Michael Saylor’s hoarding strategy is a leveraged valuation metric that ignores market realities.
Broken Bitcoin Math
The Wall Street Journal reports Michael Saylor’s Strategy Is Trapped by Its Own Broken Bitcoin Math
Saylor has trained investors to believe Strategy’s model for acquiring bitcoins would work so long as the market valued the company at a premium to the value of its bitcoin holdings. Effectively, the company’s overvalued stock became a currency to buy bitcoin.
Strategy even created a bespoke metric called mNAV to track the premium. It did so while building a bitcoin stash worth more than $50 billion financed with sales of equity and debt securities.
The problem that came to a head recently is the metric began showing the market was valuing Strategy at a discount to the value of its bitcoins. The roll-up strategy was starting to come undone, and roll-ups typically don’t work well in reverse.
Adding to the strain: The metric is artificially inflated because it ignores sharp declines in the value of some of the company’s securities. Although the metric is essentially a made-up measure, it matters for Strategy investors and the crypto market.
By Strategy’s own logic, if the metric is at a discount instead of a premium, the company should be selling some bitcoin to buy back its own securities. Investors are watching warily for any sign that Strategy might start doing so in large numbers.
The stakes are high. Strategy’s holdings represent 4% of the total bitcoins that will ever exist. Selling some could drag bitcoin’s already battered price down further, along with Strategy’s stock. A small sale by Strategy in May had that effect, even though it sold just 32 bitcoins for $2.5 million. On Monday before the market opened, Strategy disclosed it sold 3,588 bitcoins last week for $216 million. That is still a tiny fraction of the bitcoin it owns.
That is why Strategy investors watch mNAV. So what is it?
Strategy says mNAV shows its enterprise value as a multiple of its bitcoin holdings, and it used to regularly show a steep premium to its bitcoin. In its heyday, this allowed Strategy to regularly sell stock to buy more bitcoin. It acted like a traditional roll-up company using inflated shares as currency to fund an acquisition spree.
For now, that game is over. Strategy’s stock is down 75% over the past year. And the mNAV has dropped precipitously, falling below 1 last month.
That set the stage for Strategy’s announcement on June 29 that it would abandon its hold-on-for-dear-life philosophy. It said its board had authorized selling up to $1.25 billion of its bitcoin to buy back shares and cover interest payments and preferred-stock dividends.
But Strategy’s predicament is worse than it appears. The mNAV metric has a flaw that has grown acute as the prices of Strategy’s bonds and preferred shares have tanked along with its stock.
To calculate enterprise value, Strategy adds the market value of its common stock to the principal amount of its debt and the par value of its preferred stock, then subtracts cash. Normally, that formula works fine, if the debt and preferred shares are trading at or near par.
The problem now is that mNAV overstates Strategy’s enterprise value—the ratio’s numerator—by using the face value of its debt and preferred stock rather than their market value. That makes the metric artificially high. It also defeats the purpose of showing the extent to which the market is valuing Strategy at a premium or discount.
On June 26, when Strategy said the mNAV was just under 0.99, it would have been 0.89 using the market value for its debt and preferred stock.
For enterprise value, Strategy included $6.75 billion of debt and $15.46 billion of preferred stock. Those were par values, not market values. At the time, Strategy’s debt was trading at a 7% discount, and its various series of preferred shares, combined, were trading for a 28% discount.
Since then, mNAV has rebounded along with Strategy’s share price. As of 4 p.m. Thursday, Strategy’s website showed mNAV as 1.09. But it would have been 1.04 using market values for its debt and preferred stock, only a slight premium.
To stanch the bleeding, Strategy on June 29 raised the dividend on its biggest preferred series, called STRC or “Stretch,” to 12%. It hoped to lure buyers and lift the price closer to par value.
The move revealed that Strategy cares deeply about its preferred shares’ market prices, despite not using them in the mNAV metric that it spotlights for investors.
Last week, the company estimated its $2.55 billion cash buffer would buy it about a 17-month cushion to pay interest and preferred dividends without selling its crypto. But if the market starts valuing Strategy at a discount again, and it sticks, Strategy faces the prospect of running out of cash and having no choice but to tap its bitcoin stash in much greater numbers.
Strategy might have bought itself some time. There’s no telling how much it has left.
Dwindling Premium and Not Marked to Market

Bitcoin Bottom Calling
In the past few weeks numerous pundits on X have announced Bitcoin’s bottom.
The calls have been wrong but I am willing to use a fat crayon on my charts. By that metric, Bitcoin is hovering right at support that has not yet broken.

I am willing, for now to use a fat crayon on the first and last box calling it possible.
But technically, it looks like a poor setup. The blast from 60K to 82K looked promising but the immediate collapse looks draining.
Bitcoin Weekly Chart

Bitcoin bounced feebly off strong support about six times.
This is not a good sign. The more times support or resistance is tested, the more likely it will fail.
However, there is a lot of support at 50,000 and 40,000. Beneath that, there is support 35,000 and strong double-bottom support at 25,000.
Saylor Sells More Bitcoin

What Can Go Wrong?
For Saylor, plenty, but he denies it.
Today, he sold more bitcoin to fund dividends.
Liquidation
Saylor a Threat to Bitcoin
I agree with that view. Potential forced selling of Bitcoin by Saylor dampens rebound potential.
A Bit of Reality
Strategy is a leveraged capital markets wrapper built on top of Bitcoin. Once you add preferred stock, convertibles, buybacks, reserves, dividend targets, and a BTC monetization plan, you are no longer just holding pristine collateral. You are running a dollar liability machine backed by a volatile, non cash flowing asset.
That becomes a major problem in a global recession because liquidity does not automatically flow to the asset with the best long term narrative. It flows first to what settles obligations like dollars, T bills, bank reserves, money market funds, high quality collateral, and sometimes gold. That is why M2 can rise while Bitcoin falls. New liquidity can be defensive, trapped in the banking system, or parked in collateral instead of chasing crypto risk. Strategy needs Bitcoin to hold up, MSTR to keep a premium, preferred buyers to keep funding it, and capital markets to stay open. If those break together, STRC trades lower, required yields rise, dividends get lifted, cash burn accelerates, reserves shrink, Bitcoin sales become more likely, and the never sell narrative breaks. Selling Bitcoin for business continuity does not prove Bitcoin is money. It proves dollar liabilities still rule the structure.
Another Bottom Call
I suspect wishful thinking.
Bitcoin Weak Despite This
Saylor may indeed mark the bottom, but I suspect that will be when MSTR blows up entirely. But who knows?



Seems to me that for both gold and bitcoin a lot of money and energy is spent mining the product. At the end of the day the miner has gold he can see and hold if the mine produced product, while the bitcoin miner has a ledger entry. For me holding a bitcoin ledger or a gold certificate have a lot in common; both can be confiscated or return to their intrinsic value.
Trump’s logic is childishly flawed. “I’ve become a big crypto guy only for one reason: if we don’t have it China is going to have it,” he said. To me that is like a child saying I am going to hold all the toys so the other kids can’t have any. He could say the same for anything with or without value.
Gold has uses in manufacturing and jewelry.
Whenever the subject of Bitcoin comes up, I am reminded of “Extraordinary Popular Delusions & the Madness of Crowds”.
Trying to understand MSTR’s system here. So maybe folks think bitcoin is going up. MSTR is buying a lot, creating a strong market, helping to push the price up. So MSTRs stock price might represent the higher, future price of bitcoin. It can sell its premium priced stock to buy more bitcoin at a lower premium and pocket the difference or use it to make debt payments.
But if confidence in the future price begins to deteriorate, MSTRs stock price begins to deteriorate as well as the value of its debt. Everything can possibly go in reverse, pushing down the price of bitcoin and MSTRs stock along with its ability to service its debt, forcing it to sell everything at a discount. A nasty doom loop. Hopefully Saylor is pocketing a few billions before the shtf.
Billionaire investor Jeremy Grantham says bitcoin will ‘dwindle away with a whimper’
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/26/billionaire-investor-jeremy-grantham-says-bitcoin-will-dwindle-away-with-a-whimper.html
The crypto space is has some self reassuring psycho linguistics such as using the term crypto winter in order to assume that dips will be followed by a rise into spring. But markets are not like the rotation of the planets seasons. Other assumptions are rarity of a coin creates value. Rarity does not always create value. Plenty of things are rare and not valued. Marketing or utility creates value and demand. But marketing may fail to appear or be rejected if it does appear. As for utility. Not much has been put into practice as retail money. Then there is the trust-less is better assumption. There actually are individuals who make changes to the systems so is it really trust-less? Waiting and monitoring for a position to go back up again in price when its mechanisms may be fiddled with by insider humans may not actually be trust-less but rather it takes effort to monitor the individuals, Effort of monitoring is a worry factor and is not bullish.
Unlike Gold, Bitcoin has no intrinsic value. Due to high processing fee, it will never be used in actual financial transactions. It has been used by scammers for extortion, bribery & getting around sanctions. MSTR seup is a ponzi scheme and now it is unravelling. I never understood why any investor will buy Bitcoin stock as opposed to the coin itself. RIP, MSTR!
processing fees now mostly small.
It won’t be used as money because no one holds it as money. It is held as a speculative asset, not money.
This isn’t the same thing, but kind of reminds me of recent algorithmic stablecoins, where if certain assumptions held, the whole thing spun our money for the select holders, but then the assumptions could and did break down, and watch out below!
Why would an investor play around with this exotic, “trust my judgment” structure, when one could hold, say, IBIT, a straight-up BTC ETF with more direct claims to the underlying assets, and continuous marking-to-market? There may be answers I don’t see.
I suppose one answer might be, hoping there are bigger fools in the vicinity. But those seeking to cash in on the bigger fool theory might discover they are the bigger fools, the bag-holders.
And MSTR making various structures like exotic preferreds and so on, might find itself in a sort of bank run: a spiral down.
Various issuers can play with the wrappers on things, but find themselves recapitulating some pretty old finance lessons.
As Warren Buffet said: When the tide goes out you can see who was swimming naked.
I wonder how much cash Saylor is pulling out of this doomed venture before it collapses?
Everyone not selling bitcoin is what is holding its value up.