Got it. Thanks. Though I did say that I believed your record from before I started reading the blog.
Bam_Man
1 year ago
Do not pay an iota of attention to ANYTHING that these charlatans say.
In fact, if you expect the exact OPPOSITE of what they predict to happen, you will wind up being right almost 100% of the time.
RonJ
1 year ago
“Purposely and wimpishly ducking recession calls, the Fed never directly projects recessions.”
When someone yells, “fire,” people begin to panic and run for the exit. The FED wants to avoid that at all cost. Yellin, of coarse, admitted she didn’t see 2008 coming, in advance.
Webej
1 year ago
The Fed thinks it is “steering” the economy with its all-wise economics … and of course they think of themselves as excellent smooth drivers.
Of course various exogenous factors interfere with their otherwise excellent steersmanship, from time to time.
In fact, they are always using both the brake & the gas pedal simultaneously, there is no windshield, but they have good rear-view mirrors to see if they are veering off the left/right side of the road.
These people do not live in the real world.
What is more, they think that because the street is wet when it rains, they can make it rain by making the streets wet [liquidity].
I was in a car one time where the driver was using both gas and brake at the same time. The three other passengers made him stop and made me drive the rest of the way (about 150 miles). Rest assured I am fully prepared to take over the Fed’s job and run it with common sense, not Keynesian gobbledygook:
The Fed Funds rate = annualized inflation at the time + annualized growth in real GDP at the time. That is the rate is driven by the market.
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
“Wildly Optimistic Forecasts: Examining Fed GDP Projections For 2022 and 2023”
…
Par for the course.
At June 2008 FOMC meeting (otherwise known as SEVEN MONTHS deep into GFC recession), FOMC members had the temerity to RAISE GDP projection (from April’s meeting).
If you dive into the report, you will find 17 FOMC members.
Not a single member projected negative GDP growth for H1 / H2 or full year 2008.
The inflation that the Fed is attempting to fight is caused by both the supply side and the demand side. The Fed is trying to solve this through their tool which is demand side destruction. Our government has caused both increased demand (excess stimulus) and restricted supply (shutdowns, regulations, sanctions and increased taxes).
In the early 80’s, inflation was resolved through both demand destruction (Fed – bad recession) and supply side incentives that reduced regulations, lowered tax rates and improved productivity. Currently, our government is still reducing supply and increasing demand.
We continue to grow the unproductive sector of our economy (those on government support programs as well as the vast majority of government employment). I don’t see this changing so I’m with Mish on low or no growth but I think inflation isn’t going to resolved and that the Fed will reverse course and eventually let inflation run above the arbitrary 2% target.
Spending 5.35 trillion is still way beyond what the government is taking in. Therefore, the deficit spending is still stimulating demand beyond an equilibrium. I don’t think your figures include the student loan forgiveness. It hasn’t been spent by the government but I would guess the announcement is still a stimulus to demand.
Reducing the supply of labor by continuing to subsidize those not working. Reducing the supply of energy through regulations and discussion of ending fossil fuels. Reducing investment in businesses through regulations, fear of taxation increases, tax increases and additional burdensome regulations (OSHA, EPA, EEOC and 87,000 IRS agents). Reducing raw material availability, energy, food and fertilizer through stupid sanctions.
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
I much prefer predictions in the manner of the Oracle of Delphi in Ancient Greece. The priestess, aka Pythia, would be dressed as a virgin (a purple veil and short white dress) to announce her oracles while in a frenzied state. This was supposedly caused by vapors rising from a rock chasm. The priestess spoke gibberish (Ancient Keynesian) which priests interpreted and turned into poetic dactylic hexameters. The ‘best’ predictions were enigmatic and prophetic. For example,
“… When the Prytanies’ seat shines white in the island of Siphnos, White-browed all the forum – need then of a true seer’s wisdom – Danger will threat from a wooden boat, and a herald in scarlet …”
A return to a pre-Covid economy does not cut it, especially when there has not been a goat sacrificed and its liver examined beforehand.
BTW, of special interest to the investment community were the three maxims inscribed in the forecourt:
As people from the ancient world often did, Claudius Pulcher watched for omens, or signs of the gods’ will. The biographer, Suetonius (c. 70-130+), wrote about Claudius Pulcher’s pre-battle attempt at divination in his brief history of the Claudii family in the section on Emperor Tiberius, from The Twelve Caesars. According to Suetonius’ account, Claudius Pulcher conveniently had some sacred chickens on his ship, and the behavior of these chickens was thought to reflect the pleasure or displeasure of the gods. Therefore, when the sacred chickens refused to eat their feed, it was interpreted as a bad omen for the battle. By this point, however, Claudius Pulcher, was apparently irreversibly eager to go forward with his assault on the harbor of Drepanum, despite the wise counsel of his sage chickens.
According to Suetonius’ likely-embellished account, Claudius Pulcher expressed his distaste for the sacred chickens’ verdict by allegedly shouting, “If they will not eat, let them drink!” and then impiously had the chickens tossed overboard (The Twelve Caesars, Tiberius, sec. 2). With that, the admiral signaled his ill-fated attack against the harbor of Drepanum. The battle turned out to be just as horrible as the sacred chickens had warned. Of the 123 ships under Publius Claudius’ command, only 30 survived the disastrous battle, including the admiral’s own ship. When Publius Claudius returned to Rome, he was promptly slapped with a huge fine and was even accused of treason. Fortunately, he is known to have lived for a few more years after the notorious incident.
Clearly the Fed needs better chickens. Their current fortune tellers, whether they are goats or not, are terrible.
When I first saw the source, historianslut.com, I thought this will be good.
It was not what I expected, but still worthwhile for other reasons. The story of Rome vs. Carthage is a classic example of military superiority–superior soldiers, superior equipment, superior strategy (and the will to carry it out.) The lesson for all, Claudius Pulcher’s strategy of using chickens to decide what to do was NOT a good strategy.
“…Rome vs. Carthage is a classic example of military superiority–superior soldiers, superior equipment, superior strategy…”
You are kidding me, right?
It is a classic example of “I’m so much bigger than you are that my raft of lawyers on retainer will keep your lawyer buried under motions until you both go bankrupt.”
One might even say that Carthage was a culture while Rome was a very big corporation.
The deepest pockets usually win, or, he who has the gold makes the rules.
YMMV
Salmo Trutta
1 year ago
Increases in DFI loans and investments [earning assets/bank
credit], are approximately the same as increases in transaction accounts, TRs,
and time deposits, TDs, [savings-investment deposits/bank liabilities/bank
credit proxy] excluding IBDDs.
That the net absolute increase in these two figures is so
nearly identical is no happenstance, for TRs largely come into being through
the credit creating process, and TDs owe their origin almost exclusively to TRs
– either directly through transfer from TRs or indirectly via the currency route
or through the DFI’s undivided profits accounts.
Bank Credit:
2022-05-25 17025.9423
2022-09-07 17286.2629
Zardoz
1 year ago
It’s a shiny happy new world with a perfect future, citizens!
“Well, my dear Pangloss,” Candide said to them, “when you were hanged,
dissected, whipped, and tugging at the oar, did you continue to think
that everything in this world happens for the best?” “I have always
abided by my first opinion,” answered Pangloss; “for after all, I am a
philosopher, and it would not become me to retract my sentiments.”
Salmo Trutta
1 year ago
Powell is Keynesian inspired. Interest is the price of credit. The price of money is the reciprocal of the price level. Money flows are falling.
randocalrissian
1 year ago
Clearly Fed members are making their predictions with a heavy dose of PR and wishful thinking. We just need to overlook the more obvious BS like the inflation, no recession, etc calls you so rightly questioned. When the purpose is not to accurately predict the future, rather to tell us what we want to hear and/or gives us hope, we would be foolish to put full stock in them. They are using the “Build it and they will come” strategy. Hopefully we end up with more than a glorified cornfield and a few happy dreams.
I much prefer predictions in the manner of the Oracle of Delphi in Ancient Greece. The priestess, aka Pythia, would be dressed as a virgin (a purple veil and short white dress) to announce her oracles while in a frenzied state. This was supposedly caused by vapors rising from a rock chasm. The priestess spoke gibberish (Ancient Keynesian) which priests interpreted and turned into poetic dactylic hexameters. The ‘best’ predictions were enigmatic and prophetic. For example,
“… When the Prytanies’ seat shines white in the island of Siphnos, White-browed all the forum – need then of a true seer’s wisdom – Danger will threat from a wooden boat, and a herald in scarlet …”
A return to a pre-Covid economy does not cut it, especially when there has not been a goat sacrificed and its liver examined beforehand.
BTW, of special interest to the investment community were the three maxims inscribed in the forecourt:
Know thyself
Nothing to excess
Surety brings ruin
Increases in DFI loans and investments [earning assets/bank
credit], are approximately the same as increases in transaction accounts, TRs,
and time deposits, TDs, [savings-investment deposits/bank liabilities/bank
credit proxy] excluding IBDDs.
That the net absolute increase in these two figures is so
nearly identical is no happenstance, for TRs largely come into being through
the credit creating process, and TDs owe their origin almost exclusively to TRs
– either directly through transfer from TRs or indirectly via the currency route
or through the DFI’s undivided profits accounts.
dissected, whipped, and tugging at the oar, did you continue to think
that everything in this world happens for the best?” “I have always
abided by my first opinion,” answered Pangloss; “for after all, I am a
philosopher, and it would not become me to retract my sentiments.”