House Authorizes More Military Spending Than Biden and the Defense Department Requested

Image from Politico article quoted below

More Than Requested 

Politico reports House Passes $839B Defense Bill, Swatting Down Biden’s Military Plans.

  • The $839 billion National Defense Authorization Act, approved in a 329-101 vote, is $37 billion more than the administration sought in military spending.
  • On top of the budget, the bill also rebukes several of Biden’s national security plans. Members maintained a nuclear cruise missile the administration planned to scrap, hampered F-16 sales to Turkey and limited the number of aircraft and ships the Pentagon can retire.
  • The bill includes billions for more aircraft and ships than the Pentagon sought, following a bipartisan vote by the House Armed Services Committee to raise the bill’s price tag by $37 billion. 
  • Funding continues for the development of a sea-launched nuclear cruise missile, a program the White House sought to kill.
  • The bill authorizes 13 new warships, adding five ships the Navy didn’t request — an extra Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, another Constellation-class frigate, another fleet oiler and two expeditionary medical ships.
  • The bill requires the Navy to keep five of the nine littoral combat ships it sought to retire.
  • The bill also authorizes 64 F-35 fighter jets, three more than the Pentagon sought across the military services. 
  • Lawmakers approved $354 million to procure three more F-35C carrier-based jets for the Navy.

Bipartisan Action 

Excessive military budgets are always bipartisan. 180 Democrats and 149 Republicans joined forces to pass the legislation.

“It is the definition of a bipartisan bill,” said Rep. Mike Rogers of Alabama, the top Republican on the Armed Services Committee.

Hooray, More Inflation

Doesn’t anyone in DC who voted for this monstrosity understand inflation?

Are they that stupid or do they just not give a damn. 

I suspect the most useful item in the bill, a repeal of the 2002 Iraq War authorization, will be stripped out of the final bill in the Senate.

Stripping that provision would prevent a president from relying on the 2002 authorization to conduct unrelated military actions in the regions. 

If stripped, only the waste will remain. Both parties support more war-mongering. The Republicans are at least up front about it.

Hooray! Senator Manchin Finally Kills Biden’s Build Back Better Initiative

Were it not for Senator Joe Manchin, the US would be in an even bigger inflationary spiral.

For discussion, please see Hooray! Senator Manchin Finally Kills Biden’s Build Back Better Initiative

Also note, Consumer Price Index Jumps Another 1.3 Percent, Much More Than Than Expected

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

56 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
This pretty clearly demonstrates who is running the US and who they are running the US for.
No, they are not stupid.
Yes, they do not give a damn.
The Federal Reserve doesn’t borrow money to spend.
The US Congress borrows to spend and forces the Fed to provide the money — indirectly or directly.
Lord
Lord
1 year ago
So $830+ Billion won’t lead to any inflation but spending the same giving breaks to the 99% will blow up the economy into malarkey land? Ok got it
JRM
JRM
1 year ago
How much is going to replace all munitions, vehicles and other critical supplies the “KING” has sent to Ukraine??
I see it as a move to disarm the USA!!
Must of these purchases and deliveries will be way into the future, no help “NOW”!!!!
8dots
8dots
1 year ago
More mini aircraft carriers amphibious assault ships LH 9 with a dozen F-35B and Osprey to rule the waves.
37B/800B = 4.5% < 9.1% inflation rate. // Gov deficit was cut by almost $2T in the current fiscal year thanks to capital gains taxes on selling stocks and crypto, trimming the labor force, paying negative (-)5% on %30T debt/Y.
Dutoit
Dutoit
1 year ago
I would like to see an estimate of the GDPs of China and Mongol tribes when Kubilai Khan did conquer China.
Jackula
Jackula
1 year ago
Oh boy, if there was some logic behind this increase it would be understandable. We could use a heckuva lot more destroyers to patrol the shipping lanes for what is coming. Simply pork to carve up.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
1 year ago
The
funds being borrowed do not increase our productive capacity, nor increase the
efficiency of the work force. Rather the funds are used largely to finance
transfer payments to non-productive recipients and to finance “dead-weight”
military hardware. Since the goods and serves being finance by these monstrous deficits
are not offered in the marketplace, additional and un-necessary inflationary
and interest rate pressures are generated in the economy. And the magnitude of
these deficits guarantees that a significant proportion of these deficits will
need to be monetized. They are war economy budgets and therefore, require the
controls dictated by a war economy in order to be properly funded.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
1 year ago

The U.S. has had a net liquidity
deficit in every year since 1950 (with the exception of 1957), Up to 1976 (when
the private sector contributed its first trade deficit). These deficits were
entirely the consequence of excessive U.S. government unilateral transfers to
foreigners (re: foreign policy – solely our far-flung military bases and personnel). During all this time the private sector was
running a surplus in all accounts: merchandise, services and financial. The
Vietnam Ten-year War administered the coup d’etat to our gold bullion
standard. By 1968, in an effort to keep
the dollar at the $35 par, we had exhausted nearly two thirds of our monetary
gold stocks, or approximately 700 million ounces to about 260 million ounces.

Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Our elected representatives heard a rumor that China has more ships in its navy than the US. Enuff said!
Speaking of ‘man’ power issues; I am ‘informed’ that all military services are enlisting young males, who upon completing basic training, promptly declare they are transgender. They receive, at taxpayer expense, hormonal treatment, and such operations as needed to convert. Upon recovery, they cannot be assigned to active units–many (most) declare some form of psychosis, receive treatment, and are honorably discharged, receiving a disability pension.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
1 year ago
The strategy is to start building military equipment NOW and use diplomacy until they are ready for sale or use. Mobile hospitals are for offense.
effendi
effendi
1 year ago
My take on the spending isn’t the amount but where the heck will they find the manpower to crew the extra ships? Less than a quarter of the 17-25 youth can meet the low standards for recruitment and they don’t have enough men (or women or trans or furries) currently. Plus many they do have might be lost due to refusing boosters.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  effendi
The killer is that most people that age don’t meet the fitness requirements. Can’t make an effective army out of corn fed roly poly soldiers.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
1 year ago
got a chuckle about manchin. ridiculous. i’d prefer they print and borrow and pump the money into everyone’s accounts like the plague years of 2020/21. but doing it for the 1% at military industry is nasty. manchin ain’t conservative. he’s a radical spender on dumb things.
JRM
JRM
1 year ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
So you’re a MARXIST devotee???
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
1 year ago
Reply to  JRM
what the devil are you talking about. i don’t understand authentic frontier gibberish. use subtitles. yea, i’m a marxist. why i spend time on mish’s site. he’s a libertarian, like i am.
JRM
JRM
1 year ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
“i’d prefer they print and borrow and pump the money into everyone’s
accounts like the plague years of 2020/21. but doing it for the 1% at
military industry is nasty”
Is “NOT a libertarian” idea!!!!
Its a Marxist/Socialist/Communist idea of Gov’t!!!
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
He’s the ultimate democrat, a creature utterly in the control of corporations.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
1 year ago
empire 101. nothing new. we are a militaristic worldwide empire, that borrows, prints, and spends it on war, war, war. we’ve seen this in history. soviets, spanish, french, romans……….never good for 99%. but glorious for the ruling class and their sycophants at the military industry………
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
What I find hilarious is that everyone says the US doesn’t make anything any more. Well, it still makes the finest military equipment in the world and it’s pretty much the only supplier on a large scale basis.
So unfortunately it means we need constant wars around the world in order to sell our products.
Dutoit
Dutoit
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
“Well, it still makes the finest military equipment in the world”
I think that this is not true anymore. Russia is much better.
“it’s pretty much the only supplier on a large scale basis”
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Sitting in a chair pressing plastic buttons to keep the idle masses entertained pays better than providing healthcare. Sounds insane, but is it? If that bunch gets bored and cranky, all hell breaks loose.
JRM
JRM
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Where do we get the critical components for our military???
We are up the “CREEK” when we go to war against China, or eve if China just invades Taiwan..
I expect anything that uses Chips in the US military will start to have critical problems when China decides to take on the USA!!!
West can not produce modern TANKS cause the critical component in the armor comes from Russia!!!
Jojo
Jojo
1 year ago

Doesn’t anyone in DC who voted for this monstrosity understand inflation?

Are they that stupid or do they just not give a damn.

This is all about ensuring robust campaign donations from the MIC and the people who work for that blob. Nothing else takes precedence.
This is why we MUST remove money from politics by public funding all elections and severely restricting the length of the campaign horserace to no more than TWO (2) months..
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
1 year ago
Reply to  Jojo
The public funds elections now. In fact, some funding directly or indirectly even comes from outside the States. Given that people all over the world have skin in the US political game, that should be no surprise. That part of the money (albeit not a big part) will be there, like it or not, visible or not.
Now, is your suggestion that money is either illegal, or for the most part we hope, hope, hope, comes from taxpayers … but is laundered through the general fund and then is controlled by a combination of elected politicians and government employees, the latter of whom just might have a wee bit of interest in who controls their work budgets and their salaries?
Dude, I admire your hopefulness.
But I’m of the opposite opinion. I’d go with disallowing Federal employees voting in federal level elections and disallowing state employees from voting in state office elections. They have enough say in how the country is run.
And what must we think of politicians who accept money directly from those on the other side of the salary negotiation table?
Jojo
Jojo
1 year ago
Reply to  Felix_Mish
AGAIN, nothing will change until money is removed from politics.
Because politicians need so much money to run for or stay in office, they have no choice but to sell themselves to the highest bidders, whether it is the MIC, the pharma industry, the legal industry, etc. or all of the above.
What is needed is to change the equation by making all political campaigns 100% public financed from taxes and removing the horse race aspect of political campaigns.
No companies or PACS would be allowed to contribute to candidates nor to advertise on their behalf. Individuals would be allowed to contribute but everyone would be limited to one relatively low number to enforce some degree of equality, say $500. Political campaigns would last a maximum of 8 weeks, which should keep the costs down. Media would have to accept ads from all candidates but each candidate would only be allowed a maximum number of ads, so the candidate could use their allocation in the first week or spread it out.
Do this and politicians would then have the freedom and ability to vote their conscience. Don’t do this and nothing will change. PERIOD!
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  Jojo
Idealism can be dumb and dangerous. By your argument, every nutcase could ‘run for office’ and use money from the public coffers.
Here are some possible platforms: Witches for America. Morons against the Media. Pedophila for the Masses. Clone Kennedy. The Jesus Party. Putin for President…..
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
We passed the ‘every nutcase’ milestone several elections ago.
Jojo
Jojo
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
I didn’t make a COMPLETE proposal. Obviously, there needs to be some qualifications to run for office that prevent such foolishness. And yes, the definition of foolishness is what the majority agree it is. I didn’t say this would be easy, just that it is the ONLY solution that will remove most political influence buying.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
You missed Sycophants for Socialism.
hmk
hmk
1 year ago
Reply to  Jojo
One solution is to have the parasites server one term only, maybe 6 years. Also socialize the election process by have the govt fund everyones campaign with a fixed amount and yes shorten the hell out of the election process. That way they won’t be beholden to their money masters and to vote for largess that will get them reelected. The hope is they will vote on what is right without the threat of not being reelected.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  hmk
Great idea. They serve one 6 year term and are then shot dead in public with full military honors.
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
1 year ago
Reply to  Jojo
Run the numbers. Right now, for instance, US presidential campaigns are really, really cheap. A couple billion bucks? Pffft. This is for choosing the person in charge of multiple trillions spent, per year.
And, since when do we want politicians voting their own opinions (which, free tax funded money insures we will not know)? Last I checked we want them voting the opinions of those they represent. Tax funded, they will have zero incentive to vote for anyone other than the wishes of the last hand on that money – government employees.
Make public funding of campaigns illegal? Ah, the drug war on steroids. When you’re tossing trillion dollar bills around, you can count on someone figuring out that an under-the-table million dollars would be very, very, fruitful.
whirlaway
whirlaway
1 year ago
“Were it not for Senator Joe Manchin, the US would be in an even bigger inflationary spiral.”

LOL. Wait for Manchin to vote on this one.

dtj
dtj
1 year ago
The war in Afghanistan topped $1 trillion. $37 billion is a small downpayment on World War III which could end up costing $100 trillion.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  dtj
It’ll end up costing all of civilization. Mad max is coming to a reality near you!
hmk
hmk
1 year ago
Reply to  dtj
link to brown.edu 8 trillion and 900,000 deaths. But Putin is the bad guy. I can’t believe how they get away with this crap. When will the sheep wake up.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  dtj
That was over 20 years and probably cost more than 1 trillion.
I’ve read in a couple of places that some expect the US to spend a trillion or more in Ukraine by the end of the 1st or 2nd year (if it goes that long). The money doesn’t go as far when there is an actual enemy to fight and stuff gets used up fast.
It’s crazy to keep bankrolling the war there.
goldguy
goldguy
1 year ago
Disgusting, they all need economics 101, or most go along with Biden, and get some kind of kick back… we need an asteroid to land on dc
PapaDave
PapaDave
1 year ago
Reply to  goldguy
Won’t that make your gold worth more?
Probably not. Gold seems to moving backward with all this inflation talk.
I’m still thinking of buying into a gold stock as a trade. But it’s such a difficult market to call. Gold is a commodity with no observable supply/demand numbers to work from.
goldguy
goldguy
1 year ago
Reply to  PapaDave
It’s insurance plain and simple.
Jojo
Jojo
1 year ago
Reply to  goldguy
I don’t understand the insurance part. In case fiat money disappears suddenly? Or in case of an apocalypse? In the latter case there will be many people who will forcibly take your gold from you.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  Jojo
In an actual apocalypse gold will be worth less than lead (bullets), food, water and practical items (like a lighter to start a fire).
There is a well known (in prepper circles) and very interesting article from a guy who survived more than a year in a city that was under siege during the Yugoslavian war in the 90s. Gold and money had essentially no value. Barter (items or skills) was the currency and in demand items were guns, bullets, food, water and practical items like lighters so people could start a fire to cook with.
Doug78
Doug78
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
I read the same article. It was very informative as to the real value of gold.
JRM
JRM
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
But there were many who bought their way out of the cities and the country with their Gold & Silver!!
And many live here in the USA, and still tell their escape from Bosnia and they still recommend Gold and Silver in any prepper kit!!!
goldguy
goldguy
1 year ago
Reply to  Jojo
It’s worked for the last 5,000 years or so,
Yeah Maybe this time it won’t, but I would not bet on it
Jojo
Jojo
1 year ago
Reply to  goldguy
“Don’t look back. Something might be gaining on you.”
— Satchel Paige
Siliconguy
Siliconguy
1 year ago
The medical ships are interesting. The current two are rebuilt oil tankers and proved less than useful during the pandemic. They are also big, slow, and deep draft.
Pooga123
Pooga123
1 year ago
America is at war with Russia, The extra 37 billion is for Ukraine’s soldiers and the mercenaries
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  Pooga123
I think the money for Ukraine is an entirely separate item and it’s for more than 37 billion.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Stay tuned for the end of next week. Xiden and the EU have handed him the strategic initiative. Europe’s future is in Putin’s hands.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  Pooga123
‘America is at war with Russia…’
America needs to be making peace with Russia asap. US politicians should put the Cold War behind them and look to the future. China is a far greater threat with its militaristic expansion and economic domination. Together with Russia, they will control Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. Game over!
A side note: China has good reason to despise the West, and the USA in particular. Are the current Fentanyl Wars China’s retribution for the 19th-century Opium Wars? See here: link to en.wikipedia.org.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Who has China invaded recently?
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Funny how the Hollyweird set no longer talks about Tibet, and has never mentioned the Uighurs. Typical liberal racism. LOL
Jojo
Jojo
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
“America needs to be making peace with Russia asap”
Easy peasy. All Putin has to do is completely withdraw from Ukraine and commit to funding the rebuilding of the country.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Death! Death to all who oppose us!
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Zardoz
“My strength is as the strength of ten, because my heart is pure.”
Sounds almost poetical. Oh, wait, it is.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.