Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Of the 1,300 Sanctioned Oil Ships, How Many Did the US Capture?

Even hulking tankers have many ways to hide.

Hunting the Shadow Fleet

The Wall Street Journal reports The U.S. Is Hunting the Shadow Fleet. This Is What It’s Up Against.

Before dawn on Dec. 10, U.S. forces captured the Guyana-flagged Skipper for allegedly transporting sanctioned oil from Venezuela and Iran for years.

Since then, the U.S. has seized nine more tankers it says are part of the shadow fleet, while the French have seized one and India three.

The phantom fleet of sanctioned vessels now numbers 1,300 ships, according to TankerTrackers.com, a ship-tracking website.

These are their last-known positions on or before Feb 10.

Layers of Western sanctions and a recent rash of ship seizures represent the toughest suite of measures brought to bear against the so-called shadow fleet of vessels smuggling illicit oil across the globe.

Action by the U.S. and its allies against the ghost network, which has bankrolled the Kremlin’s invasion of Ukraine and supplied discounted oil to China and India, has driven up the cost and risk for the fleet’s operators. The U.S. is now seizing tankers as far away as the Indian Ocean in its pursuit of shadow vessels.

But as the number of tankers carrying Russian, Iranian and Venezuelan oil has expanded over the past four years, the methods used to disguise their routes, identities and cargo have become more elaborate—making shutting down the network completely a gargantuan task.

Shadow fleet ships, usually old, sailing under false flags and sanctioned, accounted for 6% to 7% of the global crude oil flows in 2025, according to ship-data firm Kpler. Russia last year relied on the fleet to transport around 80% of its crude and oil products, analysts estimated.

There are around 300 million barrels of Russian and Iranian oil at sea, according to ship tracker Vortexa. Traders are struggling to find buyers—who have become hesitant as sanctions have piled up—particularly given the ample supply in global markets.

A quasi-blockade by the U.S. has largely shut off Venezuelan oil from China and Cuba—the major users of shadow tankers to transport the crude. The Trump administration’s threat of extra sanctions on India for buying Russian oil has seen New Delhi reduce its purchases of Moscow’s crude. India’s coast guard said it had seized three sanctioned tankers off its shores this month, the first time it is known to have intercepted shadow-fleet vessels.

Still, together, Russia and Iran are responsible for over 11% of the world’s oil production, meaning that expunging them from the global oil trade would be challenging. The sheer number of shadow tankers and the means they have to avoid detection are among the difficulties. Removing Russia and Iran from the market would also likely raise the price of crude and increase inflation—an especially sensitive topic in the U.S. ahead of midterm elections.

Staying in the Shadows

Ship-to-ship transfers, in which one ship empties—or partially empties—its crude oil into the tanks of another, often in the middle of the ocean, enable crews to conceal the origin of the cargo. The practice has doubled in frequency over the past year.

So-called dark-port calls, when crews turn off the ship’s Automatic Identification System, mean vessels can enter and exit a harbor without leaving a trace.

Some crews conjure ghost ships by falsifying the vessel’s AIS transmissions and creating fake names—so the real ship can conduct illicit operations elsewhere. 

Another popular method of deception is to adopt a false flag or flag of convenience. Smaller, non-Western nations often outsource their shipping registry to third parties with less-stringent checks. Some countries offer sweeteners to shipowners such as cheaper registration fees or lower taxes.

Percentage Captures

13 out of 1,300 is one percent. At what cost?

If Trump really wanted to do something about Russia is this the best way?

Q: Meanwhile, where is the gusher from Venezuela?
A: There is none and there won’t be.

Venezuelan Oil Faces Long Road to Lasting Recovery, Analysts Say

Bloomberg notes Venezuelan Oil Faces Long Road to Lasting Recovery, Analysts Say

  • Venezuela could raise production to 2.5 million barrels per day over the next decade, up from the current level of 0.8 million, according to analysts at JPMorgan Chase & Co.
  • The country’s oil production could potentially reach 1.3 million-1.4 million barrels a day within two years with a political transition, but the transition itself could trigger a short, sharp shock, with production temporarily falling.
  • Analysts say a regime change in Venezuela would immediately represent one of the largest upside risks to the global oil supply outlook for 2026–2027 and beyond, but there are big doubts about whether oil majors will want to invest in the country’s uncertain environment.

Global oil production is projected to average 108.6 million barrels per day (mb/d) in 2026, driven by rising non-OPEC supply.

It may take a decade for Venezuela to add 1.7 mb/d to that 108.6. Halleluiah?

Related Posts

January 6, 2026: How Long Will it Take to Ramp Up Production of Venezuelan Oil?

Here are responses from AI, the WSJ, and an energy investor who posts on my blog.

January 6, 2026: What Are the Odds that the US Can Successfully Run Venezuela?

History is not kind to the idea. Nonetheless, let’s investigate a current take.

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

67 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Democritus
Democritus
4 months ago

How difficult would it be to defend against this?
If nothing else helps, sprinkle the tanker deck with gasoline and set it on fire.
Or fly a $1000 kamikaze drone into the helicopter hanging there with the door open and the first marine coming down.
Blowing a tanker to bits is an environmental disaster, not great for the USA status.

alx
alx
4 months ago
Reply to  Democritus

you dont defend. you attack
==

it will take single Russian rocket (=delivered in right place to bad people in middle east) to blow biggest oil tanker run by Total or BP/Shell, and whole 250-500.000 tons of oil will be gone!


Quatloo
Quatloo
4 months ago
Reply to  alx

If that Russian missile you mention hits a large ship in the Strait of Hormuz, it would significantly affect worldwide oil supply and price.

alx west
alx west
4 months ago

plan to cut Russians from trade routes reminds reverse of plan by Napoleon to blockage GB (= maritime superpower that time ) using land .

lets say it was stupid! and it failed,

alx west
alx west
4 months ago

it will take single Russian rocket (=delivered in right place to bad people in middle east) to blow biggest oil tanker run by Total or BP/Shell, and whole 250-500.000 tons of oil will be gone!

alx west
alx west
4 months ago

it is ALL THEATER,!

all those oil paths are 2way street. and what I MEANT is
western companies also use them, ship oil all around the world

so., it will take single Russian rocket (=delivered in right place to bad people in middle east) to blow biggest oil tanker run by Total or BP/Shell, and whole 250-500.00 tons of oil will be gone!

===
you figure out what next, hint : cost of running oil/ cost of insurance will go up to moon, and-or oil companies will be forced move oil around Africa, west coast.

see map!

alx

Frosty
Frosty
4 months ago

The Russian oil pipeline into China is functioning at full capacity and work on the huge new gas/oil pipelines is proceeding at a furious pace. This work is stimulating both economies and will stabilize Chinas petrochemical needs.

Russia and China are also engaged in massive solar generation projects. Trumps economic war on the world is backfiring in a major way. He is driving our former trading partners together to create their own trading blocks.

Trumps additional war on Iran is massive grandstanding and deflection. Russia has markedly increased the bombing of the Ukraine in advance of Trumps invasion of Iran.

Gold and silver markets are heading up in advance of what promises to be a messy and expensive war. A war which will be immensely unpopular at home.

I do not expect Fox and NBC to be able to rally Americans that can barely afford their rent to jump in line behind Trumps attempts to deflect Epstein revelations for much longer.

OT: Got mining stocks?

During the PM crunch last week I grabbed a new position in Hecla mining which is a US based silver producer. They managed to sell their production last quarter at $69.00 in a quarter while the average realized price for other miners was $53.00.

Since it is US based, its jurisdiction is safer. I’m not as confident in mining companies that have their mines in unstable areas. Canada, Mexico and the US based companies are my favorites.

GLTA

bmcc
bmcc
4 months ago
Reply to  Frosty

thanks again, for your analysis and sage advice………..

Frosty
Frosty
4 months ago
Reply to  bmcc

No problem on the observations. Not advise on the silver/gold information. I simply like to put it out there so I’m accountable to myself.

bmcc
bmcc
4 months ago
Reply to  Frosty

we are all big girls and boys on mish site. except for the 14 year old lassies and lads around the globe posing as boomer MAGAs for laughs…….

bmcc
bmcc
4 months ago
Reply to  Frosty

also concur it is madness. i just don’t understand amerikans desire to rule the 7 seas. my whole life. just so goddamn stupid. why not just trade and travel and mind our own business for a few decades. could that hurt? the young generation is our only hope. the geezers north of 45 seem warlike for past 4 generations.

Frosty
Frosty
4 months ago
Reply to  bmcc

No shit! Think how advanced our civilization and how much better our finances would be if we were not constantly screwing with nations that simply want to develop their societies and thrive in a peaceful world.

Stocks bitcoin and oil are down in early trading while gold is up.

What the hell is going to happen in the PM market when Chinese traders come back from the Lunar Holiday break on the 24th?

I’m thinking they have trading offices open to take advantage of these prices on the sly… The COMEX is down to 88.1 million ounces of registered Silver and first notice for the March contract is the 27th. Watch inventory levels closely to monitor deposits of silver or rolling in or out of the front month contract.

NY is going to be hammered by the storm. What fun it is to live in interesting times!

bmcc
bmcc
4 months ago
Reply to  Frosty

aye aye on the silver squeeze. all the many asian and chinese folks i know all will work and make money during lunar new year……. i’m back in NYS and city past few years. had some asian friends stay over this past weekend in fact. all working and going to schools……….the old geezers slow down a bit, is what they say, and i see with my eyes having lived in 2 chinatowns in my first 65 years.

Greenhawks
Greenhawks
4 months ago

Ministry of craziness but not funny real damaging to us

Webej
Webej
4 months ago

Russia and Iran are responsible for over 11% of the world’s oil production

People keep comparing oil flows to global production.
That is the wrong metric: Only oil exports matter, not land-locked domestic oil.

Shadow fleet ships, usually old, sailing under false flags and sanctioned, accounted for 6% to 7% of the global crude oil flows in 2025

Strikes me as low-ball. If 1300 ships is 6% of oil flows, it would imply 21,600 tankers. The world oil fleet is closer to 7000

Terms such as illicit and sanctioned make it seem as if there is some problem with legality. There isn’t. It just means they are not insured at London Lloyds. There are no applicable stipulations in international law or UNCLOS – the term is being used as if extra-territorial jurisdiction is a a thing. It isn’t; it’s better known as rogue State behavior.

Frosty
Frosty
4 months ago
Reply to  Webej

I’ve been sport fishing off of ARUBA (just off the coast of Venezuela) and observed huge numbers of tankers and cargo ships anchored offshore. Lots of fish congregate under them.

It’s like a graveyard in some areas and active in others. You can see it on the satellites if you want.

The old Valero refinery on Aruba has been mostly raised and recycled. A testament to how difficult and expensive it is to refine Venezuela’s shitty 14 API high sulfur crude.

bmcc
bmcc
4 months ago
Reply to  Frosty

sounds like fun. thanks for the observation. have you ever been to panama and seen the canal. it’s a site to behold. the jungle is exquisite. one can smell the cash registers roar as each ship waits on line to pass through.

Flavia
Flavia
4 months ago
Reply to  bmcc

Near the end of his life, we asked my uncle where he would like to travel, if he could.
He said, “I want to see the Panama Canal”.

john
john
4 months ago

Was this all part of a Plan? Israel wants America to attack Iran. But that would mean a stoppage of Oil from the Middle East to Israel. So America decides Venezuelan Oil will now be shipped to refineries in Israel until the coming War with Iran has been completed. Grabbing tankers hurts Russia financially but also China badly needs those oil shipments. But if this was the Plan that means Global Oil prices will probably soar. So how then will the Donald get anyone elected in the coming Election if gas is heading to $7.00 a gallon in America?

El Trumpedo
El Trumpedo
4 months ago
Reply to  john

You, sir, are a man of rare insight.

Steve L.
Steve L.
4 months ago
Reply to  john

Israel gets its oil from Azerbaijan; no one is stopping it. There is a glut of oil on the market; that is why oil is priced below $70 per barrel.

Greenhawks
Greenhawks
4 months ago
Reply to  john

$5 per gallon gas and diesel will collapse our economy

Greenhawks
Greenhawks
4 months ago
Reply to  john

We do not know how high gas and diesel will go but it will go much higher than where it is at! My guess $7 to $10 per gallon and maybe even higher!

Frosty
Frosty
4 months ago
Reply to  Greenhawks

The real backfire would be if Iran, Russia and China got together and simply obliterated Israel?

What would Trump do?

Fumble the football? Piss in his pants? Or, blow us all up?

Pretty high risk military confrontation going on out there kiddies!

I’m not looking forward to eating glow in the dark strontium tomatoes…

Flavia
Flavia
4 months ago
Reply to  Frosty

Trump may actually be relieved.

bmcc
bmcc
4 months ago
Reply to  Frosty

if that happened, us taxpayers will be paying for israel build out, like paris after the war…….

Jackula
Jackula
4 months ago

At $20 mil for an old oil tanker and the value of the cargo being roughly $100 mil I don’t think losing a few tankers is gonna make much of a difference. Losing the load probably hurts more but they probably get the oil on consignment with the countries of origin underwriting the risk.

EADOman
EADOman
4 months ago

So how is all of that drug smuggling from Venezuela going? I haven’t heard much since the US illegally kidnapped its president.

Steve
Steve
4 months ago

Don’t bend the knee and expect the boot of the Empire to come down firmly upon your neck. This is little more than piracy.

SteamBoi
SteamBoi
4 months ago
Reply to  Steve

And theft, kidnapping and an act of war.

Rogerroger
Rogerroger
4 months ago

They have telescopes that can detect /track small earth object in orbit. I would think a satellite or two and a good computer program could keep track of pretty much every ship on the world oceans. oil / fishing etc.

Quatloo
Quatloo
4 months ago
Reply to  Rogerroger

You would need a lot more than 1-2 satellites to do that effectively.

Art
Art
4 months ago
Reply to  Quatloo

Exactly. You would need all our spy assets, which are being used for other priorities. As Mish said- it is doable, but at what cost.

Frosty
Frosty
4 months ago
Reply to  Rogerroger

Correct and Palantir’s AI tools can read the data, track and compile the reports in real time. All ships are tracked, do not be fooled. Heat signals are read right through the clouds.

bmcc
bmcc
4 months ago
Reply to  Frosty

the remote sensing and computer cartography and GIS capabilities of modern satellites………is outstanding. hell, even in the last century we could pick up whales by satellite using different wavelengths. i worked at NASA in the 80s as a young man in grad school. you should have seen the computer demographic data the rich states had on everyone, for gerrymandering. i know you are very aware of farmers use of this tech for decades. especially in europe. brave new world was more correct than 1984. we all spy on each other, and have no problem with it. the top down USSR model was 1984 and doomed to fail.

Flavia
Flavia
4 months ago
Reply to  bmcc

Really bad in the UK ….cameras everywhere.

bmcc
bmcc
4 months ago
Reply to  Flavia

well, the UK are bootlickers and nosy assholes, too. amerikans forget we are just bastards runaway colonies of the UK. same bootlicking warmongering imperial assholes. at least in spain they celebrate the end of their empire. UK people are morons, like amerikans………..haven’t faced reality of being just humans on planet earth. like all peoples of all lands. the anti immigration attitudes there are brutal and stupid. island mentality is retarded, imho

Mick
Mick
4 months ago

The term “shadow fleet” itself is part of the government propaganda. Analysts I follow have long noted that it applies to ships no longer insured through London. We might as well declare that Russia and China are participating in the shadow financial system for daring to trade directly and escape the sanctions regimes imposed on them.

Quatloo
Quatloo
4 months ago
Reply to  Mick

It sounds similar to how the term “terrorist” is used

bmcc
bmcc
4 months ago
Reply to  Quatloo

i loved the term GLOBAL WAR ON BEING FRIGHTENING. I MEAN TERROR. my favorite.

Steve L.
Steve L.
4 months ago

Ideally, we capture all the shadow fleet. But even 13 is meaningful. These are multi-million dollar vessels; their owners are now out the value of the captured ships. The other vessel owners will think twice about allowing their expensive assets to be used for this purpose. Mission accomplished!

Your take on Venezuelan oil misses the point. Before Maduro’s capture 100% of the proceeds from sales of Venezuelan oil were stolen. That is now over as the US can ensure the funds are solely used to benefit the Venezuelan people. It may take a while to raise oil production to where it previously stood; in the meantime, the sale proceeds will no longer be diverted. Mission accomplished!

Quatloo
Quatloo
4 months ago
Reply to  Steve L.

the US can ensure the funds are solely used to benefit the Venezuelan people.”

Little Marco, are you posting on Mish Talk now?

El Trumpedo
El Trumpedo
4 months ago
Reply to  Quatloo

I’m flattered… we graduated from bots!

Neal
Neal
4 months ago
Reply to  Steve L.

Wait till other countries get in on the act. Declare any ship calling at Ukrainian ports as defying Russian sanctions and fair game to sieze. Or any ship calling at Israeli ports.
And as the UK with its police state and human trafficking record declare any ship insured by London as aiding in human trafficking as fair game as well.
None of these sanctions have international legitimacy and are just piracy.
And as for making money off the stolen oil I’m surprised that none of the ships are put out as poisoned bait. Sail a “sanctioned” tanker close to the US or France, get it diverted to their port and then set off charges to flood the port and coastline with a million barrels of heavy crude. A multi billion dollar cleanup will make stealing a dumb move.

EADOman
EADOman
4 months ago
Reply to  Steve L.

‘Before Maduro’s capture 100% of the proceeds from sales of Venezuelan oil were stolen’. 

Source please.

Jack
Jack
4 months ago
Reply to  EADOman

His ass

alx
alx
4 months ago
Reply to  Steve L.

That is now over as the US can ensure the funds are solely used to benefit the Venezuelan people
===

good . i needed good laugh today.

how are those people in iraq doing after 20 years of occupation and getting back all those money stolen by Saddam before invasion!

keep posting bot.

alx

alx
alx
4 months ago
Reply to  Steve L.

=-s. The other vessel owners will think twice about allowing their expensive assets to be used for this purpose

mo11ron!

Russians will deliver single rocket into middle east for Houthis and then blow off max capacity major tanker run by bp-shell or total!

whatcha gonna do then?

most of you voted for the uniparty all your lives
most of you voted for the uniparty all your lives
4 months ago

Stop using the Orwellian term “shadow fleet”. That’s just Oceania’s smear for “not insured by Oceania insurance companies”.

most of you voted for the uniparty all your lives
most of you voted for the uniparty all your lives
4 months ago

I asked an LLM and received pushback on my statement. It claimed Russia was violating “UN or G7” sanctions (the conflation of international law with Oceania decree is the first example of GIGO) and operated with undercapitalized insurers who might not pay out on a large claim. I then asked it how much local, state, and federal taxpayers paid for Deepwater Horizon and Exxon Valdez. (“Oops.”)

Sheesh…every fresh conversation about anything political with an LLM is like talking to a bubblehead on teevee.

Last edited 4 months ago by most of you voted for the uniparty all your lives
Jackula
Jackula
4 months ago

No doubt the LLM’s are being trained on propaganda

alx
alx
4 months ago
Reply to  Jackula

they are trained by reading western media propaganda.

cnn-bbc-abc – good!
rt, china, russia- bad!

El Trumpedo
El Trumpedo
4 months ago

99% of what they’re trained on is punditry and what people that believe the pundits write.

Might be fun to train one up on this blog… i bet it would be pretty salty.

most of you voted for the uniparty all your lives
most of you voted for the uniparty all your lives
4 months ago

Oh, also, Oceania complains about the risk of environmental disaster from some of the ship designs. So far there are no examples. But more importantly, Oceania has attacked some Russian contracted tankers with drones and bombs smuggled aboard by saboteurs.

Thus, Oceania’s own actions prove they want to cause environmental disasters (with costs to Russia) even as Oceania claims to want to prevent them.

Last edited 4 months ago by most of you voted for the uniparty all your lives
Mark Tichenor
Mark Tichenor
4 months ago

I don’t quite get the point of this perspective. How much does anyone think Trump has to accomplish immediately to confirm some action makes sense or is successful? Not that I know, understand and can quantify or qualify all this myself. IDK.

But i think we could go back and critique all “actions” by all presidents in our past and find fault. Of. course, we should have done that while they were conducting the actions first.

I’m anxious about what is going on and how much it will accomplish but I’ll await some de mark point before I judge. Is the “idea” that Iran will have both nuke capability and delivery in the near future/. Is it believable Iran would use that power against us in some way? if they do, will we, then, judge we wished we stopped that? Is it certain that to continue the Joint agreement would have been sufficient to stop an attack? IDK. Who does know? All the barn doors are open and all the horses seem gone. Perhaps because the barn has been burning for a long time?

Last edited 4 months ago by Mark Tichenor
Mick
Mick
4 months ago
Reply to  Mark Tichenor

Trump deserves no reservation from judgment at this point. It’s his economy, it’s his Ukraine war, it is his war crimes in Venezuela, and all blame for regional war with Iran and attendant consequences will land at his feet.

Mark Tichenor
Mark Tichenor
4 months ago
Reply to  Mick

What “role” in the Russo-Ukraine war do you claim is related to Trump…either actions or inactions?

Mick
Mick
4 months ago
Reply to  Mark Tichenor

What “role”. Okay, during Trumps’ first term:

Multiple CIA bases were constructed within Ukraine (revealed two years ago by the NYT)He continued a plan that began under Obama,where the CIA worked directly with Ukraine intelligence to train forces, and helped greatly expand the size of Ukraine’s military and start preparing the country for war with RussiaHe directly authorized shipment of armaments to Ukraine as part of war preparations, including Javelin anti-tank missiles, and within the past year boasted about it.Furthermore, Trump’s administration continues the flow of weapons and other material support including offensive intelligence/targeting. This targeting includes an apparent assassination attempt against Vladimir Putin’s Valdai residence on December 28, 2025 just after Trump got off a call with him while Trump was meeting with Zelensky in Mar-a-lago.

This targeting continues to enable attacks against sensitive aspects of Russian’s strategic capabilities. Scott Ritter just posted that Ukraine struck a Votkinsk plant nearly 900 miles from Ukraine’s border. This facility reportedly is involved not just in hypersonic missile production, but also nuclear-capable ICBMs. When you add this to past strikes against over-the-horizon missile radars and a strategic bomber facility (which had planes unprotected and fully visible in conformance to arms treaties), it looks like the U.S. is looking for ways to blind and weaken Russia in the nuclear domain.

We may be closer to nuclear war than at any time, perhaps even during the Cuban missile crisis, and a lot of the fault lies at the feet of DJT. I thought he might reverse course from Biden but sadly no, he was part of the problem all along.

Last edited 4 months ago by Mick
Mark Tichenor
Mark Tichenor
4 months ago
Reply to  Mick

Ok. I don’t disagree. And that did not please those of us who believe Ukraine should be responsible for its own war. There are millions of people who would disagree with what I just said and Trump’s actions in this regard. This “forum format” is not an easy format to discuss this fully.

But do you have any doubt that Trump would not jump onto a solution that woud amount to a Ukraine surrender of at least the Donbas? Even all the Easter and southern Oblasts.

And who would even contemplate that Russia would settle for less. And what “real sense” would it make for the US (not speaking for a confused Europe, here) to risk a larger war (or nuclear war) for the sake of Ukraine – a “state/region whose history is tightly coupled to Russia – throughout the last 6 centuries.

But there is more to this topic and more to the differences between the ObamaBiden strategies and the Trump strategies.

Note: I’m not talking about the Trump personalities and deportment, which I tend to find frustrating and disappointing – even embarrassing.

most of you voted for the uniparty all your lives
most of you voted for the uniparty all your lives
4 months ago
Reply to  Mick

Plus, multiple NATO exercises in Ukraine during trump’s first term.

Obviously, trump staged the war.

Of course, so did uniparty voters.

Last edited 4 months ago by most of you voted for the uniparty all your lives
Jackula
Jackula
4 months ago
Reply to  Mark Tichenor

Don’t forget N Korea has nukes. And thanks to Biden’s insane foreign policy regarding Ukraine and Russia’s help with better ballistic missile tech N Korea can hit targets as far away as Florida with nukes

And the dangerous N Korea is no longer in the news cycle…

If Iran wanted nukes they could have them within the week. Several countries would give them to them. But their religious leader is against them. Don’t believe our Western propaganda.

I’m back robbyrob
I’m back robbyrob
4 months ago
Flavia
Flavia
4 months ago

So Trump attacked Venezuela so he could send their oil to Israel?
Interesting….but isn’t their oil kinda substandard?

PapaDave
PapaDave
4 months ago
Reply to  Flavia

Most of Venezuela’s oil is in the Orinoco belt. It is Extra heavy and needs to be diluted and treated in order to make it suitable for shipping and refining.

There are over 700 refineries in the world. Roughly 70 refineries (10% of them) can actually process this extra heavy oil.

Some of Venezuela’s oil is medium to heavy crude which can be processed by roughly 300 refiners.

Flavia
Flavia
4 months ago
Reply to  PapaDave

Not substandard then, but extra heavy.
Thanks!

Webej
Webej
4 months ago
Reply to  Flavia

No, although this is often stated but it is wrong.
Heavy oil is harder to process (and to produce), but it has greater energy density, and you can produce a greater fraction of distillates (like diesel) with it.

America has been importing heavy oil from Venezuela (before sanctioning it), from Canada, and Urals grade from Russia even after the start of the SMO in 2022. Refineries are also built with a certain mix of crude grades in mind, and this is not easy or cheap to rejigger.

Frosty
Frosty
4 months ago
Reply to  Webej

At an average API of 14 it is also high sulphur and requires significant increased refinery maintenance to combat its corrosive nature.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.