Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Will the Fed Balance Sheet Get Spent into Circulation Causing Inflation?

Balance Sheet Explosion

Fundamental Error

The above Tweet is a widely believed falsehood. 

The fact is: QE neither circulates nor gets spent nor does it represent money on deck waiting to get spent. 

Quantitative Easing!” vs “Quantitative Easing” 

At the long end, QE acts to suppress rates. At the short end, with interest rates already at zero, QE does nothing at all except possibly change investor psychology. 

John Hussman discussed “Quantitative Easing!” vs “Quantitative Easing” in Counting the Chickens Twice

Quantitative easing does nothing more than replace interest-bearing government liabilities with zero-interest government liabilities.  …  because Quantitative Easing! is purely a mental formation, the only thing that alters its effectiveness is investor psychology itself.

Negative real rates do encourage speculation in assets which was the point of Hussman’s article. 

QE vs Monetary Stimulus

It’s important to distinguish between monetary stimulus by Congress, which can and certainly does get spent, from QE which doesn’t. 

From a business standpoint, the Fed certainly wants to encourage bank lending but on that score the Fed has failed.

Fed’s Balance Sheet, Bank Deposits, Bank Loans

As shown in the first chart, the Fed’s balance sheet has exploded and that in turn caused an explosion in deposits. 

But that money is going literally nowhere in contrast to Congressional stimulus which consumers will spend.

Fed’s Balance Sheet, Bank Deposits, Bank Loans Detail 

Since the beginning of the pandemic the Fed’s balance sheet is up by $3.7 trillion. Bank loans and leases barely budged.

Bank Deposits and Loans Percent Change

Thanks to Congressional guarantees and Federal programs there was a temporary bank lending increase in May of 2020. Since then, commercial loans, and loans and leases have both declined.

The Fed’s balance sheet was running a hot 70+ percent year-over-year for a full year with commercial and industrial loans plunging 15%.

That’s a chart that undoubtedly keeps the Fed sleepless. 

Sound and Fury Signifying Nothing

People portray QE as inflation or state that it will cause inflation or that it will get spent. None of that is true.

From Macbeth

QE’s but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.

Holding real interest rates in negative territory certainly has boosted asset prices and mortgage lending but QE does not get spent and never will. 

QE hasn’t even boosted demand for commercial loans which normally would get spent. 

The CPI Measures Inflation and Other Widely Believed Economic Nonsense

Economic nonsense abounds. 

To dissect another widely believed but false idea please see The CPI Measures Inflation and Other Widely Believed Economic Nonsense

Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

25 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
bgwms
bgwms
4 years ago
What stops the Federal Reserve from accumulating all Treasury debt ever issued by issuing “no interest Fed liabilities” to purchase Treasury liabilities and then remitting whatever interest is paid to the Fed on these Treasuries back to the Treasury?  Close to MMT but they haven’t done away with the tax collection aspect of things as superfluous…yet.  Think about this as a thought experiment.  Isn’t this where we are headed? What will be the implications of an enormous Fed Balance sheet and the Treasury with a net zero cost of funds.  Will this lead to higher prices?  What will happen?  Will the public lose confidence in the future value of the dollar? Of all the fiat currencies worldwide?  We have had individual hyper-inflations; Germany 1923, Hungary in the late 1940s, France in the 1790s but never a coordinated worldwide paper currency regime.  What will this all look like?
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
4 years ago
It might be instructive to change a setting on our mental model of the world’s money and stock markets.
What happens when stock market gains/losses are tax free?
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
QE does not get ‘spent’, but it does have an effect–by keeping interest rates low, it enables a massive wealth transfer from producer/savers to insiders (Wall Street, banks), and ‘borrowers’.
ThaomasH
ThaomasH
4 years ago
The relation between the Fed’s balance sheet and inflation is whatever the Fed wants it to be.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Schiff keeps calling for inflation and yet, is strongly opposed to the one thing that could potentially cause substantial consumer price inflation – government assistance to people, or what is known as “QE for the people”.
And Mish is wrong if he says that any asset deflation will cause general consumer price deflation.   Other than gasoline prices, what else would you expect to fall by a substantial amount if the asset bubble crashes by say, 30%?     Property taxes?   No.   College tuition?   No.   Groceries?  No.    Daycare?   No.   Senior care aka assisted living facilities?  No.   Health insurance?  No way.    Medicines?  No way.  Other than some discretionary items that are normally purchased by the rich – e.g. luxury imported vehicles, vacation rentals etc., almost nothing will fall in any meaningful way.  At best, the prices could go sideways for some time (before going up again).
Flatlaxity
Flatlaxity
4 years ago

Let’s take an artificial situation of the
Administration/Congress sending out another $1T in stimulus to consumers.  Assume also that this $1T has to be financed
by the issuance of Treasury debt as tax collections are already behind in
funding defense, entitlements and previous give-away–programs. 

 

There is a balance – the Treasury sends out the checks
which are paid for by largely bank and institutional (such as pension programs)
purchases of Treasury security debt.  Foreign and individual purchases have be negligible of late.)

 

One-fourth of this $1T received by consumers, according
to the most recent FRBNY study, is spent by on goods and services.  Thus $250B goes into GDP.   The
remaining three fourths is comprised by the one-third of the total going to
debt-payback and the remaining 5/12’s (42 percent) being saved.  Much of this three-fourths is bank-deposited
or used to purchase assets (real estate, equities, debt, etc.) the funds for which
can also wind up as bank deposits.

 

With much of this three-fourths winding up in bank hands,
no wonder that they’re complaining of a huge amount of money on hand.  Further, the banks have been reluctantly
slowing their loans as many people and companies have become overextended.  However the Fed in June raised the interest
rate it pays for bank reserves and also lifted the rate it pays on overnight
reverse repurchase agreements.

 

Switching over to the Federal Reserve Bank, the Fed has a
program to keep interest rates in check, especially at the short-term security
duration end, and thereby promote borrowing and economic growth. This program consists
of an ongoing monthly purchase of $80B in treasuries and $40B of GSE (Fannie
Mae, Freddie Mac, Sallie Mae, etc.) debt.  The treasury debt purchase portion has to be from the secondary market
as the law disallows Fed purchases directly from the Treasury Dept. (The Fed
does buy corporate debt, but this program is very small, or almost negligible
compared to what’s being addressed here.)

 

The $120B total is comprised by Fed newly created money.   Compared
to the value of new Treasury Dept. security issuance since the beginning of
this year, the Fed has bought some 43 percent in the secondary market, thereby
balancing a large part of the new issuance, primarily purchased by banks.

 

The $120B/mo purchases are added to the Fed’s asset balance
sheet.  It is the $120B/mo new money
creation that “waters the currency.”  This asset increase feeds into the supply of money, or M2 (although M3
and M4 are alternates.)  M2 has increased
$4.4T, or one-fourth, from 1Q19 to 1Q21.  However, nominal GDP increased only 1.4 percent during this period.  The increase in Fed assets was $3.5T or 80
percent of the nominal increase in M2.  Should we consider that the value of the dollar has also gone down 25
percent?

 

I cringe when I hear about inflation in that it only
addresses goods/services.  The inflation
of assets should be also included.  Look
at the dispensation of Government stimulus payments covered above.  The bulk goes to assets. GDP inflation is
only a subset of overall inflation.  Look
at your pet gripe about equivalent rental cost in CPI compared to the inflation
in residential housing prices.  Yet, it
is true that Government fiscal and monetary policy is directed to goods and
services.

 

A problem in determining future GDP or CPI goods/services
inflation, is how much spill-over from consumption of Government largesse will
occur?  Corporates (to support debt
payments, buybacks to increase earnings, and yields) and people on the dole
need more and more.  That’s the nature of
the beast and much of the cause of diminishing returns via the Government’s
actions.  When there’s not enough, there’s
a come-uppance.  Money will then flow
from equities/commodities/real estate to bonds.  This also will directly bear on the goods/service “real” economy. Then,
the Congress/Fed will act again to provide more – until the ultimate
reconciliation that this won’t work.

– – – – – – – – – – – – –

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Flatlaxity
The Democrats have legislation coming up, that if it passes, will give “first time home buyers” (defined as anybody who hasn’t owned a home in 3 years)  a free 15K downpayment to get into a house. Last I heard anyway.
What do you think that will do for housing asset inflation?
I think it will do two things. One is that it will blow the bubble even bigger…..and it will provide a repeat scenario (Just like 2004-2007) where buyers who are NOT decent credit risks will be given mortgages on very high priced houses………leading to high defaults within 2-3 years or less. My best guess then, is that there will be a bust cycle in housing by 2025 or so.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T

This appears to be designed only to keep the bubble going on for a little longer.   If the Democrats wanted to help people, they should seize the so many millions of unoccupied units first.   The Democrats are a right-wing party.  They just have their socially liberal tag as their USP, nothing more.  Same thing with Republicans ; they don’t give a damn what happens to poor white folks.  They just pretend to be on their side.  

Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Before 2025 is my bet, based on current pricing. With nothing saved, and nothing invested, subsidized homeowners will run for the hills on the first price ‘dip’ or employment decline–the result is likely to be a market implosion.
Sunriver
Sunriver
4 years ago
Point is, the government will use the $8 Trillion FED balance sheet on the next round of ‘Stimulus for All’ whether it is legal or not.
Nothing makes sense anymore.
anoop
anoop
4 years ago
inflation is a problem and now shortages are becoming a big problem.  the whole jerking-around with commodity prices will cause supply chains to seize up as companies try to make sure they can recoup their costs before they build.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
“But that money is going literally nowhere in contrast to Congressional stimulus which consumers will spend.”
Which is why it is better to send the stimulus money directly into people’s pockets instead of having it go through the banks by lowering interest rates. Banks have to be disintermediated because they are no longer necessary and they don’t do their job anyway when it comes to stimulating the economy. The technology to do that didn’t exist in 2008 but now it does. It would also be cheaper because it would pass through fewer hands to get the job done.
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Those sticky little hands hold the puppet strings, unfortunately.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Puppet strings fray and break when used too much.
learnmesomething
learnmesomething
4 years ago
Yeah, but…
all that newly printed “money” being used to purchase bonds is “crowding/bullying out” other investors forcing them to put their money elsewhere.  When you crowd out others, you are increasing demand and causing direct inflation in other markets… real estate/stocks/etc.
The results are more money and inflation.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
There will be a corresponding drop in velocity as the the money gets squirreled away. The Fed puts money into circulation and the bond sellers put it back out of circulation by having the money just sit there.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
What is the Fed doing with the trillion bucks or so they’ve taken in over the past few months through “borrowing” against the Treasuries in reverse repos? Treasuries are Fed assets, and they are putting them up for collateral when they do all these reverse repos. Are they just sitting on all that cash? If not, what are they doing with it?
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Allowing it to be quietly stolen is my bet.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
The FED isn’t sitting on the cash. Reverse repos reverse the next day, the FED gets back the collateral.
The operation is to give some returns on the cash that banks and non-banks hold, as Mish has said. I calculated the interest on RRPs amount to 0.00015%/day or so.
I don’t think, even the banks could be happy with the situation the central baking cabal has managed to create. The asset holders (stocks, real estate, paintings) certainly are, until the everything bubble turns into everything broken.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
If the reverse repo rate is a trillion a day, then .00015% interest is what? 1.5 Billion a day? Is that no longer a significant amount?
There is also this thing whereby the Fed is committed legally to reduce its cash balance to 450B by the end of this month, and  it was at about 711B at the end of June.
I appreciate your responses, btw. Just trying to get my head around what’s really going on.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
I also appreciate your common sense comments. Otherwise, I would just ignore you. Consider it a small, meaningless compliment. 🙂
KyleW
KyleW
4 years ago
I just do not understand this. If they are are buying Treasury bonds, isn’t the government getting new money and spending it?
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  KyleW
Do not confuse govt debt and deficit spending with QE. The latter does little but suppress rates (if that). Read my link to Hussman.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
QE, by suppressing rates, enables deficit spending.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
Reply to  KyleW
The government spends money no matter what.
The printing suppress the interest it pays on bonds/treasuries.
Some flaming idiots even celebrated the benefits, suggested the government should borrow oodles and pay back nothing except principal, or in case of German bonds, gets paid. Of course, these academics created the situation in the first place.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.