New Home Sales Bounce 7.5 Percent From Negative Revisions

New Home Sales data from the Census Department, chart by Mish

Last month I noted huge new sales negative revisions for the August. This month the Census Department reports negative revisions for September. 

If the pattern holds, there will be negative revisions next month too. 

Please consider the New Residential Construction Report for October.

New Home Sales 

  • Sales of new single‐family houses in October 2022 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 632,000, according to estimates released jointly today by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 
  • This is 7.5 percent (±20.8 percent)* above the revised September rate of 588,000, but is 5.8 percent (±19.6 percent)* below the October 2021 estimate of 671,000. 
  • In September I reported New Home Sales Jump an Astonishing 28 Percent in August to 685,000. But today we see the number is 661,000.
  • This month the Census Department revised September from 603,000 to 588,000. 

Notice the margin of errors in these reports ±20 percent!

Sales Price 

  • The median sales price of new houses sold in October 2022 was $493,000. 
  • The average sales price was $544,000. 

For Sale Inventory and Months’ Supply 

  • The seasonally‐adjusted estimate of new houses for sale at the end of October was 470,000. 
  • This represents a supply of 8.9 months at the current sales rate.  

New Homes Sold Long Term

A long term chart puts things into proper perspective. New home sales are about where they were in 1963.

New Homes For Sale By Stage of Construction

New Home Sales data from the Census Department, chart by Mish

Of the purported 470,000 homes for sale, 111,000 have not even started, nor are they likely to in this environment.  A mere 61,000 are actually completed. 

To be generous, there are 359,000 homes for sale, that have at least been started, with 298,000 under construction.

Months Supply

The reported new homes for sale supply includes 111,000 homes that have not even been started. 

What About Cancellations?

The Census Department does not subtract cancellations from its reports and cancellations due to rising mortgage rates have been huge. 

In declining sales environments and economic downturns (now), the Census Department dramatically overstates sales, even if we ignore revisions.

In economic upturns, the Census Department understates sales. 

Existing Home Sales Crash

On November 18, I commented Existing Home Sales Decline 9th Month, Down Another 5.9 Percent

  • Existing home sales are down 28.4% from one year ago.
  • Existing home sales are down 31.7% since January.

That’s a crash. And never have we seen such declines other than in recessions. 

Yield Curve Inversion Recession Signal is the Strongest in Over 40 Years

Please note The 2-10 Yield Curve Inversion Recession Signal is the Strongest in Over 40 Years

Conclusion

Factoring in revisions, cancellations, margins of error of 20 percent, and an alleged supply of homes that does not even exist, the entire new residential construction report is a joke.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

12 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
shamrock
shamrock
3 years ago
Where are you getting a margin of error of 20%? 685,000 to 661,000 is 3.5% and 603,000 to 588,000 is 2.5%.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
This would be better if the long-term history of this data were detailed, including how the data and revisions have worked during periods when the direction was changing. It brings to mind something that a corporate economist in one of my business school (Wharton) classes told me when I was complaining about inaccurate gov’t economic stats: “It’s more important to be comparable than to be correct, as long as the magnitude of errors doesn’t change.”
He wasn’t arguing against accurate data. Not at all. His point was that, when interpreting and using data, it’s important to have an idea of the history including the errors, and whether or not there have been changes in error rates. Mish, I can’t (and don’t) argue that the housing numbers are correct. You’ve done a fine job of showing that they aren’t. But there’s really no context here, so I for one (and who had plenty of experience with gov’t stats prior to retirement) cannot at this point call this significant.
Nor do I call it insignificant. Given that you’ve dived into the deeper end of the pool, I suggest a deeper dive to see how this has worked before. Is this really something to pay close attention to, or is it the usual pattern for that data series?
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
People may feel it – but can’t explain it. The economy is being run in reverse. See the GI Bill: “An important provision of the G.I. Bill was low interest, zero down payment home loans for servicemen, with more favorable terms for new construction compared to existing housing. This encouraged millions of American families to move out of urban apartments and into suburban homes.”
The 1966 Interest Rate Adjustment Act is the template. The banks were driven out of the savings business while the money stock was frozen.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
3 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
1964 was the last year the dime and quarter were minted in silver. In 1965 those coins were minted silver clad copper. Currency debasement in theory should drive people to hold onto the more precious coins, which would reduce deposits at banks. Additionally hoarding silver coins would not only freeze the money supply, but also take money out of circulation (decrease) very quickly. Maybe the 1966 Interest Rate Adjustment Act was an attempt to cover up a bad decision to debase currency?
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear
Yeah, my commodity branch owner made over a million collecting silver coins up until 1980 (up until the Hunt fiasco).
But the theory is confirmed by Dr. Philip George’s “The Riddle of Money Finally Solved”. The “Taper Tantrum” is also prima facie evidence, the FDIC’s change in deposit insurance from unlimited to $250,000. –Danielle
Dimartino Booth’s book: “Fed Up”, pg. 218
“Before the financial
crisis, accounts were insured up to the first $100,000 by the FDIC. That limit
kept enormous sums in the shadow banking system.”
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
we fillled many bags of pre 65 silver us coins in the late 60s and 70s. bags and bags of silver with zero cost basis. the bankers, the butchers and and bankers and candlestick makers freely handed over gobs and gobs of coins for the paper…………amerikans were naive. still are.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
3 years ago
Comparing the housing bubble top to the COVID housing top, The relative seasonally adjusted inventory when the seasonally adjusted sales top occurred was only slightly better at the housing bubble top (30%) compared to the COVID top (33%). After the housing bubbles popped, falling interest rates potentially helped in 2007-9, but rising interest rates potentially hurt 2022 -???. Post COVID housing looks like it will fall as hard or harder than 2007-9.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear
They are not even similar. The FED has dug a deeper hole this time around. Bernanke drained legal reserves. Powell eliminated them.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
So the median new homes sales price moved from Jul to Oct $475K then a big dip to $441K in Aug, then up from there $446K to $493K.
And the median is more resistant to outliers than the average price. I think it’s fair to say that the reporting about housing being in a tailspin is exactly that, spin.
And, I’ve read that the 2000’s teaser rate loans are making a comeback. In addition, a small number of probably well capitalized builders are starting to offer buyers a home as an investment where they pay a portion of the total cost with the loan they can afford. Not sure about all of the details, but things are getting extremely crazy out there with regards to the lengths builders & buyers are going to move homes.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
“A long term chart puts things into proper perspective. New home sales are about where they were in 1963.”
U.S. population in 1963 was 190mil.
Shouldn’t home sales increase with population?
Specifically with the advent of dual working households in the 70’s, it seems strange, especially on long term charts.
.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
It’s not the volume that’s really the issue now IMHO, rather it’s the staggering prices. There’s a severe affordable housing problem in the US and most parts of the world. While the Fed may somehow engineer a softish landing next year, I can’t see these prices hanging around much more than a few more years until something big breaks. In my neck of the woods, Woodstock GA, prices are actually still rising in both new & existing homes.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
square footage of housing in 60s was a fraction of today. even the old levitt homes have been added to be mcmansions.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.