Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

The Fed is Openly Cheering the Stock Market Plunge Following Jackson Hole

Stock market reaction to Powell’s speech at Jackson Hole. 

Neel Kashkari ‘Happy’ to See the Stock Market’s Reaction to Jackson Hole

Bloomberg reports Neel Kashkari ‘Happy’ to See the Stock Market’s Reaction to Jackson Hole

“I was actually happy to see how Chair Powell’s Jackson hole speech was received,” Kashkari said in an interview with Bloomberg’s Odd Lots podcast on Monday, reflecting on the steep drop after Powell spoke. “People now understand the seriousness of our commitment to getting inflation back down to 2%.”

“I certainly was not excited to see the stock market rallying after our last Federal Open Market Committee meeting,” he said. “Because I know how committed we all are to getting inflation down. And I somehow think the markets were misunderstanding that.”

“One of the biggest mistakes they made in the 1970s at the Fed is they thought that inflation was on its way down. The economy was weakening. And then they backed off and then inflation flared back up again before they had finally quashed it,” Kashkari said. “We can’t repeat that mistake.”

Actively Promoting Bubbles

The Fed actively promoted a housing bubble to bail out banks following the DoCom crash. Of course, the DotCom bubble was openly embraced by Greenspan as a productivity miracle.

Not understanding bubbles and crashes, the Fed promoted the “Everything Bubble” as it is now called in response to the housing crash and great recession. 

Finally, the Fed actively promoted the biggest bubble of them all in response to the Covid pandemic by the most QE and monetary stimulus ever coupled with the biggest fiscal stimulus in history.

Actively Popping Bubbles

Now, the Fed has decided it does not like the inflation it created.

The only way it knows how to fix inflation is via demand destruction. The way to do that is to kill the wealth impact from the bubbles it created. 

So now the Fed is cheering the stock market decline. 

Gaps Galore on the Stock Market, Where Is the Market Headed and When?

Earlier today, I commented Gaps Galore on the Stock Market, Where Is the Market Headed and When?

I think the S&P is headed to the 2400 level and the Nasdaq to the 6,000 level. 

That’s roughly a 50% decline from the top on the S&P 500 and a 64% decline from the to on the Nasdaq.  

Fed Pivot? Forget It!

The Fed has eliminated any talk of a pivot. It might do so, but only if there is a credit event.

We cannot rule that out, but this is not 2008. 

Housing is in a bigger bubble from a price perspective, but this time there is not the underlying liar loan problem. Nor is there a huge wave of layoffs coming. 

The job market is tight and unlike most other economic bears, I expect this recession will have a minimum unemployment rate rise.

Employment Levels in Retirement Age Groups 

With over 22 million people aged 60 or over and roughly half of them 65 or over, millions of boomers will be retiring in the next couple years.

Employment lost due to retirement will not add to the unemployment rate. 

Powell has plenty of room to hike at will especially given the massive number of openings in the Leisure and Hospitality sector. 

Expect a Long Period of Weak Growth, Whether or Not It’s Labeled Recession

On August 19, I commented Expect a Long Period of Weak Growth, Whether or Not It’s Labeled Recession

On August 26, at Jackson Hole, Fed Chair Jerome Powell Pledges to “Act With Resolve” to Beat Inflation

Key comments: “Reducing inflation is likely to require a sustained period of below-trend growth.”

Stocks are priced for perfection, not a long period of weak growth, and with the Fed openly cheering their demise.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

123 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
david halte
david halte
3 years ago
After insider trading scandals, the Fed must believe they are perceived as helping the equity markets (which they are). So they front Kashkari as a “heel” in this WWE pantomime play. Because Kashkari looks the part of an evil villain (if only to have heard that conversation). The Fed wants to avoid a straight decline in the market gaining momentum, creating a self-fulfilling negative economic mood. The Fed will rally the market in stages on the way down. But, younger brokers want so much the pivot to lazy money (that they missed out on), they became overly optimistic, as shown by a slight rise in July margin debt.
Portlander2
Portlander2
3 years ago
Housing is in a bigger bubble from a price perspective, but this time there is not the underlying liar loan problem. Nor is there a huge wave of layoffs coming.
As Buffet has said, “you don’t know who’s swimming naked until the tide runs out.” We just don’t know all of the dominos that may fall from a significant drop in asset prices. Even without bad liar loans, this could trigger what Richard Koo of Nomura calls a serious “Balance Sheet Recession” due to the excessive corporate leverage out there.
Also, the Fed’s actions come at a time of high political + inflation risk, particularly in Europe (food, fertilizers, energy), but also in China (real estate). The immense wealth destruction that may eventually happen there could have serious ricochet effects around the world.
The GFC revealed how non-resilient and tightly coupled global financial markets are, and this problem is still with us.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
JOLTS report out showing 11.2 million open jobs. No surprise….it’s the end of August, somewhere across America about 200,000 boomers retired from their jobs this month, enrolled in social security and medicare and will now sit back relax and consume while not producing anything.
It won’t stop there, another 200,000 or so in September, then October, November, December….rinse and repeat until 2030 when all 60 million (or whatever number you want to believe) retire, consume and produce nothing. Fun times ahead for those in America.
“Job openings increased in transportation, warehousing, and utilities
(+81,000); arts, entertainment, and recreation (+53,000); federal government (+47,000); and state and
local government education (+42,000). Job openings decreased in durable goods manufacturing
(-47,000). (See table 1.)”
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
You are making a lot of assumptions. I predict another pandemic by 2026 that wipes out a lot of boomers before they expected. The planet will continue to teach us lessons if we don’t change our behavior. Trying to predict out to 2030 is going to be fallacy based on how quickly the planet is changing. I expect multiple major events to wipe out tens of millions of people across the globe before the decade is out. Elon Musk is worried about population growth not being fast enough. I think the planet is showing us there is an upper bound on the number of humans that can survive.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
What are you talking about? COVID-19 was created in a lab in Wuhan, China.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
“The planet will teach us lessons,” said the superficial and dimwitted liberal cultist who somehow thinks “the planet” is a unitary and intelligent entity. I look on the bright side: “Casual” is right.
JRM
JRM
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
On another thread you stated 100,000 boomers retiring a month!!!
So which “PROPAGANDA” number do you want us to believe????
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
That’s why Bernanke censored the FED’s technical staff (pre GFC).
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
What is GFC.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Global Financial Crisis.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Which one?
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
3 years ago
MISH ! Where are you ? It s been 18 hours and 15 minutes since you wrote your last article , I could read other articles, but nothing…. nothing compares to youuuu ….(sinead o connor )
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
3 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels2
He’s quiet quitting.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
ha ha ha. i quiet quit past 30 years. served me well………….very content. been going to college for past 40 years and trading everything under the sun. less is more.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
Well, yeah, more or less.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
“One of the biggest mistakes they made in the 1970s at the Fed is they
thought that inflation was on its way down. The economy was weakening.
And then they backed off and then inflation flared back up again before
they had finally quashed it,” Kashkari said. “We can’t repeat that
mistake.”
Well, yes they can. Repeated bubbles, anyone?
Billy
Billy
3 years ago
Why is everyone blaming the Fed? Just because the media is? Last time I checked the Fed didn’t shut down our economy, pay people to stay away from work, forgive up to $20k/person for debt, etc.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
3 years ago
Reply to  Billy
…the FED has been interrupting normal economic cycles for 2 decades now by means of out of the blue created money ….it is merely a natural law that similar insane policy comes back like a boomerang at one point ….with a fckn vengeance ….
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels2
So the FED creates money for the hell of it?
Perhaps the FED is following the mandates of a spendthrift Congress.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Billy

Simple. While many may not agree with what the government did, it had to be done to prevent a deflationary crash like 2009 because of a virus from China. Now had the Fed seen the correct data in 2021, they should have hiked rates sooner. The wage spiral was a tipoff. As usual the Fed is late. This inflation spike was fully preventable.

Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
“it had to be done to prevent a deflationary crash”
If you are referring to assets:
Delay? Sure.
Prevent? No.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Defer ? I don’t think we will get back to the 2009 levels on all assets if that’s what people are thinking.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
3 years ago
Dunno, in fact I hope you re right….never say never though, under the present, dire geopolitical circumstances ….
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
“the Fed is now rooting for a price crash.”
Sure. It was evident to me Day 1 that would be necessary. With an Everything Bubble … EVERYTHING must come down to break inflation cycle. Can not prick “here” and not effect “there”.
Allowing economic inequality chasm to ever expand was pure folly … inevitably leading to civil unrest if unchecked. Bringing up the bottom IMPOSSIBLE. The only way to narrow is Crush “wealth”.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
The Fed is “rooting for a price crash” if and only if the Fed’s friends (aka big Wall Street banks) can get out unscathed.The inflation cycle will be broken on the backs of mom and pop investors, 401-ks, and pension programs.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
A lot easier (and quicker) to go lower than push higher from this level. If insiders can purchase Apple at half off, they would welcome. Obvious (imo) smart money has left the building and retail believes what worked for past 13 years still in play and propping up market.
Anyway, the big Wall Street banks (and, of course, Federal Reserve) sitting on $trillions of treasuries / GSE stuff that will profit handsomely when liquidity driven from stock market.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
What the FED wants is for money to go into paying down debt. They can see what’s about to happen to those drowning in debt.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
it’s what civilizations kings have done for thousands of years. clip the coins to debauch the currency and debt, they incurred in fighting wars and extravagant spending. this is economics and history and anthropology 101. i learned this in anthropology as an 18 year old, half paying attention.
WarpartySerf
WarpartySerf
3 years ago
3 months ago this predator (Neel Kashkari) was the biggest dove around. The biggest counterfeiter of them all.
Now the arsonist who lit the fire wants us to praise his manly firefighting prowess. What a waste of skin.
kansasdude
kansasdude
3 years ago
Reply to  WarpartySerf
Hes also the one that said we needed another good hard 6 month lockdown.
Scooot
Scooot
3 years ago
They’re using the stock market as a measure of confidence. They take the view that If confidence is high they’ll have less chance of reducing inflation.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
you make a dreadful mistake in assuming fed doesn’t understand bubbles and busts and such. very naive to think that. the fed has one mandate. keep its owners in high cotton. ps. we ain’t the owners, unless Mish has discount window access, these days.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
you are describing stagflation. glad to see you are now in the camp of FED ain’t stopping. they need to quash price inflation from the debt and currency printing from the plague years. this will take the FED years and years. stagflation. no where to hide. just reconcile we all lose. best to face reality, we all are losers with regards to purchasing power……..
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
3 years ago
The Fed is caught between a rock and hard place. They can’t have the market go down too far but they can’t continue to stimulate inflation. So the best case scenario is jawboning around 2% inflation, 1% GDP and effectively a flat market. We will likely go nowhere interestingly for years. Prices on everything need to come way down but in order to prevent speculation, money will have to be removed from the money supply. The AMT is going to hurt large corporations and take a lot of money with it. The Fed is caught between compensating for lack of fiscal policy and managing one crisis after another.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
They cannot “jawbone” inflation, which is entirely a monetary phenomenon, with the fiscal side only adding velocity. Which can be significant, but without excess money, it’s nothing.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
The FED is going to avoid out of control inflation at all costs. Out of control inflation is the worst possible outcome. It’s what kills currencies. Everything else is trivial by comparison.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
“With over 22 million people aged 60 or over and roughly half of them 65 or over, millions of boomers will be retiring in the next couple years.Employment lost due to retirement will not add to the unemployment rate.”
It would be great to do a dedicated post to this subject matter. I expect overall productivity to fall off a cliff because of this and it won’t be counted as unemployment so what does that do to GDP? Consumption will still be there at least for basic items such as food, medicine, shelter, clothing.
And it’s not just boomers retiring, it’s people in the 50+ age group and others that suffer from a variety of ailments that will deplete the workforce. Meanwhile, all these EV battery and chip factories are supposed to be built in the US – who’s going to work there? Robots?
Gov. Abbott needs to start sending those bus loads of replacements straight to the factories.
JRM
JRM
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
That number is totally made up!!!!
Yet the number of people over 60 continuing working and getting back into the work force is going up!!!!
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
Reply to  JRM
“Yet the number of people over 60 continuing working and getting back into the work force is going up”
Then you have nothing to worry about. Inflation will drop like a rock, the stock market will rally and all will be well with the world. You go right ahead and plan for that because we all reap what we sow.
JRM
JRM
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
Inflation isn’t dropping back low anytime soon!!
Inflation is the reason they continue to work or are returning to the work force!!!
Higher hourly rates = higher product prices!!!
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
If the market tanks by 50% while rates are going up, I guarantee many more boomers will be clamoring for work.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
Boomers can clamor all they want but there is a practical reality of health issues, physical job requirements, mental job requirements/skills, etc which is why a detailed look into this issue is needed here as this WILL become the driving issue in politics and economics over the next few years and few talk about it.
I expect boomers to take up jobs in the “gig” economy like Uber drivers or short term work but not clean hotel rooms as some have suggested. Cleaning is hard work not really for the aging cohort.
We are in uncharted territory here, in the past “old” people just died but as life keeps getting extended it is creating more consumption and less productivity, not just in US but around the world. There is a whole new dynamic forming never before seen on earth that needs to be explored from many angles.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
I cetainely don’t need the money, but now that I’m entering seniorhood and am living in the countryside, I have thought about taking a position in a county office just for the company. (Just wait a few years. “Remote work” ain’t gonna be anyone’s bed of roses.) Even at my advancing age and speed, I am confident that I’ll be more productive than Kids These Days, if they even show up. LOL
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
human bodies engineered by hundreds of thousands of years to only get about 45 years of good service. the added years we enjoy in modernity is bandaids. the body and mind deteriorates for most. sure my father worked until 90, but statistically humans degrade. country living in old age is rotten idea. way too much driving and loneliness, unless you have a huge family working a farm around you, and can help them, with wisdom like the old codgers did a century ago. modern rural living in most of amerika is make believe country life. best to get old in cities. walking around and sitting on a park bench with endless folks to chat with and people watch is what human primates crave. this is anthropology 101.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
Best to get old living in cities… Does it include being violently attacked because some passerby decided your hair was too grey, or robbed in a bus because you looked sideways…? Old lives do NOT matter to certain racial groups that predominate in cities.
As for sitting on park benches chatting…Personally, I’d crave for a stray bullet. Much more fun chasing great white whales. I’m as uninspired by JackW’s working in a county office, as I am doing remote work. Luckily, I have something I enjoy doing; it’s creative, and I have full control over the outcome. Now, if I can only remember what it is…
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Remote workers will learn that there’s a flip side to the coin.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
Country life doesn’t mean living alone. Depending on place, you can be surrounded by birds and animals. In their own way, more interesting than the bi-pedals.
And sadly, you can find better intellectually stimulating conversation online than anywhere else.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
If remote work really spreads, we’re going to be reading a whole lot about the negatives. How atomized do we really want to be?
SAKMAN
SAKMAN
3 years ago
Pensions. Every retired boomer I know needs rates to go up to keep their pensions relevant.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
3 years ago
I interpret the FED’s satisfaction with Friday’s move as relief they think have control of the markets. No such comment would be necessary if the FED truly had control of markets. The implication is the FED admits it really doesn’t have control over markets. OOPS, did the FED say that out loud?
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
“There’s absolutely no way either of these indices dive down to those levels without unemployment moving above 5% and staying there for the better part of 12 months.”
5% is only a rise in unemployment of 1.5 percentage points so please pay attention.
starting with 1948, here are the percentage increases in the unemployment rate.
3.9
3.2
3.0
1.8
2.0
3.7
1.5
3.4
1.1
1.1
4.5
8.2
Chart posted here:
Note the unemployment rise in 2001 was 1.1 percentage points and the Nasdaq fell from 4816 to 795. That’s a decline of a “mere” 83.5%.
I propose a 64% Nasdaq decline from the biggest bubble in history, with modest rise in unemployment (perhaps under 1%).
Helping things along, there will be massive retirements (very few in 2011), and the starting point is a huge number of pandemic-related job openings.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Good data Mish, here is my view.
The QQQ peaked on 3/20/2000 at 117.562 and it took 924 days to reach bottom on 9/30/2002 at 20.35 – an 82.69% drop.
The QQQ peaked on 10/29/2007 at 54.24 and it took 490 days to reach bottom on 3/2/2009 at 26.3 – a 51.67% drop.
If we assume QQQ peaked on 11/15/2021 at 403.99 and prior statistical drops hold true then we’re looking at a QQQ at 161.60.
Because the fed is busy fighting inflation and can’t lower rates, that problem will need to be cleared first and could take a year or two. Then “greed” needs to be cleared out. Having taken those and a few more variables into account, it looks like QQQ would bottom in early 2026 to attain the same linear slopes of past fiascos.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
I’ve already read that article.
But, none of those periods had the kind of stimulus that’s still being pumped nowadays. None of those periods had a Fed / Congress operating as adherents to Modern Monetary Theory, picking winners & losers with regards to rent & mortgage moratoriums. None of those periods had the supply chain issues we’re still dealing with. None of those periods have the millions of illegal aliens poring into what used to the United State of America forcing rents to remain sky high. None of those periods had the kind of administration we have in office today who’s singular goal is to make everything more expensive to pay for dealing with climate change.
So my point is that the Fed later this year will come to terms with the fact that it has very little control over inflation this time around. They can’t raise the FFR though the roof like Volcker did that resulted in two recessions. The media / cancel culture outcry will be loony toons. And they can’t let a rout of the 40 year bond boom get out of hand. Our debt is too massive and short-dated. So the narrative will start to change by early next year. The neutral rate of inflation, for example, all of a sudden might become 3.5-4.5% as opposed 2%. This will be tied into the message of “we have pay more to build the green economy to ensure the world doesn’t end in five years.”
If the global pandemic only created a 34% drop, then I don’t see this one creating a 83% drop, because we now live in the era of Marty Zweig’s “don’t fight the fed” on steroids. The Fed & Congress WILL NOT let this happen.
But at some point, the big one arrives. I just don’t think it’s this cycle, because let’s be honest an 83% dive today would not be a recession. It will be a depression. That, I think, comes in no more than 8 years. Retirements pushing Medicare Part A into insolvency by 2026. $1T red ink with Medicare Part B by 2028. Looming SSTF insolvency by 2030. $1T in interest expense on the debt by the end of FY 2025.
Just my $0.02. I fully admit that you very well could be right. a big correction certainly seems like it’s overdue given all the negative inputs.
Pontius
Pontius
3 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe

End of an empire. This comment highlights the mega trends not previously experienced by any society. Huge governmental debt at all levels, generous government retirement benefits, aging population, younger “workforce” not emotionally incentivized to produce at a high rate, government relieving many of the young from their responsibility of paying just debts (continuation of student loan forbearance due to pandemic crisis?), mortgages and rent. Project these trends forward and you see generational conflict over a fast shrinking pie and default at a rate never seen before. Governmental resources diverted from military, infrastructure projects to support consumption. A Wall-E world awaits this grand (perhaps flawed) experiment in democracy.

Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Biden (likely via Elizabeth Warren) wanted a third mandate for the Fed: Combatting Climate Change.
Yes, it’s crazy. But if tasked to do that (or even if a nutcase was the Chair without a specific mandate), the Fed would try to do that.
It would fail, of course, but who knows what damage the Fed could do if it tried such nonsense.
Even though the Fed can do little about supply (something I have pointed out repeatedly), do not underestimate damage the Fed can do.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
How can the Fed target oil and gas? This is not a rhetorical question. I might learn something.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
The Fed may try to restrict the use of borrowed funds, or even the access to borrowed funds, based on a portfolio’s carbon footprint instead of the positive economic activity that can be generated.
JRM
JRM
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Australian banks have come out announced they will no longer issue loans for gas guzzling cars!!!
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
They can’t unless they change what securities they buy. Right now they only buy treasury securities and MBS. Which has no effect on climate change.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
The FED by pumping bubbles created a huge splurge in everything and mega climate change, but I don’t think prudent FED is what Elizabeth Warren has in mind.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
bunch of hooey politicians spew. the FED has only one mandate. all the other stuff is jawboning gibberish. but makes good copy for business news media.
Portlander2
Portlander2
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
The SEC is trying to address Climate Change risks to portfolios via reporting requirements. The problem is, without a CO2 tax or something like it that can actually impact the bottom line, better reporting is a weak lever.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Portlander2
Do you know the difference between the SEC and the Federal Reserve, or didn’t they cover that in your Gender Studies major? Portland is where young idiots go to retire, until they get tired of sharing a two-bedroom dump with four other slackers who f’d off all the way through high school and Portland State “University.” Then, in their late 30s, with no real employment history (“budtender” and “marijuana trimmer” don’t count) they look at their grim lives and rotating thief/roommates and go to the park blocks to riot because why not take out their failure on something or someone else? Meantime, in the suburbs, enterprising Asians with visas do the real work. That’s who Intel hires, not you.
Denver1
Denver1
3 years ago
The FED is doing nothing to end inflation so long as the rest of the Beltway and many states are deficit spending like drunken sailors without memories at a rate not seen since WW2. Forgiving up to a trillion in student debt, hundreds of billions spent in US for “Ukraine”, with more to fight China and the rest of the world, a trillion to remake American green with a million IRS agent Lois Lerner wannabes tipping the economy for more and more Beltway explosion.
The real market force just may be Biden’s newly found popularity polling in the past week…. a real catalyst for the world markets to destruct.
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
Reply to  Denver1
Raising interest rates and QT certainly fights inflation. Government running deficits doesn’t add to inflation unless the deficits are funded by the FED via QE. And the FED never buys state and local government debt.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
Based on some calculations with some very smart people, it looks like we’re going to be in a stock market mess until 2027, that’s the date for the S&P bottom in case anyone is wondering. There will be plenty of “rallies” and “corrections” in between but we’re on a long trek down from here.
Looks like bonds shall rise from the ashes….
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
Whatever happens, there are always opportunities for wise investors to profit.
Given the volatility these days, and the availability of so many different investment vehicles, there are more opportunities than ever to profit.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
I have been suggesting put options for some time now…some people make money every day 😉
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
I too have a suggestion that will work with this economy.
Purchase stocks when prices are low, then only sell them for more than you paid.
kansasdude
kansasdude
3 years ago
“the stock market is all that matters” Obama.
Until they decide otherwise.
RunnerDan
RunnerDan
3 years ago
Reply to  kansasdude
Nailed it. Its amazing how sober-minded Fed folk, like Kashkari, are now talking. Its as if they received a bulletin from their employers that a throttled-down economy is now preferable to “save the planet”.
Portlander2
Portlander2
3 years ago
Reply to  kansasdude
Trump was more fixated on the stock market than Obama by far. He saw it as a “Winner/Loser” indicator reflecting directly on Him in every 24-hour news cycle. Undoubtedly, Trump is now quietly (maybe soon publicly?) cheering with Kashkari. Today, he’d be publicly bullying Powell to reverse course. He did this on a few occasions at his MAGA rallies when he was President and probably succeeded at least some of the time.
Portlander2
Portlander2
3 years ago
Reply to  Portlander2
To clarify, Trump would be “publicly bullying Powell to reverse course” if was President today, but as he’s not, he would consider a stock market crash to consign Biden to “Loser” status. Would the public agree by November? The thing is, the stock market is a leading indicator, and the political consequences of a crash now (e.g. a rise in unemployment) probably won’t be manifest until after November. And may only mildly manifest eventually if Mish is right.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
3 years ago
“I think the S&P is headed to the 2400 level and the Nasdaq to the 6,000 level. Nor is there a huge wave of layoffs coming.” You’re on record stating that the later equates to low 1%’ish max rise in unemployment. That’s absolutely CRAZY! There’s absolutely no way either of these indices dive down to those levels without unemployment moving above 5% and staying there for the better part of 12 months.
In addition, it may take until early next year for MoM negative job losses to appear, if they appear at all to any great extent. Granted, I’m surprised that the 30YFRM has jumped so rapidly in the last 10 days, but this rise is entirely due investors expecting a dovish Fed to raise it’s hand before the start of CY Q4 exiting stage left. However, there’s a better chance than not that inflation continues to fall through October and thereafter at which point the Fed will stop raising rates by Nov of this year, 3.5%.
Peak 30YFRM are probably set for between now the FMOC in September. At that point, mortgage rates will start to fall. How fast is hard to guess. But, I firmly believe that when an intersection of 5% with a even as slightly positive job means a stabilizing housing market.
But your market low numbers vs job losses make absolutely zero sense, IMO.
Roadrunner12
Roadrunner12
3 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
“But your market low numbers vs job losses make absolutely zero sense, IMO.”
Mish states: “With over 22 million people aged 60 or over and roughly half of them 65 or over, millions of boomers will be retiring in the next couple years.

Employment lost due to retirement will not add to the unemployment rate.”

The largest segment of the baby boom generation is coming to retirement age. I specifically remember reading that 1961 was the worst year to be born from “Boom, Bust, Echo” It resonates with me because I was born in 1962 another bad year to be born. According to the book the early boomers had all the advantages being first in line with all the good jobs and the late boomers, (Gen X) termed at that time had to fight it out with the largest number of people entering the work force. On top of it, I got out of high school in the 1980 recession.
The 60-65 employment population is at a peak, will decline and rise somewhat although not to the degree when the Echo generation enters that age group.
How that affects the unemployment rate remains to be seen but an exceptionally large cohort is set to retire.
Boom, Bust and Echo – Quill and Quire
“Thanks to media fixations, most of us know about the baby-boomers, that “bulge” of the population born between 1947 and 1966, said to be responsible for such current societal ills as complacency and overconsumption. But of course, everyone alive is part of a “cohort,” that is, belongs to a group born in a particular span of time. For example, if you were born in 1937, you are one of the “Depression kids,” which means, according to the authors, “it wouldn’t hurt to learn a little humility.” Because so few people were born in Canada in 1937, you haven’t had much competition, unlike, say, the poor soul born in 1961, “one of the worst years in this century to be born.” The first year of the ’60s spawned the huge crowd of late baby-boomers (dubbed Generation X by author Douglas Coupland) who were shut out of most of society’s good jobs by the mass of older boomers already ensconced in them.”
Roadrunner12
Roadrunner12
3 years ago
Reply to  Roadrunner12
I might be wrong on this also but if my memory is correct, the cohort classed as baby boom may have different years when comparing Canada to the United States due to the pill becoming available a few years earlier or later in one country.
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
“There’s absolutely no way either of these indices dive down to those levels without unemployment moving above 5% and staying there for the better part of 12 months.”
5% is only a rise in unemployment of 1.5 percentage points so it would behoove you to read and pay attention.
starting with 1948, here are the percentage increases in the unemployment rate.
3.9
3.2
3.0
1.8
2.0
3.7
1.5
3.4
1.1
1.1
4.5
8.2
Chart posted here:
It would also behoove you to note the unemployment decline in 2001 was 1.1 percentage points and the Nasdaq fell from 4816 to 795. That’s a decline of a “mere” 83.5%.
I propose 64% with modest rise in unemployment at a time of massive retirements (very few in 2011).
It would also behoove you to note this is the biggest bubble in history.
So get a grip on what is purportedly “crazy” then apologize for absurd statements.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
I have a hard time signing onto a stock crash with no material effect on employment, but we shall see.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
it’s a bunch of bunk. layoffs in tech already wrecking r/e out there, which will cascade to real estate agents and building tradesmen and restaurants……………..out here in nyc, already the 30 something professionals in tech and business finding it tough to find work after the plague years…………..shadow stats has the true unemployment figures if we reconcile to decades past. boomers are spendthrifts and will be busted soon, in retirement of leisure……………maybe 20% of them are solvent. the vast majority too dumb to save a plug nickel.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Hard to know how much of the stock run up in the past 3 years is margin based due to the ridiculous amount of money sloshing around in the system. If people are forced to liquidate margin then stocks may deflate a lot more than anyone realizes even though employment remains high and the rest of the economy seems sound.
Another thing is that if inflation continues to rise and profit margins are squeezed on the business side (wages, inputs vs sales price) then earnings go down and that could add to stock decline. That doesn’t even consider the average Joe or retired boomer needing to draw down their stock portfolio to make ends meet.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
The 2001 recession had several unique factors that might account for the slight unemployment decline and the large drop in Nasdaq
First, I give little credence to the Y2K as a cause except that it somewhat affected the national psyche.
However, the dot-com boom generated enormous price growth in Nasdaq with relatively little employment growth. It was primed for failure so it didn’t take much to start down. Also, 9-11 (at the end of the recession–MArch thru November), sent stock prices plummeting as soon as markets reopened. All told, a major drop in stocks, with corresponding low unemployment.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
I could be cynical and ask how much did Goldman lose on Fed-Friday? (Alternate question: How much did Goldman sell during the previous week?)
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
“One of the biggest mistakes they made in the 1970s at the Fed is they thought that inflation was on its way down. The economy was weakening. And then they backed off and then inflation flared back up again before they had finally quashed it,” Kashkari said. “We can’t repeat that mistake.”
That is a very clear statement backed by action so they will get inflation down no matter what. Not a good time to go into a career in finance. That party is over. Best to find a career where you actually make something.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Kashkari is wrong. The Great Inflation was due to the “monetization of time deposits”, the transition from clerical to electronic processing, and the end of “gated” deposits. So, the buying pressure was always on the top side of the Fed Funds “bracket racket” (interest rate manipulation).
Matt3
Matt3
3 years ago
It seems to me everyone wants to defeat inflation by destroying the demand side. How about improving the supply side?
Maybe not make it so comfortable for people under 60 to be “out of the workforce”. Taking away the free health care, EBT cards, and housing subsidies to those able but unwilling to work. We could use this money to subsidize the social security payroll taxes (employee portion) for those workers.
We have to do something to get labor force participation up. Especially for men. Men need to be gainfully employed.
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  Matt3
Biden and the Progressives are actively killing the supply side in energy while doing nothing about the supply side in metals.
Heck, they oppose any new mines as well.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Steve_R
Permits are a necessary but far from sufficient condition needed to start pumping.
Steve_R
Steve_R
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
I agree, but that is far from actively killing the supply side.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Steve_R
They certainly have been killing energy supply. The only thing holding gas prices down is draining the SPR. That can’t last much longer.
Steve_R
Steve_R
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
SPR is all heavy sour crude, not sweet crude, maybe they want fill some of the caverns with sweet crude since some of independent refineries use that, not sure. They will be refilled at lower prices IMHO.
I hope you are aware that sour heavy crude and sweet crude are two different products.
Steve_R
Steve_R
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
also US oil rig count year to date
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
“Permits are a necessary but far from sufficient condition needed to start pumping.”
Ding, Ding, Ding we have a winner
How many did the EPA approve?
Steve_R
Steve_R
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
I realize the EPA was probably did not exist in the last administration, that being said, how would you like a refinery in your back yard?
Matt3
Matt3
3 years ago
Reply to  Steve_R
How would you like to freeze?
On the supply side, hw about lifting all the sanctions? That would help everyone.
Steve_R
Steve_R
3 years ago
Reply to  Matt3
? where do you live? I spent most of my life freezing in the midwest and do not live there anymore.
Steve_R
Steve_R
3 years ago
Reply to  Matt3
Ok, I am guessing you live somewhere in Europe?? I have no control of our government or their actions.
Steve_R
Steve_R
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  Steve_R
Permits in low-productivity areas! How many permits in Alaska and the Gulf?
Steve_R
Steve_R
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
From the article
In a statement shared first with CBS News, the Department of the Interior cited a “lack of industry interest in leasing in the area” for the decision to “not move forward” with the Cook Inlet lease sale.
???
Steve_R
Steve_R
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  Steve_R
Trump and Biden were/are both relatively insignificant when it comes to most commodities, like oil and gas.
Mish is correct when he says that Biden could be doing more, but its a moot point. There is little he can do compared to the size of the market. The market is the most important element here, not the President.
For example, Trump wanted more “clean coal” but during his presidency, coal miner jobs declined by 23%, and production fell by 31%. So much for his intentions.
Biden wanted to restrict US oil and gas production, yet it has gone up a lot during his term so far. Could it have gone up more with better policies? Yes. But not by much.
Its not about the president or politics. Its about the companies in the marketplace.
And oil companies worldwide have been reducing capex for close to a decade now. Which has resulted in less supply today. Combine that with stronger than expected demand and you have todays situation of low inventories, tight supply and high prices. Which was all foretold more than two years ago on this very blog.
Who was listening to the prophets back then? I was. Anyone else?
Steve_R
Steve_R
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
And oil companies worldwide have been reducing capex for close to a decade now
Could be why there was no interest in from that article about the Alaska lease, the oil companies that remain have been careful since a ton of them went bankrupt the last time down.
Congratulations of your investments. For me I believe that the term “oil” is misunderstood. Sweet crude and heavy sour crude are two different products all together. It all depends on how the refineries are set up. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-oil-refineries-idUSKBN1HX0H8
I am not sure if the gulf state refineries have started to convert them to process sweet crude, I do not think so since it is so expensive to do so. The gulf state refineries would have benefitted from Keystone pipeline since it has the ability to process tar sands oil. The tar sands oil from Alberta, Canada is not processed in the eastern Canada due to the pollution and the amount of water need to process.
This is why people get confused about the movement of oil around the world. It is all about how the refineries are setup. Someone the other day thought that heating oil for New York comes from Texas, it does not it come from Canada. Anyway have go for right now will talk with you another time.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  Steve_R
Thank you. That was one of the most gracious replies I have ever received on this blog.
I completely agree with your comments on the different oil types; sour vs sweet, heavy vs light, etc. and how refineries are set up for specific types of oil. Very misunderstood.
And I want to again thank those who came before me on this blog for their selfless sharing of investment ideas. I am trying to pay it back.
radar
radar
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
I was…owe a big debt of gratitude to Realist for the heads-up!
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  radar
Me too !
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
you speak the truth. mish is wrong on this one for sure. as you say capex is down for a decade.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
i wouldn’t call them prophets. C suite executives are just robots posing as humans, who see handwriting and know how to get things done. i know tons and tons of C suite executives in big banks and big oil. they ain’t prophets, more wind up toys.
dbannist
dbannist
3 years ago
Reply to  Steve_R
Those permits are nearly worthless.

You are conflating permits with production. If you grant permits where there isn’t any oil did you really do anything? No, you didn’t. It appears you did, but you didn’t actually help anyone. The permits that are needed are permits in actual oil producing areas. There is a reason oil companies haven’t jumped on the Biden permit train and it’s because those permits will never allow them to make a profit. These are very very low oil producing areas.

Trump, on the other hand, granted permits in very high oil producing areas.

vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
not true. biden has been a friend of oil and gas forever. the problem seems to be the corporate posturing away from old energy sources to future. big energy is driving the move to electric and other sources……….not government. you have it backwards.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Matt3
The Fed has little or nothing specifically to do with supply. People tend to overestimate what the Fed can do. The Fed can create money for banks to lend but it cannot create solvency needed to service the debts. Obviously, it’s more complicated in the execution, but it’s still the foundation of their power. Want to increase supply? That’s fiscal, regulatory, and tax policy. Senile Joe and his people flunked Econ 101. If anyone thinks they’ll be adding supply, or create the conditions needed for it to happen, they’d better think again.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Agree. People here overestimate what the Fed can do.
But people here also overestimate what Biden can do. Particularly when it comes to worldwide commodity markets.
The supply of commodities is mostly about the companies that actually invest the money and do the work.
Follow what they are doing.
And of course, when it comes to oil, you also have to follow what OPEC is doing.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
In normal times, which we haven’t seen for a good 20 or so years, the bond market disciplines the stock market at least loosely. Since the Panic of ’08, the Fed has removed that discipline and now here we are. Once they really get the bond market off the fake money dole, the b.s. will get drained from equities and will stay that way for much longer than today’s free-money addicts imagine.

And yeah, I agree with Mish about this not being like ’08 in housing for the reason he stated. There’ll be pain, but the housing market won’t lock up, or more precisely, the MBS market won’t lock up. If there’s going to be any lock-up, I’d watch out for crypto. We simply don’t know where those tentacles reach, and I doubt the Fed does either.

Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
“…I’d watch out for crypto… Nailed it1
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
The GFC was completely different. It was deflationary. The money stock didn’t change for 4 years. The rate-of-change in required reserves contracted (less than zero), for 29 contiguous months. In contrast, during the Covid experience, the money stock expanded at an unparalleled rate while supply chain and supply side factors contributed to demand-side pressures that still exist.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
“massive number of openings in the Leisure and Hospitality sector.”
I foresee a lot of underfunded boomers transitioning to a humbler existence as maids and clerks… but only the ambulatory. The non-ambulatory will face an even humbler fate.
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
agree with that
There will be lots of openings, perhaps not where people want to work
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Well, look on the bright side: Plenty of art history maids will appreciate the mass-production prints on the walls. LOL
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
In fact, they’ll eventually invent a new word for those courses of study. You heard it here first: maidjors. LOL
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
You know not that many of the boomers parents stopped working at 65. Having enough to retire on then was just as hard as now so boomers will still work if they need the money or to pass the time.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Meanwhile the average age of US farmers is 60! Worse, the upcoming generations lacks the interest and skills to farm. May be a good time to make youtube videos on how to farm.
JackWebb
JackWebb
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
It is VERY difficult for a young person to become a farmer. Has been that way for many decades.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.