
Balance Sheet Explosion
Fundamental Error
The above Tweet is a widely believed falsehood.
The fact is: QE neither circulates nor gets spent nor does it represent money on deck waiting to get spent.
“Quantitative Easing!” vs “Quantitative Easing”
At the long end, QE acts to suppress rates. At the short end, with interest rates already at zero, QE does nothing at all except possibly change investor psychology.
John Hussman discussed “Quantitative Easing!” vs “Quantitative Easing” in Counting the Chickens Twice
Quantitative easing does nothing more than replace interest-bearing government liabilities with zero-interest government liabilities. … because Quantitative Easing! is purely a mental formation, the only thing that alters its effectiveness is investor psychology itself.
Negative real rates do encourage speculation in assets which was the point of Hussman’s article.
QE vs Monetary Stimulus
It’s important to distinguish between monetary stimulus by Congress, which can and certainly does get spent, from QE which doesn’t.
From a business standpoint, the Fed certainly wants to encourage bank lending but on that score the Fed has failed.
Fed’s Balance Sheet, Bank Deposits, Bank Loans
As shown in the first chart, the Fed’s balance sheet has exploded and that in turn caused an explosion in deposits.
But that money is going literally nowhere in contrast to Congressional stimulus which consumers will spend.
Fed’s Balance Sheet, Bank Deposits, Bank Loans Detail

Since the beginning of the pandemic the Fed’s balance sheet is up by $3.7 trillion. Bank loans and leases barely budged.
Bank Deposits and Loans Percent Change

Thanks to Congressional guarantees and Federal programs there was a temporary bank lending increase in May of 2020. Since then, commercial loans, and loans and leases have both declined.
The Fed’s balance sheet was running a hot 70+ percent year-over-year for a full year with commercial and industrial loans plunging 15%.
That’s a chart that undoubtedly keeps the Fed sleepless.
Sound and Fury Signifying Nothing
People portray QE as inflation or state that it will cause inflation or that it will get spent. None of that is true.
From Macbeth
QE’s but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Holding real interest rates in negative territory certainly has boosted asset prices and mortgage lending but QE does not get spent and never will.
QE hasn’t even boosted demand for commercial loans which normally would get spent.
The CPI Measures Inflation and Other Widely Believed Economic Nonsense
Economic nonsense abounds.
To dissect another widely believed but false idea please see The CPI Measures Inflation and Other Widely Believed Economic Nonsense
Subscribe!
Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.
Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.
If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.
Mish


Let’s take an artificial situation of the
Administration/Congress sending out another $1T in stimulus to consumers. Assume also that this $1T has to be financed
by the issuance of Treasury debt as tax collections are already behind in
funding defense, entitlements and previous give-away–programs.
There is a balance – the Treasury sends out the checks
which are paid for by largely bank and institutional (such as pension programs)
purchases of Treasury security debt. Foreign and individual purchases have be negligible of late.)
One-fourth of this $1T received by consumers, according
to the most recent FRBNY study, is spent by on goods and services. Thus $250B goes into GDP. The
remaining three fourths is comprised by the one-third of the total going to
debt-payback and the remaining 5/12’s (42 percent) being saved. Much of this three-fourths is bank-deposited
or used to purchase assets (real estate, equities, debt, etc.) the funds for which
can also wind up as bank deposits.
With much of this three-fourths winding up in bank hands,
no wonder that they’re complaining of a huge amount of money on hand. Further, the banks have been reluctantly
slowing their loans as many people and companies have become overextended. However the Fed in June raised the interest
rate it pays for bank reserves and also lifted the rate it pays on overnight
reverse repurchase agreements.
Switching over to the Federal Reserve Bank, the Fed has a
program to keep interest rates in check, especially at the short-term security
duration end, and thereby promote borrowing and economic growth. This program consists
of an ongoing monthly purchase of $80B in treasuries and $40B of GSE (Fannie
Mae, Freddie Mac, Sallie Mae, etc.) debt. The treasury debt purchase portion has to be from the secondary market
as the law disallows Fed purchases directly from the Treasury Dept. (The Fed
does buy corporate debt, but this program is very small, or almost negligible
compared to what’s being addressed here.)
The $120B total is comprised by Fed newly created money. Compared
to the value of new Treasury Dept. security issuance since the beginning of
this year, the Fed has bought some 43 percent in the secondary market, thereby
balancing a large part of the new issuance, primarily purchased by banks.
The $120B/mo purchases are added to the Fed’s asset balance
sheet. It is the $120B/mo new money
creation that “waters the currency.” This asset increase feeds into the supply of money, or M2 (although M3
and M4 are alternates.) M2 has increased
$4.4T, or one-fourth, from 1Q19 to 1Q21. However, nominal GDP increased only 1.4 percent during this period. The increase in Fed assets was $3.5T or 80
percent of the nominal increase in M2. Should we consider that the value of the dollar has also gone down 25
percent?
I cringe when I hear about inflation in that it only
addresses goods/services. The inflation
of assets should be also included. Look
at the dispensation of Government stimulus payments covered above. The bulk goes to assets. GDP inflation is
only a subset of overall inflation. Look
at your pet gripe about equivalent rental cost in CPI compared to the inflation
in residential housing prices. Yet, it
is true that Government fiscal and monetary policy is directed to goods and
services.
A problem in determining future GDP or CPI goods/services
inflation, is how much spill-over from consumption of Government largesse will
occur? Corporates (to support debt
payments, buybacks to increase earnings, and yields) and people on the dole
need more and more. That’s the nature of
the beast and much of the cause of diminishing returns via the Government’s
actions. When there’s not enough, there’s
a come-uppance. Money will then flow
from equities/commodities/real estate to bonds. This also will directly bear on the goods/service “real” economy. Then,
the Congress/Fed will act again to provide more – until the ultimate
reconciliation that this won’t work.
– – – – – – – – – – – – –
This appears to be designed only to keep the bubble going on for a little longer. If the Democrats wanted to help people, they should seize the so many millions of unoccupied units first. The Democrats are a right-wing party. They just have their socially liberal tag as their USP, nothing more. Same thing with Republicans ; they don’t give a damn what happens to poor white folks. They just pretend to be on their side.