Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

For the First Time Since 1991, Germany’s Trade Surplus Vanishes

Germany balance of trade, from Tweet below

Suicide Watch for Deutsche Bank

Germany’s Model is Ugly

Germany’s Stock Market Cap

Nitrogen Restrictions

https://twitter.com/SNMilitary/status/1543956777389146113

Battle of the Bulge

Mandatory Measures to Drastically Reduce Nitrogen Emissions

Please note Dutch Farmers Angry Over Mandatory Measures to Drastically Reduce Nitrogen Emissions

Farmers in the Netherlands have been angered by the government’s plans for tougher measures that would drastically reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides.

The Dutch government unveiled its goals on Friday, mandating reductions of up to 70% in many places and as high as 95% in others in a bid to protect nature — or what the cabinet called an “unavoidable transition”. 

“We have to emit so much less nitrogen, and unfortunately the agricultural sector emits a lot,” explained Christianne van der Wal, Minister for Nature and Nitrogen Policy.

The small, densely populated country of 17.5 million has a large animal population — nearly four million cattle, 12 million pigs and 100 million chickens.

Population Picture

The Message 

Tiny Netherlands is the second-largest agricultural exporter in the world after the US.

But more cows, pigs, and chickens are unacceptable even as the cost of food is soaring globally. 

How Long Before Putin Shuts Off Natural Gas Delivery to Europe?

The big question of the day remains: How Long Before Putin Shuts Off Natural Gas Delivery to Europe?

Here are the two key questions of the day Europe needs to address: How long and what’s the economic impact?

Some readers commented Putin would not cutoff the gas as it is a source of revenue.

 Don’t be so sure of that. A cutoff does not have to be permanent. It could be for a week. Also drastically reduced supply could have the desired impact that Putin wants. 

A Laughable Explanation of the G7 Oil Price Buyers’ Cartel Emerges

It’s important to note that a huge decrease in supply as opposed to a total cutoff would cripple the EU while keeping money flowing to Russia. That’s more likely than a total shutoff.

These outcomes are all in the hands of Putin. The EU has no control of supply, it is a buyer not a seller of energy.

Yet, the EU thinks of creating a “buyer’s cartel”.

For discussion, please see A Laughable Explanation of the G7 Oil Price Buyers’ Cartel Emerges

Meanwhile, please note the battle between the Greens and the realists is coming to a head. 

Second, please note the export chickens are coming home to roost. Germany, Japan, and China are all struggling with exports. This is what happens when the US goes on a buyer’s strike.

It’s even worse for Germany with its decimated trade ties with Russia and China.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

61 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
4 years ago
I have a a funny feeling that Germany will soon be separating itself from the suicidal death-cult of Eurotardistan.
I predict that within the next 18 months they will leave the Euro (if it still exists by then), EU and NATO and become a “non-aligned” country – much like Switzerland – which will allow them to have closer commercial and diplomatic ties with Russia.
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  Bam_Man
When has Europe ever done anything that quickly since 1945, and probably long before?
8dots
8dots
4 years ago
Russian forces might move on the Mariupol/ Kharkiv line, sandwich Karamators & Slovyansk from both sides, east and west, blockade them,
blow them up, until they give up. Summers are for mopping up. Winters are for cracking NATO.
8dots
8dots
4 years ago
Europe have to solve her chronic negative energy deficit with nukes and mini nukes. France, Germany, Italy… have to beef up their defense industries, to survive on their own, for more political clout and for export.
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  8dots
All of that is long-term. Imagine a city on fire, and someone saying, “We need to buy fire trucks and tanker planes.” Well yes, that’s certainly true, but what about that fire right now? Italy is going to build up its military? Would that be the same Italian military that was defeated by the Ethiopians? LOL
8dots
8dots
4 years ago
Eurozone trade deficit/ surplus :
Red, energy : hopefully a negative spike to ignore, under 2013 lows, when Brent was above 100, before the 2014 collapse. Red might stabilize at higher negative level if Ursula Von der behave.
Blue : peaked in 2016 when export to China was booming. Since 2000 blue was never negative. That might change.
If both Blue and Red are in negative territory, the Euro will decay and DXY will rise above Nixon trading range towards the 1999/2001 level.
8dots
8dots
4 years ago
It’s either EU19 or NATO32.
ZZR600
ZZR600
4 years ago
Looks like we will benefit from price controls in the UK
Obviously, when everything disappears off the shelves they will blame in on Putin
Scooot
Scooot
4 years ago
Reply to  ZZR600
I expect they’d introduce rationing.
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  Scooot
Maybe America will have to organize convoys to resupply Britain? LOL
prumbly
prumbly
4 years ago
I guess EU leaders are wayyyy too arrogant to do the two things they should be doing:
1) Admitting they were wrong allowing themselves to become so completely dependent on Russian energy in the first place
2) Making nice with Mr Putin
The problem is EU bureaucrats have little to lose personally, with their huge, guaranteed salaries. They won’t be the ones paying the price for their hubris.
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
4 years ago
Reply to  prumbly
Their “huge, guaranteed salaries” will soon be paid in hyper-inflated, near-worthless Euros.
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
No one knows what Russia will do. There are three camps: 1) Nothing, 2) Temporary shutoff, maybe even just the threat, 3) Shut ‘er down for quite a while. No one in “the West” should ever forget just how outrageously “the West” has acted. Nor should anyone have any illusions. The strategic initiative is not “ours,” but “theirs.” There are prices to be paid for stupidity. We will soon learn what those prices might be.
shamrock
shamrock
4 years ago
Biden considering dropping Trump’s China tariffs to ease inflation pressure. Stocks up.
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
Lets hope so.
But then, will China invade Taiwan?
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
They’re not ready yet. Thankfully, by the time they’re ready I will be dead.
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
Crumbs.
prumbly
prumbly
4 years ago
Who knew that the Germans were this stupid?
effendi
effendi
4 years ago
Will Germany ever get back to a trade surplus? Any LNG they import to replace Russian piped gas must cost multiples of piped gas. That means a permanent reduction of production of energy intensive goods for export in addition to paying the extra for the LNG denting the balance of payments.
Also one thing I never here the MSM mention when they say exports to Russia will be reduced for decades is that also means exports to many countries in Central Asia will also be reduced as the logistics of shipment across Russia becomes more expensive without depots in Russia that supply both the near and far reaches of Russia as well as all the Central Asian former soviet nations,
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  effendi
This is indeed the crux of the matter.
Gas from Russia is just the tip of the iceberg. The cheap nuclear power is being abandoned, as Mish noted, farmers are going to be forced to stop farming over Nitrogen (lol). Basically doing business in the EU is just getting more and more expensive which makes Germany less and less competitive.
The UK was lucky it got out when it did.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
4 years ago
Reply to  effendi
Maybe if there remains a Germany much longer. With every politician working extra hard to come up with the absolute worst decisions for their countries, there’s liable to be some changes in the near future. Personally, the last 10 years have looked more like an Ayn Rand novel than anything else to me. Just my opinion.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
If you were leader of Germany or even all of Europe what would you do? I am curious. I hear a lot of can’t do this and shouldn’t that but that is all.
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
That’s about all you ever get here. They are all so sure of their criticisms until you ask about their investment ideas and all I hear is a bunch of scared kids, waiting for the depression, cowering in the shadows with their gold and cash.
goldguy
goldguy
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Nothing wrong with gold and cash, especially now
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  goldguy
Gold is a dead asset. Historically, a terrible investment.
As Warren Buffett likes to point out: if you bought $10000 in gold in 1942 it would be worth $500,000 today. Whereas $10000 in a US index fund would be worth over $51 million today. 100x the return.
And the cash is still worth $10000. But it buys a heck of a lot less.
goldguy
goldguy
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Hmmm, funny, I have made somewhere between 500k and 1mm over the last 15 years or so buying and selling gold stocks… Not bragging, just showing what can be done with the proper company’s and some patience.
You sound as if your money is burning a hole in your pocket…
Have you bought your first 10k in I bonds yet? Currently at 9.62% basically risk free
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  goldguy
I can understand owning gold stocks. I have occasionally owned them.
But over the last two years, oil and gas stocks have been incredibly rewarding. Far outpacing gold stocks.
goldguy
goldguy
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Gold stocks are due for a decent bounce, be on board
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  goldguy
I don’t see the reasoning. Costs are going up for gold miners, but the price of gold isn’t.
I am interested in the long term scenario and I just don’t see it in gold.
But that’s what makes a market. Differences of opinion.
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
4 years ago
Reply to  goldguy
I bonds? What are they?
prumbly
prumbly
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Historically, investing in an index fund is a terrible idea. If you had bought $10K in the S&P index in 1998 you would now have $60K, but if you had bought Amazon stock you would now have over $4M.
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  prumbly
Lol! Hindsight on a successful stock! Why didn’t you pick Kodak or Blockbuster? Too funny.
prumbly
prumbly
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
You clearly missed my point. Saying that gold is a bad investment because it under-performed a US stock index in the past is just as silly as what I put in my post. Investments are for the future, not the past.
Do you think the next 50 years in the US are going to be as good as the last 50? Is that the track we’re on?
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  prumbly
Wow! You just don’t get it do you?
Even an index fund, which includes large numbers of stocks (winners and losers) did 100x better than gold over a 70 year time frame.
You are welcome to your gold.
I will stick with stocks of productive companies.
Christoball
Christoball
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
If we all became millionaires the same way we would never become millionaires.
prumbly
prumbly
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
It’s abundantly clear what they should do – drop their idiotic, ineffective sanctions against Russia and stop supplying Russia’s enemies with weapons. If the Germans want to end their reliance on Russian energy they need to do it slowly over years, not in one suicidal, panicked, self-destructive action.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
There is no defacto leader of Europe so it’s impossible to imagine someone with that kind of power.
That said, Germany should never have abandon Nuclear energy, nor should they have stopped buying cheap Russian gas. I personally would have let Ukraine go on day 1 because it’s clear where its going to end anyway. If the US wants to prop up Ukraine let them but if I was Germany I would not have done any sanctions.
Germany should probably also abandon the Euro too since it’s bankrolling multiple dead beat countries. They will have to take some write downs but in the long run will be much better off without doing the bankrolling since that’s also hanging over their heads until the stop doing it.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Basically you are saying do what Russia says and weaken yourself even more.
prumbly
prumbly
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Huh? Most of the world isn’t sanctioning Russia – is that “doing what Russia says”? Is China doing what Russia says? India? Mexico? 170 countries!
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
I’m saying I would not wreck my entire country for someone else’s country that I am not treaty bound to defend.
Russia and Ukraine are like a husband and wife having a domestic issue in public (husband hit the wife). Germany (and by extension Europe) could choose to stay out of it or get involved and pick sides. They decided to pick the side of the wife even though they depend on the husband for their livelihood.
You asked what they should do and I’m saying they should not have picked sides. America can pick sides because America doesn’t depend on Russia for anything.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Russia and Ukraine are not like a husband and wife. They are different countries and your analogy does not fit in any way. Germany and Europe did decide to get involved and they decided it for their reasons which are very logical.
I asked you what you would do now and you responded with the “they shouldn’t have done it” when that is not what I asked you. I asked you what would you do now. I guess you don’t have a clue.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Russia and Ukraine were once married (ie belonged to the USSR) prior to it’s breakup. So maybe husband and wife should be changed to 2 ex’s fighting over who gets the kids (those eastern provinces + Crimea) in public and the husband hits the wife.
I already said what I would do now.
1) Cut off any/all support for Ukraine and rescind sanctions on Russia. Re-open and commit to Nord 2 pipeline.
2) Start getting those nuclear reactors back online and/or start the 10-15 construction process on new ones. The transition to green energy is a multi-decade effort so nuclear still makes sense for several decades while transitioning to wind/solar.
3) Start planning to leave the Euro (something Mish has been discussing since the PIIGS issues back in 08) since Germany is clearly the country most equipped to go it alone (better than the UK).
BTW, America is already cutting off the gas to Europe (Biden not allowing LNG plant to restart to keep gas prices here low for political reasons) and it hasn’t even been a few months time since the US pledged to help Europe transition from Russian gas. Not a real shocker but should open the eyes of anyone in Europe who thinks they can get away from having their gas supplies cut on a whim.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
The US and Great Britain were once together too but no longer. The husband-wife analogy is bull unless you look at it as Russia loving to screw Ukraine and slap the country around.
So you want Europe to declare Russia winner, buy Russian oil and gas and take that time to build nuclear power plants. As an aside Germany leaves the Euro also.
Your first proposal is off the table already. If Europe comes back to Russia you can be sure that Russia will make sure Europe can’t leave it again which rolls into the second proposal which assumes that Russia will not stop Europe from building reactors to make Europe free from Russian energy. Your last point that Germany leaves the Euro is not attractive to Germany because the new currency will appreciate so much that Germany’s exports to the rest of Europe couldn’t afford them. Being in the Euro is an great advantage for Germany and will remain so.
Have you read Germany’s justifications for weaning themselves off of Russian energy and for supporting Ukraine? If not you should. You may not agree with them but they do set out why they chose as they did. You are assuming that Russia is still viewed as a benevolent power in Europe. It is not and they says everything.
Christoball
Christoball
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Wife cheated on husband and keeps flirting with NATO
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Doug, for me it’s an even toss-up between Bali and Tahiti. As my Dad put it: “The more you ‘rassel with a turd, the more shlt you get on your hands.”
Bronco
Bronco
4 years ago
“Suicide Watch for Deutsche Bank”
Always a candidate to be a Black Swan.
$1.34 trillion balance sheet
$17 billion market cap (and heading South)
What, me worry?
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Reply to  Bronco
So how are you going to trade this?
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
No wonder FromBrussels is frustrated.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
The cost of supporting Ukraine is rising rapidly and Germany essentially bankrolls the ‘PIGS’ countries so imagine how bad things are going to be there in a few months time when Germany is no longer running a surplus to bankroll those countries.
The leg is officially turning black now. Europe should have cut off the toe (Ukraine) months ago but the leg may soon have to go.
Mish, I am not sure the US is on a buyers strike as much as energy cost making Germany not viable economically.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
4 years ago
Germany falling? I guess this is the beginning of some very interesting times indeed!
PapaDave
PapaDave
4 years ago
Food, water and energy. Three things we are very dependent on.
I know how to invest in energy. Looking for ideas on food and water.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
On the food side of things it’s mostly commodities trading. Not for the faint of heart but about 15 years ago I knew a guy who liked to do it (instead of stocks) and when he was right he made a LOT of money but when he missed he lost a lot of money.
I don’t know any company or companies that own water rights. That’s typically always owned at the state or country level and not for sale to companies for obvious reasons.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Nestle owns the rights to bottle water from a river near me. And probably you as well. For example, coke had their Deja Vu bottling plant in Dallas set up just downstream from the waste management treatment plant on the Trinity River over 20 years ago.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  HippyDippy
So they can bottle water from the river. Are they guaranteed ‘X’ amount of water such that they can divert it. That would be ownership of the water because it means if the river was running dry they could collect 100% of it.
My guess is that’s not the case and even if it was, I’d also wager a lot of money that should that river ever run low/dry that their guarantee would be rescinded in a heartbeat by politicians because you can’t live without water.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
I know around here it has already affected the river. Never underestimate the corrupt nature of local governments. Keep in mind that in Florida, the state owns the rainfall even. No rain barrels allowed! Due to their deep concerns for the aquafer system of course. But they don’t mind draining the lands for corporations. Who actually run things. In related news, there is another county near me that used to be filled with small farmers. Bill Gates bought a lot of land there for farming, and coincidentally got the water usage regs rewritten to his benefit. Many of the farmers had to fold as it affected them so much.
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
There was a big wrangle where I live over this. The usual nutcases killed the project, which would have been limited to a max of 15% of the river’s flow.
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  HippyDippy
So that’s why I never really liked Coke. LOL
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Stockpile Evian!
JackWebb
JackWebb
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
We get our water from a well. Country living.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Papa, I tend to favor having shelter first, then I can wash down my food with water, while I still have some energy.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.