What Percentage of The August Blowout New Home Sales Will Never Close?

New home sales data from commerce department, chart by Mish.

On September 27, I reported New Home Sales Jump an Astonishing 28 Percent in August

My comment then was “I highly doubt this number will survive revisions.”

One of my reasons was that new home sales are counted at contract signing whereas existing home sales are counted at closing. Cancellations have been huge.

Redfin Tweet Thread

 

Point number one is the key idea “As mortgage rates reach a new high since 2007, more homebuyers are delaying or canceling their buying plans altogether.”

US Home-Sale Cancellations Soar in July as Buyers Pull Back

On August 16, Bloomberg reported US Home-Sale Cancellations Soar in July as Buyers Pull Back

Failed US home-purchase deals jumped in July as buyers continued to back away from the market amid rising mortgage rates.

Roughly 63,000 home-purchase agreements were canceled in July, equal to about 16% of properties that went into contract that month, according to an analysis by Redfin Corp. That was up from 15% of deals that fell apart in June. A year earlier, when the housing market was running hot, it was about 12.5%.

No Revisions, Just Bad Data

A check with the Census Department explains they are OK with bad data. Please consider this Census Department comment on Cancelled Contracts.

The Census Bureau does not make adjustments to the new home sales figures to account for cancellations of sales contracts.

The Survey of Construction (SOC) is the survey used to collect all data on housing starts, completions, and sales. This survey usually begins by sampling a building permit authorization, which is then tracked to find out when the housing unit starts, completes, and sells. When the owner or builder of a housing unit authorized by a permit is interviewed, one of the questions asked is whether the house is being built for sale. If it is, we then ask if the house has been sold (contract signed or earnest money exchanged). If the respondent reports that the unit has been sold, the survey does not follow up in subsequent months to find out if it is still sold or if the sale was cancelled. The house is removed from the “for sale” inventory and counted as sold for that month. If the house it is not yet started or under construction, it will be followed up until completion and then it will be dropped from the survey. 

Since we discontinue asking about the sale of the house after we collect a sale date, we never know if the sales contract is cancelled or if the house is ever resold. Therefore, the eventual purchase by a subsequent buyer is not counted in the survey; the same housing unit cannot be sold twice.

As a result of our methodology, if conditions are worsening in the marketplace and cancellations are high, sales would be temporarily overestimated. When conditions improve and these cancelled sales materialize as actual sales, our sales would then be underestimated since we did not allow the cases with cancelled sales to re-enter the survey. In the long run, cancellations do not cause the survey to overestimate or underestimate sales.

In the short run the data is very flawed. 

In downturns sales are overestimated. In recoveries, sales are understated. 

Years later we have GDP revisions as a result.  Lovely. 

“No Recession” Idea Based On GDI Was Just Revised Out the Window

Speaking of revisions, the BEA made huge negative revisions to gross domestic income. 

Many people believed the US was not in recession because income numbers were not aligned with GDP.

Yesterday, I commented “No Recession” Idea Based On GDI Was Just Revised Out the Window.

Expect more revisions. And since we are headed into a slowdown, those revisions will tend to be very negative.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com

Please Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish 

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

21 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
1 year ago
Follow-up question: How many people remain who want a house and can qualify for a mortgage? With mortgages up more than 30% year over year, that number can’t be many.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
Seinfeld + Reality … what’s not to love?
“With the housing market transiting abruptly from red-hot to frozen, we believe many businesses, investors, and policymakers will be caught off guard by how quickly economic trends shift. Once the new reality sets in and prices adjust, we expect the sudden slowdown in housing to place further pressure on consumer spending and corporate earnings.”
MPO45
MPO45
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Thanks for the link, it was funny and I need to re-watch that episode.
Is anyone else as giddy as me about next week’s T-bill auction? I honestly never thought those words would leave my keyboard but here we are, let’s go nuts.
4-week and 8-week laddering coming right up.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Look at the trendline for the 30 September GDPNow “forecast.”
This is not a forecast. This is random noise. This is not good.
Billy
Billy
1 year ago
I’d like to know what the average deposit percentage people are walking away from.
I’m wondering if those percentages are higher than the percentage of the houses are being discounted.
gstegen
gstegen
1 year ago
I don’t think the data is flawed, it is just mislabeled. It should be called sales contracts signed, not sales. It would be nice to get the final sales data but at least they should not confuse readers about what the data is. Most people don’t check the fine print like Mish.
Free Money 449
Free Money 449
1 year ago
As a Real Estate Appraiser talking to builders…..I suspect 25% or MORE will be cancelled. Even if they do close, how many will lose their jobs in the coming months and end up as early payment defaults….I suspect another 25%.
Good Times are GONE
MPO45
MPO45
1 year ago
Reply to  Free Money 449
I’m curious how as an appraiser you are valuing homes now.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  Free Money 449
Brutal
8dots
8dots
1 year ago
Honey, don’t pullout prematurely, not until SPX close below Sept 2020 low.
1-shot
1-shot
1 year ago
My guess is that a lot will close.
That sales bump happened when interest rates temporarily dropped. I just sold a home to a buyer last month who at first wanted all kinds of extra work done, even though it was an “as is” sale. when I said no and told them I wasn’t accepting their counteroffer and would resell it to someone else, they begged to take it “as is” – why? Because they had locked in a 5% loan that was about to expire and rates had jumped to 6.5%.
They closed.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
1 year ago
“National Shortage of Affordable Rental Housing — The U.S. has a shortage of 7 million rental homes affordable and available to extremely low-income renters, whose household incomes are at or below the poverty guideline or 30% of their area median income.”
We live in a predatory society. The houses that are most profitable to build are larger than an “affordable” home.
RonJ
RonJ
1 year ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
Those featured on Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous?
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
The US has an excess of 20-25 million people that do not earn enough money to live in this country.
Sure, I’d like to live in Monaco, or Zurich for that matter, but it’s not feasible.
MPO45
MPO45
1 year ago
Interestingly, the political climate is also going to be changing the housing market in ways few considered. From Redfin, a survey indicates a 43% stronger desire to live in states that allow abortion. With a huge demographic crisis and crazy political nonsense, there will be states that will be big winners and big losers.
I wonder how many of those cancellations were driven by politics

“One in five (19%) homebuyers and sellers would only live in a place where abortion is fully legal, up significantly from 12% last year, before the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and gave states the power to ban abortions. An additional 33% would prefer to live in a place where abortion is fully legal, up from 28% last year.

On the flip side, 11% would definitely not live in a place where abortion is legal, down from 15% a year earlier. An additional 12% would prefer not to live in such a place, down from 17% a year earlier.”

KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45
I wonder how many of those cancellations were driven by politics
Close to 0. Roe v Wade was overturned long before the contracts were signed.
MPO45
MPO45
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Yes but pregnancies weren’t and that’s when you need one.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45
The real question is how many will actually vote with their feet rather than check a box on a survey?
Even Mish who has hated Illinois politics (taxes) forever remained there for a decade before finally moving to Utah.
I suspect people are going to wait it out and see what happens for a few years before doing anything drastic like move out of state. For one, moving is expensive and most are tapped out. Then add in that many don’t or won’t want to live far from their family or want to have to make a whole new set of friends etc.
The people who might need abortions who can move are only women ages 18-40 who aren’t married. What percentage of the overall population do you think that is? 10% maybe based on 50% being women, and 20% of those being ages 18-40?
MPO45
MPO45
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Even Mish who has hated Illinois politics (taxes) forever remained there for a decade before finally moving to Utah.
True but women don’t have a decade to move, there is a very short window to get that medical procedure. I think the broader problem is women (and men) that are graduating colleges and get competing offers:
offer 1: move to california, high pay, access to medical procedures as needed.
offer 2: move to alabama, low pay, medical restrictions, patriarchy nonsense, bigots, and religious zealots.
Which one would you choose if you were 20? The same if you get laid off now and get an offer for a job out of state, this will now play a factor. Personally, I would never move to states like Missouri, Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas, etc. No way no matter how much the pay and I’ve had offers. One company in one of these states begged me and said I could work remote and my response that at some point, I would likely need to visit the office and I had no interest in setting foot in these states and don’t want to support them with a single cent of tax revenue.
Lastly, with the demographic crisis, even a small 5% population change will be devastating to most states and their businesses. You don’t need to take my word for it, just sit back and watch what happens by 2030.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45
I’ll be watching closely and so will a lot of people obviously.
If I was a woman age 20 and sexually active I’d be on the pill so it wouldn’t matter whether my state had abortion or not. Then again I believe in being preemptive and taking responsibility for my choices. Sadly, not many do anymore.
If people aren’t moving to those states it has WAY more to do with low pay than anything else.
JRM
JRM
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45
Yep keep believing those phony democat majority polls!!!!

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.