Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Home Prices Have Peaked, Case-Shiller Data Lags, Now What?

Case-Shiller home price data via St. Louis Fed, chart by Mish

Home Price Synopsis 

Home prices have peaked this cycle but one would not know that by looking at the raw numbers or the chart.

The Case-Shiller National Index hit a new high in June of 483.5, up from 480.7 in May, and 473.0 in April. 

The Case-Shiller 10-City Index hit a new high in June of 520.4, up from 518.9 in May, and 512.8 in April. 

Q: Why am I confident the top is in?

A: Case-Shiller data lags. It is a three month average of the preceding three months. The June report is effectively from April-May, and this is August. 

Moreover, prices have already declined in Denver, Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, and D.C.

Next month I expect to see declines in more cities. Within two months, the national index will turn lower. But the top is already in. 

Understanding the lag, April is likely the peak month nationally.

Home Prices Disconnect From Rent and OER

Home Price Disconnect Notes

  • National is the Case-Shiller national home price index.
  • 10-City represents the weighted average of the cities in the first chart.
  • CPI is the Consumer Price Index
  • OER stands for Owner’s Equivalent Rent. It is the single largest component in the CPI with a current weight of 23.5% of the total CPI.
  • Rent of Primary Residence is a CPI component with a weight of 7.2% of the CPI.

OER is the mythical price the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) says one would pay to rent one’s own house from oneself, unfurnished, without utilities.

CS National, Top 10 Metro Percent Change From Year Ago

Percent Change From Year Ago Notes (June 2022)

  • CPI: 9.06%
  • OER: 5.48%
  • Rent: 5.78%
  • Case-Shiller 10-City: 17.37%
  • Case-Shiller National: 17.96%

Three Measures of Inflation

CPI data from the BLS, PCE from the BEA, the adjusted CPI is a Mish calculation

Adjusted CPI Discussion

My Case-Shiller adjusted CPI is calculated by substituting the percentage change in the Case-Shiller national index for OER in the CPI.

The result is an adjusted annual CPI rise of 11.20%, just under the record high for this data series.

There is a lot of controversy over this procedure. The BLS and many economists will point out that houses are not a “consumer” expense but a “capital” expense.

That’s technically accurate except historically home prices used to be in the CPI so historical comparisons are a bit distorted.

The problem with being “technically” accurate is that it is a huge mistake by the Fed to ignore asset bubbles. Inflation matters, not just alleged CPI inflation.

This historical distortion never mattered much in practice because the second chart shows OER, the CPI, rent, and home prices all rose in sync.

Real Interest Rates

CPI data from the BLS, the adjusted CPI and Real Interest Rates are Mish calculations

Real Interest Rates Discussion

One can calculate “real” (inflation-adjusted) interest rates by subtracting the rate the Fed charges from CPI measures.

Mortgage rates had been around 2% in January but have since soared so one could formulate another version of “real” based on mortgages.

Regardless, the Fed wanted higher inflation and finally got it in spades.

Why the Inflation Surge?

  1. Three rounds of fiscal stimulus, two by Biden and one by Trump
  2. Supply chain disruptions
  3. Massive change in consumer preferences from services to goods
  4. QE finally mattered

The war is barely reflected in these charts as it began in February of 2022.

Poor Measure of Inflation

The big problem the Fed failed to see is that the CPI is an extremely poor measure of inflation.

Inflation matters, not just alleged consumer inflation.

The Fed missed a huge jump in inflation because it does not know what to look at.

Leading Theories – Now What? 

  1. This is not a bubble and prices will remain firm
  2. Prices will crash
  3. Prices will do a slow bleed ultimately resulting in a steep decline

Theory number 1 pertains to the fact this is not 2008, there are no liar loans, there will not be people walking away. 

Theory number two says people will quickly reduce prices to dump declining assets. 

Right now I favor scenario number 3, essentially the mid-point of the first two.

Economically speaking, the best scenario is number 2, a price crash.

Q: Why is a crash the best scenario
A: Because the longer and higher home prices stay elevated, the less household formation, the less residential investment, the less new home construction, the less durable goods and appliance purchases, etc.

The longer and stronger housing prices remain firm the longer we will have weak growth. 

 A crash is not benign, however. The wealth impact of a crash will destroy some demand as will a stock market decline.

The Fed is Openly Cheering the Stock Market Plunge Following Jackson Hole

It is very important to note that The Fed is Openly Cheering the Stock Market Plunge Following Jackson Hole

Minneapolis Fed president Neel Kashkari was ‘Happy’ to See the Stock Market’s Reaction to Jackson Hole.

Expect a Long Period of Weak Growth, Whether or Not It’s Labeled Recession

On August 19, I commented Expect a Long Period of Weak Growth, Whether or Not It’s Labeled Recession

On August 26, at Jackson Hole, Fed Chair Jerome Powell Pledges to “Act With Resolve” to Beat Inflation

Key comments: “Reducing inflation is likely to require a sustained period of below-trend growth.”

Stocks are priced for perfection, not a long period of weak growth, and with the Fed openly cheering their demise.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish 

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

41 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Christoball
Christoball
3 years ago
With almost 2 million Baby Boomers a year dying there is going to be many legacy houses on the market. These were houses originally bought at much lower prices, and will sell at going prices whatever they may be. Many heirs of an estate do not get along with each other and often the goal is to quickly liquidate and allocate the funds. Divorce will also force a lot of sales. Even if employment is strong, regional manufacturing plants or administrative offices could be shuttered because of slowing demand for their products or higher efficiency’s or consolidations elsewhere. These events along with rising interest rates could have prices turn quickly downward. It is not different this time.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
“Now What?”
Now we buy more puts on home builder stocks. Easiest way is to buy puts on XHB. It’s trading around $60. The January 19, 2024 puts $55 strikes trading for $6.5. If XHB drops 50% to $30 then puts will be worth $25/contract. That’s $2,500 profit per contract. 10 contracts = $25k – 6.5k = $18.5k profit.
In case anyone wondering, yes I have bought put contracts and will likely buy more at the next XHB rally. This is not financial advice, due your own due diligence, consult a financial adviser…blah.blah..blah.
Save this post, ridicule me if I am wrong, praise me if I am right.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
3 years ago
Given the increase in mortgage rates, house prices need to come down a good 20% just to remain in buyers’ inelastic budgets.
JG1170
JG1170
3 years ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear
You’re being kind, it’s 25% for sure, probably 30%.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
Final Category for Article: Modern Monetary Theory
Since the Great Recession, the Fed and more importantly the US Congress and associated agencies like the Consumer Fraud Protection Bureau have chosen to manage the US economy through a means that generally aligns with Modern Monetary Theory. This change is the single greatest threat to America’s financial well-being. Nearly everything in this article can and will be nullified by these and other governmental agencies up to a certain point. By this, I mean there’s only so long that this adherence to MMT can continue. At some point, possibly not too far in the distant future, estimated to be about 8 years, the entire house of cards will come crashing down.
Finally, I generally agree with all of Mish’s points, especially this one:
“The longer and stronger housing prices remain firm the longer we will have weak growth.”
8dots
8dots
3 years ago
Don’t trust anybody from Yale. Option #1 : The blue zone might send AAPL to a new zone > $3T. SPX might reach Nov 6/10 2021 fractal zone. Option #2 : SPX might breach Feb 2020 high. We don’t know what will happen in the blue zone casino. The odds are against the lemmings.
shamrock
shamrock
3 years ago
Since you mentioned the California electric car mandate, I thought you might find it funny that today officials requested that people don’t charge their cars and please keep the air conditioners at 78 minimum because it’s so hot there isn’t enough power for those things. Yikes.
JRM
JRM
3 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
This is what the “REAL EXPERTS” have been warning about going all electric…
We can not produce enough “GREEN” to power all these vehicles that the Democats are “DEMANDING” we buy!!!
I say we are still 30 years away from that capability, by then we will be strip mining asteroids and other planets!!!
Fish1
Fish1
3 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
A peek below the surface reveals this: The advisory is that EV owners should not charge their cars between 4:00 PM and 9:00 PM. There is plenty of power up until 4:00 PM but that is when solar panels begin to trail off. Figure out how to store some electricity and the electrical generating problem is solved. Electrolytes in tanks that we charge during the day is one idea. The point is that this is quite soluble.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  Fish1
Lets have millions of large toxic batteries spread across the country. With no way to recycle them. Put windmills on top of every peak and cover our farmland with solar panels. An environmental utopia.
Fish1
Fish1
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
You would prefer large toxic tanks of hydrocarbons that we constantly burn off into the air around us? Solar panels are proving to be powerful contributors to the grid, we now need electrical storage. An easier engineering problem.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Fish1
“Soluble” as in dissolves into nothingness when confronted with reality?
Esclaro
Esclaro
3 years ago
Looking at the real estate listings here I have to laugh. People with $600,000 houses are dropping the price 5k. Yeah right, like that’s going to make a difference!
OUdaveguy
OUdaveguy
3 years ago
Reply to  Esclaro
LOL! And when does the latest Wall-Street-corporate-media narrative of imminent rate cutting start again? The August edition was a bust for stonks!
jiminy
jiminy
3 years ago
Reply to  Esclaro
We had a 100k price cut in our neigborhood, still no sale.
desertsteve
desertsteve
3 years ago
I agree prices have peaked but there will be no crash. I think prices will moderate to flat or -1 to -3% but only briefly.
1. The number one driver of real estate buying is employment and employment is strong even if the fed raises the unemployment rate to 4%.
2. Agree, loan quality from 2008 crash is much better, better credit used for borrowers, better loan to values, better debt to income ratios and no significant sub prime lending. Also, in 2008 there was no wage inflation to keep up with rising interest rates. While wages are not keeping up 1-1 they are still rising and off set some of the rate increases. Once the economy slows further rates will retreat some but not all of their gains.
3. We are still under built in the USA by about 4 million homes.
4. People still buy houses even when rates rise albeit at a slower pace.
5.. Demographics, the millennial generation is now the largest and just starting to form households after some delay, they are the drivers.
6. Real estate markets are local first, not national. In some areas it costs just as much to rent as buy even with higher rates.
7. “Stay in place”, many people are going to ride out the storm and not move because they have low (3%) 30 year fixed mortgages. I.E. it is too expensive to move with higher rates and rents. This will effect the supply side and limit the number of homes available for the “move up” buyer. SUPPLY AND DEMAND dynamics will not present like they did in 2008 – 2010 where much of the supply came from repossessed homes.
8. Large institutions like Blackstone own a significant number of residential properties. They don’t need to sell and since we are under built people will have to rent. Everyone needs a place to live. Once prices moderate, they will be back in buying helping to support housing.
IMHO (In My humble Opinion)
OUdaveguy
OUdaveguy
3 years ago
Reply to  desertsteve
On your #7 point; I consider myself “grandfathered” into Colorado Springs. No way I could afford my house here now that it has doubled from my purchase price during the previous all-time low interest rates on mortgages. I’ll bet I’m not alone…..
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  desertsteve
Sounds a lot like what I read back in 2007. Right before the crash.
JG1170
JG1170
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Exactly. All this guy did was rattle off the tired old NAR talking points without evidence. Sure there are plenty of jobs, but bubble jobs (refinance agent, asset flipper) pay a lot better than non-bubble jobs (Foot Locker associate, Table server). Also, it should be obvious to anyone by now that there is NO housing shortage. JUST A SHORTAGE OF LISTINGS, which will resolve itself over time, especially as the Baby Boomers exit the market in way or another.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Um… what happens when an investment is highly leveraged, the cash-flow is relatively restricted, and the interest rate goes from 2% to say 10%?
You think it’s related to the Fed QT-ing its MBS?
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Investors will pull the plug much quicker than owners of primary residence.
If you live in home with neighbors you like / good views / proximity to work / good school district / etc you are more likely to “deal with it”.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
You bought your $300K home for a very inflated $600K. $50K of savings as equity and a $550K mortgage at 3.5% 30 years. Monthly payment with mortgage, property taxes, and insurance of say $3,000, or $36K per year.
Assume prices drop 10%, so your house is worth $540K. That is, you lost your equity ($50K plus $10K of repaid principal).
Some people will sell, and cut their losses! Now, prices have dropped 20%– and more will walk away. However, now the house is worth $480K, and the mortgage is worth around $530K…. THIS IS KEY. Then, 30%…. all the way down to…. $300K, where the house price represents real value.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
If you bought it for $600K, and it wasn’t a VA or FHA loan, you either put $120K down or put $60K down and took out private mortgage insurance. If you’re foreclosed, you’ll lose that nut. That discipline eroded badly in the ’00s, but came back since. Yep, the market is overvalued, but we’re not going to see another housing panic unless the entire house of cards falls down, in which case it’ll be an everything panic.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Okay, it’s only an example–my point being that the amortization rate on new mortgages brings big equity problems as prices decline. Using the $120K down, you are wiped out with a 20% decline. Now, we get the thunderstorm on the prairie. The cows are already spooked by thunder and lightning. It just takes a few cows to get the herd running. Some people will panic. If the owner has also lost in the stock/bond/bitcoin markets, real panic sets it.
In 2006-7 the low hanging fruit was different–frankly, back then I expected the McMansion market to collapse first. I knew people with income of 70K buying houses in the $700K price range.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
You might be “wiped out,” but only when you sell. What really happens is that you stay put. The average house turns over in 7 years.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
And what will ultimately control how deep the housing recession will be is jobs. If we come through the next 12 month with minimal job loses (i.e., Mish’s expected 1% or less) then housing is NOT going to drop much more than 10-15%. I’m very happy to see the 30YFRM ballooning back up to 6%. The question is will it have staying power. My guess is it won’t
Moreover, everyone has been yapping about how this time is different. As Mish puts it, we don’t have all those liar loans. Well, like you and Captain fully recognize, we’ve got a lot of people who have been lying to themselves about what they can really afford over that average 7 years. Assuming there’s not further stimulus or rent / mortgage relief down the road (that’s a big freakin IF) then the combination of inflation, modestly lower home values and continued declines in real income may all conspire to create a very bad housing situation next year. I hope China’s real estate market finally collapses and we have a certain amount of contagion over to US financial intuitions.
With all that said, I think everyone would agree that calling how this housing recession is going to play out will be a lot harder than the last time around.
OUdaveguy
OUdaveguy
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
I’m still getting flyers twice a week in Colorad0 Springs with offers to buy my home or sell it for me…..I think some of the mania has subsided here, (all-cash bidding wars for $100K over asking price being the norm a year ago), but homes are still selling ultra fast here. “Get to work Mr. Chairman!”
kpmyers
kpmyers
3 years ago
Another major contributing factor to inflation….Covid Rental and Mortgage payment moratoriums. This is basically another form of UBI.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Reply to  kpmyers
Certainly a factor.
2 years ago the hip thing was to move out of urban death zones and buy a rural / suburban home and work from home … while draining shelters for a companion pet.
Shelters are filling up with returned pets … will the bright lights (and employers) beckon people to return?
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
suburbia and exurbia is soul sucking for the city dwellers that fled under plague panic. they are coming back to cities in caravans, legal and illegal…………..sell the auto, save a ton on heating big ugly mcmansions……….walk to office or work from town house or apartment…………………..old fashioned town living.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
Don’t forget the bullet-proof vest and the concealed carry permit.
OUdaveguy
OUdaveguy
3 years ago
Reply to  kpmyers
Stealth UBI; great point!
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
How long can sellers wait? … especially if recession long drawn out?

SEATTLE–(BUSINESS WIRE)– (NASDAQ: RDFN) —New listings of homes for sale fell 15% year over year in the four weeks ending August 21, the biggest annual decline since the start of the pandemic. As a result, the supply of for-sale homes fell 0.6% from the previous four-week period–a slight decline, but just the second such drop since February, according to a new report from Redfin (redfin.com), the technology-powered real estate brokerage.

The dearth of homeowners putting their homes up for sale is partly a reaction to reduced demand and falling prices as there are fewer buyers in the market due to rising mortgage rates and economic uncertainty.

Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Help?
(Bloomberg)–Home Partners of America, the single-family landlord owned by Blackstone Inc., will stop buying homes in 38 US cities, becoming the latest institutional investor to back away from an overheated housing market.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
JRM
JRM
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
You must have missed the story where China is drawing up military plans to take out Starlink satellites..
Since they are civilian use for now, China could do it without it be an attack on the USA!
Also, I’m betting a lot of those launches from the US not involving Musk was the US military!
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  JRM
Yes China does feel threatened by its citizens having unfiltered access to the internet. Considering that there are about 2,500 Starlink satellites now with a projected 14,000 in a a couple or so of years then downing that many satellites is going to tough, really tough. What really scares the Chinese government is that soon anyone will be able to link into Starlink satellites using only a normal cell phone. The phone would just see the satellite as a cell tower and link in. For now it is just text and voice. In time it will be video.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Starlink is still exceptionally expensive compared to terrestrial options for internet. Only the very wealthiest of Chinese could even dream of paying for Starlink access (assuming they could even manage to pay for it since it could easily be blocked).
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Depends on the market. In France they are offering 50 euros a month now. Prices will drop as volume increases which is their model. The speeds are excellent. My daughter in Vermont switched over a few months ago and they love it. It’s not for dense urban areas but most people in the world do not live in those type of cities so they have a big potential market. Russia has been trying their best to block Starlink access in the Ukraine in Russian-occupied areas and has so far failed.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
A lot of houses were bought by large corporations to rent. They either bought those houses using borrowed money or using investor’s money. If the money were borrowed then higher interest rates as Powell wants probably wasn’t in their spreadsheet calculations so they might be in an uncomfortable position and might want to liquidate some of their portfolio. If they bought using investor’s money then the problem is similar but still worrying. The investors might be happy with the present dividends but not happy with the asset value which will have fallen. They might be looking to cut their positions too. We have a good chance of seeing a wave of distressed selling coming. I have notice a lot of houses on sale in areas where the buying was mainly due to covid. The pullback in prices could turn into a rout.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Home Partners of America is about to learn the effect of high leverage on returns, and the meaning of interest rate risk. When you start from near-zero %, going up to 10+/- will be ‘epic’. Movie and textbook material galore. Got cash?

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.