Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

The Democrats’ Hypocritical Assault on the Filibuster

Sinema refuses to break the filibuster. Image Washington Post, white caption by Mish.

Bipartisan Effort to Preserve 60 Vote Threshold for Legislation

Please consider the April 7, 2017 article by Senator Sue Collins: Senators Collins, Coons Lead Effort to Preserve 60 Vote Threshold for Legislation.

U.S. Senators Susan Collins (R-ME) and Chris Coons (D-DE) led a bipartisan group of 61 Senators in writing to Senate leadership, urging them to preserve the 60 vote threshold for legislation.

“This letter demonstrates that a majority of the Senate, both Republicans and Democrats, can come together to protect an important tradition of the Senate that recognizes the rights of the minority and makes bipartisan legislation more likely,” said Senator Collins. “After the contentious and polarized debate of the past few weeks, I am hopeful that this letter indicates a new determination by a bipartisan group of more than 60 Senators to move forward to solve the pressing problems facing our nation.”

“Democrats want the Senate to work, and we are willing to partner with our colleagues across the aisle if we can get things done for the American people,” said Senator Coons. “We have a long way to go to heal the wounds between our two parties, but this letter is a small first step towards that important goal.”

Democrat and Independent Signees 

Chris Coons (D-DE), Joe Manchin (D-WV), Claire McCaskill (D-MO), Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Angus King (I-ME), Mark Warner (D-VA), Michael Bennet (D-CO), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Bob Casey (D-PA), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Brian Schatz (D-HI), Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Joe Donnelly (D-IN), Jon Tester (D-MT),  Thomas Carper (D-DE), Kamala Harris (D-CA),Maggie Hassan (D-NH), Bill Nelson (D-FL), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), Tim Kaine (D-VA), Jack Reed (D-RI), Ed Markey (D-MA), Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), and Bob Menendez (D-NJ).

Angus King caucuses with the Democrats so that makes 32 Democrat senators signing a letter to keep the filibuster. 

Republican Signees 

Susan Collins (R-ME), Orrin Hatch (R-UT),  John McCain (R-AZ), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK),  Roger Wicker (R-MS), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Luther Strange (R-AL), Richard Burr (R-NC), Jerry Moran (R-KS), Roy Blunt (R-MO), Marco Rubio (R-FL), John Boozman (R-AR), Thom Tillis (R-NC), Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), John Thune (R-SD), Bill Cassidy (R-LA), Michael Enzi (R-WY), Jeff Flake (R-AZ), Dean Heller (R-NV), Chuck Grassley (R-IA),  Rob Portman (R-OH), Lamar Alexander (R-TN), John Kennedy (R-LA), Thad Cochran (R-MS), Ben Sasse (R-NE), Todd Young (R-IN), Pat Roberts (R-KS), Johnny Isakson (R-GA), Mike Lee (R-UT).

Donald Trump was president, yet 29 Republican senators signed that Letter Supporting the Filibuster

Hypocrite List

Chris Coons (D-DE), Michael Bennet (D-CO), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Angus King (I-ME), Bob Casey (D-PA), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Mark Warner (D-VA), Jon Tester (D-MT), Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Brian Schatz (D-HI), Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Thomas Carper (D-DE), Kamala Harris (D-CA), Maggie Hassan (D-NH), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), Tim Kaine (D-VA), Jack Reed (D-RI), Ed Markey (D-MA), Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), and Bob Menendez (D-NJ).

Those 26 Democrat hypocrites signed a letter to keep the Filibuster when Trump was president and now seek to trash it. 

What Changed? 

What changed is obvious. Democrats now believe 50 votes is enough to do whatever the hell they want.

Fortunately, they only have 48 votes because Democrats Senators Joe Manchin (WV) and Krysten Sinema (AZ) put integrity ahead of politics. 

The pair is also able to think ahead and look behind. 

What If?

Q: What if it only took 50 senators in the first two years of a Trump presidency?

A: We might have national Right to Work legislation; collective bargaining for public workers might be out the window; bankruptcy reform is certainly needed and we might have it, and prevailing wage laws would be scrapped. 

I support all of those things and would love to have them. And that’s just for starters. 

But everything would reverse when Democrats had the White House and Congress (like now). 

50 would be enough. There would be no bipartisan legislation to speak of. 

Scorched Earth

Mitch McConnell explicitly warned about this on March 16, 2021 vowing ‘Scorched Earth’ If Senate Ends Filibuster.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell warned ominously Tuesday of a “scorched earth” landscape if Democrats use their new majority to bring an end to the Senate filibuster in hopes of muscling legislation supporting President Joe Biden’s agenda past GOP opposition.

“Let me say this very clearly for all 99 of my colleagues: Nobody serving in this chamber can even begin — can even begin to imagine — what a completely scorched earth Senate would look like,” McConnell said in a Senate speech.

McConnell said the partisan gridlock of the Trump and Obama eras would look like “child’s play” compared to what’s to come.

Mob Rule, Not Gridlock

Many blasted McConnell for those comments but they apply to both parties. 

McConnell is mistaken on one key point however. It would not be “partisan gridlock”. 

It would be more like Chicago gangs duking it out, each reversing the other’s gains when they had more members.

Judicial Appointments 

By the way, it was Democrats who changed the rules on Judicial appointments from 60 to 50 Senators so Obama could get his court picks approved. 

Guess who complained when Trump made appointments.

Obama vs Obama 

Senator Obama wanted to preserve the filibuster (under a Republican president, of course), then applauded its removal to get his appointments approved.

Democrats then bitterly complained about not being able to stop Trump appointments.

McConnell also shifted his stance. 

What a hoot! 

Sinema Censured 

The Washington Post reports Arizona Democratic Party Votes to Censure Sinema, citing filibuster vote. 

State party chair Raquel Terán said Saturday’s censure vote, which was taken behind closed doors, was a direct consequence of Sinema’s unwillingness to endorse Senate rule changes to pass voting rights legislation. The senator’s move, she said, crossed a red line at a time when voting rights are under attack.

Sinema had said on Wednesday that although she backed the Democrats’ voting rights bills, she feared that eliminating the Senate’s 60-vote requirement for major legislation would add to the country’s divisions. With Sinema and Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.) joining Republicans in opposition to filibuster changes, Democrats’ immediate hopes of passing voting rights legislation were dashed.

Progressive Happy With Mob Rule 

The Progressives are happy with the “scorched earth, mob rule”  prospect because they are not at all interested in bipartisanship, ever.

They are hell bent on destroying the country with extreme socialist idiocy that has failed everywhere it’s been tried.

Progressives saw this as their big chance. They blame Senators Manchin and Sinema for placing integrity over extreme party politics.

That is the sorry state of affairs.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder. 

Mish   

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

31 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Getting rid of the filibuster would only work if we had more than 2 political parties.
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
SOMEBODY needs to kill it. Paying senators to read Green Eggs and Ham to prevent democracy from happening is pants on your head stupid.  It’s a bug.
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
It’s a republic.
The Constitution prevents democracy from happening. Otherwise there could be no freedom of speech, etc.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
You’re against the mechanics of how it works. I agree. But I like the idea of needing 60 votes to override it.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
It could be worse than what Mish imagines (rival gangs reversing orders when they have majority).
If I was the Dems and got the filibuster voted out, I’d pass all kinds of things now with my 50%. Then, just before election day, I’d PUT BACK the filibuster so nothing could be reversed if they lost control to the Rep. That way you get everything you want with no chance of it being reversed.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
“Then, just before election day, I’d PUT BACK the filibuster so nothing could be reversed if they lost control to the Rep.”
Why wouldn’t the Republicans then in control, just remove the filibuster again, pass whatever nonsense they fancied, and then put it in place again before they were to lose control…
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
How can you do that if it requires 60 votes to remove it? You can only do that if you get the 60 votes.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Then, how can the Dems remove it with less than 60 votes?
One, or at least I, would assume that if party A with 51 votes could pass everything they felt like, including a rule which required 98 votes to reverse any of it, it would already have been done a long time ago. IOW, that it would take at least X votes to put in place a rule requiring X votes to reverse. Otherwise, you’d simply have a one-way valve to complete gridlock.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
They wouldn’t need to do that. They could make changes that would assure they stay in power perpetually. Split Texas, Florida, and every red state into two states. A blue part and a red part. They would gain 2 senate seats for every state they split.
They could make it illegal to contest any vote or make it legal for anyone to vote, regardless of citizenship. Or lower the voting age to 14, vote in schools on a school day, and then have teachers tell their students to vote democrat.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
4 years ago
the fillibuster is neither good or bad.   it’s just a rule.   can be kept or tossed out.   has zero to do with constitution or democracy.     the fact citizens get worked up either way when it’s used,  for some things and not others,  is comical.     anyone still caught up in the D or R teams,  has been played by their betters and rulers who are scamming you.    it is entertaining though.   
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
The filibuster is effectively hysteresis imposed on the raw vote tallies. In order to reduce mindless back-and-forth fluctuation.
Similar to a thermostat: Absent hysteresis implemented in the controller, you’d have the heating element switch on and off like a machinegun, as the temperature rose to 0.01 degrees above set point, then fell to .01 degrees below. Which, while OK in abstract models with zero switching cost, is not good in the real world of physical components.
The same is true for Senate voting outcomes: If every single little rule and law gets reversed every single midterm election, back and forth: It gets very hard and expensive for all those who have to make changes to accommodate for mere back-and-forth flapping of the rules. So a filibuster helps keep things more stable. Which, anytime change is not free, is in and of itself, good.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Well, the DONORcrats are going to need the filibuster very soon!   They did almost nothing for the people and are going to lose the elections.
As for Manchin and Sinema being the champions of “integrity”… puhleeze!    Sinema promised in her campaign to lower prescription drug prices.  And when legislation to do the exact same thing came up, she opposed it!   What made the difference?  About $750,000 in donations from Big Pharma and the medical device industry.   

 

vanderlyn
vanderlyn
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
sinema is a phoney.   she used to be great as a state rep.  in my hood in phoenix back in the day.  a solid civil libertarian…….  got to the bright lights of DC and she sold out lickety split.    
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
4 years ago
As little Jimmie Madison wrote, “Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm“.
The US’s political leadership keep themselves occupied by burning the furniture of the house they’ve been bequeathed. Who taught them to do things that way?
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
“State party chair Raquel Terán said Saturday’s censure vote, which was
taken behind closed doors, was a direct consequence of Sinema’s
unwillingness to endorse Senate rule changes to pass voting rights
legislation.”
Behind closed doors- what were they trying to hide? Democracy dies in darkness. Not to mention, totalitarianism is not democracy. Ironic that the state party does not accept Sinema’s voting right. Huh.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
Next time, a simple majority can reinstate the filibuster. That’s the whole point.
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Republicans had the same chance and did not take it!
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
so what?   who cares if Rs took it.  in fact they did.   just for some types of votes like judges………fillibuster is no sacred thing.   it’s just a little rule.    neither good nor bad.    just procedural.     
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
4 years ago
A 60 vote majority is what electrical engineers call a hysteresis. It’s necessary for stable systems. It prevents system oscillations when the signal changes rapidly about the transition point.
Call_Me
Call_Me
4 years ago
Really no different from one side bemoaning election integrity one cycle, then celebrating the ‘most fair’ election the next cycle.  Whip up the population into a non-thinking emotional frenzy, extract $, then repeat in 4 years.
It goes well in a country where one has to show proof of double/triple covid-related vaccination to eat at restaurants in some cities, but saying that a person should produce a government-issued ID in order to vote is verboten.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  Call_Me
As long as the government issues the IDs completely free of cost and addresses the issues faced by voters who don’t have a car and can’t travel to an office on a working day and wait in line to get the ID.    Otherwise, it is just a new form of poll tax.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
How many people don’t have a government ID (Drivers License, Passport or other ID for those without licenses)? I bet it’s less than 10%.
If you really want to vote that bad, you have plenty of time to get an ID. There is no excuse not to get one because you can go to Walgreens or CVS 7 days a week to get a photo for a passport etc.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
It is estimated to be about 11 percent of voters i.e. about 21 million people.   Which is 3x the margin of victory in the Biden v Trump race of 2020.   Regardless of what the percentage is, there should be NO fee charged for the ID if it is going to be required at the polls.   
We don’t want to regress 60 years.  But the regressives… well, it is in their name!   That is exactly what they want to do.  Surprise, surprise!
Call_Me
Call_Me
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
One needs documentation to work so the feds can properly tax, one needs documentation to have a personal banking account so the feds can keep tabs on your finances, one needs documentation to move about the countryside via plane or by driving (for safety?).  Either one participates in the system or not, but to characterize showing a government ID as a poll tax is completely wrong.  A poll tax does not have any utility outside of voting, whereas your government-approved document permits many other ‘freedoms’.
Call_Me_Al
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Otherwise known as the population of illegal aliens.
Esclaro
Esclaro
4 years ago
The Trump Death Cult wanted mob rule when his regime was in power. Now it’s our turn for mob rule. The only REAL solution is to divide the country and let people live with like minded people. I do not want to have anything to do with members of the Trump Death Cult. Let’s end this now!!!!
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  Esclaro
Please take a look at the facts.
29 Republican Senators signed a letter in support of the Filibuster when Trump was president. 
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
CATO fillibustered in ancient roman senate.     but our young empire’s history is quite short lived.  from wikipedia.    “It is not part of the US Constitution, becoming theoretically possible with a change of Senate rules only in 1806 and not used until 1837.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filibuster#cite_note-Binder-55 Rarely used for much of the Senate’s first two centuries, it was strengthened in the 1970shttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filibuster#cite_note-56 and in recent years, the majority has preferred to avoid filibusters by moving to other business when a filibuster is threatened and attempts to achieve cloture have failed.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filibuster#cite_note-57 As a result, in recent decades this has come to mean that all major legislation (apart from budgets) now requires a 60% majority to pass.
FlyNavy1
FlyNavy1
4 years ago
Reply to  Esclaro
Trump has been out of office for over a year.  Have Mommy Google it for you.
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
Reply to  Esclaro
I fail to see , under our current system , where one could not live with like minded people .   Hat’s off to Senators Manchin and Sinema .  Truly pivotal , heroic  actions  . Hurry up midterms .
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  Esclaro
Portland might be a good option for you. You could hang out with Antifa.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.