Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Stablecoin Wars, Forced Binance Conversions, and the Irony of it All

Stablecoin Wars

Stablecoins cannot pay interest or they would then be regulated as securities. And with rising interest rates, there’s a lot of money collecting interest at the exchanges. 

A battle is on for that money. The result is a stablecoin war as  Binance Makes Move on Rivals.

Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, said it would automatically convert users’ deposits of several rival stablecoins into its own stablecoin, Binance USD, starting this month. Analysts say Binance’s decision could escalate the rivalries among the largest stablecoin players, such as Tether and Circle, and generate additional revenue for Binance as the market cap of its stablecoin grows. 

Circle Internet Financial Ltd., which issues the second-largest stablecoin, USD Coin, held $40.1 billion in short-term Treasurys as of Sept. 15, according to its website. The Boston-based company earned $28.5 million in interest income on USD Coin in 2021 and $100.4 million for the first six months of this year, according to a recent filing.

Circle estimated it could earn $438 million in total interest income this year and as much as $2.2 billion in 2023, it said in a financial outlook presentation in February. USD Coin has a market cap of $50 billion.

Tether Holdings Ltd., the company behind the largest stablecoin with a market value of $68 billion, held $29 billion in U.S. Treasury bills at the end of June, according to its latest attestation. Tether also charges a 0.1% redemption fee for a minimum withdrawal of $100,000. 

On Binance, many tokens and derivative contracts are still quoted and collateralized in tether. Mr. Shah wrote that Binance users may be more likely to withdraw their Binance USD as USD Coin than tether “given the inconvenient inability to convert BUSD to USDT without executing a trade.”

Tether said Binance’s move could be “aimed at taking out USD Coin’s number two spot and replacing it with Binance’s own BUSD” stablecoin. 

Tether Audit 

Tether has promised an audit for years and has not delivered. Instead it offers an “attestation.”

This is a “trust me, the money is there” statement, of which only $29 billion of which is actually in US Treasury Bills. 

The rest can literally be anything (or nothing at all), but whatever it is (or isn’t), it’s not as liquid as short-term US treasuries. 

Please note that a Bloomberg Investigation Tried to Find $69 Billion in Tethers and couldn’t. 

On February 23, 2021, Coindesk reported NY AG’s $850M Probe of Bitfinex, Tether Ends in an $18.5M Settlement

The New York Attorney General’s office (NYAG) has settled with Bitfinex over a 22-month inquiry into whether the cryptocurrency exchange sought to cover up the loss of $850 million in customer and corporate funds held by a payment processor.

The NYAG’s office announced the settlement Tuesday, formally ending the inquiry that kicked off in April 2019. Under the terms of the settlement, Bitfinex and Tether will admit no wrongdoing but will pay $18.5 million and provide quarterly reports describing the composition of Tether’s reserves for the next two years. More significantly, these reports will match information Tether already provided the NYAG about its reserves. The NYAG will bring no charges as part of the settlement.

Settlement does not imply lack of guilt nor does it imply the money is really there.

Indeed, the conclusion was that it isn’t. 

Happenings in El Salvador 

That’s Max Keiser and Stacy Herbert with Nayib Bukele, El Salvador’s president.

Bukele has adopted bitcoin as legal tender to the consternation of the US, other developed countries, and the IMF.

Arguably, that alone is enough to cheer for Bukele. He is running again for president but that is against the Constitution. After Bukele packed the court, it approved him running again.

A Gallup poll gave Bukele an 85% approval rating and an 95% rating in security matters. So who am I to object to him running again for president? 

That aside, isn’t there a better way like changing the Constitution rather than packing the courts. 

Billboard in Austin

Ben Hunt on Bitcoin

Ben Hunt on “Bitcoin!”

Note “Bitcoin” and “Bitcoin!” are not the same thing. 

Unfortunately, that is paywalled. I will ask Hunt if he might unlock that. 

A Hint at Hunt’s Thoughts on “Bitcoin!”

You vs “You!”

Noting the importance of the “!” in previous Hunt writings (without having read or being a subscriber to Hunt) I commented on June 18, 2022 The Crypto Crash and Why It’s Impossible For “You!” to Cash Out

Memes of the Day

The newly circulated idea of the day looks like this: 1 BTC = 1 BTC.

I have seen that in perhaps a hundred Tweets recently. Yes, truly genius. And one US digital dollar = one US digital dollar. They are all alike.

$1 = $1 is equally brilliant. 

“Can’t Go Below $20,000” 

Several people Tweeted Bitcoin could not possibly dip below $20,000 because they have seen the order flows.

Damn, it seems the order flows did not care what those fools thought. 

“Bitcoin Does Not Care What You Think”

That’s true of course, given that Bitcoin cannot think at all.

Here’s another “brilliant” truism.

Bitcoin does not care where Bitcoin believers think the price of Bitcoin is headed.

Stable Coins

The allegedly stable coin LUNA went to $0.

Many more are headed that way. 

“You” Can Cash Out But “You!” Cannot

  • What’s the difference?
  • You is an individual
  • You! is the collective

At an individual level, “You” can still get the current quoted bid for a Bitcoin ($17,600 as I type)

But “You!” cannot get the current quoted bid. If everyone tried to sell, the price would crash to $500 or whatever the price marginal buyers are willing to pay.

Looking ahead, “You” may be able to get more than $20,000 tomorrow for a bitcoin but “You!” certainly cannot.

But hey that’s OK because I have it on great authority that $1 BTC = $1 BTC and nothing else matters because “Bitcoin is Money” and “Money Always Goes Up.”

You vs You! is not just about Bitcoin. The same applies to Tesla, Apple, gold, and silver. A lot of imaginary wealth has already blown up and more is coming up. 

Cult Hero Worship

Money Always Goes Up 

Bitcoin Will Go Up Forever

Bitcoin will go up forever, like money is supposed to do, unless you don’t know what money is.”

What a hoot. 

Irony of the Day

Luna, a stablecoin, went to zero. Tether is less than 50% backed by US Treasuries. 

Bitcoin and the crypto space was founded as an anti-dollar alternative. 

But competition in the crypto space is heating up for unaudited tokens partially or allegedly backed not by dollars, but derivatives of dollars. 

That’s worth another hoot.

Finally, other than barter, the only way to do anything with Bitcoin is to trade it for dollars, euros, or other fiat currencies.   

If you think you are directly buying stuff with Bitcoin from a merchant, you are mistaken. It’s overwhelmingly likely the merchant convert that Bitcoin to dollars or euros pressuring the price of Bitcoin in the process. 

Still think “you!” can cash out”?

“You!” can’t. Bitcoin is far too volatile for use as money, permanently relegating its use as a speculative play thing. 

This post originated at MishTalk.Com

Please Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish 

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

50 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Carl_R
Carl_R
3 years ago
What is the difference between Binance holding the money in Biance accounts that isn’t currently invested in USD (as brokerages do), and Biance calling that money BUSD? Either way, Biance has the money, and the customer has a credit. I guess the difference is that if Biance goes under, they don’t owe anything to the client; instead the client owns a worthless BUSD.
techlover
techlover
3 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
Big difference in KYC implications on holding USD for a customer at Binance (or another exchange) vs the customer holding BUSD.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago

Central Banks Are Inflation Creators, Not Inflation Fighters | Mercatus Center

“Milton Friedman mockingly retorted that “whatever may be true
about the economy, the propensity of economists to appeal to a change in our
economic structure whenever they are puzzled works quite the way that it used
to.” He similarly noted that medicine that had been given to treat this illness
worked exactly the way that an economist would expect. The problem was not that
the illness was new, but rather than the patient had been given the wrong
medicine.”

“A prime example of the importance of counterfactuals is the concept
of a monetary policy offset. This idea has been made popular in recent years by
economist Scott Sumner.”

It’s stock vs. flow. Money matters. Velocity matters more.
The Impact of Large Time Deposits on the Growth Rate of M2 (richmondfed.org)

Professor emeritus Leland James Pritchard (Ph.D., Chicago
Economics 1933, M.S. Statistics) never minced his words, and in May 1980
pontificated that:

“The Depository Institutions Monetary Control Act will have a
pronounced effect in reducing money velocity”.

So, one of the thing’s impacting
velocities is the growth of large time deposits:

See the 1yr trend in large time deposits:
Large Time Deposits, All Commercial Banks (LTDACBM027NBOG) | FRED | St. Louis Fed (stlouisfed.org)
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Bitcoin peaked at about the same time as the Wilshire 5000 (an historic blowoff).
Monetarism is about the money stock, not interest rates. Banks aren’t intermediaries. If the commercial bankers are given the sovereign right to create legal tender, then the DFIs must be severely circumscribed in the management of both their assets and their liabilities – or made quasi-gov’t institutions.

Hiking administered rates reduces R-gDp more so than inflation. And this time is different from Volcker’s period (because of the DIDMCA). “In 1982, however, this long-run upswing (in v) was abruptly reversed; over the six quarters from the last quarter of 1981 to the first quarter of 1983 velocity declined at an average annual rate of 4.8 percent, a phenomenon unprecedented since the Great Depression.”

If the FED pivots, it will accelerate inflation more than R-gDp. We are stuck with stagflation.

Siliconguy
Siliconguy
3 years ago
A digital currency is not money until I can pay my taxes in it. And that requires that its value stays stable enough for the check to clear without it suddenly going up or down 10%.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
3 years ago
Reply to  Siliconguy
It’s also very much currency if you can pay someone in it, anonymously, to whack all and any who may try forcing you to hand over “taxes” to them….
Or, if you can bribe the taxman to let you off the hook. Without anyone being the wiser….
Even so, stability is largely a necessity for something to become a currency.
The fundamental problem is, though, specifically that it is fiat dollars which is not stable. That’s the so-called “currency” which sees supply arbitrarily, at the whim of a roomful of retards, double every few years or so. With almost all the fresh print being handed out, in exchange for nothing, to a bunch of clueless child-brains even more given to manias and panics than the average illiterate.
If dollar supply was stable, as in anchored 1-to-1 to Gold; BTC prices would have been a lot more stable as well. As would food prices, house prices, energy prices and all other prices. So the problem is not BTC lacking “stability” due to anything intrinsic to itself nor crypto currencies. per se. But rather that BTC moves more in line with prices for stuff the basket-cases at The Fed arbitrarily does not include in their various “baskets,” that it does with stuff just as arbitrarily included. Btc is no different from stocks, bonds etc. in that regard. Those are also not all that “stable” when measured in USD.
Fundamentally, though: The quantity of BTC vs the quantity of real goods produced, is a lot more stable than the quantity of USD vs real goods. BTC outstanding haven’t been growing much at all, for years now. The “instability” of BTC, when measured in USD, is solely a side effect of the theft rackets which is dependent on continued USD debasement.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
For an esoteric form of “money” there sure is a whole lot of continued talk about digital currencies. Biden is talking about digital currencies, the US Treasury is talking about them, the SEC is talking about them, bloggers are talking about them, the public is talking about them. This doesn’t sound like an instrument that is dying if everyone is talking about it.
I don’t hear anyone talking about tulips as an investment vehicle but everyone still talks about bitcoin and the like. There are even millions of people on Youtube and other social media talking about digital currencies right now and they will continue to do so over the next decade or two until we have a final victor or several.
As long as the talk continues so too will digital currency. I will reiterate again that digital currencies will outlive all the people criticizing them, that’s a 100% iron clad guarantee.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
People are still talking about Dutch tulips, mostly as a warning about silly investment schemes.
Pretty much the same sort of warnings as now with digital “currencies.”
Always remember that some of those Dutch folk got out early and retired rich.
Most didn’t.
Billy
Billy
3 years ago
The most stable coin is made out of gold, has no serial number, can’t be controlled.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Billy
Platinum is very stable too, silver not so much.
I don’t understand palladium, but they tell me it’s very useful with internal combustion engines.
ASYusoff
ASYusoff
3 years ago
Luna, a stablecoin, went to zero.” This isn’t quite right. The stablecoin you meant was UST. It was supposed to stay at $1.00 through an algorithm tied to Luna. This had worked, until it didn’t through a combination of factors. Anyway UST went off the cliff, losing more than 99% of its value. But it didn’t go to zero.
Those who lost almost all of their investment/speculation in Luna and UST certainly had enough motivation to try salvage things. It has split into two camps: Luna and Luna Classic (LUNC), with UST becoming USTC.
Surprisingly (or maybe not too), all these still have significant value! In fact, some lucky sods made quite a tidy stash from their speculations after the crash. Goes to show, again, that with speculations, the most critical factor is “timing”. The asset is actually secondary. Even assets that one thinks as `useless, worthless’ (and even if they really are) can bring in profits for speculators.
ASYusoff
ASYusoff
3 years ago
Reply to  ASYusoff
EDIT: It was Luna that lost more than 99%. Maybe 99.9% at one time. With UST, it had been around 98% loss.
“What does it matter, 99 or 98%?” For speculators, quite a lot. The bold sods who had bought the reincarnated USTC when it was at $0.02 recently made 200% in profit when it went to $0.07. After just three months.
One can say what he likes about cryptos, plus of the various dubious projects and downright scams. But it’s a very big field, and there are still opportunities to make serious profits.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  ASYusoff
Those folks with $0.07 USTC after three months?
Do they have that profit from $0.07 stashed in US dollars in an FDIC insured bank?
Or are they still holding USTC “valued” at $0.07?
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
Ben Hunt: “What made Bitcoin special is nearly lost, and what remains is a false and constructed narrative that exists in service to Wall Street and Washington rather than in resistance.”
Wall Street and Washington are well known for false and constructed narratives. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen now proclaims that the IRS is is the “foundation of our government.” Here i thought the Constitution was, which actually predates the IRS.
“Safe and effective.”
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
No taxes = no government = no Constitution.
Section 8 of the Constitution
Enumerated Powers
  • Clause 1 General Welfare Clause
  • The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Wow. That General Welfare Clause covers almost as much Congressional ground as the Interstate Commerce Clause they have applied so completely.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
I liked what you said, but “Here I thought the Constitution was,…”
Should be: Here I thought the Constitution IS,…
See how insidiously and easily we all slip sometimes.
8dots
8dots
3 years ago
Gautam Adani, net worth $156B in Sept 2022, an Indian, commodities and energy trader, might beat crypto ilan as number #1, leaving
behind Jeff Bezus, Bernard Arnault and WB.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
3 years ago
In the 3 months since those posts, Bitcoin has moved sideways. MicroStrategy has borrowed $500M to buy more Bitcoin. I believe enough Bitcoin holders have other investments in their portfolios that a general market selloff spooks them or get margin calls and sell their Bitcoin. Bitcoin will drop farther from these levels.
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
3 years ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear
Bitcoin is down 14% in the past month and down 51% in the past six months.
Imploding Ponzi schemes behave like this.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Bam_Man
BTC has been within a trading range for 3 months, flat for everyone but day traders.
JeffD
JeffD
3 years ago
Great article. Thanks.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
I find debating the number of angels that can fit on the head of a pin a much more productive use of my time.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Seven; the number is seven. Seven is a sacred number. Also, with one small angel in the center, and six small angels spaced around it–hexagonal closest packing results–that is, a mathematical tautology with respect to angels fitting on pins. Alternatively, for over-weight angels, the number is ONE. You could also make a case for THREE angels of average size.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Seven is a big deal in the Bible.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Symbolism notwithstanding, to be strictly correct, the actual number of angels fitting on the head of the pin depends on the size of an angel, (assuming all angels occupy the same amount of area) relative to the area of the head of the pin. I have always found the website below helpful when calculating my angels. Clearly, much work needs to be done in this area since the symbolic considerations are significant. Now, where is my Hpnotiq?
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Captain, does it say anywhere in the rules that you can’t stack your angels on horizontally, like cordwood? Can you interlock them? Seems the way to go if you’re looking for big numbers.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
It depends not on the size of the angels but on the size of the pinhead and theoretically there is no size limits on pins nor on their heads.
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
  • Actually, one of the theories behind the status of the number ‘7’ is indeed that it is the only stable configuration for packing your tent poles (as a wandering Amorite, in the Ancient Near East: Amorites were non-citizens living on the margins of the settlements).
  • That is also likely the origin of the 360° (6 poles around a central one: 60 was like 100 to us, the system was hexagesimal, 5×12, derived from counting dozens with one hand, and ones with the finger bones, 4×3, or phalanges as they are called; hexagesimal base 60 numbers are the origin of 60 seconds and minutes, 12 hour day/night, and the degrees latitude/longtitude, etc).
  • More likely is that 7 represented the names of the days of the week (between market days), named for the seven planets (which were known to the ancients), we still refer to Sun-day and Moon-day, etc.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Did Helen really did have a face that launched a thousand ships?
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
There are some faces that some men will do damn near anything for.
8dots
8dots
3 years ago
A Crypto victory. Ukraine special forces destroyed Russian troops, created panic. Special forces cannot hold 9,000 sq km territory.
That’s not their job. Iranian Shahed 136 drones attacked HIMARS, 155mm and 122 guns. It’s hard to defend against them. Russia
have massive artillery power. Kherson is still in Russian hands. Kiev : Shahed 136 changed crypto plans. Winter is coming to Kharkiv and Berlin.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  8dots
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  8dots
You have been watching Russian TV again. That is what they said this morning. Olga Skabeyeva aka “The Iron Doll” told us it wasn’t Ukrainians that kicked their butts but NATO special forces. What will she say tomorrow? I can’t wait.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Once again, big blank spots in the post. Firefox, Edge, Brave, Chrome — doesn’t matter. Oh well. Couldn’t have been too important.
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
You are the only one who cannot see Tweets.
It’s on your end
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Three browsers and a cellphone? Hmm. I must have a curse. Oh well.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
You have an Ad blocker running?
On Firefox with an Ad blocker I get blank spots. On a stock Chrome browser, I get all the tweet images filled in. Been that way for me for a long time now. So I often open in Chrome just to see those images.
It seems the images aren’t passing some sort of ad-on filter.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
I quote from my own post: “Firefox, Edge, Brave, Chrome — doesn’t matter.” I don’t have this problem with any other website. Only this one.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
You only browsing from home? I wonder if your home router is preventing tracking like the Blur add on. Or if Windows firewall or something else is dong it.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
All of that would possibly make sense if other websites had anything like these display problems. I doubt my router has decided to single out Mish Talk. Remember, this website routinely eats comments including those of the website founder. I’ve been online since the days of bulletin board systems and 300 baud dialup, and haven’t run into anything like this.
I only mention it when there’s something I really wanted to see here. I’d say one-third to half of Mish’s posts are incomplete on whatever device I use, wherever I use it. Oh well. I’ll live. And I’ll stop, I promise. Mish is okay with it, and that’s the bottom line.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
I was going to suggest you trade in your 1200 baud modem, but your cellphone has the same problem??? If you live under high tension power lines, you might try wrapping the cellphone in aluminum foil.
Christoball
Christoball
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
I don’t mind putting on a tin foil hat now and then ; but I refuse to wrap my cell phone in aluminum foil.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
It’s not tweets, it’s images. Wherever those images come from (via twitter or from your site), they don’t load for me either with an ad blocker.
If they are coming from twitter, maybe it’s because we don’t have twitter accounts (I for one do not) so I am not logged into twitter and maybe that’s why twitter won’t serve them.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
My Firefox is set to private browsing, but Edge isn’t. This site appears right smack next to ads there, and with big white spaces. Same goes for Chrome on my Android phone. I’m not any kind of computer geek. If it works, great. If not, grrrr. Just like any other appliance.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
OK, it’s not Ad Block plus. For me it’s Blur, an add on that’s designed to stop tracking by other sites. As soon as I disable that, and hit refresh the site shows fine in Firefox. Once I turn Blur back on, it disappears again.
Apparently Twitter is a site that Blur prevents from tracking you on the web.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Mish, posting this here in case you miss it deeper below in one of the replies to JackWebb:
It’s not Ad Block plus. For me it’s Blur, an add on that’s
designed to stop tracking by other sites. As soon as I disable that, and
hit refresh the site shows fine in Firefox. Once I turn Blur back on,
it disappears again.
Apparently Twitter is a site that Blur prevents from tracking you on the web.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Dear Mish:
I run Firefox 64 bit on Micro$oft Window$ 7.
Same large expanses of white space beneath bold headings that JackWebb has been reporting, and for just as long.
I do have uBlock Origin running to keep the crud out.
Your site connects to more domains than just about anything I look at.
Sorry that some of your links are considered crud.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Try Opera.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Opera is just another wrapper around Google’s Chromium.
I use it on my cellphone.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.