A Debate Over Excess Savings, How Much Stimulus Still Hasn’t Been Spent?

The lead images is from a Tweet.

“Not sure most investors appreciate how much it will take to eat through the excess savings & healthy balance sheets that the pandemic created for households as a whole. Because people don’t understand flows and balances. The excess savings is a balance. The savings rate a flow,” says Wasteland Capital.

Excess Savings?!

In Austrian economics “excess savings” is impossible. It implies no one would consume, thus we would all starve to death. 

The Austrians are correct, but let’s discuss an alternate definition as provided. 

“Excess savings = the cumulative savings above the pre-pandemic amount.”

How Much Free Money Stimulus Still Hasn’t Been Spent?

Income and spending data from the BEA, chart by Mish

Without using the term “excess savings” I took a stab at the above definition on April 22 in How Much Free Money Stimulus Still Hasn’t Been Spent?

Chart Notes

  • SAAR stands for seasonally-adjusted annualized rate.
  • The three rounds of free money stimulus in April of 2020, January of 2021, and March of 2021 are clearly visible.
  • Stimulus generated inflation. But how much still isn’t spent?

The above chart is two month old, so let’s do an update, this time looking at real (inflation adjusted income and spending.

Real Disposable Income and Spending

Income and spending data from the BEA, chart by Mish

Big Excess?

Don’t be so sure. 

Free money that goes to bottom rung households tends to immediately get spent. The higher the rung, the longer the savings remain unspent. This is complicated by the fact that most of the money was supposed to go to lower tiers, and further complicated by corporate fraud, especially in round one.

More importantly, personal spending does not count down payments on homes, mortgage paydowns, stock market or Bitcoin purchases, capital expenses for businesses, drug money, other illegal uses, or money sent to relatives overseas. 

Paying down debt is also saving. Money paying down credit card bills also constitutes saving. 

Crypto Heaven 

The notion that there is a big pool of accumulated savings ready to spend for months into the future is very questionable.

I have a sneaking suspicion that much of the allegedly unspent money went to crypto heaven or the stock market.

Point of clarification: The money did not go to money heaven, someone still holds every dollar. 

It’s wealth that went to money heaven.

Q: What is “saving”?
A: Production Minus Consumption 

We handed out free money with nothing being produced then we wonder why we have inflation!

Evidence Suggests the Money Already Spent

On May 17, I noted Retail Sales Easily Beat Expectations, US Treasury Yields Jump in Response

However, the next day I noted Target Plunges 25%, What About Yesterday’s Big Retail Sales Blowout?

Reports by Target and Walmart strongly suggest something other than pent-up saving.

Target Key Points

  • Higher markdowns
  • Inventory impairments
  • Lower than expected sales in discretionary items
  • Inability to raise prices 

Walmart also warned about bloated inventories. 

Amazon is laying off workers. 

Discretionary Spending Exaggerated

Credit Card Debt and a 3-Way Crash

Expect a Recession

Consumers are in such great financial shape they went on a credit card binge instead of spending alleged savings.

If there is a “tailwind” of savings, which I rather doubt, it will be consumed in a flash in the coming recession. 

When is that? 

I Expect a Deep Recession to Start This Quarter or Early Third Quarter

That triggered a silly discussion on Twitter noting this month is the end of the second quarter. Yes, that’s true but most key data is still from April.

Jobs are a very lagging indicator. They rose in the first quarter of the Great Recession and in many preceding months.

The key number is retail sales. The most recent data is April. It was way stronger than expected. But is it believable?

For discussion, please see Is a Recession On the Way or Has it Already Started

Also see, Target Plunges 25%, What About Yesterday’s Big Retail Sales Blowout?

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

23 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
LawrenceBird
LawrenceBird
1 year ago
Also question a long run savings rate of 7% and even if accurate, how much of that is due to a very small subset of the population. I suppose it is impossible to quantify a median savings rate but my guess would be for 95% of the population the rate is around 2%.
Jojo
Jojo
1 year ago
Reply to  LawrenceBird
For 95% of the population, I think the best guess would be negative savings, especially if you eliminated housing value.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
1 year ago
This may be the first recession that started from the supply side (inability to produce) rather than demand side (the desire to spend less).
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
1 year ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear
I think it is both. Most people that retired or stopped working consume less. Inflation has eaten into it as well. This recession was overdue before covid. Don’t people remember the Fed QT tantrum the market threw in 2018? The Fed needs to reestablish baseline equilibrium by removing all QE and letting rates normalize. Only productivity should survive in the end. Most of the economy is still unproductive and doesn’t contribute to overall productivity.
prumbly
prumbly
1 year ago
If you print a load of money and shove it into poor people’s sweaty, outstretched hands, isn’t this really a big net zero? Won’t money simply be devalued by the amount you print, aka inflation?
RunnerDan
RunnerDan
1 year ago
Reply to  prumbly
Yes. Same effect if you hand the money to an ever growing and essentially useless bureaucracy.
goldguy
goldguy
1 year ago
The middle class (is there a middle class?)will be eating pancakes mourning, noon, and night similar to the last great depression.
RunnerDan
RunnerDan
1 year ago
Reply to  goldguy
Place a comma after pancakes and your sentence works in both senses of mourning/morning!
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
1 year ago
Reply to  goldguy
Replace pancakes with Ramen noodles. Pancakes have wheat in them which is quite expensive.
Sunriver
Sunriver
1 year ago
The poor, as a percentage of the population, is increasing rapidly due to inflation and asset bubbles. Credit Card usage will increase tremendously going forward.
This Post WWII Monetarist experiment is not going to end well. Unless the poor like cake.
RunnerDan
RunnerDan
1 year ago
Bracket the “excess savings” with the “planet has too many people” argument. Common feature among the declaimers is a lack of common sense and/or they are just evil power grabbers.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
1 year ago
My take on so called excess savings theory: the perpetrator of the financial crisis needed to explain away their failure for the dumb enough who still buy their bs.
Mish
Mish
1 year ago
Someone always gets the money. But the thesis is the poor have it and will spend it.
What if the poor already spent it and the wealthy no longer feel so wealthy due to asset price declines?
Q: What is “saving” anyway?
A: Production Minus Consumption
We handed out free money with nothing being produced then we wonder why we have inflation!
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
1 year ago
Reply to  Mish
“Someone always gets the money.” Hmm. What is money? Do we not simply have layers of fiat currency that are printed from thin air and thus can go back into thin air? The dollar is the senior fiat currency, created by a soverign. Stocks are fiat currencies created by corporations. Bitcoin is fiat currency created by the people. All from thin air.
In a recent example you mentioned $1000 and LUNA being $2000 in the economy until LUNA went under and that fiat currency was evaporated back into the ether from whence it came. How are corporate stocks or the dollar any different. All are IOUs/debt. Isn’t this just a long discussion which used to be answered by Exter’s pyramid?
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Mish
2008+: free money given to banks and financials – no inflation.
2020+: free money given to “civilians” – inflation within 18 months.
The FRB claimed they wanted to increase inflation to 2%, but couldn’t get the inflation they “wanted.”
The Fed always knew how to create inflation; they simply didn’t want to give money to “civilians.”
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
“Consumers are in such great financial shape”
Absolutely.
The only explanation for this chart is that it is upside down.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Is that worse than 2012? Don’t show it to papa Jerome.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Did crypto denominated holdings count in those savings figures? If not, I don’t see that they’d have any effect. Somebody ended up with the real dollars, even if it all goes to zero.
MIFE
MIFE
1 year ago
Reply to  Zardoz
The same could be said for any purchase that is not consumed. Stocks, gold, bonds, land etc. Someone else always gets the money, so it is a shift in ownership of money and assets, not a spending/removal of money
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  MIFE
So a decrease in savings would essentially represent money going from people to corporations, or are corporate savings counted too?
Naphtali
Naphtali
1 year ago
Reply to  Zardoz
But aren’t corporations people too?
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  Naphtali
Yep… and money is speech.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Naphtali
Only when they vote in elections.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.