Gaps Galore on the Stock Market, Where Is the Market Headed and When?

S&P 500 chart courtesy of StockCharts, annotations by Mish

Filled gaps are in blue, partially filled gaps are in black, and unfilled gaps are in green.

What Are Gaps?

Gaps occur when the stock market opens up higher than the high of the previous day or down lower than the low of the previous day. 

Gaps tend to fill sooner rather than later, but some last for years before filling. A small number never close.

S&P 500 Gap Analysis

The decline from the S&P 500 peak at 4818 to 3810 was orderly the entire way, leaving no gaps that were not quickly filled.

In early June the S&P 500 gapped down twice hard. That provided a warning signal to bears. In late June there was a gap up that filled before the end of the month. 

On August 10, there was a big gap up, now filled. On August 22, there was a gap down that is partially filled. I suspect that will satisfy the gap gods.

The main unfilled gap below is on July 15.

S&P 500 Gap July 15, 2022

S&P 500 chart courtesy of StockCharts, annotations by Mish

I expect that gap to fill easily, sooner rather than later.

Nasdaq 100 Index Gaps

Nasdaq 100 Index chart courtesy of StockCharts, annotations by Mish

Filled gaps are in blue, partially filled gaps are in black, and unfilled gaps are in green.

Compared the S&P 500 the Nasdaq is very disorderly. There are huge gaps down in early April that are unfilled. I expect those gaps will fill, but not for many years. 

There is a partial fill of the gap down on August 22. As with the S&P 500, that may satisfy the gap gods.

I expect the two open gaps below to fill sooner rather than later. The target is about 11350.

S&P 500 Weekly Chart 

S&P 500 weekly chart courtesy of StockCharts, annotations by Mish

The pandemic gaps down closed within about 6 months thanks to the biggest stimulus in history. 

The gap down in June closed within a month. 

Apple 

Apple chart courtesy of StockCharts, annotations by Mish

Apple has a gap at 155 that I expect will fill easily. 

S&P 500 Monthly Support Levels

S&P 500 monthly chart courtesy of StockCharts, annotations by Mish

My primary downside target is 2400. Stocks would not even be cheap at that level. 1800 or lower is not out of the question.

I am also open to the idea that 2800 is the bottom but I highly doubt that. 

My downside targets have not changed since I first started posting them on February 18, 2022.

Here is the chart I posted then.

$SPX Chart Posted February 18

That gap just above 4000 has now been closed. There is another one around 3400 that I believe is a near given will close.

My Tweet at the Time

IZ

The Fed cannot rescue markets while simultaneously trying to convince Washington that it is determined to fight inflation, slowing growth notwithstanding. In any case the pain threshold (if there is one) is much higher (lower asset values) than in Q4 ’18 imho. 

Mish

Bingo The Fed is not in control of everything, never was really, but belief goes a long way.

At most, the Fed can control some rates but that is at the expense of loss of control of everything else.

Here, Inflation makes it difficult to even pretend control.

Nasdaq 100 Monthly Chart 

Nasdaq 100 monthly chart courtesy of StockCharts, annotations by Mish

Where To From Here?

I strongly suggest a minimum decline to the 7500 level but perhaps 6000 or so is more likely. That would be a decline of 64 percent, a typical, not extreme bear market. 

Bear in mind that would only take out 3.5 years of a 12 year bull market to a level seen in 2019. 

This is the bubble the Fed created.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell Pledges to “Act With Resolve” to Beat Inflation

Bear in mind that in Jackson Hole last week, Fed Chair Jerome Powell Pledges to “Act With Resolve” to Beat Inflation

Key comments: “Reducing inflation is likely to require a sustained period of below-trend growth.”

See the above link for many other important comments and an important discussion of inflation expectations.

Expect a Long Period of Weak Growth, Whether or Not It’s Labeled Recession

On August 19, I repeated my message from earlier this year: Expect a Long Period of Weak Growth, Whether or Not It’s Labeled Recession

Powell is in agreement. We are likely in recession now, but label it however you like. It does not matter what you call it. 

What does matter is stocks are priced for perfection, not a long period of weak growth.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

24 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RedQueenRace
RedQueenRace
3 years ago
“Gaps occur when the stock market opens up higher than the high of the
previous day or down lower than the low of the previous day.”
What you are describing is a “full” gap.
Technical analysis also recognizes “partial” gaps which occur when the market opens above / below the previous day’s close and doesn’t touch it during the succeeding action.
“That gap just above 4000 has now been closed. There is another one around 3400 that I believe is a near given will close.”
There are a number of gaps below before the 3389.48 full gap is reached, including the following 2 full gaps.
3707.71, opened on 6/21/2022
3589.81, opened on 11/24/2020
A move to fill the gap at 3589.81 would provide a lower low (current is 3636.87) and potentially set up a strong reversal depending upon how the market gets there and its technical condition. I don’t think the market is going to fail at the SPX 200 dma as it did and not come back for another attempt, especially since the 200 dma is falling. The SPX could go to the 3400 gap, but I wouldn’t bet on it yet. It could easily find support before or after filling higher gaps. After today’s action the SPX RSI closed at 36.77 and the CCI is already at -174 so it isn’t that far from oversold territory. The histogram level for the PPO (percentage-based version of MACD that eliminates price level distortions) is approaching an area where reversals have occurred in the past.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
This is idiotic.
It’s like “filling in” gaps in the max/min temperature records.
Yeah, eventually all the gaps will probably “fill in.”
Counter
Counter
3 years ago
Lots of gaps in that chart going all the way to Covid lows. Gaposis
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
“Gaps tend to fill sooner rather than later, but some last for years before filling. A small number never close.”
At least until another 1929-32 event occurs. They say that can’t happen again, which is the case, until it does. In 1987, the Dow set a new record one day loss of 22%, which was something that couldn’t happen after 1929-32, but did anyway. Glass-Steagall was something that would never be dismantled, as it was designed to prevent 1929-32 from happening again. Oh, that’s right, it was dismantled. The barn door was opened again.
8dots
8dots
3 years ago
Dr Faust in Feb 2020 : US will stay comatose until we know what we don’t know. Infusion kept US economy alive in the hospice bed. The cause was the virus, the symptom was Dr. Faust.
Billy
Billy
3 years ago
Reply to  8dots
Rahm Emanuel – “You never let a serious crisis go to waste”
Billy
Billy
3 years ago
My guess is that the S&P 4,500 gap will fill around the end of the year and all of the lower ones will fill around 2030 +/- a year.
Steve_R
Steve_R
3 years ago
Reply to  Billy
With midterms coming up this year, I would agree with your target. Not all gaps are filled, it would be like saying that there is a gap in WTI at $10 going back to March of 2020 that needs to be filled. Could it happen, yes but the rest of the markets are going with it.
Billy
Billy
3 years ago
Reply to  Steve_R
I agree not all gaps are filled. Mish agreed with that too in his Newmont article about gaps.
I’d also like to call a bottom soon at 3,700. I’ll be in 100% at that point.
8dots
8dots
3 years ago
Those little baby bubbles, gaps, are tiny in comparison to the ones in 2008 and Feb/Mar 2020. JP fight hypothecation . Bazookas don’t cure hypo. Exogenous causes can cause panic, shutting down the o/n market Hypo is JP worst nightmare, not inflation.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  8dots
Wow, lightning strikes. Another comment that made sense.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Agree. It doesn’t matter what you call it. Recession. Slow growth. Whatever.
All that matters is that you invest appropriately. Its another good day for those who have a lot of oil stocks.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Putting oil in every conversation is your way of having fun. I get it.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
I try my best! Lol!
Mife
Mife
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
All’s swell if you got oil wells.
Paraphrasing of course
Nuddernoitall
Nuddernoitall
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Energy works quite well for me also, but let’s not lose sight of the bigger picture; that being the New FAANG opportunities. Note the following:
In an investor note, Merrill Lynch and Bank of America Private Bank investment strategists Lauren J. Sanfilippo and Joseph P. Quinlan have said that we are in the throes of a new investing epoch of war and high inflation and energy transformation–one that needs a new FAANG.
“It’s a play on hard assets and hard power. That’s where we’ve been hiding out, it’s been working out well relatively speaking to the rest of the market. In a matter of months, we have gone from a pandemic to Putin; infections to inflation; Big Data to Big Oil; zoom to zinc; masks to mascara; E-commerce to electric vehicles; jabs to javelins; swabs to sanctions; Webex to weddings; boosters to bombs; Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) to liquefied natural gas (LNG); Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO); work-from-home to work-from-office; the cloud to cobalt; and lite assets to hard assets.”
Out is the old FAANG and in are the new growth areas of Fuels, Aerospace & defense, Agriculture, Nuclear and renewables, and Gold and metals/minerals aka FAANG 2.0
“This cohort is emblematic of a world undergoing profound change. A sampling of this change: energy security is now the top priority of most governments–just ask Poland and Bulgaria, cut off from Russian gas. Global defense spending topped $2 trillion for the first time in 2021 and is headed higher. World food prices are at record highs. Nuclear is poised for a comeback; Electric Vehicle demand continues to soar. Gold is now the preferred asset of central banks thanks to geopolitics, while resource/food nationalism is proliferating around the world, adding even more upside pressure to metal/mineral and food prices,”
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Nuddernoitall
In fundamental terms, I agree with a lot of that. But “FAANG” is just an acronym for speculation. If the Fed does its job and stops blowing air up everyone’s skirts, the fundamentals will reassert themselves. Graham & Dodd will return with a vengeance.
Nuddernoitall
Nuddernoitall
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
A few points…
1) You state, “In fundamental terms, I agree with a lot of that.” To me, that suggests your gut feels comfortable with fundamentals which you can use to your advantage. I say go with it. Clarity is a good thing.
2) You state, “FAANG is an acronym for speculation.” Is it really? I think of FAANG as the original 5 stocks (actually it was 4 before AAPL was added a little later) that as an aggregate grew massively from 2012 to current (and even more massively) from 2015 to current. IF I could buy a basket of new “FAANG” stocks that could replicate the old FAANG, who wouldn’t take those returns. (Not…that I am wildly sure the new FAANG basket of Holy Grail securities are lining up to jump into my portfolios.)
3) You say, “the fundamentals will reassert themselves” and “Graham & Dodd will return with a vengeance.” But, I ask when will that happen? How can you be so sure? In another MISH post today, you referred to a “normal” time 20 years ago. That would have been in about 2002, just two years after the Dotcom bust. Did people in 2002 think “normalcy” in the markets had returned just because Pets.com collapsed two years prior?
I’m engaging with you respectively and appreciate your prior comment to my post. I hope you understand that. But, to me the term, “normal” especially as it pertains to financial markets is as vague as understanding when Godot is going to show up. Everyone is waiting for Godot/normalcy, and has their perspective of what and who Godot is, but in the end…no one really ever finds out. I am indeed suggesting, there is no Normal. It may never have been around, and it certainly is not returning soon. Cheers Jack Webb.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Nuddernoitall
Value will return. Always does when the air is let out of the tires.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
I enjoyed reading all the replies to my original post. Lots of ideas regarding investments. Nice to see.
Thank you Nuddernoitall and JackWebb.
Nuddernoitall
Nuddernoitall
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
You’ll like this:
Fossil fuels will dominate energy for at least 30 more years, Liberty CEO says
Aug. 29, 2022 8:38 PM ETLiberty Energy Inc. (LBRT)By: Carl Surran, SA News Editor
The U.S. is not in the middle of an energy transition, and the “vast majority” of energy will come from hydrocarbons for at least the next three decades, Liberty Energy (NYSE:LBRT) CEO Chris Wright told Bloomberg on Monday.
“We’re investing a lot of money in some new energy technologies; some of this is great, but it’s not an energy transition,” Wright said, adding that subsidies for wind and solar will only drive up power prices and increase grid instability.
“Shoveling subsidies to wind and solar, who are 3% of global energy, that’s not going to meaningfully change greenhouse gas emissions,” the CEO also told Bloomberg, contradicting the public positions staked out by many other oil and gas executives.
——————————————————-
…apparently, there are some within the energy industry who have found their voice. It’s about time!
Nuddernoitall
Nuddernoitall
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
But Liberty CEO Chris Wright just did sell 17,000 shares this past Friday.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  Nuddernoitall

There are always some executives selling shares for some personal reasons.What is telling though is what the majority of executives are doing. And from what I have seen they have been backing up the truck and buying heavily over the last year.And the companies themselves continue to implement NCIB and SIB (buybacks) for 10% or more of the outstanding stock every year, after first paying down debt. Many companies I hold shares in are already debt-free. Many others will be debt-free within a year.It is a testament to how undervalued the stocks are, when companies feel they can get a better return on their cash flow by buying back shares, rather than expand capex. Particularly at these high oil prices.

Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Nuddernoitall
And if I’m right I can claim to be a genius.
And if I’m wrong everyone will forget, sooner rather than later.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.