Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

The Exceptionally Poor Timing of Small Bank vs Large Bank Cash Deployment

Monthly average Cash percent allocation of bank assets 

Right before a major hiking cycle by the Fed, both large and small banks decided to deploy deposits. 

Smaller regional banks went all in.

It was a major mistake that resulted in three US bank failures. Silvergate Bank, Silicon Valley Bank, and Signature Bank, collapsed and were taken over by the FDIC because of duration mismatch losses and runs on the banks. 

Securities in Bank Credit

Monthly average Securities in Bank Credit percent allocation of bank assets 

Securities in bank credit largely consist of Treasuries and Agencies (mortgage backed securities). 

Both large and small banks loaded up on duration risk at precisely the wrong time. Estimates of unrealized bank losses range from $625 billion up to $2 trillion. 

Residential Real Estate 

Monthly average Residential Real Estate percent allocation of bank assets 

The beginning of 2022 was an amazingly bad time to increase exposure to residential real estate. 

Small banks increased exposure more than large banks. Given price declines, most of those homes are now worth less than the mortgage.

Commercial Real Estate

Monthly average Commercial Real Estate percent allocation of bank assets 

Smaller regional banks are much more exposed to commercial real estate loans than larger banks. 

As with residential, property values are declining making risk of default greater.

Who’s Holding the Losses?

Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities Index 

Not Just a US Problem

https://twitter.com/Laeeth/status/1639755508021186560

Money Supply Is Headed for 6th Month of Contraction

Please note Money Supply Is Headed for 6th Month of Contraction

Whether the Fed pledges to temporarily paper over bank losses, the losses are still real. 

Expect further contractions in credit as a result.

MishTalk Video, What’s the Real Risk Now, Is it Inflation or Deflation?

Given the obvious inflationary forces, that may seem like a silly question, but let’s take a closer look in a video discussion.

Please consider What’s the Real Risk Now, Is it Inflation or Deflation?

If you understand credit, you may know the answer, but if you have not seen the post, please take a look. 

This post originated at MishTalk.Com

Please Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish 

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

23 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
8dots
8dots
3 years ago
Problem #1) unrealized losses to maturity. problem #2) High tech savants bought 2M/5M houses using stocks as collateral. // Solutions :
1) Send SPX sideways to cleanse the 10Y dirt. CD paying 4.5% for 13/14 months with a min of 25K account (less than o/n rates).
# 2) Thereafter send QQQ higher to cleanse impaired high tech collateral. 3) Repeat step #1 and #2. 4) Repetitions to confuse investors. No recession. The banks are safe. The banks have never been safer before.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Bernanke
in his book: “The Courage to Act”: “Monetary policy cannot be directed at a
single class of assets”. I guess MBS purchases don’t count.
The Riegle-Neal Interstate
Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 contributed to the problem. Banks pay for the deposits that they already own. Commercial bank credit creation is determined by monetary policy, not the savings practices of the nonbank public.
From
the standpoint of the commercial banks, DFIs, the monetary savings practices of
the public are reflected in the velocity of their deposits and not in their
volume. Whether the public saves, or dis-saves, chooses to hold their savings
in the DFIs, or transfers them to the NBFIs, will not, per se, alter the total system assets, or system liabilities of the DFIs – nor alter the forms of these assets and
liabilities.
Cocoa
Cocoa
3 years ago
My friend bought a commercial building in SF. It was 1/2 off previous listing. Was 2 million. That’s a 50% writedowns and the weak hands had to shake it off the books. So come next year, those fancy skyscrapers are coming up for new leases. And nobody wants to work downtown SF. It’s a dive and empty now. Game over
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Cocoa
“Remember, once you’re inside you’re on your own.”
Where is Snake Plissken when you need him?
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
I heard he’s dead. ;/
BlauGloriole
BlauGloriole
3 years ago
Yes losses are the problem. Emergency financing will be provided until there is a significant downturn both in the real economy and in financial assets. Then rates will plummet and duration losses will evaporate.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
excellent analysis. i’m praying to mar a lago, five times per day on my prayer mat. for a really nice big r/e crash in prices. i don’t care where or what kind. when cap rates make sense we’ll know. per the past century, trend, the large money centers banks who own the FED will be picking on the carcass of regional banks. same as it ever was.
Matt3
Matt3
3 years ago
I added up the above allocations for small and large banks. These asset areas total per below
Small – 70.6%
Large – 57.4%
I know banks have assets that are fixed (RE and others) but that certainly isn’t enough to cover the gaps from 100%. For small community banks, a normal balance sheet on the liability side might be 10% capital and about 90% deposits. On the assets side a loan/deposit ratio of 70%. This would be 63% loans. Guess about 7% in physical assets, prepays and that leaves 30% in securities – both available for sale and held to maturity.
So where are the big banks putting all the deposits now and where were they putting them when fed rates were about 0?
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  Matt3
Big banks have direct access to the Fed and were parking money there for a small amount of interest.
Mish talked about it here (hes done it in many posts actually)
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  Matt3
Matt numbers are from the Fed’s H.8 Report also available on Fred.
There are sections on small and large banks.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
See: “Because of the conversion of a thrift institution to a commercial bank”
Today’s thrifts are actually banks. They are capable of creating money. The distinction muddies up commercial bank credit.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
It’s hilarious how now so called banking experts are coming out and are shocked how badly run SVB was. They’re trying to make it seem like a isolated incident involving unusually poor management. Just a cover to hide the fact that pretty much all banks are managed the same way. The only thing that separates SVB from other banks is they had a run on deposits.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
The real difference was SVB had a LOT of deposits compared to loans because it was essentially a startup bank full of deposit money being drawn down by startups burning though cash.
Most normal banks have fewer deposits and more loans and the deposits they do have are not being drawn down by startups.
On the other hand if the loan industry gets into trouble (as Mish alluded to with home prices going under water) then normal banks will be in trouble.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
They had withdrawal requests for almost half their deposit base. No bank could handle that.
Christoball
Christoball
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
The startup stock certificate sales boys ran out of buyers. Withdrawals from accounts continued and were not replenished by the startup snake oil sales.
Columbo
Columbo
3 years ago
This is not regarding Mish’s post, but I thought this news was of interest.
Per Briefing.com, China and Brazil agreed to trade in their own currencies instead of the U.S. dollar.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  Columbo
Countries have been free to do this forever. What’s the big deal.
Before Brazil used Reals to buy dollars to send to China to pay in Yuan and China did the reverse (used Yuan to buy dollars to pay in Reals).
Now Brazil just used Reals to buy Yuans and China uses Yuans to buy Reals.
Nothing has changed other than the intermediary step of converting to US dollars.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
That, Tex, is exactly the point – don’t use dollars.
MBA SOFA
MBA SOFA
3 years ago
Reply to  Columbo

There is a problem for China. What do they buy with reals? They go one week to Copacabana, good. They buy samba vynils, marvelous. And… they need to change the reals to dollar if they want to buy good cars, good wine or send the children to a good college.

KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  MBA SOFA
Brazil has a lot more to offer than tourism. Like oil and food for example.
Columbo
Columbo
3 years ago
Reply to  MBA SOFA
Sugar cane for one, hehehe.
Christoball
Christoball
3 years ago
Reply to  MBA SOFA
Brazil makes Airplanes, Embraer.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  MBA SOFA
And… they need to change the reals to EUROs if they want to buy your list.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.