … Do they allow him to wear that bull horn hat thingy in prison? … Did the prison warden finally comply to make him food like his mom makes it?
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Droughts, floods, wildfires, etc. These extreme weather events are costing us a lot economically and in extra inflation.
Whether you want to call it climate change or not doesn’t matter to me. The important thing is the impact.
I have made this request to Mish before. How about a series of stories about the economic cost of recent climate change or extreme weather events?
Not being able to use barges till the river rises means we will need to use more energy intensive methods of transporting goods, like trains and trucks. So energy consumption and costs go up. And the barges transport bulk items like coal and grains, which adds pressure to those prices as well.
This same situation (low river levels) happened in both China and Europe this year as well, with similar effects.
Bottom line: more energy demand, less energy supply, and higher inflation.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Could we even survive in a world where Karen McMommy can’t drive her Very Exceptional McChildren 30 miles each way to and from their exclusive, private McSchool each morning in their gigantic Ford Expenditure?
Roy
Roy
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
You post a number of comments implying that AGW (now known as Climate Change, due to lack of evidence of actual warming) is at the root of these types of problems. Please explain how global warming causes a lack of rainfall. The data do not support the increased extreme weather claims. Lack of water depth in the Mississippi is problematic for transport of heavy loads is the theme of this article. Mish doesn’t cite any specific causes. Is it possible that environmental regulations have prevented dredging operations and the water that is flowing is spread out over a wider area now? I certainly don’t have all the answers. You seem to have one answer that applies to everything, no matter how contradictory.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  Roy

I know you asked Zardoz, but I looked it up. Couldn’t copy the link though. So here is the average man’s interpretation:

Global warming means the atmosphere is getting warmer.
Warmer air causes more evaporation from the soil.
The warmer air can also “hold” onto more water vapor.
So in the hot US southwest we are getting more soil evaporation than normal (which makes the drought even worse).
The moisture laden air rises, moves east, cools, and dumps even more rain than it used to, because there is more water in the atmosphere now. Resulting in more floods.
Its probably more complicated than that, but that’s the best I can do.
And it sure looks to be what is happening.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  Roy
It doesn’t. It moves the rainfall to other places. You may have seen on the news that Pakistan suddenly became a lake a few weeks back.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
You do realize that rainfall amounts can vary a lot in a given location from year to year. There are records of prolonged droughts and floods going back as far as there are written records. Thousands of years.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
We will have to because you are not going to get people to voluntarily cut their energy consumption. And that especially goes for the poorest throughout the world who only use 1/1000 of what the typical American does.
So, in spite of any new efficiencies that we develop, we will continue to need more energy every single year going forward. Which is going to come from both renewables and fossil fuels for the rest of this decade. Perhaps by the next decade it will all come from renewables, and I am already looking into which companies might thrive in that environment.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
The elitists are not cutting their energy consumption. They think they are special and are thus exempt from what they want to impose on the rest of us.
What is really funny is that i probably use less electricity than the local climate alarmists, who want to end fossil fuel production. Virtue signalling is cheap. Ed Begley, on Young Sheldon, is probably one of the few actors who actually lives as he preaches.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ

Can’t you read?

I repeat:

We will have to because you are not going to get people to voluntarily cut their energy consumption. And that especially goes for the poorest throughout the world who only use 1/1000 of what the typical American does.
There are almost 8 billion consumers of energy in the world. And very few of them want to voluntarily cut their energy use.
Face it. We need more energy every year.
Oh. And you get a gold star and a pat on the back for being a greenie. Good for you for being one of the exceptional few who lead by example and reducing your energy consumption.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
“Can’t you read?”
Yes i can. Which is why i said what i said. The elites aren’t going to play by the rules.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ

This conversation is going nowhere. Its like talking to the wall and expecting an intelligent response.Bye Ron.

KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Lowest level in a decade. So, why was it lower a decade ago if CO2 levels have gone up since then?
And a major contributor to low water levels in China is because they dammed up every river.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn

This is the last time I warn you to stop putting words in my mouth you FB. Next time I IGNORE you so I never have to see you try that again.I did not say lowest level in a decade.FB

KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
I never claimed you said that. I wrote it because it’s what’s currently happening. The water level is the lowest in a decade.
billybobjr
billybobjr
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Lower back in the decades before record lows 30s and 40s. Ignore these bumbling fools . Probably didn’t measure the river
till 1900 or so. That means 122 years that they measured it , this is a second of history in earth time probably been lower many hundreds of times over the millions of years it has been a river
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn

If they have dams, they should have more water available, not less. You see, water doesn’t cease to exist when it touches a dam. Rather, it piles up . Science!

KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
The dams have to maintain a certain water level to operate properly, so a lot of water that would otherwise flow down stream raising river levels gets dammed up instead.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.