Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Amusing Tales of a Coal Bottleneck in Germany and the Failure to Plan

Shipping News, Coal Edition

Here’s an amusing story about Germany’s increasing dependence on coal via Eurointelligence

One of the more shocking statistics about German electricity production is that coal constituted some 32% in the third quarter of 2021. Coal is not only the largest single source of power generation in Germany. Its share has been rising, up from 26.4% from a year earlier. The reason is the increase in gas prices. The withdrawal of three nuclear power stations at the beginning of this year, and the remaining three at the beginning of next year, will lead to a further increase in the proportion of coal in energy production. Robert Habeck [Vice-Chancellor of Germany] wants coal to become the fallback in case Russia cuts off the gas. So there could a massive short-term increase in coal production.

Except the industry is not ready for it. One big problem is transportation. We reported on the falling levels of the river Rhine, and its huge role for Germany’s supply chain. This is where all the heavy stuff is transported, like coal. Germany has no problems importing coal, but struggles to get the coal to power stations. Apart from low water levels, the capacity of Germany’s logistics industry is being used up to transport wheat and other cereals from Ukraine. The rail system is also overloaded. Transportation infrastructure is fixed in the short run. And since coal production is ultimately doomed, nobody has invested in long-term transportation infrastructure projects, and we presume nobody will.

The reason for the lack of investment is the government’s plan to phase out coal production by 2030. What they did not see coming is the reversal of the downward trend in global production that started last year and that, we presume, will have continued this year. Habeck’s plan to expand coal production further in case of a Russian gas embargo came as a shock to the industry, as Bild reports. They were not prepared for this. It means the decommissioned coal-fired power stations would have to be dusted off and rekindled. They also haven’t invested in staff.

Remarkably Stupid in Many Ways

  • Angela Merkel mothballed nuclear power plants to appease the Greens.
  • The Nord Stream II natural gas pipeline is ready to deliver gas but is totally shut down due to sanctions
  • Nord Stream I needs repairs but sanctions limited availability of parts
  • Rather than put the nuclear plants back in production Germany is resorting to more coal but supply constraints hinder getting the coal to the plants.
  • German Greens would rather use more coal than nuclear.
  • Sanctions have driven up the price of natural gas so much that Germany is discussing rationing natural gas.
  • Coal is the single largest method of generating electricity in Germany, 32 percent in the third quarter of 2021 up from 26.4 percent. It’s use is undoubtedly higher today.

Well Done Germany!

Also note Germany’s Climate Protection Minister Mandates More Coal to Produce Electricity

And Let’s Investigate Alleged EU Environmental and Climate Change Progress

This is what happens when you mandate green energy and have no legitimate plan to get there. 

US vs Germany

In the US, president Biden had no realistic plan to phase out fossil fuels but sought to mandate targets anyway.

Fortunately, on July 15, I was pleased to report Hooray! Senator Manchin Finally Kills Biden’s Build Back Better Initiative

Unfortunately, Biden Declares Climate Emergency to demand more green energy.

Fortunately, I expect the Supreme Court to nix whatever Progressive nonsense Biden concocts to deal with climate change. See the above link for discussion.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

69 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
ricardo2000
ricardo2000
3 years ago
Alexis de Tocqueville: ”When the taste for physical gratifications among them has grown more rapidly than their education… the time will come when men are carried away and lose all self-restraint…. It is not necessary to do violence to such a people in order to strip them of the rights they enjoy; they themselves willingly loosen their hold…. they neglect their chief business which is to remain their own masters.”

Do some research about Levelized Costs of Energy (LCOE) Mish. Electricity generation sources’ costs are compared using this technique. Lazard.com provides the LCOE gold standard for more than a decade. Lazard currently states that utility scale renewables are cheaper to BUILD and OPERATE than to operate any EXISTING utility scale electricity source. NO nuclear plant for the past 20 years has been constructed on time and within budget. Nuclear power isn’t even close to being cheap before consideration of decommissioning and waste disposal. Anyone who watched Fukushima blowup knows that catastrophic failure risks everything. Look behind Fukushima and see a headland so high it would take an end of the world tsunami to flood the top. But it was a few million cheaper to build it on the shore than to build pipes and pumps raising cooling water up the hill. Nuclear industry engineering and business decisions can’t be trusted. Asserting anything else is pathetically, treacherously, stupid.

Why else does EVERY energy company invest in renewables? It isn’t that they are ALL mistaken. So it must mean that everyone who wants operation and investment in coal, natural gas, and especially nuclear, doesn’t know what they are talking about. Get it through your head: nuclear power was NEVER going to be to ‘cheap to meter’. Quacking about ‘nuclear power’ in any form, including Small Modular Plants and fusion, is designed to make excuses for nuclear weapons, and to provide money for the nuclear power subsidy industry.
The only thing remarkable about EU energy policies is that they have placed themselves wholly in US oil company pockets with stupid Russian sanctions. Well, what can anyone expect from White Western media cloaca but dimwitted political bigotries, and completely ignorant business decisions.

Jimmy Carter: “[The US] is just an oligarchy, with unlimited money being the essence….”

H. L. Mencken (1880 – 1956): “Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.”

William Casey (CIA Director 1981-1987): “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”

Anon1970
Anon1970
3 years ago
NATO countries have been imposing sanctions on Russia since its takeover of Crimea in 2014. Now the sanctions are boomeranging back on the rest of the world. US meddling in Ukraine is turning out to be very costly, especially for the Ukrainians.
psstory
psstory
3 years ago
You are either a capitalist or central planner. You can’t have it both ways. Do you want the central government to plan the economy or do you want the free market to take effect? Please don’t tell me that you want Biden or any government planning our economy.
ricardo2000
ricardo2000
3 years ago
Reply to  psstory
John Stuart Mill (1806 – 1873): “I did not mean that Conservatives are generally stupid; I meant, that stupid persons are generally conservative.”

This ‘psstory’ comment is ridiculous. The idea that there was ever a ‘free market’ is laughable, especially in the energy industry. You haven’t heard of the Standard Oil Trust and the Seven Sisters so your comment this is simple minded ignorance. It was ‘free market’ capitalists, in a treacherous attempt to cut labour costs, that gave China its industrial capacity. Now their ‘centrally planned’ economy will overcome the White West. The Global South has repudiated US-NAYOYO leadership. This risks completely changed trade patterns where the White West is excluded from almost every source of raw materials and markets for their ‘services’.

Ursula Le Guin: “We live in capitalism. Its power seems inescapable. So did the divine right of kings. Any human power can be resisted and changed by human beings. Resistance and change often begin in art, and very often in our art, the art of words.”
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Apparently, Switzerland is also releasing oil from its SPR to make up for oil that can’t be transported on rivers due to low water levels.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
the history of the world is a never ending episodes of insanity. the germans greens became an industry and they committed fratricide on their fellow citizens. add on amerikan war mongering and forcing them to further commit idiocy with cutting off pipelines…………..another insane episode. what’s next. my guess is biden and kamala never leave whitehouse. stop the steal. we had our last election. ever. mamala for life.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
And there is nothing you can do about it. Complaining incessantly is a total waste of time, yet that is all the majority of commenters here do.
On the other hand, you can look for the investment opportunities that appear as a result. I believe you are one of the commenters here that looks for those opportunities.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
“Complaining incessantly is a total waste of time…”
Papa, please take your own advice.
mrchinup
mrchinup
3 years ago
Should be a nice cold winter for those mentally ill liberals. Should have listened to TRUMP.
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
There is absolutely no majority for this cancelation of nuclear power: It was just opportune to form a coalition with greenies.
It’s akin to Obama dumping Osama at sea or Clinton expanding NATO and bombing Yugoslavia (Monica Lewinsky!) and expanding NATO … an opportunity for domestic partisan jostling … and here we are, in a war with Russia.
In the nineteenth century, Parliaments still had doctors, businessmen, professors, priests and ministers.
In most countries now, it’s 99% law degrees.
Where parties used to be fluid or even episodically thematic, the main parties are now fixed, and nobody votes on the basis of arguments or conscience as they did back then, they all vote along party lines.
Parties monopolize policy, which generally aligns with party programs only rhetorically; election outcomes are funded by moneyed interests.
Parties are cartels and subvert democracy, which is based on the Enlightenment ideal that with enough debate reason will prevail.
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
Ha Ha. Just wait until you read what problems they have moving around oil to inland refineries fed by Russian pipelines, or even offloading it at ports not scaled for the job. Or what to do with plant that was built for different grades of oil. Ha Ha.
kansasdude
kansasdude
3 years ago
Infuriating is more like it. And Biden is right there on screwing the US over. Neither one of these parties is worth a **** and neither one of them can help from shooting themselves in the foot when they’re at the cusp of taking over. Republicans could’ve been a shoe in but no, they had to go after roe/wade and now they are after the lgbtq crowd. And now the dems want to drag Hillary and her 10,000lbs of medical equipment back to the presidential-hopeful podium. What a bunch of self-serving, greedy jackasses.
Carl_R
Carl_R
3 years ago
Reply to  kansasdude
The Roe v. Wade decision may not be around that long. A Trump endorsement helps among Republicans, but hurts among Democrats and Independents. Thus, many Trump-endorsed Senate candidates won in primaries that seem destined to lose in November. That will cost Republicans seats they had a shot at winning, or might have expected to win, in Arizona, Ohio, Georgia, and Pennsylvania. With a larger majority in the Senate, court packing may well be not far away.
Crenvy
Crenvy
3 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
I “liked” this relative to providing good insight, not for the posited outcome. Hopefully, a red wave could overcome such a prognostication … not that the outcome really makes much difference in the long run politically.
JRM
JRM
3 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
Real Polls are not showing what you “believe”!!!!
Only people that are living in their “ECHO” chamber are buying what the DEMOCATS and MSM are selling!!!
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
3 years ago
From “It’s the economy, Stupid!” to “It’s the availability of energy, Stupid!” Greens had their chance, and now the virtue signalling will stop.
Crenvy
Crenvy
3 years ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear
Doubtful. The leftists have gotten this far by totally ignoring logic and basic principles of real science. They are 90% in charge of the propaganda output, so it just keeps going as they can twist any situation 8 ways to Sunday.
mrutkaus
mrutkaus
3 years ago
Well you can’t say they were shallow thinkers!
Carl_R
Carl_R
3 years ago
The great irony here is that wind and solar, while they appear “green” on the surface, may not turn out to be all that “green”. Both produce power irregularly, and thus require storage and/or backup power options. Both involve huge blights on the landscape that are detrimental to wildlife. Solar, in particular, requires a lot of toxic chemicals to make the voltaic cells, and down the road, will create an expensive toxic waste problem disposing of them at their end of life. It’s one thing to put cells on the roof of a house, with the power to be used primarily locally, or a windmill on a farm to pump water and/or do other local tasks, and quite another to create massive solar and wind farms.
At this point, probably the safest, and most environmentally friendly form of energy production, after hydro and geothermal, is nuclear. It boggles my mind that “greens” want to shut down existing nuclear reactors and replace them with more toxic forms of energy production, but I freely admit that I’m not up on the situation. Perhaps the reactors in question are at the end of their lifecycle, and need to be shut down anyway. In any case, it is interesting to watch Germany and France going in opposite direction with regards to energy production.
kansasdude
kansasdude
3 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
It appears none of that matters to them. They get in a mindset of what’s good and ram it down your throat regardless of facts. Only the facts that support their agenda are considered. That much is obvious.
Carl_R
Carl_R
3 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
I would add that I expect to see a mix of technologies. No one is “the answer”, but rather, all are part of the answer, and the mix will vary by location. Obviously the biggest drawback to nuclear is the high cost to build a plant, and the long time required, as in a decade or more. Wind and solar are quick to install, but take 75-300 times as much land, and produce more irregular output. The free market will ultimately tell us which countries chose wisely, and which chose poorly, as choosing a less “optimal” method to generate power will eventually show up as higher rates.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
Food, water, shelter and energy. All crucial to our survival. And demand keeps going up for all of them.
And ironically, our increasing demands for these necessities threatens our future survivability.
Regarding energy, there is no perfect source, but some are better than others, relatively speaking. We are currently in a transition phase away from fossil fuels towards renewables. And we can all see that renewables are not a perfect answer. (There is no perfect answer.) They are merely a relatively better answer in many cases. (Not all cases.) And the transition is not going well. In part because energy demand was underestimated, and the build out of renewables was over estimated.
Which has left us in a position where we have under invested in fossil fuels for the last decade. And we have no current plans to increase this investment significantly going forward.
Which means high fossil fuel prices for the rest of this decade at least and a great return on investment in many fossil fuel companies.
Crenvy
Crenvy
3 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
Hydro and nuclear have huge carbon footprints for construction and maintenance, short- and long-term.
Nothing matches the power of Petro energy density and portability, so even the green stuff is not self-sustaining.
Some type of energy, so new that we haven’t invented it yet (no, not fusion) is required, but no one is working on it afaik.
Gara
Gara
3 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
The whole madness can be explained by viewing the green hysteria not as a logical movement around environmentalism to genuinely deal with real issues, but rather as a sort of new age religion.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago

Everyone loves having their cake and eating it too. In
Europe they complain about the EU but if asked if they want to leave it few
want to. The same for the Euro. The Germans complain about the Greece, Spain
and Italy and Greece, Spain and Italy complain about Germany but when asked if
they want to leave the Euro few want to. The UK was able to leave the EU only
because they had their own currency, never really saw themselves as
Continentals and the Continentals never really saw them as European either. Before the Russian invasion the inter-country
bitching revolved around the “holier than thou” arguments over (fill in the blank) issues that in many
cases remind me of what we see in the US.

That has mostly changed. Finding solutions to the big issues
such as survival dominates the discussions now. The ECB is searching for ways
for the EU to survive financially in a time of dire necessity and now that
Germany itself has need of the ECB rather than the opposite possible solutions
that were rejected before suddenly become relevant. The EU obviously needs a
deep, liquid bond market like you find in the US so to get that you are going
to need the EU to be able to issue bonds or more likely take over some of the
bonds of member nations such as Italy and now Germany. I should mention that
Hamilton got the finances of the new country in order by having the federal
government assume the debts of the states and financed the interest payments by
selling land and taxes on booze. I do not know what shape it will take but the
conditions and the willpower to do it are present thanks to Putin.

In the US there are 10-year Federal bonds but individual
states also issue 10-year bonds and there is no incapability. The individual
state 10-year bonds trade at different prices depending as to their ability to
repay bondholders. Texan bonds trade at much higher prices than Illinois ones
for example. In the EU the same is true. Of course it is more complicated than
that but the EU and the ECB are trying to find its “financial feet” you might
say and the political changes will be coming also because that has to be
changed somewhat also. The process is ongoing and the next few years are going
to be very interesting.

prumbly
prumbly
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
It take balls to leave the EU, once you’ve started sucking at that teat. So far only the British have flopped out their gonads and gone for it.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  prumbly

Hasn’t gone well for them so far, but if the EU collapses and they don’t, they can call it a win.

Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  prumbly
Maybe because they once joined a common market, and it has evolved into a pompous political project with imperial ambitions.
Ask if you want to leave a political project or a common market, and you will have different answers.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
“Amusing Tales of a Coal Bottleneck in Germany and the Failure to Plan”
There is indeed some failure to plan here.
In addition, there is the unpredictably of the future, which makes some planning simply impossible.
There is also some irony. Heat waves and droughts are one of the issues affecting river levels, making coal transport more difficult.
Heat waves and droughts are also reducing hydro-electric power production (similar to whats happening at Lake Meade and Powell).
In addition, the efficiency of solar panels declines at extreme high temperatures.
The increasing frequency and severity of heat waves will increase energy consumption while at the same time reducing some energy production.
At this point in time, we are still very dependent on fossil fuels for the majority of our energy, even though they are making the global warming problem worse.
As I keep saying; I can’t do anything about this problem. But at least I can try to profit by investing in oil and gas companies whose product remain in high demand.
LM2022
LM2022
3 years ago
Just read a hilarious article about little Englanders on holiday being stuck in a 8 hour queue at Dover trying to get through customs to leave their island. The French are sticking it to the English good and hard on Brexit. Talk about lack of planning! With Boris on holiday and 6 weeks before the new prime minister is chosen, expect England to descend into chaos!
effendi
effendi
3 years ago
Reply to  LM2022
So thousands of British holiday makers will skip France as a holiday destination in future costing thousands of French families of the income they would earn providing lodgement, meals etc.
But petty government workers on 4 day weeks and a nice pension scheme don’t care about that.
I also read about a number of French resort towns in crisis as sanctions mean few Russian visitors. Way to go France.
LM2022
LM2022
3 years ago
Reply to  effendi
That’s fine – little Englanders can go holiday in some grey, cold post industrial wasteland in their own country. They won’t be able to afford vacations by the time the UKIP-Tory-Brexit party is done with them. Way to go Little England!
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  effendi
I live in France and I haven’t heard of any resort town having problems because of a lack of Russian tourists. On the other hand I do her about the wave of American tourists in France taking advantage of the highest dollar-euro rate for twenty years.
effendi
effendi
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Chorcheval (upscale ski resort) has lost 90% of their Russian visitors. Any place dependant on Russian tourists is finding out what sanctions mean.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  effendi
You mean Courchevel. Russians made up 7% of the clientelle. The station will survive the lack of Russians. It’s a good party station but myself I prefer stations with more challenging runs.
happypuppy888
happypuppy888
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
You do, ha?
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  happypuppy888
Yes of course. Courchevel is a tame party place and very expensive. It by far does not have the best slopes. Tell me, have you skied there and then in other places so you can compare?
Jack
Jack
3 years ago
Reply to  LM2022

Lmao. Would expect chaos everywhere else first before UK. Having lived in France, I do like the french but if true this would be their loss – guess folks will just skip France next time – plenty other places to go.

LM2022
LM2022
3 years ago
Reply to  Jack
I don’t think they care. The English have so poisoned the well with Europe that Europe would be happy to see them go somewhere else. I was in Spain for 2 weeks recently. Made sure to explain I wasn’t British. There’s no love there.
prumbly
prumbly
3 years ago
Reply to  LM2022
It’s quite normal. Britain and France have been at each other’s throats for centuries, and the period when they were both in the EU must have been confusing and somewhat disconcerting to both parties.
Things will get interesting when France and Germany get back to their normal state of conflict and rivalry. Coming soon! The EU cannot work – there’s just too much history that says that it must fall apart. Of course it will take some sort of economic calamity – like the one the Europeans are creating for themselves today – for this to happen. Grab the popcorn!
Scooot
Scooot
3 years ago
Reply to  LM2022
Nearly half the families in distress that you’re laughing at would have voted to remain in the EU.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Scooot
That’s the great thing about democracies. Nearly half isn’t enough.
Scooot
Scooot
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker

Empathy? They lost the vote (and most accept it) but are taunted as if they voted the other way.

JRM
JRM
3 years ago
Gas is now flowing through the Nordstream 1 pipeline!!
prumbly
prumbly
3 years ago
The 800 pound elephant in the room has always been the very simple fact that renewable energy just doesn’t work as a replacement for fossil fuel energy and never will. This has been obvious for a long time, and yet delusional thinking has completely taken over the West. Even with the current situation, few seem to get it. It boggles the mind.
Jack
Jack
3 years ago
Reply to  prumbly
Need to accelerate fusion tech.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  prumbly
So what happens when the fossil fuel is gone?
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Nuclear energy can trick your mind.
There was a story about spent fuel rods at Fukushima. These rods were stored there in tanks while Japan was constructing a reprocessing facility.
These had to be cooled by circulation water, but the pumps went out.
The fear was that the water would evaporate and the still hot rods would burn through the steel containers.
Imagine, nuclear fuel is enriched to 4-5 %, and these rods were already spent, but still generate enough heat to burn through steel.
I thought I knew some nuclear theory, but the operating conditions were somewhat of an eye opener.
Jojo
Jojo
3 years ago
While waiting for commercial fusion power, molten salt and pebble bed reactors could solve the problem you mention.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Why do you think the earths core is still molten after billions of years.
All the radioactive material that’s still decaying keeps it warm.
Bombillo
Bombillo
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Gravitational compression keeps the core hot. Mars didn’t have enough mass to sustain it’s molten core.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
That’s a nice theory of which I am a skeptic.
Eighthman
Eighthman
3 years ago
Day after day, we are confronted with the harsh choice of judging our leaders: Are they fools or just lying?
The horror is, they are probably fools. Yellen didn’t foresee inflation? (like, her job?) Now, she wants an oil price cap? So that Putin can bruise his ribs laughing, “Guys, let’s see if we can make oil go to $180 a barrel”? Greenspan (the genius) didn’t think banks needed regulation? Germans dump nuclear power? For coal instead? Dishonesty you can fix. Stupidity? We may be doomed.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  Eighthman
It’s baked into the cake.
The rule of Maximus states that people’s deputies cannot be much smarter than the average voting public.
Surprised it had such a long run.
Jojo
Jojo
3 years ago
Reply to  Eighthman
Carlin’s famous quote also applies to politicians:

“Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.”
― George Carlin
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
George was clearly in the stupider half because he didn’t understand that average != median.
And yet I still love his comedic genius.
Bombillo
Bombillo
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
George used the word average, which is the mean.
JimK
JimK
3 years ago
Reply to  Bombillo
median and mean are… well Never mind…
Carl_R
Carl_R
3 years ago
Reply to  JimK
Mean and median are not identical, but especially in a normal distribution, which intelligence is, are usually very close. I would guess that 49-51% of the people are below the mean, so while it isn’t going to be exactly 50%, it’s close enough for a joke.
Lip
Lip
3 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
In the normal distribution, with which intelligence is modelled, they are the identical. Using median would have been more accurate, but would not have worked as well for the joke.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
george knew most of his audience would have no clue what median is versus average. he was teaching with comedy. not giving an SAT exam. you need a sense of humor dose ASAP. i hope medicare pays for it.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  Eighthman
Stupid people are usually the most evil people.
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
Reply to  Eighthman
Neither. Everything they say is performative. What they want is power & influence. What they say is calculated for political effect. None of it is meant literally. Truth or reality is not even a consideration. Only political realities are calculated.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
U.S. electricity generation mix in 2021:

– Coal, 22%
– Natural Gas, 38%

– Nuke, 19%
– Wind, 9%
– Hydro, 6%
– Solar, 3%
– Etc & rounding, 2%

Wind and solar have gone way up in recent years, and now we have less reliability. Imagine that.

Jojo
Jojo
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Generating solar power from satellites would significantly increase the reliability of power. There is serious work ongoing to try and make this a reality.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
And think of the military power that would put in the hands of a despot.
Bombillo
Bombillo
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Storing electricity is the key to renewables. It is quite conceivable that renewables could provide sufficient electricity but to have the e available when demand is extraordinary is the challenge. An engineering problem that is soluble, imo.
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
Reply to  Bombillo
Storing energy has always been the problem, otherwise people would have stored the summer heat to stay warm in the winter instead of using fire, back in the day, 50,000 years ago.
Jojo
Jojo
3 years ago
How about USA supply chain problems?
========
The Hidden Fees Making Your Bananas, and Everything Else, Cost More
by Michael Grabell | ProPublica
June 16, 2022
The story you’re about to read is bananas, and it’s also about bananas.
Last fall, a company called One Banana loaded 600,000 pounds of the fruit from its plantations in Guatemala and Ecuador onto ships bound for the Port of Long Beach in California. Once they arrived, the bananas, packed in refrigerated containers, were offloaded by cranes for trucking to a nearby warehouse, where the fruit would be sent to supermarkets nationwide.
But in the midst of a global supply chain crisis, none of the trucking companies the importer normally worked with were willing to come and get the containers.
As the bananas sat at the marine terminal, a logistics specialist for One Banana scrambled, contacting more than a dozen trucking firms.
With each passing hour, the bananas grew closer to spoiling.
“We need to pull out 15 containers from Long Beach Port,” the logistics specialist wrote in an email to one firm. “Please let me know if you could help me with this.”
A trucking company finally said it could — but only if One Banana first paid $12,000 per container on top of already higher transportation costs.
This is where the plot ripens.
….

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.