Housing Starts and Permits Rise in August but 2021 Essentially Flat

Building Permits 

  • Privately‐owned housing units authorized by building permits in August were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,728,000. This is 6.0 percent above the revised July rate of 1,630,000 and is 13.5 percent above the August 2020 rate of 1,522,000. 
  • Single‐family authorizations in August were at a rate of 1,054,000; this is 0.6 percent above the revised July figure of 1,048,000. 
  • Authorizations of units in buildings with five units or more were at a rate of 632,000 in August. 

Housing Starts 

  • Privately‐owned housing starts in August were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,615,000. This is 3.9 percent above the revised July estimate of 1,554,000 and is 17.4 percent above the August 2020 rate of 1,376,000. 
  • Single‐family housing starts in August were at a rate of 1,076,000; this is 2.8 percent below the revised July figure of 1,107,000. 
  • The August rate for units in buildings with five units or more was 530,000. 

Housing Completions 

  • Privately‐owned housing completions in August were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,330,000. This is 4.5 percent below the revised July estimate of 1,392,000, but is 9.4 percent above the August 2020 rate of 1,216,000. 
  • Single‐family housing completions in August were at a rate of 971,000; this is 2.8 percent above the revised July rate of 945,000. 
  • The August rate for units in buildings with five units or more was 356,000. 

Above details from the Census Department New Residential Construction Report.

Year-over-year figures are very distorted because of Covid. It’s best to step back and just look at numbers as in the lead chart. 

Here’s a closer look with a spotlight on 2021.

Housing Starts, Permits, Completions Detail 

Starts and Permits in 2021

  • 2021 Starts: Seasonally-adjusted housing starts were 1.625 million in January and 1.615 million in August. In between the bounces and dips even out.
  • 2021 Permits: Seasonally-adjusted permits were 1.883 million in January and 1.728 million in August. The trend in permits has generally been lower.

Housing Starts 1959-Present 

Since 1959 the average number of starts per month, seasonally adjusted, is 1.431 million units. We are at 1.615 million units now.

Housing Shortage Illusion

On August 23, I noted The NAR Claims There’s a Chronic 5.5 Million Shortage of Houses

Why Buyers Are Aggressive

  • Cheap money from the Fed
  • Free stimulus money from Congress
  • A booming stock market bubble makes everyone feel wealthy

Let’s not confuse a genuine shortage with an artificial shortage due to monetary stimulus by the Fed and free money stimulus from Congress coupled with a booming stock market bubble.

The shortage is an illusion. 

Thanks for Tuning In

Like these reports? If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

17 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago
The state government in California just usurped local zoning laws. Home owners can now build a rental unit in the back yard, with abandon. It seems there are all manner of companies willing to buy people’s homes- skip the real estate agent. Wouldn’t be surprised if they will want to buy them up, in order to build a rental unit in the back yard, then sell them to Black Rock. Also, it will open up single family properties to be replaced with apartment buildings.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
It would seem even a clock as broken as Newsom’s, does manage to occasionally be right! Congrats to them!
I bet they’ll still manage to fall way short of the 6 million, or thereabouts, housing units for which there exists profitable demand in San Francisco alone, though. There’s still no cure for stupid, after all; even if those afflicted occasionally do experience less severely symptomatic moments.
1-shot
1-shot
2 years ago
Home prices may be in a bubble – although I don’t believe that story, but housing supply is definitely not. We had 10 years of below normal levels of construction to the tune of 500,000 less homes per year than needed because of the overbuilding, sloppy lending, speculation and subsequent price crash of the early 2000’s.  We’ve been playing catchup ever since then and have a long way to go.  Just read the charts. 
Now builders (myself included) are cutting back on construction and slowing delivery again due to artificial worker and material “shortages”. Free money given to workers for not working and price gouging by materials producers, suppliers and transporters is largely to blame.  It doesn’t suddenly cost 5-10 times as much to transport containers from China to the US. Millions of containers didn’t suddenly just disappear off the face of the planet. Nor has the cost of raw materials increased by the percentages we are being overcharged for finished products. Transportation companies, from ships to truckers are getting paid rates not seen in decades – 4 times pre-Covid levels.
How else can you explain companies making record profits on sales volumes that are 50% lower than pre-Covid levels.  These costs aren’t expected to drop until later next year – except by Powell and the politicians. Most will NEVER return to pre-Covid levels. This means lower margins for builders or higher priced homes and less of them for consumers. For now, sellers have the upper hand. Who knows what the future holds.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  1-shot
Yep.
Carl_R
Carl_R
2 years ago
To what extent will the steel shortage affect home completions?
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Encroachment of the fish developers
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
2 years ago

Well this is interesting..finally we may have a break in covid 19 origins. 

Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
2 years ago

The scary part is they were making infectious chimeric Mers viruses,” the source said.

“These viruses have a fatality rate over 30 per cent, which is at least an order of magnitude more deadly than Sars-CoV-2.

“If one of their receptor replacements made Mers spread similarly, while maintaining its lethality, this pandemic would be nearly apocalyptic.”

Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
“The documents were released by Drastic, the web-based investigations team set up by scientists from across the world to look into the origins of Covid-19.” 
D.R.A.S.T.I.C.

(Decentralized Radical Autonomous Search Team Investigating COVID-19) 

DRASTIC says it uses whistleblowers and leakers to get its data. The documents found by them concerning what the article talks about testing  in bat caves can be found here:
I have no idea if DRASTIC is a serious organization or not but I thought I would put up the link to them anyway.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
They were the group that gave the lab leak story legs but metadata research on papers that were pulled from Chinese researchers online. Below is the latest. Looks like China was rejected for funding for projects enhancing bat viruses. The question is what did they do after this. 
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago

They obviously continued to do the gain-of-function research
in my opinion. If some scientists had reservations they would easily find
others with no qualms so the research continues. I wasn’t very much aware of
DRASTIC before. If they are getting DARPA documents that haven’t been published
anywhere else then they are leaked documents and not from whistleblowers which
brings up another question. Why are they leaking?

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
I really doubt any real evidence that confirms the actual deeds are going to be forthcoming. It’s just one more damning bit of circumstantial evidence.
Anybody with a brain has known since at least late spring of 2020 that the preponderance of circumstantial evidence pointed to a lab origin of COVID. The other narrative, no matter how hard the media and the medical bureaucrats tried to push it, really never held much water.
It’s just so easy to fool practically everybody, that they thought they could say anything they wanted and their appeals to authority would be more convincing than anything having to do with the technical aspects. Daszak should probably go to jail, Fauci should be fired, and we should outlaw GOF research.
But none of that is likely.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
The worst part of all was that the main stream media and big tech suppressed anyone who dared question the official narrative of the wet market bat origin.
Now of course the truth is coming out but it’s been 20 months later and the public is exhausted by Covid talk and the truth is still not getting much coverage in the media or by big tech. So of course it’s going to get swept under the rug and GOF research will continue. Had they admitted the truth in the beginning the public would have demanded GOF be banned minute 1.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
““You now have permanent capital competing with a young couple trying to buy a house,” said John Burns, whose eponymous real estate consulting firm estimates that in many of the nation’s top markets, roughly one in every five houses sold is bought by someone who never moves in. “That’s going to make U.S. housing permanently more expensive,” he said. 
The consulting firm found Houston to be a favorite haunt of investors who have lately accounted for 24% of home purchases there. Investors’ slice of the housing market grows—as it does in other boomtowns, such as Miami, Phoenix and Las Vegas—among properties priced below $300,000 and in decent school districts. “
This really is a thing. I get cold calls nearly every day from who-knows-where.
The thing is that these companies use a different cash-flow model than ordinary landlords. The long term result is going to be lower cap rates and higher prices. 
Housing starts are down here, but nothing that looks too weird so far….still less than a month of single-family inventory for sale in the Austin Metro Area.
I don’t expect to find anything else to buy here that will flow the kind of cash I need to get to make the math work for me as an investor. Fortunately, I am able to hang on to what I have, which is probably a good long term strategy, even if the “everything bubble” does pop.
We could see a fairly substantial crash and still see serious inflation picking right back up. CPI barely went negative in housing for one year in the last crash. Rents here never even fell.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
In the haste to prevent deflation we have inflation everywhere (monetary phenomenon).
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
To be honest I am surprised that starts and completions haven’t fallen off a cliff this year as lumber and other materials skyrocketed in price. Unless you were contractually obligated to start and/or complete your build why would you even begin given the costs were ~30K more than the year before for the average house.
So many people will be underwater on day 1 once the prices for materials goes down later this year or next and the same house can be built for 30K less. The same with those buying new cars at crazy inflated prices.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
True, but businesses have to keep doing what they do in order to stay alive.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.